Sourceforge site shows countdown banner to download start, but no download ever
happens.
| Problem description | Exchange this text to describe the problem
(What does not work? What do you expect?) |
| Browser variables | Values |
| navigator.appCodeName | Mozilla |
| navigator.appName |
. They may be
ok, but they were written for older versions of the software. I don't think I'm
in a position to "coordinate the work ".
Thoughts?
Joe
Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
>On 2/14/2017 10:40 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> From
to to.
Any suggestions.
Joe Stewart
The download link with these parameters to sourceforge, is well, broken..
I expect it to work. :) I use Win7 64bit with latest IE11 and java package.
*Browser variables**Values*navigator.appCodeName Mozillanavigator.appName
Netscapenavigator.appVersion 5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0;
continue the good work.
Best,
Joe Henderson
Ann Arbor, MI
Sorry but technically the CMS publishes all committed
changes to the staging site. The only way to partition
changes is to partition your commits.
On Monday, May 19, 2014 3:17 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 05/19/2014 09:51 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 29/04/2014
, schrieb Joe Schaefer:
Sorry but technically the CMS publishes all committed
changes to the staging site. The only way to partition
changes is to partition your commits.
but which data will be published: the content of the SVN repository or
the content of the personal CMS work space?
I guess
Internal error (actually my bad I made a bad change to the svn authz file).
Please make a minor edit and try again, it should work now.
On Monday, May 19, 2014 6:53 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 05/20/2014 12:19 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
I was working on getting Tal's
Remove from this mailing list
Thanks
Jo eVanCott
Disclaimer: This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
you have received
We had to restore blogs from backups, so some of the latest
data was lost. The service is stable again, sorry for the inconvenience
this has caused.
Buildbot/CMS is still not building off commit-triggers with no predictable ETA,
but we're hoping the resolution will come in days versus weeks.
In a nutshell the message you are trying to approve
has only a single HTML mime component and your
list is configured to strip that component, leaving
an empty message which ezmlm refuses to deliver.
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:42 PM, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I
CMS is not working at this point, sorry. Please be patient
while we debug.
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:04 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 4/22/14 4:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
CMS appears to be back up.
Blog is down.
Just got a report that downloads were timing out.
Ah NO. Those so-called phantom committers
had their commit to this projext revoked when you graduated
to a TLP, but the larger point that Greg's making
remains true- it is a false sense of security to
rely on ACL's to pretend you don't need to vet your
commit list. See
FWLIW, passive users of Apache projects generally expect
and get very little direct say in what features
get actively developed and put back into the project.
OTOH, people who actively contribute, by either supplying
patches, or filing quality and timely bug reports with
enough details for some
3 days I'd say is fine. There is no
need to rush out and fix a broken trunk,
no matter what the rationale may be.
From: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:32 PM
Subject:
The PMC decides whether or not an expressed
veto is valid or not. But generally speaking,
vetos should not be either thrown around willy-
nilly nor should they be challenged every time
they are issued.
It's all part of how we work, this recent episode
should be considered a learning experience
Honestly I'd say that if anything is clear,
it's that changing away from the status quo
currently enjoys zero consensus.
As a Ph.D. mathematician who knows about Bourbaki,
all I can say is that line of argument is curious
here. There are no authorities other than the spec
to turn to about how
OTOH I haven't seen anyone issue a technical
veto on this change, which is really what's
required before Pedro actually needs to revert
anything.
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org dev@openoffice.apache.org; Pedro Giffuni
13, 2013 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Calc behavior: result of 0 ^ 0
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
OTOH I haven't seen anyone issue a technical
veto on this change, which is really what's
required before Pedro actually needs to revert
anything.
I
deliberations
about what the right value is for POWER(0,0)
unless you insist in supporting the evaluation
of polynomialexpressions using the POWER
function.
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent
Yes editing svn:log revprops
is admissible and done routinely.
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: missing commit log
Hi Carl,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at
Hm, looks like it didn't recover
properly from a reboot action.
Should be up now.
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 7:07 AM
Subject: Bugzilla down
Hi,
FYI bugzilla has been down
1 or 2 is the easiest to accomplish:
just alter the regexps in path.pm to ignore
those directories (you'll need a negative pattern
so be sure to test it before applying).
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Friday, December
Your change to the authz file goes into effect
immediately- it's just that the scripts that
service the committer-index URLs are cronned
to run only a few times a day.
From: Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Sunday,
24 matches
Mail list logo
