Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Henri Gomez
AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new systems and new webapps. That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and it's sad. How could it be accomplished, may be via a master tomcat

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new systems and new webapps. That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and it's sad. How could it be

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Peter Rossbach
Here my wishes list: a) Clearer/better Loadbalancing Algo - better understanding of domain/partition based strategy ( I have detect some problemes here) - busy strategy - http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138 - real load strategy ( ask tomcats before balance the

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Remy Maucherat
Henri Gomez wrote: AJP 1.5 should support automatic discovery of tomcat backend, new systems and new webapps. That's the current need for many of us when adding tomcats / webapp behind Apache 2 webservers. In such case we need to restart them and it's sad. How could it be accomplished, may be

Form Authentication

2005-10-25 Thread Patrick Dalla Bernardina
Hi, I'm using tomcat as my java web application server. I'm having a problem with FORM login config. As I've seen in tomcat source code, FormAuthenticator.java is responsible for this kind of authentication. FormAuthenticator saves a request to a protected resource, redirects to form login

solicit some interest in fixing bug 36847 (PatchAvailable)

2005-10-25 Thread Haroon Rafique
Hi, Can I solicit some interest from the tomcat developers to fix a rather trivial (yet annoying) bug which has an easy fix available? The bug in question is: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36847 Thanks in advance, -- Haroon Rafique [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34654] - ZipException when using tag in deployer

2005-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34654. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28222] - getRequestURL() in forwarded jsp/servlet doesn't return new url

2005-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28222. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Costin Manolache
Yes, this is a valid case, but as I said, I think it could be added without breaking binary compatibility. But if we just can't find one - I think it would be far better to use a real protocol, with some build-in extensibility - rather than invent our own brand-new protocol or ( even worse ) patch

Re: Status/Authority of AJP/1.5

2005-10-25 Thread Costin Manolache
On 10/25/05, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: DBUS is a good example in IMO - I'm not saying to use their impl, which doesn't fit, just the protocol spec. The major power of AJP protocol is known-header-name indexing, and IMHO there is no other protocol that is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37242] New: - Tomcat insert header info into javascript code

2005-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37242] - Tomcat insert header info into javascript code

2005-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37242] - Tomcat insert header info into javascript code

2005-10-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Bea give us a Admin Console?

2005-10-25 Thread Sriram N
--- Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Rossbach wrote: Has everyone more information about this bea admin console project: http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=pr01542.htmFP=/content/news_events/press_releases/2005 Since I can not recall that there was an discussion on