Re: [VOTE] Release JEXL 3.0 based on RC2

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. There are many findbugs and a bunch of PMD warnings, but this is not blocking. +1 Oliver Am 18.12.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi all, > > JEXL 3.0 RC2 is now available for review. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.2 based on RC1

Hi Matt, Am 18.12.2015 um 22:03 schrieb Matt Benson: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Oliver Heger > <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote: >> Artifacts and site look good, signatures are fine. >> >> However, I was not able to build from source with Jav

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.2 based on RC1

Artifacts and site look good, signatures are fine. However, I was not able to build from source with Java 1.6 and 1.7 on Windows 10. This is what I get: [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.5.3:manifest (bundle-manifest) @ commons-weaver-maven-plugin --- [ERROR] Manifest

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

Hi Kristian, while checking the release I found some problems: * The commons-io-2.5.jar in the binary distribution contains a cobertura.properties file. This is probably created by running the site build over the release build before creating the distributions. In the past we had a problematic

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 4.1 Based on RC2 (24h vote)

Hi Thomas, +1 Many thanks Oliver Am 25.11.2015 um 23:20 schrieb Thomas Neidhart: > Hi all, > > we have accumulated enough changes since the last 4.0 release as well as > we need to provide a fix for the known remote code exploit via java > de-serialization. Therefore, I would like to start a

Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.5.0 based on RC1

Environment: Apache Maven 3.2.1 (ea8b2b07643dbb1b84b6d16e1f08391b666bc1e9; 2014-02-14T18:37:52+01:00) Maven home: C:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.2.1\bin\.. Java version: 1.8.0_45, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_45\jre Default locale: de_DE, platform

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.4 based on RC2 - resend with corrected tag

Build works fine for me with Java 1.5 and Java 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. So +1. Interestingly, when I build the site locally my clirr report shows 12 errors. In addition to the 3 errors about methods added to an interface, I also get a bunch of errors about public methods

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 4.1 Based on RC1

The Maven build worked fine with Java 1.6 and 1.7 on Windows 10. With Java 1.8 I get the following compilation error in test classes: [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO] - [ERROR]

Re: [beanutils] release 1.9.3?

Am 01.06.2016 um 22:09 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > wrote: > >> >> >> Am 31.05.2016 um 23:31 schrieb Gary Gregory: >>> While there is not much new for 1.9.3, just two fixes,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC1

Am 03.06.2016 um 22:16 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Jun 3, 2016 12:53 PM, "Oliver Heger" <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > wrote: >> >> Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look > good. >> >> The site cannot be bui

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. The site cannot be built with Java 8, and the release notes are missing BEANUTILS-477, but this is not blocking. I ran the tests for [configuration] with the new jar and got a single test failure which seems to be caused

Re: [ALL] About binary compatibility

Hi Benedikt, Am 02.06.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi, > > we do seem to have different opinions when it comes to binary compatibility > and how it should be handled. Usually we would say "this should be decided > on a component basis". However this discussion is coming up again and

Re: [LANG] Would CircuitBreaker better fit into [NET]?

The current implementations that we have a pretty generic and just track memory consumption or count events (e.g. failed service invocations). They are not tighed to any specific use case or domain. I think, [lang] is a good fit, but maybe the classes can be moved to a separate package?

Re: svn commit: r1748347 - in /commons/proper/csv/trunk/src: changes/changes.xml main/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVFormat.java test/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVPrinterTest.java

Just as an info, [configuration] has a similar problem. There is a FileHandler class (in the io subpackage) which allows defining a target file in various ways and does the conversion to streams. Oliver Am 14.06.2016 um 18:33 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > How about something like: > > on

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-configuration #5

2016 1:29 PM, "Benedikt Ritter" <brit...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Gary has the karma to make you a Jenkins Job Admin. Just ping him. >>>> >>>> Benedikt >>>> >>>> Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-configuration #5

