Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Mathias Bauer pisze:
Nicolas Mailhot schrieb:
That's completely true on the 'no building or packaging' side. On the
'just give access' side, distributors prefer regular versioned archive
dumps on an ftp/http:
OK, I will put this information into the ongoing
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Otherwise, the only solution is to develop the extension framework that
could install dicts.
This is what we are doing (complemented by several other things like
thinking about system wide installation of dicts and native packages as
discussed in another thread).
HI kevin
http://borel.slu.edu/obair/hil_PH.zip
Laurent, if you're willing to upload this to the server, I'll add it
to the wiki.
is this language already registered inside OOo ?
What is the country name of PH ?
otherwize will have to be bound to another language as a dirty workaround
On 10/8/07, Laurent Godard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI kevin
http://borel.slu.edu/obair/hil_PH.zip
Laurent, if you're willing to upload this to the server, I'll add it
to the wiki.
is this language already registered inside OOo ?
It doesn't appear to be. I'll start the ball rolling
Hi
I suppose there's no harm in at least uploading the dictionary at this
point. I'll report back when there's been some progress on adding hil
to the list of registered languages.
The problem is that is will not be associated to any language
(and i don't remember how OOo behaves if we give
On 8.10.2007, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hristo Simenov Hristov wrote:
Hi,
A lot of people complain that when they install new version of OOo they
have to install our dictionaries again. Is it possible to be done
something? For example in language packages (isntall) to add respective
Hristo Hristov pisze:
On 8.10.2007, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hristo Simenov Hristov wrote:
Hi,
A lot of people complain that when they install new version of OOo they
have to install our dictionaries again. Is it possible to be done
something? For example in language packages (isntall) to add
