Re: [DISCUSS] Many shared stuff should be dropped

hi Tamasz, I think you're right on maven-dependency-tree, as it was with maven-artifact- transfer I'm not really convinced *many* shared stuff should be dropped: IMHO, over- generalization And I think that when replacing a shared stuff with direct use of an existing API, in fact what normal

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin version 4.0.0-M14

+1 Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows and umask = 022 (parent POM not upgraded, which should remove the umask requirement) Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 5 mai 2024, 21:29:12 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > we solved 4 issues: >

[ANN] Apache Maven Shade Plugin 3.5.3 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Shade Plugin, version 3.5.3 This plugin provides the capability to package the artifact in an uber-jar, including its dependencies and to shade - i.e. rename - the packages of some of the dependencies.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.3

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : zhongming hua, Olivier Lamy, Romain Manni-Bucau, Hervé Boutemy PMC quorum reached I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the artifacts to the central repo

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.3

Hi, We solved 3 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12354342=Text Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2096/

[ANN] Apache Maven Plugin Tools 3.12.0 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Plugin Tools, version 3.12.0 The Maven Plugin Tools contains the necessary tools to generate rebarbative content like descriptor, help and documentation. https://maven.apache.org/plugins-tools/index.html You should

[ANN] Apache Maven Source Plugin 3.3.1 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Source Plugin, version 3.3.1 The Source Plugin creates a jar archive of the source files of the current project. https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-source-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's

[ANN] Apache Maven Artifact Plugin 3.5.1 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Artifact Plugin, version 3.5.1 This plugin is used for Reproducible Builds tasks about artifacts. https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-artifact-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Plugin Tools version 3.12.0

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Sylwester Lachiewicz, Tamás Cservenák, Hervé Boutemy PMC quorum: reached I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the artifacts to the central repo

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Source Plugin version 3.3.1

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Olivier Lamy, Tamás Cservenák, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Slawomir Jaranowski, Hervé Boutemy PMC quorum: reached I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the artifacts to the central repo

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.1

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Sylwester Lachiewicz, Slawomir Jaranowski, Tamás Cservenák, Hervé Boutemy PMC quorum: reached I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the artifacts to the central repo

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Plugin Tools version 3.12.0

Hi, We solved 3 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317820=12354176=Text Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2082/

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Source Plugin version 3.3.1

Hi, We solved 3 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317924=12353471=Text Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2081/

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.1

Hi, We solved 4 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12353681=Text Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2078/

Re: Revert commit 740dae43ca3ccf7692f37edf3184387e5666ca6b

Hi Konrad, I saw the fork between Maven 3.9.x where I started the documentation job and Maven 4: - Maven 3.9.x: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1444 as you can see, requiredMavenVersion exists since 3.0.2 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-4840 - Maven 4:

Re: release of maven-source-plugin

output file = another classifier has to be configured Regards, Hervé Le lundi 25 mars 2024, 07:31:53 CET Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > IIUC, this is an explanation of the mystery failure that started the > MSOURCE-121 update > > but after MSOURCE-121, the plugin itself stops with a

Re: release of maven-source-plugin

ory a > > écrit : > > Hi All, > > > > As long as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSOURCES-143 is in > > play, Commons will stay on a pre-3.3.0 version. > > > > I re-read the comments, I still don't know what we can do in Commons > > to addr

release of maven-source-plugin

I'd like to release maven-source-plugin 3.3.1 to drop the umask sensitivity during Reproducible Builds :)1 but there are a few issues open https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MSOURCES/versions/12353471 they are related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSOURCES-121: I don't get

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

Le lundi 26 février 2024, 13:42:19 CET Ceki Gulcu a écrit : > Hello Bernd, > > I was unaware of the capabilities of the release flag. Thank you for > explaining. a proof that even capabilities like --release flag from JDK 9 (JEP 247 https:// openjdk.org/jeps/247) need to be promoted because it's

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

Le mardi 27 février 2024, 13:32:36 CET Elliotte Rusty Harold a écrit : > Toolchains support using JDK 8 to compile even though JDK 17 is > executing Maven, which does handle this. Unfortunately toolchains are > poorly designed, badly documented, and not widely understood within > the community.

