On 20.05.2012 14:47, Daniel Gruno wrote:
This will effectively make for two (or three) new votes for adopting
each piece:
- Adopt a privacy policy for the docs and refer to the various tracking
methods used as they get implemented - see the draft at
Sending to docs@ as well, as this applies to that list too.
Grumpiness may occur, so apologies in advance.
On 05/19/2012 09:32 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
Looking at the call for votes [retained below for reference] and at the
votes, I'm not sure if the +1 voters were aware of the specific
On 07.05.2012 16:02, Daniel Gruno wrote:
With an impressive 8 x +1 binding votes and no -1's, as well as +2 from
other docs@ readers, I believe we can call this vote passed with flying
colors :).
Apologies for being late with this, but the specifics of the currently
used implementation
With an impressive 8 x +1 binding votes and no -1's, as well as +2 from
other docs@ readers, I believe we can call this vote passed with flying
colors :).
We will begin rolling out the commentary system in the trunk docs
shortly, and then we'll see where the wind of the web takes us.
I suspect
On 04-05-2012 21:04, Igor Galić wrote:
[+1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
This may be worth a separate thread, but I'll just ask
it here, before I forget about it:
Any chance we'll see a backport of this to /current/ ?
If so, will we display the same comments as
On 04.05.2012 15:58, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[+1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
Thanks for pushing this and helping Rich and the project with so much
positive energy.
Rainer
I'll be a bad boy and top-post on this reply, as well as add dev@ to the
list of recipients.
In docs@, we have been discussing the possibility of adding comments to
the various pages in our documentation. As the discussion has
progressed, we have settled on the idea of trying out Disqus as a
On May 4, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
Obviously, I'm +1 on this, as one of the folks who's been gently pushing for it
for years. This is something that the PHP docs do right. Integrating comments
into the documentation is a
+1
[+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
[+1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
On Friday 04 May 2012, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
+1
[+1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
This may be worth a separate thread, but I'll just ask
it here, before I forget about it:
Any chance we'll see a backport of this to /current/ ?
If so, will we display the same comments as in /trunk/ ?
So long,
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel:
On 5/4/2012 8:58 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
+1
--
Daniel Ruggeri
[+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
+1
On 2012 5 4 15:04, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote:
[+1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
This may be worth a separate thread, but I'll just ask
it here, before I forget about it:
Any chance we'll see a backport of this to /current/ ?
If so, will we display the
Daniel Gruno wrote:
[+/-1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
+1
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
16 matches
Mail list logo
