Re: Building on Windows

On 2/2/2016 9:25 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: OpenGrok looks and sounds like something I should learn about. I think my next step is to look into the state of python. Matters may have been complicated because I did a

Query on C++ UCB XInteractionHandler interface - is it possible to have/write a non-UI-based interface to respond on?

Hi, I'm looking at coding a pet C++ project to use the Content Brokers provided by the UCB/UNO subsystem. I note that the XInteractionHandler-derived classes can be used to handle responses to supply e.g. user/pswd details for Authentication etc. >From a class diagram I've found, it

Re: Possible difference between RPM and DEB OO instaals

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 06:08:12 -0500 > Carl Marcum wrote: > > > On 02/01/2016 12:27 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > A thread on en-Forum suggests that there may be a difference, perhaps > even a bug,

Re: Building on Windows

On 2/2/2016 4:34 PM, Greg Bullock wrote: On 2/1/2016 3:33 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: ... Thanks for looking into it. It appears to probably be, ultimately, an issue with TortoiseSVN mangling line endings. I am redoing the checkout using Cygwin's command line svn. Once that is done, I'll

Re: Building on Windows

python had apparently not been built. I don't know why. I was able to get the build going again with "build --all:python". It is now making progress, but from time-to-time I get this sort of failure: ==

RE: Building on Windows

The line-ending business is a mess. The normal approach with SVN and Tortoise SVN is to set the system to bring platform-dependent line breaks to the working folder on check-out and updates and to use the standard on-repository (LF = NL, no CR) on check-ins. This is by file type (wildcard)

RE: Building on Windows

+1 Yep, there it is. Thanks Greg > -Original Message- > From: Greg Bullock [mailto:g...@nwra.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 18:54 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Building on Windows > > > > On 2/2/2016 4:37 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: [ ... ] > > I found

Re: Building on Windows

Thanks. On 2/1/2016 11:50 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: According to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19641685/java-jni-jawt-error-unresolved-external-symbol-imp-jawt-getawt8 you're using a 64 bit JDK instead of a 32 bit one. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Patricia Shanahan

Re: Building on Windows

Thanks. Now I get to: = Building module pyuno = Entering /cygdrive/c/OpenOfficeDev/Trunk/main/pyuno/source/module mkout -- version: 1.8 dmake: makefile.mk: line 56: Error: -- Include file pyversion.mk, not found On 2/2/2016 4:18 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: For

Re: Building on Windows

OpenGrok[1] tells me the pyversion.mk file is in main/python; through building it would get delivered to main/solver/... and found by pyuno. Did python not build before pyuno did? pyuno/prj/build.lst lists a dependency on python when PYTHON is defined[2]: bgpupyuno : stoc cpputools

Re: Building on Windows

I've documented this gotcha on both https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Thanks. > > > On 2/1/2016 11:50 PM,

Re: Building on Windows

For me, main/icu fails to build on Windows about 50% of the time for no apparent reason; I've begun to think it's some sort of build race condition within that module. I haven't seen the buildbots fail there, and nobody else has reported this problem. If this is your problem, the only fix I know

Re: Possible difference between RPM and DEB OO instaals

On 02/01/2016 12:27 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: A thread on en-Forum suggests that there may be a difference, perhaps even a bug, between the RPM and DEB linux installs. In /Tools /Options /OpenOffice : General, there is an option to switch between OO file dialogues and O.S. file dialogues.

Re: Building on Windows

Good. My latest error is: NMAKE : fatal error U1073: don't know how to make '".\..\..\lib\icuin.lib"' Stop. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\PROGRA~2\MICROS~1.0\VC\bin\nmake.exe' : return code '0x2' Stop. dmake: Error code 2, while making './wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_icu' I am

Re: Building on Windows

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > OpenGrok looks and sounds like something I should learn about. > > I think my next step is to look into the state of python. Matters may have > been complicated because I did a "dmake clean" after changing my configure >

Re: Building on Windows

OpenGrok looks and sounds like something I should learn about. I think my next step is to look into the state of python. Matters may have been complicated because I did a "dmake clean" after changing my configure parameters to use a 32 bit JDK, before continuing the steps from configure on.

Re: Building on Windows

On 2/2/2016 4:37 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 2/2/2016 4:34 PM, Greg Bullock wrote: On 2/1/2016 3:33 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: ... Thanks for looking into it. It appears to probably be, ultimately, an issue with TortoiseSVN mangling line endings. I am redoing the checkout using

Re: Let's fix the Windows build bots

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 04:48:17 +0200 Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > This still isn't working: I've changed > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/create-ooo-snapshots-index.sh > but

Re: Possible difference between RPM and DEB OO instaals

On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 06:08:12 -0500 Carl Marcum wrote: > On 02/01/2016 12:27 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > A thread on en-Forum suggests that there may be a difference, perhaps even > > a bug, between the RPM and DEB linux installs. > > > > In /Tools /Options /OpenOffice :