It seems that an email address of mine is hard-coded in the job configuration. But I do not seem to have the rights to view or even change the configuration :-( Oliver Am 27.05.2016 um 09:01 schrieb Apache Jenkins Server: > See > > >

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-configuration #5

Am 27.05.2016 um 21:07 schrieb sebb: > On 27 May 2016 at 19:54, Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote: >> It seems that an email address of mine is hard-coded in the job >> configuration. > > No, but the config is set up with: > > * Send separate

Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-configuration #5

ing into this. I did check my settings, and here my @apache mail is set. This one is forwarded to my private mail address and not related to the company address. Oliver > > On 27 May 2016 at 20:13, Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote: >> >> >> Am 27.05.2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on RC1

For the record, I voted +1, too. Oliver Am 26.05.2016 um 21:35 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > This vote passes with the following votes: > > - Gary Gregory: +1 > - Jochen Wiedmann: +1 > - Benedikt Ritter: +1 > - Stian Soiland-Reyes: +1 > - Bernd Eckenfels: +1 > > I'll continue with the release

Re: [beanutils] release 1.9.3?

Am 31.05.2016 um 23:31 schrieb Gary Gregory: > While there is not much new for 1.9.3, just two fixes, I would not mind > pushing out a release, just to get the refreshed dependency on Commons > Collection out since there has been noise about it related to security. > > Thoughts? +1, would it

Re: Resign from PMC...

James, Am 19.06.2016 um 01:36 schrieb James Carman: > I wish to resign from the Apache Commons PMC. Thank you. > sorry to hear this. Would you mind telling us something about your reasons? - Of course, you don't have to if you don't want. Regards Oliver

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Am 19.06.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hello Oliver, > > Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am So., 19. Juni 2016 > um 17:43 Uhr: > >> Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look >> good (there are a nu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Build works fine with Java 1.7 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good (there are a number of PMD and findbugs warnings, but I think this is acceptable). However, I was not able to build the site locally because of: [ERROR] Could not find resource

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.12 based on RC2

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 18.06.2016 um 18:12 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > Hi all > > as promised I've cut a RC for Compress 1.12. > > The Release Candidate is available for review at: >

Re: [VOTE] Form a separate TLP based on [math]

+1 I assume this step is beneficial for [math]. Here in commons we may miss you. Oliver Am 16.01.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Phil Steitz: > The discussion has thus far been generally favorable. I would like > therefore to put the proposal to split [math] out into a separate > TLP to a VOTE.

Re: [Math] How fast is fast enough?

Am 06.02.2016 um 12:31 schrieb James Carman: > Okay, folks, this is definitely getting out of hand. Let's put a moratorium > on this thread for the weekend or something and try to come back together > next week and try to move forward. I would urge folks to watch this while > we wait: > >

Re: [compress] test failures in master

With Java 1.6 on Windows 10 I get: Results : Failed tests: ArchiveReadTest.testArchive:103 Problem checking c:\data\dev\projects\OpenSource\commons-compress\target\test-classes\archives\FreeBSD.ar ArchiveReadTest.testArchive:103 Problem checking

Re: [compress] test failures in master

Am 07.04.2016 um 21:18 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > On 2016-04-07, sebb wrote: > >> On 7 April 2016 at 10:19, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> I set up > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/Commons-Compress-Windows/ > > Thanks! > >> Most tests failed with > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

aining two different build files is a pain and error-prone. The trend seems to be dropping the ant build. I would be in favor of this. Oliver > > Benedikt > > Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am So., 20. März 2016 > um 22:42 Uhr: > >> Hi all, &

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Am 22.03.2016 um 01:32 schrieb James Carman: > +1 drop ant So we agree on this one. What about the actual vote? (Nudge, nudge) Oliver > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:06 PM Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > wrote: > >> Hi Benedikt, >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Since we already started to use fractional numbers, I would be +0.5. I am also worried about the JNI stuff, but I think a new group of developers would be good for this community. Oliver Am 21.03.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

h interface with many possible result types, but one can achieve the same results. Oliver > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > Le 20/03/2016 22:42, Oliver Heger a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> after a series of alpha and beta releases, I think we are now ready to &

