Greetings, I have a few questions after having been subscribed to
this list for a few days.
1) I see that there's not a lot of activity on this list. What is
the current active status of the project?
2) I notice that there is a database interface, but even though
SQLite is supported, the
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:12:58 -0400
Tom Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings, I have a few questions after having been subscribed to
this list for a few days.
1) I see that there's not a lot of activity on this list. What is
the current active status of the project?
Hint:
On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Davi Arnaut wrote:
2) I notice that there is a database interface, but even though
SQLite is supported, the exposed APIs resemble DBM-style interfaces.
Is there a plan to create a super-simple rowset style interface for
backends that support it?
I don't know, what
Tom Bradford wrote:
Greetings, I have a few questions after having been subscribed to this
list for a few days.
1) I see that there's not a lot of activity on this list. What is the
current active status of the project?
apr tends to grow in fits and spurts. So you may see the list quite
On 4/24/06, Tom Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings, I have a few questions after having been subscribed to
this list for a few days.
1) I see that there's not a lot of activity on this list. What is
the current active status of the project?
As others have said, it varies.
2) I
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:13:38 -0400
Tom Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Davi Arnaut wrote:
2) I notice that there is a database interface, but even though
SQLite is supported, the exposed APIs resemble DBM-style interfaces.
Is there a plan to create a
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:27 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Documentation discussions do belong on [EMAIL PROTECTED], since the docs need
the
eyeballs of the authors who designed the interfaces. Thank you for
the
offer, as all contributions, code, docs, beer are welcome.
Very good. I'll
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Davi Arnaut wrote:
IMHO, Inoue Seiichiro's tutorial goes out of scope (eg, describing
what
a thread is, et cetera). What kind of documentation you're most
interested
in ? Guides, how-to, tutorial..
Describing what a thread is, how a socket works, etc, are all
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Umm, what do you mean by DBM-style? The dbd stuff doesn't seem very
similar to DBM apis to me. If you have alternate APIs you'd like to
see feel free to propose them on this list.
By DBM-style, I mean you're effectively talking about the
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 16:13 -0400, Tom Bradford wrote:
Sorry, but Doxygen and a slideshow with little to no actual
information (both of which I've already seen) do not a suite of
documentation make.Doxygen is as valuable in the grand scheme of
things as is Javadoc, and that's not much
On 4/24/06, Tom Bradford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Umm, what do you mean by DBM-style? The dbd stuff doesn't seem very
similar to DBM apis to me. If you have alternate APIs you'd like to
see feel free to propose them on this list.
By
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 17:07 -0400, Tom Bradford wrote:
By DBM-style, I mean you're effectively talking about the storage of
key/value pairs where the atom representation of a value is
effectively a void pointer, rather than tuples, which is how SQLite
and other RDBMS' inherently
I just noticed the 'open source projects using APR' section... feel free to
add me to the list :-)
mod_bt / libbtt
http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/
- Tyler
On 4/24/06, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed the 'open source projects using APR' section... feel free to
add me to the list :-)
mod_bt / libbtt
http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/
Send in a patch to the website and I'd be happy to apply it.
-garrett
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:12, Tom Bradford wrote:
Greetings, I have a few questions after having been subscribed to
this list for a few days.
1) I see that there's not a lot of activity on this list. What is
the current active status of the project?
Activity is variable. Check the
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/06, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed the 'open source projects using APR' section... feel free to
add me to the list :-)
mod_bt / libbtt
http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/
Send in a patch to the website and I'd be
On 4/24/06, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/06, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed the 'open source projects using APR' section... feel free to
add me to the list :-)
mod_bt / libbtt
On Monday 24 April 2006 22:22, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
I just noticed the 'open source projects using APR' section... feel free to
add me to the list :-)
mod_bt / libbtt
http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/
But isn't that an apache module? So that makes use of APR pretty
much automatic, as in
On Apr 24, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 17:07 -0400, Tom Bradford wrote:
By DBM-style, I mean you're effectively talking about the storage of
key/value pairs where the atom representation of a value is
effectively a void pointer, rather than tuples, which is how
On 4/24/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 22:22, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
I just noticed the 'open source projects using APR' section... feel free to
add me to the list :-)
mod_bt / libbtt
http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/
But isn't that an apache module? So
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/06, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/06, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed the 'open source projects using APR' section... feel
free to
add me to the list :-)
I've *got* to stop sending mail out from the wrong address... bad tyler!
---BeginMessage---
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 22:22, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
I just noticed the 'open source projects using APR' section... feel free to
add me to the list :-)
mod_bt /
On 4/24/06, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, here it is!
Committed and pushed to the live site, thanks!
-garrett
This patch makes dealing with SysV IPC shared memory a bit easier:
- If a shared memory segment exists with the key that you want, a
check is performed to see if anybody else is using it. If not, then it's
assumed that the segment is a result of an unclean shutdown of a process,
and we
24 matches
Mail list logo
