Re: Struts2 JSF Integration Proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Dakota Jack
at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Struts2 JSF Integration Proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Dakota Jack
] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Struts2 JSF Integration Proposal

2006-08-08 Thread Dakota Jack
] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [jira] Created: (WW-1388) Shopping Cart Example throws HTTP 500

2006-07-20 Thread Dakota Jack
it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts

2006-07-01 Thread Dakota Jack
] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts

2006-06-30 Thread Dakota Jack
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts

2006-06-30 Thread Dakota Jack
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts

2006-06-30 Thread Dakota Jack
] - Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2ยข/min or less. -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts

2006-06-30 Thread Dakota Jack
] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts

2006-06-30 Thread Dakota Jack
over 1 million songs.Try it free. -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts

2006-06-30 Thread Dakota Jack
to reinvent it! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Action as Struts

2006-06-30 Thread Dakota Jack
? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-24 Thread Dakota Jack
] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
-Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
? -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
developer already has to know about, rather than adding abstraction layers so I can be agnostic about the front controller that is under the covers. Don Craig -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
. Frank - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-22 Thread Dakota Jack
to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: SAF2 JSF Support (was Re: Does Struts ...)

2006-06-21 Thread Dakota Jack
it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [action2] Combining JSF and SAF2

2006-05-21 Thread Dakota Jack
. Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [action2] Combining JSF and SAF2

2006-05-21 Thread Dakota Jack
it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [action2] Combining JSF and SAF2

2006-05-21 Thread Dakota Jack
This post shows who the limited person is. It is you, Ma'am. On 5/21/06, Kimani Darisha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh wonderful, more comments from the list idiot. K. On 5/21/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who wants these frameworks combined? This is what has been killing Struts

Re: [action2] Combining JSF and SAF2

2006-05-21 Thread Dakota Jack
, and is only here to confuse people. K. On 5/21/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have seen no very popular need. This is like Bush-Speak. Baloney parading as truth. On 5/21/06, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After talking with several on this list about the possibility

Re: [action2] Combining JSF and SAF2

2006-05-21 Thread Dakota Jack
: From: Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are right, for once. I only speak for myself. Those who are unwilling to listen to others are condemned by their own choice to a life of ignorance. Sheese, sorry this got your panties in a bunch. On 5/21/06, Kimani Darisha wrote: To anyone

Re: [action2] Combining JSF and SAF2

2006-05-21 Thread Dakota Jack
not belong. Anyone who brings JSF to Struts cannot be working on too much voltage. On 5/21/06, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course you aren't, Gary, because my panties are not in a bunch. You are the one with his panties in a bunch because you

Re: [action2] Combining JSF and SAF2

2006-05-21 Thread Dakota Jack
cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [action2] Combining JSF and SAF2

2006-05-21 Thread Dakota Jack
it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [action][Proposal] Architecture plan for Struts Action 2.0

2006-05-07 Thread Dakota Jack
. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Dear trolls...

2006-05-03 Thread Dakota Jack
This is silly, whomever you are. On 5/3/06, netsql [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and that is why you will kill me last? :-0 .V Dakota Jack wrote: At least you are civil. That part is good. - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: Dear trolls...

2006-05-02 Thread Dakota Jack
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Dear trolls...

2006-05-02 Thread Dakota Jack
Dakota Jack wrote: What is amazing to me is that the people who are called trolls are only those in some way contrary to the status quo. Others in favor of the status quo who do nothing but use invective and display 10 year old conduct are never mentioned. They are used by the powers

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-27 Thread Dakota Jack
oversees Shale, Tiles, and SAF 1. WebWork is not the only project here. /snip -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-27 Thread Dakota Jack
morning for me, and I do not feel like just lurking as usual. :) I will understand if you all think less of me for this utterly juvenile email. I think less of me too. Today is not a good self-control day. :( On 4/27/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People do not do work around here

Re: Tea Time with the Trolls (Was: Re: Proposal for change)

2006-04-27 Thread Dakota Jack
actually have a point. All the rhetoric about the Apache Way is not useful or productive. /snip -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Dear trolls...

2006-04-27 Thread Dakota Jack
a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-26 Thread Dakota Jack
is brought on for Shale and not for Struts. On 4/25/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/25/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the kind of stupid, assinine comment What is stupid or assinine about pointing out that your count is incorrect? It *is* incorrect. You counted

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
shall we. ... for our committers to use on open source projects... What part of that says anything about personal gain? -- James Mitchell On Apr 25, 2006, at 12:50 AM, Dakota Jack wrote: Isn't this using the committer status for personal gain? On 4/23/06, Ted Husted [EMAIL

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Proposal for change

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/25/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is a case in point: I count four (4) posts to the dev list in Greg Reddin's history. Pity you can't count. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?w=2r=1s=greg.reddinq=a -- Martin Cooper He

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
? -- James Mitchell On Apr 25, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Dakota Jack wrote: We can advertise our wares here? I did not know that. I thought this list was about Struts and not about Ted's business. But, excuse me. I should have known that Craig was not the exception in using the list

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-25 Thread Dakota Jack
] wrote: Yep, I agree. You wouldn't believe the commission percentage that Craig gets whenever he sells a free copy of Java Studio Creator. I'm impressed that you noticed that toowow. -- James Mitchell On Apr 25, 2006, at 7:50 AM, Dakota Jack wrote: There is a big difference between

Re: Agitator Licenses for Struts Committers

2006-04-24 Thread Dakota Jack
. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Struts Faces - what to do?

2006-04-14 Thread Dakota Jack
. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [action1] cleaning up the build

2006-04-14 Thread Dakota Jack
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Fwd: Action/Shale/JSF Overlap? (Was -- RESTful JSF)

2006-04-10 Thread Dakota Jack
interceptors without having to rewrite everything. This is a good discussion, and I hope it can continue and be a benefit to both communities. Don Craig -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Action/Shale/JSF Overlap? (Was -- RESTful JSF)

2006-04-09 Thread Dakota Jack
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [OT] What can I do?

2006-03-20 Thread Dakota Jack
in the gaps left by the servlet platform /snip -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-20 Thread Dakota Jack
to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-20 Thread Dakota Jack
Following is a sample implementation of a real CoR pattern. Notice how different it looks? Notice how data driven it is? On 2/18/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dakota Jack wrote: The flexibility is clear. But, from what I can see the pattern is not CoR. Ok, I'll bite

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-19 Thread Dakota Jack
] - On 2/18/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dakota Jack wrote: The flexibility is clear. But, from what I can see the pattern is not CoR. Ok, I'll bite... can you explain that? Frank On 2/16/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig McClanahan wrote

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-19 Thread Dakota Jack
. ~Dakota Jack

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-19 Thread Dakota Jack
. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-19 Thread Dakota Jack
that this is NOT the API design in commons chain. The Command, hopefully, but NOT, would be part of a command pattern. ChainBase, NOT Command, hopefully, but NOT, would be part of a chain pattern. -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-18 Thread Dakota Jack
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-15 Thread Dakota Jack
/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-15 Thread Dakota Jack
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Struts offers Shale for JSF

2005-12-17 Thread Dakota Jack
and accepts that it is the right thing to do because of how he feels. On 12/16/05, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI Dakota Jack is a troll. Please don't encourage him, even if you agree with his position. sean On 12/16/05, Patrick Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This sounds

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Struts offers Shale for JSF

2005-12-16 Thread Dakota Jack
but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Struts offers Shale for JSF

2005-12-16 Thread Dakota Jack
that Struts has many sub-projects, and two major frameworks: an Action framework and a Component framework. Patrick On 12/16/05, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With some people like Craig McClanahan delivering talks at significant conferences entitled with contrary ideas like

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Struts offers Shale for JSF

2005-12-16 Thread Dakota Jack
: an Action framework and a Component framework. Patrick On 12/16/05, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With some people like Craig McClanahan delivering talks at significant conferences entitled with contrary ideas like Is Shale the next Struts, you might excuse people

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Struts offers Shale for JSF

2005-12-15 Thread Dakota Jack
but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Clarification on Shale Framewok

2005-11-30 Thread Dakota Jack
-Thanks Jeevan - Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack

Re: site/build/DRAFTS.txt

2005-11-26 Thread Dakota Jack
announcement about that too. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merger with WebWork

2005-11-25 Thread Dakota Jack
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of StrutsTags by FrankZammetti

2005-11-25 Thread Dakota Jack
PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Struts 1.3 Naming

2005-11-05 Thread Dakota Jack
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Struts 1.3 Naming

2005-11-04 Thread Dakota Jack
Yahoo: fzammetti MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Struts 1.3 Naming

2005-11-04 Thread Dakota Jack
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~

Re: Web Framework Consolidation

2005-10-27 Thread Dakota Jack
to navigate to other pages (and to run app-level code that your pages shouldn't know about). It fits nicely, and in a lot of ways it's like using JSP as your view tier... only with much more capable pages. Rich Dakota Jack wrote: Bolting JSF onto Struts makes no sense. They are simply

Re: Web Framework Consolidation

2005-10-15 Thread Dakota Jack
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack

Re: [OT] RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts Committer: Gary vanMatre

2005-08-26 Thread Dakota Jack
making at least a cursory check. Anyway, your suggestion is clearly mistaken. On 8/25/05, David Durham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dakota Jack wrote: First, comparing Struts and JSF is like comparing C++ and Visual Basic. Struts is REQUEST-DRIVEN MVC and JSF (Shale) is PAGE CENTRIC RAD (rapid

Re: [OT] RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts Committer: Gary vanMatre

2005-08-24 Thread Dakota Jack
. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Shale Volunteers (was Re: [OT] RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT])

2005-08-24 Thread Dakota Jack
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts Committer: Gary vanMatre

2005-08-22 Thread Dakota Jack
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts Committer: Gary vanMatre

2005-08-22 Thread Dakota Jack
Engineer / Open Source Evangelist Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance EdgeTech, Inc. http://www.edgetechservices.net/ 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx Yahoo: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: jmitchtx On Aug 22, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Dakota Jack wrote: Just wondering

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-20 Thread Dakota Jack
not always be helpful, but it's perfectly natural :) Frank Dakota Jack wrote: I have to agree personally with Rod Johnson J2EE without EJBs, Spring framework architect, etc., when he says that Shale is merely a stopgap and that Struts as we know it is simply incompatible

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

2005-08-17 Thread Dakota Jack
. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

2005-08-17 Thread Dakota Jack
, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

2005-08-17 Thread Dakota Jack
. HTH, Ted. On 8/17/05, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is Ted's 2002 offering: you will see that this has nothing to do with stripping .x. I think, further, that what Ted is talking about originated with Hubert Rabago, although I am not suggesting that Ted is suggesting otherwise

Re: JSF vs. Struts

2005-08-11 Thread Dakota Jack
tell people about it and try and convince them. That's hype. It may not always be helpful, but it's perfectly natural :) Frank Dakota Jack wrote: I have to agree personally with Rod Johnson J2EE without EJBs, Spring framework architect, etc., when he says that Shale is merely

Re: [Proposal] Struts Ti

2005-08-04 Thread Dakota Jack
of interest. Good show! -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of ShaleReleasePlans by CraigMcClanahan

2005-07-30 Thread Dakota Jack
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How about including Struts controls/dialogs library into core Struts?

2005-06-27 Thread Dakota Jack
it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 1.3 ETA

2005-06-15 Thread Dakota Jack
good is there in these sorts of mean exchanges? -- You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back. ~Dakota Jack~ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

  1   2   3   >