On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
...
The proposed 8.0.15 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.14
Yee-haw.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed 8.0.14 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.14
Looks good to me. Mostly NIO tested on home-brewed app.
Yoav
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
...
The proposed 8.0.5 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.5 (alpha)
[ X ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.0.5 (beta)
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.5 (stable)
Works
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.4 release is now available for voting.
The main changes since 8.0.3 are:
- Update Eclipse JDT compiler to enable full Java 8 support for JSPs in
the default configuration
- Add new,
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.52 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.52/
The Maven staging repo is:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed 8.0.3 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.3 (alpha)
[ X ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.0.3 (beta)
[ ] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.3 (stable)
Looking
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.1 release is now available for voting.
The proposed 8.0.1 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.1 (alpha)
[ X ] Beta - go ahead and release as
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Rossen Stoyanchev
rstoyanc...@gopivotal.com wrote:
I can confirm that the issue with the empty Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header
also affects Chrome 31.0.1650.63.
I haven't tested 8.0.0 myself yet, but if it's broken on Chrome 31,
that's a far bigger problem than
Others have mostly captured the pros and cons, so mine is brief...
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
I've been using Git more and more for Tomcat development and was
wondering what folks thought about moving Tomcat to git. This isn't a
formal proposal or a
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed 8.0.0-RC5 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC5 alpha
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.45 release is now available for voting.
This release candidate contains JSR-356 Java WebSocket 1.0 implementation.
Note that use of this functionality requires Java 7.
It can be
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that
Konstantin Preißer has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
Welcome ;)
Yoav
In addition to a number of high quality bug reports and patches,
Konstantin
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.43 release is now available for voting.
This release candidate contains JSR-356 Java WebSocket 1.0 implementation.
Note that use of this functionality requires Java 7.
It can be
Browsing http://tomcat.apache.org and clicking on the links in the
left-hand menu's Download section, e.g. this one for Tomcat 7.0, leads
to a broken page: http://tomcat.apache.org/download-70.cgi.
Problem running mirror.cgi; if it persists, contact infrastruct...@apache.org.
In the meantime,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 1 is now available
for voting.
The proposed 8.0.0-RC1 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC1 alpha
Yoav
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.42 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.42/
The Maven staging repo is:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.40 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.40/
The Maven staging repo is:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.39 release is now available for voting.
The proposed 7.0.39 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.39 Stable
The usual home-brewed app testing, no
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.37 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.37/
The Maven staging repo is:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.35 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.35/
The Maven staging repo is:
Nice!
Thanks,
Yoav
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Remy Maucherat r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I ported a valve providing mod_rewrite functionality (most of it) for
Tomcat 8, and committed it in the sandbox. This could be easily placed
in the main repository, where it would provide an
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
The Maven staging repo is:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.32 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.32/
The Maven staging repo is:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
I now have my proposed alternative resources implementation complete to
the point where it is worth comitting somewhere for others to comment
on. I therefore, propose the following way forward:
+1 to the plan. I've read
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.26 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.26/
The Maven staging repo is:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, took a bit to get the Apr polling to work and add some minimal tests.
Please take another look - in particular to
https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java
The
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
All,
There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
1. scp+rsync via people.a.o
2. Nexus
I don't have a strong preference between them. Is there a difference
between the two approaches in how fast
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:30 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.35/
According to the release process, the 6.0.35 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_35 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.20 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.20/
The svn tag is:
Meta: +1 to starting this thread and its thinking this early.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Therefore, after the next Tomcat 7 release, I would like to do the
following:
- Copy tomcat/trunk to tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk
- Start making Servlet API changes to
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.18 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.18/
The svn tag is:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.16 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.16/
The svn tag is:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed 7.0.14 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Alpha
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Beta
[ X ] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Stable
Yoav
That's really cool, Mark. I'm glad you're doing this.
I know we all have our doubts about scanning tools like this. But my
main issue with them is always so many false positives that it feels
hopeless. You seem to have fixed that.