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

My +1 Oliver Am 20.03.2016 um 22:42 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > after a series of alpha and beta releases, I think we are now ready to > release the final 2.0 version of [configuration]. So this is the > corresponding release vote. > > Configuration 2.0 RC1 is avai

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Configuration 2.0 Released

on how to submit bug reports, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the Apache Commons Configuration website: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/ Oliver Heger, on behalf of the Apache Commons community

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > after a series of alpha and beta releases, I think we are now ready to > release the final 2.0 version of [configuration]. So this is the > corresponding release vote. > > Configuration 2.0 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.a

[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0 based on RC1

Hi all, after a series of alpha and beta releases, I think we are now ready to release the final 2.0 version of [configuration]. So this is the corresponding release vote. Configuration 2.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.11 Based on RC2

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. The build with Java 1.5 failed for me because of OutOfMemory errors in a number of test cases. I vaguely remember that I had similar problems with previous versions; so this is not blocking. +1 Oliver Am

Re: [VOTE] Commons NET 3.5 based on RC3

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 02.05.2016 um 01:12 schrieb sebb: > Try again. > > == > > NET 3.5 RC3 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/net/3.5_RC3/ (13489) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC4

Hi Benson, when checking the RC I get a pretty strange effect on downloading the binaries from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/binaries/: The browser shows me "dist - Revision 13260: /dev/commons/io/binaries". However, the downloaded artifacts are obviously the ones from the

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC4

Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 14.04.2016 um 17:41 schrieb Benson Margulies: > Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote. > > Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Commons-net 3.5 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 One thing I find a bit strange: In the release notes it is mentioned that the release is not source compatible to the previous one because of a method added to an interface. However, the clirr report only

Re: svn commit: r1742696 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/build.xml

Am 08.05.2016 um 10:51 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst: > Am 07.05.2016 um 16:44 schrieb Oliver Heger: >> Thank you for updating build.xml. >> >> There has been some discussion to drop the ant build completely as it >> tends to become outdated. Most Commons components alrea

Re: [configuration] continuous integration

Hi Dennis, Am 07.05.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst: > Hi! > > http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/integration.html > links to https://continuum-ci.apache.org which no longer exists. What > about setting up a job on http://builds.apache.org? no objections from my

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons CSV 1.3 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 06.05.2016 um 10:12 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi, > > we have fixed some bugs and added some nice new features since we released > Apache Commons CSV 1.2. So I'd like to release Apache Commons CSV

Re: svn commit: r1742696 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/build.xml

Thank you for updating build.xml. There has been some discussion to drop the ant build completely as it tends to become outdated. Most Commons components already did this, and I would be in favor of this. WDYT? Oliver Am 07.05.2016 um 11:41 schrieb d...@apache.org: > Author: deki > Date: Sat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on RC1

Build (maven) works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.8. Site looks good. The binary distribution is a bit different from other Commons releases: It only contains the jar in a lib subfolder (no source or javadoc jar), and the release notes are missing. But I don't think this is blocking. So +1 Oliver

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

e build fails with: >> >> $ mvn -v >> Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1; >> 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00) >> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.2.5/libexec >> Java version: 1.6.0_65, vendor: Apple Inc. >> Java home: /Library/Java/

[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

Hi all, there have been a number of bug fixes and also some new features for [configuration] since version 2.0 has been released. Those should be made available to the public. This is the vote for the 2.1 release. Configuration 2.1 RC1 is available for review here:

[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC2

Hi all, after the failed vote for RC1 a new RC has been created. The only difference is that the checkstyle plugin has been downgraded which should allow building the project on Java 1.6. Configuration 2.1 RC2 is available for review here:

