with
configuration factory service even?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Tenant-Implementation-in-Sling-tp4031217p4039070.html
Sent from the Sling - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
to ConfigAdmin as well so that an osgi service
could have different configurations for different tenants, just like we have
based on run-modes?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Tenant-Implementation-in-Sling-tp4031217p4038579.html
Sent from the Sling
Hi all,
Is there any support added to ConfigAdmin as well so that an osgi service
could have different configurations for different tenants, just like we have
based on run-modes?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Tenant-Implementation-in-Sling
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Andreas Schaefer Sr. schaef...@me.com wrote:
...it might a good idea to add the getSearchPathExtension() to the Tenant...
Shouldn't that rather be called getAdditionalSearchPaths?
In Sling, extension means the .html at the end of a URL, IMO we
should avoid
I still like my TenantAware approach :) as by this you explicitely mark
your component to handle things Tenant specific.
Do you mean with that that we place the Tenant on a Thread Local which then can
be obtained from the Servlet Resolver?
If so do you intent to place the Tenant into the
Ok, will adjust the wiki page.
- Andy
On Feb 25, 2014, at 1:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Andreas Schaefer Sr. schaef...@me.com
wrote:
...it might a good idea to add the getSearchPathExtension() to the Tenant...
Shouldn't that
I think using a thread local is an implementation detail and TenantAware
has a single method like
TenantResolver getTenantResolver()
while TenantResolver has a single method
Tenant getCurrentTenant()
(Don't quote me on the names, its just the first option which came to my
mind)
And then
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Andreas Schaefer Sr. schaef...@me.com wrote:
...My confluence name is ‘schaefera’
Ok, I have added you to the sling-contributors group, you should now
have write access to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
BTW I saw that there is a page called
Hi
Thanks. I’ll created the page here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Multitenancy+Support+Integration
and also created a ticket for it here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3414
- Andy
On Feb 24, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
Hi Carsten
Even if a Search Path Extension is not used outside of the Tenants I still
think it would be great to keep things separate. Based on my tests if the
Search Path Extension is set when the Resource Resolver of a request is created
and the Servlet resolver’s own Resource Resolver is
If you want the method to get the search paths extensions to be on the
resource resolver and make it independent of a tenant, then why do we need
this method at all?
In the case of a tenant getSearchPath would return the normal search path
with the tenant specific one prepended.
Carsten
If we have the search path extension separate and it is settable we do the
following with it:
1) We can set it with a Servlet Filter instead of having it to hook into the
Engine
2) In the Servlet Resolver the Search Path that did deliver the Servlet can be
used in order to manage the cache.
Right, 2) and also 3) are good reasons to keep it separate. I think it
makes sense to link the search path extension somehow to the tenant.
In the old proposal (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Multitenancy+Support) we
suggested to have a special method on the resource resolver
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Andreas Schaefer Sr. schaef...@me.com wrote:
...I started to look into how to add tenant support to Sling
I haven't looked at the details but my feeling is that tenant means
different things to different people, so it would be good to have a
list of use
Hi Carsten
First I want to clarify that the Search Path Extension has nothing to do with
Tenants per se but is a “per-call” extension of the search path which could be
used without tenants.In order to make the overlays work the Search Path
Extension must be set early on. For this part the
Hi
Yeah, I can do that. My confluence name is ‘schaefera’.
BTW I saw that there is a page called Multitenancy Support” which talks about
the Tenant. I would like to create a page called Multitenancy Integration”
where I would talk about how to use Tenants within Sling.
- Andy
On Feb 21,
Hi Andy,
I'm not sure if we need search path extensions which are not related to
tenants.
The adaption to a tenant does not tie it to the resource resolver module,
the adapter factory can live in the tenant module and therefore the
resource resolver module is totally unaware of tenant handling.
Hi
I started to look into how to add tenant support to Sling.
This is my test scenario:
I have an /apps/foo/bar/html.esp and a /apps/tenant1/foo/bar/html.esp and a
/content/mynode entry. The title of the second html.esp is different so that I
know which one is loaded.
Changes to the code:
Sorry, I forgot to mention that the Search Path Extension is prepended to the
Search Path when it is requested (in the Resource Resolver).
- Andy
On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Andreas Schaefer Sr. schaef...@me.com wrote:
Hi
I started to look into how to add tenant support to Sling.
This
Hi Andy,
this sounds interesting - and I guess a patch would be great. Now I just
would like to present my idea again - just for the sake of discussion :)
I think over time there will be more components than just the servlet
resolver which make use of the tenant and the extended search path, so
Hi
I am working for a client which needs support for tenants and because the
current implementation of the Tenants in Sling is just that but no integration
I started to code a workaround. For now I have a patch that does the trick but
it is not clean because I use a Servlet Filter to place the
Hi Andy,
Thank you for bringing this up. I have a similar requirement.
I don’t see any way of integrating Tenants other than patching Servlet
Resolver. This is what I had done for my customer but for a really specific
case (they are not truly multi-tenant).
I also had to use ThreadLocal. I
22 matches
Mail list logo