Thanks,
Yoav
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Mark Thomas
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.10 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.10/
The svn tag is:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.7 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.7/
The svn tag is:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:37 PM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/
According to the release process, the 6.0.32 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_32 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Jason Brittain
jason.britt...@mulesource.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:18 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
According to the release process, the 6.0.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_30 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X ]
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The current Manager implementations have slightly different definitions
of 'active session' that I would like to make consistent in 7.0.x (and
maybe backport to 6.0.x)
snip /
I intend to make the following changes unless
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:56 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/19/2010 06:33 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/
According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
I'm teaching a Tomcat course today and tomorrow and one of the students
raised the question why is the default host called localhost? The implied
relationship to 127.0.0.1 was causing confusion. That got me thinking:
1. Is
I thought I voted Beta as well before I left on vacation last week --
maybe that was for the RC4 instead? Anyways, happy to see it out.
Congrats ;)
Yoav
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Sorry for the delay. Work got in the way for a few days.
I am
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
All,
The next Tomcat 7.0.0 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC4
can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.0-RC4/
The svn tag is:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 17/05/2010 22:31, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first
blog post. It can be previewed here
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first
blog post. It can be previewed here:
http://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomcat/?previewEntry=apache_tomcat_7_released
Suggestions for improvements
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
Allow C-T-R for changes to svn properties:
[ ] +1
[ X ] 0
Allow C-T-R for any whitespace changes:
[ ] +1
[ X ] 0
Allow C-T-R for trivial fixes to English messages that are in resource files
and those that
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 is:
[ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
I don't
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:56 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
My usual testing
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.29 is:
[ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
I'm a
Please see Justin's proposal below for the Incubator. (From a
general, public list.)
I think it'd be great for Tomcat to do the same. Your thoughts / votes?
Yoav
-- Forwarded message --
From: Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:57 AM
Subject:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:25 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/
According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
I did not run the
I kind of liked what you did, replacing the hard-coded numbers with
tags / tokens. But I don't feel strongly enough about it either way,
so +0 to what you did ;)
Yoav
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Konstantin gave some arguments, why the use of
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 14/01/2010 14:23, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.23/
According to the release process, the 6.0.23 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X]
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Tim
Whittington has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
Please join me in welcoming him.
Welcome aboard, Tim ;)
Yoav
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
[ X ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Yoav
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/6 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does
contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the
whole archive CTR. On the rare occassions where someone wishes to make a
change to code
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
I think we have kept the backwards compatibility option for long enough.
Given the security implications I'd like to deprecate it for Tomcat 6
and remove it for Tomcat 7.
+1.
Yoav
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mark Thomasma...@apache.org wrote:
Once 4.1.x is archived, there will be no release branches sharing code.
Therefore, we have the option to restructure 5.5.x to remove the use of
+1.
Yoav
-
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Tim Funk funk...@joedog.org wrote:
On a quick glance - it seems to be off of all the wikis. Including the wiki
home http://wiki.apache.org/general/
I believe that's right, and we don't need one. In general, all ASF
projects have the same Terms of Use, as
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Konstantin
Kolinko has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
Welcome aboard dude ;)
Yoav
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
devli...@hanik.com wrote:
I was thinking sometimes next week, how does that sound?
+1.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/current/tc4.1.x/STATUS.txt
needs one more vote before I can included it in 4.1.x and roll the 4.1.39
release after the 4.1.38 release was aborted.
+1.
Yoav
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gents,
I was planning on doing a beta release of the connection pool, but first
announce it for testing.
any thoughts on doing that or the process involved?
Sounds like a good idea. I don't see a need for much
Just FYI, if you're looking for more Maven information or are just
bored, which I doubt ;)
https://wiki.hubteam.com/display/Eng/Maven
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Sorry folks, obviously meant to send to another list ;)
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just FYI, if you're looking for more Maven information or are just
bored, which I doubt ;)
https://wiki.hubteam.com/display/Eng/Maven
Yoav
--
Thanks,
Yoav
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that we do have a module directory, I'd like to propose to take the
bayeux impl out of tomcat core, and put it into an individual module
reasons
1. It's built on top of Tomcat, but its not core tomcat
2. We
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_16 later today.
The current trunk has few fixes over released 1.1.15
Improved IPV6 checking, building against APR 1.3
(not mandatory, but allows to build), and one API typo.
+1.
Yoav
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to remove the invoker servlet entirely from trunk (and hence TC7.x
onwards) and deprecate it in 6.0.x.
+0. We should document it boldly and let people know before the release.
Yoav
Filip,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if there are no objections, I'll start integrating this into trunk tonight or
tomorrow,
I've read the bug in Bugzilla and looked at the code. I understand
why you want a new connection pool
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hear both of your concerns, and I will withdraw the proposal, thanks for
speaking up
These are all good comments. Is it possible to package up in a way
that core Tomcat does not depend on it, like Costin
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to create a branch of connectors
for native component so it depends on the
new APR 1.3.x API
+1.
