Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread Gerald Müllan
Hi, s:tableSuggestAjax strongly relates to s:inputSuggestAjax, so both components should be moved together. cheers, Gerald On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I'm doing the related tasks of move sandbox components that has reached the conditions to be

Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread Gerald Müllan
Hi Andrew, Will DOJO be optional for tomahawk or will promoting these components force more 3rd party library dependencies to be added to tomahawk (regarding the Ajax components)? The ajax components all have a dependency to dojo, there is no other js library involved. As long as you are

Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leonardo Uribe wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:58 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The list of components is fine. And I very much appreciate all your work on this and the tomahawk bugs you've been fixing recently. However at the risk of

[jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-1831) JSF12 UIComponentClassicTagBase.getCreated is broken, breaking t:updateActionListener

2008-03-04 Thread Simon Kitching (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Kitching resolved MYFACES-1831. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.3-SNAPSHOT Ok, now fixed. The

Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi *, if Leonardo does as discussed, we can have both the 1.1 version and 1.2 from the same branch. (I don't see why this shouldn't be possible). regards, Martin On 3/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leonardo Uribe wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:58 PM, simon [EMAIL

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-988) Problem with PPR for components with multiple HTML tags

2008-03-04 Thread Tomas Havelka (JIRA)
Problem with PPR for components with multiple HTML tags --- Key: TRINIDAD-988 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-988 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-989) InputListOfValues limitations

2008-03-04 Thread Tomas Havelka (JIRA)
InputListOfValues limitations - Key: TRINIDAD-989 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-989 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Bug Components: Components Affects Versions:

Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Marinschek schrieb: Hi *, if Leonardo does as discussed, we can have both the 1.1 version and 1.2 from the same branch. (I don't see why this shouldn't be possible). Sorry, I must have missed this as discussed discussion. Do you mean that there will be: * no use of new for-loops

Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi Simon, the three of us (Leonardo, you, me) discussed this in our component-generation discussion. @use of 1.2 constructs: yes, you are right, it should not use any 1.2 constructs (at a maximum - with reflection, so that we stay independent). Facelets does something similar. We need a 1.2

Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Marinschek schrieb: Hi Simon, the three of us (Leonardo, you, me) discussed this in our component-generation discussion. @use of 1.2 constructs: yes, you are right, it should not use any 1.2 constructs (at a maximum - with reflection, so that we stay independent). Facelets does

Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Tomahawk could add standards based portlet support for 1.2. On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:20 AM, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Simon, the three of us (Leonardo, you, me) discussed this in our component-generation discussion. @use of 1.2 constructs: yes, you are right, it should not

[jira] Commented: (ORCHESTRA-15) Orchestra in Portal Environment

2008-03-04 Thread Codrin Bojan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12574996#action_12574996 ] Codrin Bojan commented on ORCHESTRA-15: --- I got some similar error in my environment

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-990) Subforms inside table or iterator not working.

2008-03-04 Thread JIRA
Subforms inside table or iterator not working. -- Key: TRINIDAD-990 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-990 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Bug Components:

[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-990) Subforms inside table or iterator not working.

2008-03-04 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Felix Röthenbacher updated TRINIDAD-990: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Subforms inside table or iterator not

[jira] Commented: (ORCHESTRA-15) Orchestra in Portal Environment

2008-03-04 Thread Scott O'Bryan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12575053#action_12575053 ] Scott O'Bryan commented on ORCHESTRA-15: Portlet's don't have the ability to have

[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-986) EXTERNAL DIALOG FAILING TO RESIZE TO CONTENT

2008-03-04 Thread Matt Cooper (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Cooper updated TRINIDAD-986: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.6-core) 1.2.7-core

[orchestra] plans

2008-03-04 Thread Thomas Spiegl
Hi orchestra team, just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks for your effort! Are there any plans to release orchestra-core-1.1? When looking through the project I was missing ... 1) download link for orchestra-core-1.0 on http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html 2)

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi orchestra team, just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks for your effort! yep, works great! Are there any plans to release orchestra-core-1.1? When looking through the project

Re: [Tomahawk] List of components to be upgraded from sandbox to tomahawk 1.2

2008-03-04 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Martin Marinschek schrieb: Hi *, if Leonardo does as discussed, we can have both the 1.1 version and 1.2 from the same branch. (I don't see why this shouldn't be possible). One idea (of many ideas that I have to do this) is use the following layout for tomahawk trunk build core core12

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-985) Maximum date on tr:validateDateTimeRange is maximum date minus 1

2008-03-04 Thread Yee-Wah Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12575139#action_12575139 ] Yee-Wah Lee commented on TRINIDAD-985: -- 1) This demo seems to work:

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-04 Thread simon
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 20:38 +0100, Thomas Spiegl wrote: Hi orchestra team, just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks for your effort! Great - thanks for the feedback. Did you use the persistence stuff, or just the plain conversation-scoping? Are there any

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-985) Maximum date on tr:validateDateTimeRange is maximum date minus 1

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Robinson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12575155#action_12575155 ] Andrew Robinson commented on TRINIDAD-985: -- Demo works fine for me:

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-04 Thread Thomas Spiegl
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:24 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 20:38 +0100, Thomas Spiegl wrote: Hi orchestra team, just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks for your effort! Great - thanks for the feedback. Did you use the

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-987) add 'scoped-id-holder' and 'multi-scoped-id-holder' to transform.xsl and transform12.xsl

2008-03-04 Thread Jeanne Waldman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeanne Waldman resolved TRINIDAD-987. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.7-plugins add 'scoped-id-holder' and

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-991) Specify scoped-id meta data in the generated faces-config.xml file to be used by Design Time tools

2008-03-04 Thread Jeanne Waldman (JIRA)
Specify scoped-id meta data in the generated faces-config.xml file to be used by Design Time tools -- Key: TRINIDAD-991 URL:

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-985) Maximum date on tr:validateDateTimeRange is maximum date minus 1

2008-03-04 Thread Yee-Wah Lee (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12575198#action_12575198 ] Yee-Wah Lee commented on TRINIDAD-985: -- Strange. I cannot get the issue to reproduce