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

Le mardi 27 février 2024, 18:33:43 CET sebb a écrit : > On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 17:01, Benjamin Marwell wrote: > > > Compiling for Java 8 with > > > Java 17 -release 8 is not the same as compiling with javac from JDK 8. > > > They do not produce the same byte code. +1 that's a fact > > > There is

working on plugins system requirements history: volunteers?

as discussed on the "Java version for Maven" thread(s), enablers are key IMHO on plugins system requirements history, we started with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-400 we need to fill data on every Maven -project plugin:

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.pa

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

for sure, given the JDK almanach https://javaalmanac.io/jdk/ , we'll have to update our plans https://maven.apache.org/developers/compatibility-plan.html the approach I'd love to promote is "what do we require to not hurt our diversity of users when upgrading minimum prerequisites" (and I'm

[ANN] Apache Maven Shade Plugin 3.5.2 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Shade Plugin, version 3.5.2 This plugin provides the capability to package the artifact in an uber-jar, including its dependencies and to shade - i.e. rename - the packages of some of the dependencies.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.2

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Romain Manni-Bucau, zhongming hua, Guillaume Nodet, Tamás Cservenák, Benjamin Marwell, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Slawomir Jaranowski, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Olivier Lamy -1: Elliotte Rusty Harold PMC quorum reached I will promote the source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.2

FYI I reviewed PRs and merged what I was confident with I can't say if this one can be merged: I don't know the feature sufficiently I understand the good intent of the feedback, even if I find -1 a little bit strong: I did what I could, believe in my good intent too doing that release Regards,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.2

, Hervé Le samedi 17 février 2024, 19:00:47 CET Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921 > rsion=12352505=Text > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.2

Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12352505=Text Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2065/

Re: Java version for Maven 4?

Le dimanche 21 janvier 2024, 22:03:59 CET Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > At build time, I think it's fine to bump to whatever is needed to make > our life manageable. If 17 is required, so be it. +1 my biggest concern with Maven 4 is not JDK runtime requirement, but plugins future when a plugin

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia version 2.0.0-M9

uh, it had been dropped by inadvertance in https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia-site/commit/ecd62ed94b6e9445237e780171edff8f437a4895 doxia-tools needs rework, since it's not only one component but a collection, like plugins/ in Maven site I'll do the update Le dimanche 7 janvier 2024,

Re: Nexus returns 400 Bad Request

interesting details IMHO, we're back to the HTTP wire protocol between Maven CLI and repositories not being precisely defined on edge cases = what to put as HTTP return code, what to put as reason phrase (deprecated in HTTP/1.1, removed in HTTP/2), and what to get from HTTP body idea has been

Re: New year - new challenge - required Maven 3.6.3 as minimal for core Maven Plugins

for the records, "Maven Plugins Compatibility Plan" strategy is stored in https://maven.apache.org/developers/compatibility-plan.html = the doc to refer to and update if necessary after the current discussion Le vendredi 29 décembre 2023, 14:42:17 CET Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Hi, > >

Re: Plugins documentations - improvements

notice that it is also the javadoc spirit: when there is a long multi-line description, table is expected to keep only first line and detail the full description Le samedi 23 décembre 2023, 23:29:22 CET Konrad Windszus a écrit : > Hi, > currently those sections deviate slightly (e.g. the

Re: Plugins documentations - improvements

in early days, from memory, there were a few fields displayed only in the details section https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-compiler-plugin-2.2/compile-mojo.html like expression: I don't find anything else (perhaps even older reports had more fields like this one) but you're

Re: Maven profiles and dependency resolution

Hi Piotr, Thinking at it carefully, AFAIK it is a design decision done in early Maven 2 design time: - POM properties don't influence dependencies - profile activation influence dependencies (I don't know for CLI properties) The rationale is that: 1. POM properties are expected to be fixed

Re: injecting an object for plugin configuration on Maven CLI

gt; https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-configuring-plugins.html#Mapping > _Value_Objects support conversion from string. There is nothing built in for > complex classes containing multiple values of different types. > > Konrad > > > On 17. Nov 2023, at 08:51, Hervé B

injecting an object for plugin configuration on Maven CLI

my use case: I want sometimes to execute maven-toolchain-plugin or animal- sniffer-maven-plugin on CLI without updating pom.xml the only issue I'm facing is how to write the -D properties to populate a few fields from Objects required in plugin configuration: - signature

Re: Changing Minimum Build Requirements for plugins to JDK11

no need to change the build prerequisite: just add a profile to activate the release flag on newer JDK: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM-447 Regards, Hervé Le lundi 13 novembre 2023, 20:38:00 CET Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > Hi, > > currently we have already the build

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-8 release

Le lundi 23 octobre 2023, 10:00:59 CEST Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Le sam. 21 oct. 2023 à 18:19, Herve Boutemy a écrit : > > I updated release notes > > > > a few remarks/questions: > > > > - it would be nice to have a description in Jira issues for all the new > > features, because some

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin version 4.0.0-M10

+1 Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows and umask 022 Regards, Hervé Le mardi 3 octobre 2023, 11:12:36 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M12, Maven Reporting Impl > 4.0.0-M10, Maven Reporting Exec 2.0.0-M10

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Reporting Exec version 2.0.0-M10

+1 Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows and umask 022 Regards, Hervé Le mardi 3 octobre 2023, 00:14:52 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M12, Maven Reporting Impl > 4.0.0-M10 vote/staging repo! > > we solved 3

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.5

I updated my svn and ran: for f in * do rm $f wget https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1996/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.9.5/$f done both in source and binaries: this resulted in .asc change in source only, everything else was ok I committed the update now we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.5

yes, you can drop the staging repository and re-deploy: only the 2 -bin archives will be different Regards Hervé Le lundi 2 octobre 2023, 11:10:36 CEST Tamás Cservenák a écrit : > Bah, > > This is the same problem as before... but originally it happened on my > desktop. This time the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Reporting Impl version 4.0.0-M10

+1 Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows and umask 022 Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 1 octobre 2023, 20:19:26 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M12 vote/staging repo! > > we solved 3 issues: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 2.0.0-M12

+1 Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows and umask 022 Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 1 octobre 2023, 20:03:02 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > we solved 5 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320 > rsion=12353413 >

[ANN] Apache Maven Artifact Plugin 3.5.0 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Artifact Plugin, version 3.5.0 This plugin is used for Reproducible Builds tasks about artifacts. https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-artifact-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.0

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Sylwester Lachiewicz, Tamás Cservenák, Michael Osipov, Hervé Boutemy PMC quorum reached I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the artifacts to the central repo

Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.0

was intended to the list :) -- Message transmis -- Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.0 Date : samedi 30 septembre 2023, 18:45:51 CEST De : Michael Osipov À : Hervé Boutemy Am 2023-09-29 um 08:00 schrieb Hervé Boutemy: > Hi, > > We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.0

+1 Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done on *nix with JDK 11 Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 29 septembre 2023, 08:00:39 CEST Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322 > rsion=12353118=Te

verifying signatures, PGP or ... (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.0)

reason to check PGP signatures at build > time? And if there is, why are we doing this with a fixed map instead > of looking them up in Maven Central? > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:00 AM Hervé Boutemy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 6 issues: > > https:/

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.0

Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12353118=Text Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1992/

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.16

+1 Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022 Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 22 septembre 2023, 20:28:55 CEST Tamás Cservenák a écrit : > Howdy, > > Note: Maven Resolver 1.x lineage after this release is going into "bugfix > only" maintenance mode (and will

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.5.1

+1 Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022 Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 21 septembre 2023, 21:51:21 CEST Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921 > rsion=12353341

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Javadoc Plugin version 3.6.0

+1 Reproducible Build not fully ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022 maven-javadoc-plugin-3.6.0-source-release.zip is the file that is not reproducible: it contains non-reproducible src/it/mrm/3rdparty/_doclet-1.0.jar and src/it/mrm/repository/_mjavadoc450-static.jar I

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

can you try plexus-xml 3.0.0 and confirm this works as you expected initially, please? Regards, Hervé Le mardi 25 juillet 2023, 20:56:04 CEST Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Hi > > I'm trying to update plexus-utils 3.5.x to plexus-utils/plexus-xml 4.x in > maven-enforcer > > In

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

to 4, as it breaks (for now) running your code in Maven 3 but requires Maven 4 Thanks for the feedback, this helped us clarify the plan Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 10 septembre 2023, 18:50:27 CEST Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > working on it, I created a branch for plexus-xml 3.x: >

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

ly to plugins but also to shared libs for > maven (ASF also plexus and mojohous) > > Sylwester > > niedz., 10 wrz 2023, 09:00 użytkownik Hervé Boutemy > > napisał: > > Le samedi 9 septembre 2023, 19:33:51 CEST Václav Haisman a écrit : > > > On 25. 07

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

Le samedi 9 septembre 2023, 19:33:51 CEST Václav Haisman a écrit : > On 25. 07. 23 20:56, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm trying to update plexus-utils 3.5.x to plexus-utils/plexus-xml 4.x in > > maven-enforcer > > > > In maven-enforcer (and in many other plugins ...) is used,

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

update = what is causing the compatibility issue Regards, Hervé Le samedi 9 septembre 2023, 11:33:59 CEST Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > > o.c.p:p-u 4.x that depends on > > -> o.c.p:p-xml 4 that depends on > > notice this dependency is *optional* > it's useful only for Rea

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

ok, I updated plexus-utils and plexus-xml sites and added a few key aspects about how these relate to old Plexus Utils 3 https://codehaus-plexus.github.io/plexus-utils/ https://codehaus-plexus.github.io/plexus-xml/ I hope this will help Le samedi 9 septembre 2023, 11:14:52 CEST Hervé Boutemy

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

> o.c.p:p-u 4.x that depends on > -> o.c.p:p-xml 4 that depends on notice this dependency is *optional* it's useful only for ReaderFactory/WriterFactory, for XmlReader/Writer fully removing the dependency would have broken full compatibility by removing a few methods: it was preferred to mark the

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

yes notice p-u site is broken https://codehaus-plexus.github.io/plexus-utils/ and we should probably also find a way to publish also latest p-u 3 javadoc in parallel I'll see what I can do also to help on this Le vendredi 8 septembre 2023, 10:53:11 CEST Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Thanks,

Re: plexus-utils 4.x and Xpp3DomBuilder

right conclusion Le mercredi 26 juillet 2023, 06:55:10 CEST Christoph Läubrich a écrit : > I tried the same with Tycho and the conclusion was that a maven plugin > can currently not upgrade to plexus-xml4 if you still want to support > maven 3.x > > Am 25.07.23 um 20:56 schrieb Slawomir

Re: CVE-2021-26291 for plugin writers

in fact, whatever you do in your plugin POM, they are provided by Maven core at runtime (ignoring the precise version the plugin asked for) but marking them provided in your plugin pom.xml makes this fact more visible Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 31 août 2023, 03:15:15 CEST Jeremy Landis a écrit :

Re: Multi-repo experience

Le samedi 26 août 2023, 09:50:28 CEST Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > Hi Volkan, > > Yes, I worked a lot on this aspect fo Maven: the result is summarised here > https://maven.apache.org/scm.html > > As you can see, you can get "Maven Full Sources" in one command using Goog

Re: Multi-repo experience

Hi Volkan, Yes, I worked a lot on this aspect fo Maven: the result is summarised here https://maven.apache.org/scm.html As you can see, you can get "Maven Full Sources" in one command using Google "repo" tool. Please have a llok and we can dive into more details if you need Regards, Hervé

Re: [CANCELED][VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.4

you probably rebuilt the release with "mvn install" = what you need to avoid and it seems the rebuild was done with an environment that did not give you the same output as the reference build FYI, I was able to rebuild Maven Resolver 1.9.14 with the same output as you

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.13

+1 Reproducible Build ok: reference done on *nix with JDK 17 and umask 022 Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 22 juin 2023, 11:47:30 CEST Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > +1 > > wt., 20 cze 2023 o 16:13 Tamás Cservenák napisał(a): > > Howdy, > > > > We solved 2 issues: > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] POM model version

Le dimanche 18 juin 2023, 21:49:41 CEST Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Le dim. 18 juin 2023 à 21:14, Hervé Boutemy a > > écrit : > > I now understand our divergence: you implicitely use Maven 4 with some > > updates > > already done on xsd versions that I did not

Re: [DISCUSS] POM model version

for Maven Central if one of these is chosen, I ask everybody to seriously work on it and document all the new aspects that this reveals Don't just say "nice" Regards, Hervé Le samedi 17 juin 2023, 10:07:42 CEST Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Le ven. 16 juin 2023, 19:20, Hervé Bou

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.12

.9.11 as well? IMHO there must > > be the same issue present, or if not, am even more puzzled... > > > > T > > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 7:13 PM Hervé Boutemy > > > > wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> notice that Reproducible Builds

Re: [DISCUSS] POM model version

at way you can have more > > room to try changes to the POM format. But there really should be a > > mechanism for pushing POM changes downstream and XSD seems like a good > > option for that. Sorry if this is already the plan and I'm repeating what > > is already kno

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.12

+1 notice that Reproducible Builds is NOT ok on 1 file: reference build done on *nix with JDK 17 and umask 022 the only issue is in maven-resolver-named-locks-redisson-1.9.12-bundle.zip: │--rw--- 2.0 unx49423 b- defN 23-Jun-16 13:32 objenesis-3.3.jar │+-rw-r--r-- 2.0 unx49423 b-

Re: [DISCUSS] POM model version

Le lundi 12 juin 2023, 01:50:56 CEST Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > > Don't look at Maven code to judge: the whole logic is based on "known > > unknown" > > = we don't know who parses POMs published to Maven Central, but there are > > many > > (it's easy to cite many, but not all). > > I can't buy

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 3.4.0

+1 Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 11 juin 2023, 22:14:08 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > we solved 17 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318121 > rsion=12350597 > > There are still a

Re: Build POM and consumer POM (was Re: [DISCUSS] POM model version

gt; > Also drops some build meta which cant be resoled anymore portably like > compiler setup, which graalvm version was used and lastly would need to > drop or not props not used elsewhere. > Think staying as close as possible of the source is overall good to consume > as in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ASF parent 30

wow, what a release! +1 Reproducible build ok Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 11 juin 2023, 19:02:05 CEST Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 25 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250 > rsion=12352680 > > Commits: >

Re: [DISCUSS] POM model version

Le vendredi 9 juin 2023, 11:22:26 CEST Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Le ven. 9 juin 2023 à 08:59, Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > > adding a new POM element in build POM was supposed to be something for > > Maven 5 > > and to trigger a POM 5 version, to make clear that we are le

Re: [DISCUSS] POM model version

adding a new POM element in build POM was supposed to be something for Maven 5 and to trigger a POM 5 version, to make clear that we are leaving the Maven 3 space (that uses POM version 4, hence the need for version clarification between Maven and it POM model version) if we enter that space

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

Le mardi 6 juin 2023, 20:19:23 CEST Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > One question for people that want JDK 8 support. What IDE do they use to > develop ? Because none of the actual IDE is running JDK 8, though they can > be used by JDK 8, just like maven with toolchains. good point, thanks for adding

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

lt;https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > Le mar. 6 juin 2023 à 09:11, Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > > you're right that we're currently talking about core, not plugins > > > > but this question will inevitably extend from core

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

n/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > Le mar. 6 juin 2023 à 08:27, Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > > > > notice that this will also impact all plugins: and given the few work > > > > done >

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

> > notice that this will also impact all plugins: and given the few work done > > on > > plugins to clearly show what plugin version remains compatible with a JDK > > release, I feel we're not taking the topic the right way > > Can you detail it please? While we keep plugin-api java 8 compat -

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

Le mardi 6 juin 2023, 01:54:27 CEST Henning Schmiedehausen a écrit : > To get this discussion a bit more back to actual substance: > > Do you still need toolchains with JDK 11/17? I set the release version to > "8" (or anything else) in my builds, ripped out all the toolchains and it > "just

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven runtime vs artifact runtime?

I think this difference during Maven build between compile time JDK vs tests execution time JDK is key for normal users choice. And ease of setup if multiple JDKs are involved (= it's not easy to have configured prerequisites in place) I suppose good articles showing the full setup to do so

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

it's not about *one not wanting* to upgrade (anybody can use JDK 17 if they want currently) it's about *one forcing everybody else* to upgrade (and enter the toolchain setup question) I'd be curious to see what will happen the day one of the base plugin force to upgrade:

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

+1 I really don't what benefit we get from going to Java 17 I perfectly see the impact we'll have on our users: for what benefit? notice that this will also impact all plugins: and given the few work done on plugins to clearly show what plugin version remains compatible with a JDK release, I

Re: GH issues and GH discussions

Le lundi 29 mai 2023, 13:50:58 CEST Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > To fulfill the formalism (also have documented the decision here on the > ML) we should start simply a VOTE to get an in general decision about > moving to GH-issues to leave JIRA behind... (not about the details) that > can be

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Project Info Reports Plugin version 3.4.4

+1 Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 26 mai 2023, 21:29:11 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > we solved 6 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317821 > rsion=12353222 > > There are still

Re: GH issues and GH discussions

Le vendredi 26 mai 2023, 19:41:53 CEST Benjamin Marwell a écrit : > Big +1, as more and more projects are already migrating (including Apache > Shiro). > > I'd vote for maven-jlink-plugin: Not many issues currently. > > > not having to create an issue if a PR exists first > > I'd at least make

Re: GH issues and GH discussions

on testing GH issues migration from Jira: yes cache-extension [1] looks like an interesting example, given it has a small history with its Jira content we also have mvnd which uses GH issues from the start: testing and making clear practices on release and release notes could also be worked

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven SCM 2.0.1

+1 Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix Regards, Hervé Le lundi 15 mai 2023, 20:55:39 CEST Tamás Cservenák a écrit : > Howdy, > > We solved 2 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828 > rsion=12353247 > > There are still a

[ANN] Apache Maven GPG Plugin 3.1.0 Released

The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven 3.1.0 Plugin, version 3.1.0 This plugin signs all of the project's attached artifacts with GnuPG. https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-gpg-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven GPG Plugin version 3.1.0

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Slawomir Jaranowski, Tamás Cservenák, Michael Osipov, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Olivier Lamy, Hervé Boutemy PMC quorum reached I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the artifacts to the central repo

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven GPG Plugin version 3.1.0

Hi, We solved N issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317521=12350161=Text Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1935

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Resource Bundles 1.5

mac" uh, it's the first time I see this I'll try to investigate later, but I'm not worried for this release: this issue is not about the current content but probably an issue that pre-existed when run on Mac > > sob., 1 kwi 2023 o 19:56 Hervé Boutemy napisał(a): > > Hi, > > >

[VOTE] Release Apache Resource Bundles 1.5

Hi, We solved 14 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314621=12352992=Text Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-1032/

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven SCM Publish Plugin version 3.2.1

+1 Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 26 mars 2023, 19:51:31 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 8 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317920 > rsion=12349526 > > There are still

Re: Migrating Apache Resource Bundles from svn to Git

jeudi 9 mars 2023, 08:10:28 CET Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > this is one of the last piece of code that the Maven project maintains in > svn (de-facto not doing any release...) > This is not a funny task, but it has to be done > > I finally prepared the work, with a plan fully de

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >