maven-core tests fail when invoked via ant.

2011-06-19 Thread Kasun Gajasinghe
Hi, We are in the process of integrating Maven in to Gentoo. Currently, we are trying to bootstrap maven. Our strategy is to integrate each and every sub-project of Maven-2.2.1 [1] separately. So, we first transformed these to an ant projects by generating the build.xml via `mvn ant:ant`. I know

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Mark Struberg
a very good idea +1 LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 6/19/11, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: From: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com Subject: Re: The JIRA chocolate box To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Date: Sunday, June 19, 2011, 3:05 AM I am only proposing

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Olivier Lamy
Nice idea +1. BTW asking a test case is not very easy. As most of the time issues happen on corpo/private *complex* project. So extracting a test case can be hard. 2011/6/19 Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com: If no one objects to this idea, I'd like to add a component, which is an email

Re: Get thee to the Core...

2011-06-19 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I opened MNG-5119 to track this. We can use the Wiki too [2], if useful at any time. I already did some minor improvements and published 3.0.4-SNAPSHOT site [3] (sync pending) to see the actual state, to be compared with 3.0.3 [4] I'm starting to test ideas on shared components, since they are

RE: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Gavin McDonald
-Original Message- From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 19 June 2011 6:08 AM To: Maven Developers List; Maven Project Management Committee List Subject: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6 Hi, We solved 3 issues: Really? You'd release a

RE: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Dont know if we're looking at the same jira; I see 10 issues being resolved. +1 binding Given the amount of *work* staging a release is, I hardly doubt anyone does a release they don't think is worth it. Kristian sø., 19.06.2011 kl. 18.34 +1000, skrev Gavin McDonald: -Original

Re: RE: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Stephen Connolly
don't knock somebody who is taking the time and effort to actually run a release. any improvement is an improvement... you could quibble that maybe it should have been a 2.5.1 and not a 2.6 but it is down to the person who steps up to make the release. speaking with my pmc hat on, any

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2011-06-19 00:30, Benson Margulies wrote: I just looked at the 'blocker' issues. We have a variety of very old JIRAs here. None of the ones I looked at have a self-contained test case that would can be downloaded, run, and converted to an integration test, etc. This is one of the major

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg
This is a great idea. Some minor comments inline. On 2011-06-19 04:22, Benson Margulies wrote: If no one objects to this idea, I'd like to add a component, which is an email like the following to the user list. --snip-- Dear Maven Users, Over the years, the JIRA for core Maven

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread sebb
On 19 June 2011 11:52, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-06-19 00:30, Benson Margulies wrote: I just looked at the 'blocker' issues. We have a variety of very old JIRAs here. None of the ones I looked at have a self-contained test case that would can be downloaded, run, and

Re: svn commit: r1137235 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-changes-plugin/pom.xml

2011-06-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hmm, I not quite sure what happened here. Benson? On 2011-06-18 22:00, bimargul...@apache.org wrote: Author: bimargulies Date: Sat Jun 18 20:00:55 2011 New Revision: 1137235 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137235view=rev Log: [maven-release-plugin] rollback the release of

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
FWIW, I've spent plenty of time on the 'trying to make a test case' side of the fence and I appreciate how hard it can be. If someone makes a cogent case that they can't come with a testcase, then there are possible outcomes: 1: A dev finds the story sufficiently compelling to try to build a

Re: svn commit: r1137235 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-changes-plugin/pom.xml

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
I know what I think I did. 1) my copy of the pom was one back from Dennis' change for the locale. 2) I started the release process. 3) I got an error to the effect that pom.xml was out of date. 4) release:rollback 5) svn up, with a G on the pom, which I thought merged Dennis in. I can't rule out

Re: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Mark Derricutt
I'd rather see a release with 3 bug fixes if they code base is idle than see not see a release for weeks/months whilst someone waits for N more issues to be resolved. -- Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:34 PM,

Re: RE: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
1: This [VOTE] is cancelled due to a merge snafu in the prep. 2: for Gavin: I spent several days fixing up a very broken feature to render the plugin actually usable with customized JIRA installations. I want to put that work to work in the real world, and I didn't see any other outstanding

Re: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
Kristian, How are you seeing 10? --benson On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote: Dont know if we're looking at the same jira; I see 10 issues being resolved. +1 binding Given the amount of *work* staging a release is, I hardly doubt anyone

Re: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11212version=17375 ?? Den 19. juni 2011 kl. 13:40 skrev Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com: Kristian, How are you seeing 10? --benson On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2011-06-19 13:39, Benson Margulies wrote: Kristian, How are you seeing 10? In the release notes: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17375styleName=TextprojectId=11212 In JIRA 4 the default layout changed so that it shows some sort of summary, which I don't understand

Re: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
Well, that explains that. 2.6 it is, and new vote coming soon. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-06-19 13:39, Benson Margulies wrote: Kristian, How are you seeing 10? In the release notes:

[VOTE take 2]: release maven-changes-plugin version 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
Hi, We solved 10 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17375styleName=TextprojectId=11212 There are plenty of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE take 2]: release maven-changes-plugin version 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 BTW: Your reply-to and send-to headings are not totally according to maven common release procedure; http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html Kristian sø., 19.06.2011 kl. 08.16 -0400, skrev Benson Margulies: Hi, We solved 10 issues:

Help in starting with maven prompter

2011-06-19 Thread goutham vasireddi
Hi I would like to create this scenario on running a maven project: Do you want to enter module-name? ( Y / N) (on entering Y , i should ask for the parameter) *Y module-name: nameofthename * (on entering N , i should terminate the asking process and the rest of the project build should be

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread John Casey
+1 Great idea! On 6/18/11 10:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: If no one objects to this idea, I'd like to add a component, which is an email like the following to the user list. --snip-- Dear Maven Users, Over the years, the JIRA for core Maven (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG) has

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Is there any smart way to tag a bug as processed in a triaging process so we can focus on the remaining bugs? I've always wondered if there's any option to tag an issue or create shared custom lists...? K Den 19. juni 2011 kl. 18:42 skrev John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org: +1 Great idea!

Re: [VOTE take 2]: release maven-changes-plugin version 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, i've checked the web site and found that the link (http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin-2.6/index.html) to the changes.xsd file does not work... Furthermore the link Cobertura Test Coverage links to the index.html page...and not to a cobertura test coverage... And a

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2011-06-19 18:46, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: Is there any smart way to tag a bug as processed in a triaging process so we can focus on the remaining bugs? I've always wondered if there's any option to tag an issue or create shared custom lists...? We should be able to use Labels for this:

Re: [VOTE take 2]: release maven-changes-plugin version 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Benson, Did you use Maven 3 to deploy the site? I recommend using Maven 2 for site deployment until we get maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-4 released. On 2011-06-19 19:00, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, i've checked the web site and found that the link

Re: [VOTE take 2]: release maven-changes-plugin version 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
1) yes. WHen I use 2 I got stumped on authentication in the deploy. 2) I can redeploy. Little did I know. I don't see any reason to rewind the vote. I'll redeploy. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Benson, Did you use Maven 3 to deploy the site? I

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Labels are now a native feature in recent releases of Jira and they are really useful to tag issues for a need like this one. We could use them also to give a complexity level of the issue, ... The need is to define them and follow a common convention Another solution is to have a custom workflow

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:13:11 PM Dennis Lundberg wrote: On 2011-06-19 18:46, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: Is there any smart way to tag a bug as processed in a triaging process so we can focus on the remaining bugs? I've always wondered if there's any option to tag an issue or create

Re: [VOTE take 2]: release maven-changes-plugin version 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
I have redeployed using 2.x. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: 1) yes. WHen I use 2 I got stumped on authentication in the deploy. 2) I can redeploy. Little did I know. I don't see any reason to rewind the vote. I'll redeploy. On Sun, Jun 19,

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
labels seems reasonable, assuming that Codehaus deploys them. Given the positive response to this idea, I plan to send the email tomorrow some time and start on MNG. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: On Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:13:11 PM Dennis Lundberg wrote:

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Stephen Connolly
as far as I know ben made you me and brett admins... but that might be for maven stuff only... I can always bash ben on the head if we want to ;-) (our at least ask someone to bash ben on the head) - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and

Convoluted jiras

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
Since my lame attempt at humor on the last thread led to some confusion, I'll keep this relatively straight. Consider, if you please, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2258. For one thing, this report is marked as 'superceded by' another, but it's still open. What's that mean? For another, it

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Yes I am admin on the codehaus instance thus technically it is possible for now. It will be perhaps less easy when we'll be @ Apache. Arnaud On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: as far as I know ben made you me and brett admins... but that

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Arnaud Héritier
yes label are available @ Codehaus Arnaud On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote: labels seems reasonable, assuming that Codehaus deploys them. Given the positive response to this idea, I plan to send the email tomorrow some time and start on MNG.

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
We're good here. I just added the label maven-messy to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2258 as an experiment. I suggest that we use a specific label for the backlog, so: Old report, no test case: maven-backlog-cleanup New report, no testcase: maven-needs-testcase

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
All committers will have access to 'edit' issues at Apache, and that's all you need to work with labels. 2011/6/19 Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com: Yes I am admin on the codehaus instance thus technically it is possible for now. It will be perhaps less easy when we'll be @ Apache.

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Arnaud Héritier
It was about to (re-)define the workflow which requires full jira admin Arnaud On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote: All committers will have access to 'edit' issues at Apache, and that's all you need to work with labels. 2011/6/19 Arnaud Héritier

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
Yes, indeed. 2011/6/19 Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com: It was about to (re-)define the workflow which requires full jira admin Arnaud On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote: All committers will have access to 'edit' issues at Apache, and that's

Re: [VOTE take 2]: release maven-changes-plugin version 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2011-06-19 19:42, Benson Margulies wrote: 1) yes. WHen I use 2 I got stumped on authentication in the deploy. 2) I can redeploy. Little did I know. I don't see any reason to rewind the vote. I'll redeploy. Me neither. A redeploy will do nicely, thanks. I'll try to review tomorrow. On

RE: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Gavin McDonald
-Original Message- From: Kristian Rosenvold [mailto:kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 19 June 2011 7:50 PM To: 'Maven Developers List' Subject: RE: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6 Dont know if we're looking at the same jira; I see 10 issues being resolved.

RE: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6

2011-06-19 Thread Gavin McDonald
-Original Message- From: Mark Derricutt [mailto:m...@talios.com] Sent: Sunday, 19 June 2011 9:37 PM To: Maven Developers List; ga...@16degrees.com.au Subject: Re: [VOTE]: release maven-changes-plugin 2.6 I'd rather see a release with 3 bug fixes if they code base is idle than see

1.5 policy

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
http://maven.apache.org/developers/java5.html Should we update the above? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: maven-core tests fail when invoked via ant.

2011-06-19 Thread Brett Porter
Is there a reason you can't use the build.xml we've already provided for those that need to bootstrap? Hopefully that would simplify things for you. The problem you're seeing is probably related to an incorrect definition of a META-INF/plexus/components.xml file related to that SecDispatcher

Re: 1.5 policy

2011-06-19 Thread Brett Porter
IMO yep, no need to go through that much effort - we haven't supported running Maven on Java 1.4 in the core for quite some time now. On 20/06/2011, at 8:29 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: http://maven.apache.org/developers/java5.html Should we update the above?

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks for initiating this. The cleanup is something I've worked on from time to time and each time burned out before getting to the end :) It's definitely a case of many hands make light work. At the moment, we use versions to measure triage, but labels sound like a much better alternative. I

Re: Convoluted jiras

2011-06-19 Thread Brett Porter
On 20/06/2011, at 5:30 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: Since my lame attempt at humor on the last thread led to some confusion, I'll keep this relatively straight. Consider, if you please, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2258. For one thing, this report is marked as 'superceded by'

Re: Convoluted jiras

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
It's closed because I, myself, closed it today :-) On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: On 20/06/2011, at 5:30 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: Since my lame attempt at humor on the last thread led to some confusion, I'll keep this relatively straight. Consider,

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Benson Margulies
There is one critical issue open only because it was never ported to 2.0.x. Presumably that also gets closed? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: The JIRA chocolate box

2011-06-19 Thread Brett Porter
Yes. On 20/06/2011, at 11:10 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: There is one critical issue open only because it was never ported to 2.0.x. Presumably that also gets closed? - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: maven-core tests fail when invoked via ant.

2011-06-19 Thread Kasun Gajasinghe
Hi Brett, On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: The problem you're seeing is probably related to an incorrect definition of a META-INF/plexus/components.xml file related to that SecDispatcher component. You're probably pulling in a file you didn't intend to.