Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Henri Gomez
AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new systems and new webapps. That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and it's sad. How could it be accomplished, may be via a master tomcat

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new systems and new webapps. That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and it's sad. How could it be

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Peter Rossbach
Here my wishes list: a) Clearer/better Loadbalancing Algo - better understanding of domain/partition based strategy ( I have detect some problemes here) - busy strategy - http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138 - real load strategy ( ask tomcats before balance the

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new systems and new webapps. That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and it's sad. How could it be accomplished, may be

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Costin Manolache
Yes, this is a valid case, but as I said, I think it could be added without breaking binary compatibility. But if we just can't find one - I think it would be far better to use a real protocol, with some build-in extensibility - rather than invent our own brand-new protocol or ( even worse ) patch

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Costin Manolache
On 10/25/05, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: DBUS is a good example in IMO - I'm not saying to use their impl, which doesn't fit, just the protocol spec. The major power of AJP protocol is known-header-name indexing, and IMHO there is no other protocol that is

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM Subject: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5 Questions since some interesting ideas have popped up with respect to the next flavor of AJP... firstoff, who holds

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Costin Manolache
I tought some time ago AJP was 'deprecated' - to be replaced with plain HTTP and mod_proxy ? Costin On 10/24/05, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List dev@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:11 PM Subject: Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5 I tought some time ago AJP was 'deprecated' - to be replaced with plain HTTP and mod_proxy

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-24 Thread Costin Manolache
I see. Sorry, I've been sleeping for quite a while, I'm slowly getting up to speed with the latest developments. Are you saying that mod_proxy_ajp is significantly faster than mod_proxy ? That's interesting. To answer your question - ajp10 and ajp11 were used in JServ, developed in Apache. Ajp12