Like Mark, I'm also OK with removal.
Yoav
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.27/
According to the release process, the 5.5.27 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ X ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Beta
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wont stop this release, there are way too many important fixes.
the only way this release wont happen, is if we don't get 3+ stable votes,
then we do another release
You don't need 3 stable votes. You need
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and easier to embed variant. I think it's time to see what can be
contributed back to tomcat main branch, what can be
released, and what needs to be retired or moved out.
Overall, a huge +1. I think this is the best
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:33 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about cutting a release candidate on Monday, Aug 18th and if all is
well, have a release towards end of next week?
+1.
Yoav
-
To
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader.java?r1=603340r2=616953pathrev=616953
Should the actual privileges work be inside the log.isTraceEnabled
check? Don't we want to do the work independent of the log level?
--
Thanks,
Yoav
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.18/
According to the release process, the 6.0.18 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
Yoav
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
I think this toolkit should
[X ] +1 include it as an independent component, I'm
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The plan is to tag it later today.
Comments ?
+1.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM, ilango_g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found the location of the bug database at ASF Bugzilla. This is a place to
start?
Yes, that's a good place to start. You will also want to read several
pages on http://www.apache.org/dev/, including How the ASF Works,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like some feedback on the contribution, before I call for a vote for
inclusion
thanks
Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
I'm happy to welcome this
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check http://people.apache.org/~costin/startup/ for a new class I
would like to add to tomcat(head), and an associated example/unit test. It
allows a jetty-like mode of programmatic loading/config of tomcat,
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't add the option - you'll see that tomcat uses a separate mbean
server. I want to have it consistent -
with or without -Dcom.sun... to use the platform mbean server.
+1 from me. Maybe add a flag to
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin told us he didn't want to change the current source layout.
I agree with Coston on this. But thankfully Maven is flexible in this
area. You can define any set of source folders.
- add subdirs (for modules)
Filip, this is a fairly rare case where I disagree with you ;)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
simply because it requires changes, I like to think we work according to
It can be done without requiring any changes.
if it aint broke, don't fix
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current build scripts are fully tested and work well. Adding
additional methods of building or replacing these scripts altogether
would only provide ways to create and/or release broken binaries.
Again, no one is
Looks good to me.
Yoav
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Please find below a draft of an announcement I intend sending to the users
list later this week. Comments?
Mark
Subject: [ANN] Tomcat support status
All,
We would like to draw
I just sent in a deny command, hopefully that will work quickly.
Yoav
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Antonio Petrelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you stop this madness?
Antonio
2008/3/6, MDaemon at qualitas.it [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not contain a
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the way Apache is structured, it is impossible to say that 3.x is no
longer supported. If three PMC members were to show an interest in
expanding it in the future (say myself, Costin, Henri), then the rest would
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the release process, the 4.1.37 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
I did limited testing on the distro (examples, etc.) as well as
deploying a home-brewed up and running scripted tests
+1.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Whilst working through a general update of the docs webapp (CATALINA_BASE
vs. CATALINA_HOME, Tomcat 5 - Tomcat 6, common/lib - lib etc) I cam
across this page.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding a note that 3.x is no longer supported / removing much of the 3.x
info from:
/index.html
/security-3.html
/whichversion.html
/bugreport.html
Thoughts?
+1.
Yoav
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 AM, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The normal way is to go through the incubator process.
Why? This is not a new project, Guy is not becoming a committer yet.
This is a code contribution from a committer and a volunteer. It's
not different in spirit than a
On Jan 31, 2008 10:06 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the release process, the 5.5.26 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
According to the release process, the 6.0.16 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 15, 2008 10:19 AM, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ X ] Make tcnative release independent from tomcat release and add the
corresponding pages in http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/
I like modularity.
Yoav
I'd vote the same given the new choice. I'm also willing to help with
putting docs up, etc.
On Jan 15, 2008 10:47 AM, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think that the tcnative releases should be
I think the difference is based on an understanding of what
constitutes a release. A tarball in www.apache.org/dist/... is a
release by definition. Files cannot go in that directory or its
children without a vote.
If they're there, they're a release. We have to vote on them or pull
them out.
1 - 100 of 475 matches
Mail list logo