[configuration] Checkstyle settings

Hi, in revision 1742698 the checkstyle configuration has been changed. The log says "fixed checkstyle violations, updated to latest version of checkstyle-maven-plugin, ensure correct checkstyle configuration is applied in all cases". I think with the new configuration checkstyle is now run on

Re: [configuration] Checkstyle settings

n be fixed before a release. But I do not want to be forced to fix all style violations at any time. Especially, as such violations will creep in nevertheless (somebody does a quick commit without running the full build) and then cause problems in the future. Oliver >> >> chas >

Re: [VOTE] Release DBCP 2.2 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1, great work! Oliver Am 31.07.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Matt Sicker: > We have fixed quite aWe have fixed quite a few bugs and added some > significant enhancements since DBCP 2.1.1 was released, so I would like

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC2

Am 01.08.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst: > Hi Benedikt! > >> The build log is here [1]. It looks like some generated classes are checked >> by checkstyle which causes the build to fail. The build works with Java 7 >> and Java 8. So my vote again is -1 because I think mvn clean install

[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Hi all, after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build problems on Java 1.6. Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration

Re: [configuration] Checkstyle settings

06.08.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >>> Le 2/08/2016 à 21:17, Oliver Heger a écrit : >>> >>>> Well, for me style is not that important. (We cannot even agree on a >>>> common style for the Commons project.) Therefore, seeing the violations >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

users and this community as it generates a lot of frustration. Please reconsider your -1 vote. Oliver > > Then IMO we should switch trunk to Java 7. > > Gary > > On Aug 13, 2016 12:37 PM, "Oliver Heger" <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > wrote: > >> >> >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

ns-configuration2: Execution default-site of >> goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:site failed: Java >> returned: 1 -> [Help >> 1] >> [ERROR] >> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the >> -e switch.

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst > wrote: > >> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory: >>> -1 >>> >>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK. >>> >>> Building with: >>> >>> Apache Maven 3.0.5

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

Because of the failing test I also feel a bit uneasy, but nevertheless I am +1: It is only a test class, the problem occurs only in a specific setup, it is already fixed in trunk, and the release is really overdue. Thanks Oliver Am 05.07.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > This vote is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

t; Thank you, > Gary > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > wrote: > >> Ok, here is the full stack trace. The German error message means that >> the system cannot find the specified file. >> >> Wh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC8

Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 10.07.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi all, > > hopefully the final RC for releasing Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 :-) Changes > since RC7: > > - fixed failing build on Windows plattforms > -

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC2

Hi, so do we have a confirmation that the current state in trunk builds correctly on the problematic platforms? Then I could start preparing another RC in the next days. Thanks Oliver Am 02.08.2016 um 09:08 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst: > Hi Gary! >> We have a mini-mess here: >> >> - checkstyle's

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC2

Am 01.08.2016 um 21:50 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> > wrote: > >> >> >> Am 01.08.2016 um 11:04 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst: >>> Hi Benedikt! >>> >>>>

Re: [configuration] Checkstyle settings

Am 02.08.2016 um 08:54 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst: > Am 01.08.2016 um 21:31 schrieb Oliver Heger: >> Am 31.07.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Matt Sicker: >>> Fixing all the checkstyle errors first is kind of a prerequisite to >>> enabling it by default. >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

Hi Benedikt, Am 28.07.2016 um 08:30 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hello Oliver, > > Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am Mi., 27. Juli 2016 > um 21:30 Uhr: > >> Thanks for the reviews so far. >> >> I tested with the Java 1.6 compatibility p

[CANCELED][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC1

This vote is canceled because of a problem with the build under Java 1.6. I will create another RC soon. Thanks for the reviews. Oliver Am 24.07.2016 um 22:31 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > there have been a number of bug fixes and also some new features for > [configur

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

Hi, when building from the source distribution with both Java 1.7 and 1.8 I get the following test failure: Results : Tests in error: JDKGenericDumpTestCase.data:60->findJavaHomes:65->findJavaHomesOnWindows:77->findJavaHomesOnWindows:84 » Win32 Tests run: 102, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

up. > > Gary > On Jul 3, 2016 7:50 AM, "Oliver Heger" <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> when building from the source distribution with both Java 1.7 and 1.8 I >> get the following test failure: >> >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the following binding votes: Gary Gregory: -1 Jörg Schaible: +1 Oliver Heger: +1 Oliver Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

+1 Oliver Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There > has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build > problems on Java 1.6. > > Configuration 2.1 RC3 is avai

Re: [CONFIGURATION] Ready for 2.2 release?

Am 03.02.2017 um 12:24 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi, > > I need some fixes from trunk in one of my projects. Since I’ve not been > involved in the development of [CONFIGURATION], I’d like to ask what is > blocking the 2.2 release and whether there is someone willing to RM. > AFAICT, there

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hi Rob, all my points from the previous RC have been addressed. +1 Great work! One minor thing I noticed: AFAIK, the md5 hashes have to be added to the files in the distribution area. Oliver Am 30.01.2017 um 15:14 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > Hello all, > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.1 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. The site build failed for me with Java 1.8 because of Javadoc errors, but this is not blocking. Site and artifacts look good. I noticed that OSGi manifests of jars use the same symbolic bundle name, e.g. for commons-jcs-core-2.1.jar and

Re: [CONFIGURATION]: JavaDoc for generated classes (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1)

kt > >> >> Gary >> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> >>>> Am 06.02.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Oliver Heger < >>> oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>: >>>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Many thanks! Oliver Am 05.02.2017 um 15:23 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi, > > we’ve fixed some bugs since the release of Commons Configuration 2.1 so I’d > like to call a vote to release Commons

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

Am 06.02.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: > +1 > > bin zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. > src zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. > src zip RAT check OK. > src zip CLIRR check OK. > > Building with 'mvn clean test' OK. > > Building site with 'mvn site' > > Using: > > Apache Maven 3.3.9

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC2

Hi, build works with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. The site build failed for me with Java 1.8 with the following error: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.6:site (default-site) on project commons-text: Error generating

Re: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.6 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10, including the site build with Java 1.8. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 16.02.2017 um 17:11 schrieb sebb: > Time for another Validator release ... > > == > > Validator 1.6 RC1 is available for review here: >

Re: [VOTE] Commons-net 3.6 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. The site build with Java 1.8 failed for me with a few Javadoc errors. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 11.02.2017 um 17:55 schrieb sebb: > It's about time to release the next version of NET. > > == > > NET 3.6 RC1 is available for

Re: [DISCUSS] Scala at Commons

As we already host some C-code in Commons, I see no reason to reject Scala or other JVM languages. I have done some experiments with Scala myself and am very impressed by this language. I might even have a small library which could become a component. One question: Which build tool would we use?

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Configuration 2.1 Released

-configuration/ Oliver Heger, on behalf of the Apache Commons community - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 (Update)

After receiving some more votes, the vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 is now successful with the following votes (binding votes marked with a *): Gary Gregory: -1 * Jörg Schaible: +1 * Oliver Heger: +1 * Raviteja Lokineni: +1 Benedikt Ritter: +1 * Thanks for all

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 11.09.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Gilles: > Hi. > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Rng 1.0 (from RC1). > > Tag name: > RNG_1_0_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v')

[lang] LANG-1275 in upcoming 3.5 release?

Hi, for LANG-1275 which I have just created I already have a fix that I could directly commit. Is it okay to do this or would this interfere with the preparations for the 3.5 release? Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [lang] LANG-1275 in upcoming 3.5 release?

he rebase approach. In case it helps, I also uploaded the patch to the Jira ticket. Oliver > > On 9 October 2016 at 06:37, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hello Oliver, >> >> Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> schrieb am Sa., 8. Okt. 2016

Re: [VOTE][RC2] Release "Apache Commons RNG" version 1.0

Am 17.09.2016 um 18:13 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Hi All, > > Gilles: I can see you are frustrated by the late comments and opinions when > the code has been sitting in the repo for all to see. I hope we can resolve > all of this amicably. > > All: We have only one shot at 1.0, this will set the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

Am 16.08.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Oliver Heger: > The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the > following binding votes: > > Gary Gregory: -1 > Jörg Schaible: +1 > Oliver Heger: +1 After closing the vote, two more votes have been cast: - Raviteja

Re: [beanutils] Gradle build weirdness

Am 27.09.2016 um 18:47 schrieb Raviteja Lokineni: > Does anyone have any fix for it or have experienced the same? Did you get this resolved? I just replaced the dependency in a Maven build, and the new version was picked up immediately. So I think the deployment to Maven central and meta data

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1

Hi, the build works fine for me with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10, even the site build is successful with Java 1.8. The artifacts and the site look good. However, I found a problem with the binary distribution: It contains two spurious jars versioned with 3.5-SNAPSHOT. I think this needs to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

Am 26.10.2016 um 21:21 schrieb Thomas Vandahl: > Am 25.10.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>: >> when building on Windows 10 with Java 1.6 I get the error below. The >> build with Java 1.8 is successful. >> >> On the distributions,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

y > > On Nov 5, 2016 1:37 PM, "Thomas Vandahl" <t...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Oliver, >> >> On 05.11.16 21:18, Oliver Heger wrote: >>> It seems that there are many breaking changes between this release and >>> beta1; for instance, the clir

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

It seems that there are many breaking changes between this release and beta1; for instance, the clirr report for the core component lists numerous errors. Is it not against Commons policy to publish incompatible artifacts with the same maven and package coordinates to Maven central? Oliver Am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.3 based on RC2

Build worked for me with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. The site build failed with Java 1.8, but was successful with 1.7 (following the build instructions). Artifacts and site look good. +1 Minor nit: The OSGi meta data is problematic because all bundles have the same symbolic name. But I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

Hi, when building on Windows 10 with Java 1.6 I get the error below. The build with Java 1.8 is successful. On the distributions, I found some problems: - Both the source and the binary distribution deflate in the same folder. Typically, different folders are used. - The binary distribution does

Re: [lang] LANG-1144: Multiple calls of org.apache.commons.lang3.concurrent.LazyInitializer.initialize() are possible

Am 23.10.2016 um 22:18 schrieb pascalschumac...@apache.org: > Repository: commons-lang > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 96c8ea2fb -> dc53e49b4 > > > LANG-1144: Multiple calls of > org.apache.commons.lang3.concurrent.LazyInitializer.initialize() are possible > > minimal clean-up > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component

+1 Oliver Am 23.11.2016 um 14:47 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes: > [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a > concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator] > > Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding > of its purpose, developed and released

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC2

Build works fine for me with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Site build works with Java 1.8. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 13.10.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi, > > finally I found the time to prepare Apache Commons Lang 3.5 RC2 :-) > We could not release RC1, because

Re: [lang] Thread safety annotations

Am 28.11.2016 um 22:28 schrieb Gary Gregory: > WRT licensing, I re-implemented the annotations in git master. Notice that > all Javadocs are different and much simpler for now. Feel free to write > more. As the length of this thread shows, using annotations for the purpose of documenting

Re: [VOTE][RC6] Release Commons RNG 1.0

Build works with Java 1.6 and 1.8, site builds fine with 1.8. Artifacts and site look good. On the site I still miss an aggregated Javadocs Link. +1 Oliver Am 07.12.2016 um 00:22 schrieb Gilles: > Hi. > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC6). > > > Tag name: >

Re: [VOTE][RC6] Release Commons RNG 1.0

hives are not corrupt; they can be opened with 7zip. Sorry for the noise. Oliver > > > On 8 December 2016 at 07:58, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 21:39:02 +0100, Oliver Heger wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> s

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >