Re: Welcome committer Jake Luciani

Three cheers! On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jake Luciani jak...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jonathan and Cassandra PMC! Happy to help Cassandra take over the world! -Jake On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: The Cassandra PMC has voted to add Jake as a

Re: current stable

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: Back when I used to run postgresql, I saw the same cycle:  - most people don't bother testing until stable .0 is released  - consequently, most people don't deploy to production until .1 is released I think moving the

hinted handoff should use its own sstables

So maybe this idea has been sent around before but I would like to know what everyone thinks. We have a huge column family called bigdata let's say 200 gb a node. We have used cass* as you would expect we never read before writing and during our bulk loading we can get rates like 2000 inserts per

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.8.0 (take #3)

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Jeremy Hanna jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.comwrote: +1 non-binding fwiw - I ran some basic pig scripts that I have with 0.8 and they worked fine including using a UDF, filtering data, and outputting to Cassandra. - I also tried the pig and word_count examples in

Re: Announcements List

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:48 PM, David Boxenhorn da...@citypath.comwrote: I am not going to argue the point, because it's not really the point that I wanted to make. Maybe I'm an atypical user. The point I wanted to make is that there should be someplace for users to go to find out what's

Re: AW: interest in creating a cassandra-gossip library?

Would this help? http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1157967 On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote: Roland, I was also interested in this for very similar reasons. I was planning on working on this after tackling some of the thrift build clean

Re: ByteBuffers and StorageProxy

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Todd Burruss bburr...@expedia.com wrote: My recent bug was that I was sending a zero length ByteBuffer (because I forgot to flip) for a column name. The problem I have is that the insert was accepted by the server. Should an exception be thrown? The end

Re: Discussion: release quality

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Hanna jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.comwrote: I'd like to start a discussion about ideas to improve release quality for Cassandra. Specifically I wonder if the community can do more to help the project as a whole become more solid. Cassandra has an active and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.1.0-beta1

I have a github fork of hector that deals with the removed key and row cache settings in the column family meta data. I needed this because it helped me build hive 0.8 and c* in the same jvm. But it is useful because older Hector clients have trouble talking to 1.1 if you try anything meta data

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 1.0.8

+1 (non binding) Great that 1.0.7 had a nice shelf life, and that 1.0.8 has just a couple minor patches. On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote: Been some time since 1.0.7

Re: RFC: Cassandra Virtual Nodes

I agree having smaller regions would help the rebalencing situation both with rp and bop. However i an not sure if dividing tables across disk s will give any better performance. you will have more seeking spindles and can possibly sub divide token ranges into separate files. But fs cache will

Re: RFC: Cassandra Virtual Nodes

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Sam Overton s...@acunu.com wrote: On 19 March 2012 09:23, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: Hi Radim, The number of virtual nodes for each host would be configurable by the user, in much the same way that initial_token is configurable now. A host taking a

Re: RFC: Cassandra Virtual Nodes

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Sam Overton s...@acunu.com wrote: For OPP the problem of load balancing is more profound. Now you need vnodes per keyspace because you can not expect each keyspace to have the same distribution. With three keyspaces you are not unsure as to which was is causing

Re: RFC: Cassandra Virtual Nodes

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Eric Evans eev...@acunu.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: It's reasonable that we can attach different levels of importance to these things.  Taking a step back, I have two main points: 1) vnodes add enormous

Re: RFC: Cassandra Virtual Nodes

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Tom Wilkie t...@acunu.com wrote: Hi Edward 1) No more raid 0. If a machine is responsible for 4 vnodes they should correspond to for JBOD. So each vnode corresponds to a disk?  I suppose we could have a separate data directory per disk, but I think this

Re: RFC: Cassandra Virtual Nodes

I just see vnodes as a way to make the problem smaller and by making the problem smaller the overall system is more agile. Aka rather then 1 node streaming 100 gb the 4 nodes stream 25gb. Moves by hand are not so bad because the take 1/4th the time. The most simple vnode implementation is vmware.

Re: Document storage

Some work I did stores JSON blobs in columns. The question on JSON type is how to sort it. On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Jeremy Hanna jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com wrote: I don't speak for the project, but you might give it a day or two for people to respond and/or perhaps create a jira

Re: Document storage

The issue with these super complex types is to do anything useful with them you would either need scanners or co processors. As its stands right now complex data like json is fairly opaque to Cassandra. Getting cassandra to natively speak protobuffs or whatever flavor of the week serialization

Re: java.net.SocketException

If you are using ~[na:1.6.0_14 you should upgrade to a later 1.6 JVM before trying to troubleshoot anything else. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Chao Wang chao.w...@ericsson.com wrote: HI, Does this java.net.SocketException: No buffer space available related to cassandra? /Chao

Re: how to upgrade my cassadra from SizeTieredCompaction to LeveledCompactiom

As soon as you use the CLI to change the compaction strategy for a column family Cassandra will consider all SSTables level 0 and being level-ing them. With that much data, think hard before making the change. You have to understand how level ed will work with your workload. On Sun, May 13, 2012

Re: Welcome committers Dave Brosius and Yuki Morishita!

Congrats! On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to both of you for your help! -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support http://www.datastax.com

Re: findbugs

I am sure no one would have an issue with an optional findbugs target. On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: was any decision about findbugs made? you do not consider code style recommended by findbugs as good practice which should be followed? I can submit few

Re: maximum sstable size

I have another ticket open for this. On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: done https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4897

Re: 2.0

Good idea. Lets remove thrift, CQL3 is still beta, but I am willing to upgrade to a version that removes thrift. Then when all our clients can not connect they will be forced to get with the program. On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Jason Brown jasedbr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jonathan, I'm in

Re: Stable Hector version with cassandra 1.1.6

One thing to note. The maven repo has moved from me.prettyprint to org.Hector-client so that should aid in your searches of the maven repo. On Tuesday, December 4, 2012, Bisht, Jaikrit bis...@visa.com wrote: Hi, Could someone recommend the stable version of Hector libraries for Cassandra

Re: Compund/Composite column names

This was discussed in one of the tickets. The problem is that CQL3's sparse tables is it has different metadata that has NOT been added to thrift's CFMetaData. Thus thrift is unaware of exactly how to verify the insert. Originally it was made impossible for thrift to see a sparse table (but that

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.0-rc1

Question. 1.2.0-beta2 Why does the thrift interface have 2 CQL methods? CqlResult execute_cql_query(1:required binary query, 2:required Compression compression) throws (1:InvalidRequestException ire, 2:UnavailableException ue, 3:TimedOutException te,

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Release Apache Cassandra 1.2.0-rc1

remember reading this is the way google has suggested using protobufs, mark all fields optional always for maximum compatibility. On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.com wrote: Question. 1.2.0

Re: max_compaction_threshold removed - bad move

:( Seems like a good thing to have, i can figure at least one degenerate scenario where having that helps. The first being a currupt sstable... compaction will never be able to remove it and then each compaction will likely try to comact it again... and fail. On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:35 AM,

Re: max_compaction_threshold removed - bad move

that came from) On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.com wrote: Was the change well accounted for in the changes.TXT or the readme.txt? The news file says: CQL3 is now considered

Re: Proposal: require Java7 for Cassandra 2.0

Counter proposal java 8 and closures. Jk On Thursday, February 7, 2013, Carl Yeksigian c...@yeksigian.com wrote: +1 On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: Java 6 EOL is this month. Java 7 will be two years old when C* 2.0 comes out (July). Anecdotally, a

Re: Understanding Read and Writes During Transient States

When a node is joining/bootstrapping the ring and replication factor is 3, the write operation should be delivered to 4 nodes. The three current natural endpoints and the new one. In this way if the joining node fails to join the other nodes did not miss any writes. The joining node will not

Re: Notes from committer's meeting: overview

I am curious what you mean when you say does the fat client work right now? What does not work about it? I have a fat client app running same jvm as c* it seems to work well. On Monday, February 25, 2013, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote: Last Thursday, DataStax put together a meeting

Re: bug report - CQL3 grammar should ignore VARCHAR column length in CREATE statements

If the syntax effectively does nothing I do not see the point of adding it. CQL is never going to be 100% compatible ANSI-SQL dialect. On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Michael Kjellman mkjell...@barracuda.comwrote: Might want to create a Jira ticket at issues.apache.org instead of submitting

Re: bug report - CQL3 grammar should ignore VARCHAR column length in CREATE statements

http://www.edwardcapriolo.com/roller/edwardcapriolo/entry/schema_vs_schema_less Does your the tool handle the fact that foreign keys do not work? Or for that matter, how are your dealing with the fact that a primary key in cassandra is nothing like a primary key in a RDBMS? Generally under the

Re: bug report - CQL3 grammar should ignore VARCHAR column length in CREATE statements

different and essentially not compatible with each other. With schema and cassandra less is more. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote: http://www.edwardcapriolo.com/roller/edwardcapriolo/entry/schema_vs_schema_less Does your the tool handle the fact that foreign

Re: bug report - CQL3 grammar should ignore VARCHAR column length in CREATE statements

with SQL based ETL, refining CQL3 would be life changing and ease the transition. ap On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.edwardcapriolo.com/roller/edwardcapriolo/entry/schema_vs_schema_less Does your the tool handle the fact

Re: Bitmap indexes - reviving CASSANDRA-1472

I am not sure about the collection case. But for compact storage you can specify multiple-ranges in a slice query. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3885 I am not sure this will get you all the way to bit-map indexes but in a wide row scenario it seems like you could support a

Re: Major compaction does not seems to free the disk space a lot if wide rows are used.

This makes sense. Unless you are running major compaction a delete could only happen if the bloom filters confirmed the row was not in the sstables not being compacted. If your rows are wide the odds are that they are in most/all sstables and then finally removing them would be tricky. On Thu,

Re: CQL vs Thrift

If you understand how cql collections are written you can decode them and work with them from thrift. It's quite a chore and i would not suggest trying yo do it however. (I suspect tyler tried it and jonathan broke his hand jk) There is a perl cassandra driver that did something like this. On

Re: Fw: Fwd: CQL Thrift

This is always so hard to explain but http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/thrift-to-cql3 Get to the part that looks like this: update column family user_profiles with key_validation_class = UTF8Type and comparator = UTF8Type and column_metadata=[] Since the static column values validation types

Re: Node side processing

Check intravert on github. I am working t get many of those features into cassandra. On Thursday, February 27, 2014, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote: A few: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4914 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5184

Re: Proposal: freeze Thrift starting with 2.1.0

I am -1. For a few reasons: Cassandra will be the only database ( that I know of ) where the only official client to the database will live in source control outside of the project. I would like some clarity on this development will go on in an open source fashion. Namely: 1) Who does and how do

Re: Proposal: freeze Thrift starting with 2.1.0

PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.com wrote: If you are using thrift there probably isn't a reason to upgrade to 2.1 What? Upgrading gets you performance regardless of your api. We have already gone from no new feature talk to less enphisis on testing. How comforting

Re: Proposal: freeze Thrift starting with 2.1.0

Avro was removed. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.com wrote: With support officially deprecated that will be the only way to go. If a user wants to add a function to thrift they will have to fork off cassandra, code the function themselves write

Re: Proposal: freeze Thrift starting with 2.1.0

users when Avro was removed. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.com wrote: With support officially deprecated that will be the only way to go. If a user wants to add a function to thrift they will have to fork off cassandra, code the function

Re: Proposal: freeze Thrift starting with 2.1.0

If you are using thrift there probably isn't a reason to upgrade to 2.1 What? Upgrading gets you performance regardless of your api. We have already gone from no new feature talk to less enphisis on testing. How comforting. On Tuesday, March 11, 2014, Dave Brosius dbros...@mebigfatguy.com

Re: Proposal: freeze Thrift starting with 2.1.0

, I don't know of any use cases for Thrift that can't be done in CQL Can dynamic composites be used from CQL? On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote: +1 to Jonathan's proposal. On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Proposal: freeze Thrift starting with 2.1.0

to add features, call a vote and add language to stop them. +1 On Wednesday, March 12, 2014, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.com wrote: , I don't know of any use cases for Thrift that can't be done in CQL Can

Re: Proposal: freeze Thrift starting with 2.1.0

There was a paging bug in 2.0 and a user just reported a bug sorting a one row dataset. So if you want to argue cql has surpassed thrift in all ways, one way it clearly has not is correctness. To demonatrate, search the changelog for cql bugs that return wrong result. Then do the same search for

Re: Cassandra Java Driver and DataStax

What a fun topic. I re-joined the list just for this. As I understand, it the nature of the Apache Software Licence any corporate entity is allows to produce open and closed source software based on Apache Cassandra, however the Cassandra name is a trademark of the ASF foundation. As I under it,

Re: [RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 3.10 released

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: > The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache > Cassandra version 3.10. > > Apache Cassandra is a fully distributed database. It is the right choice > when you need scalability and high availability

Re: Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandra has no Availability on datacenter failure?

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Kant Kodali wrote: > yes agreed with this response > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:07 AM, James Carman > wrote: > > > I think folks might agree that it's not worth the time to worry about > what > > they say. The ASF

Pluggable throttling of read and write queries

Older versions had a request scheduler api. On Monday, February 20, 2017, Ben Slater > wrote: > We’ve actually had several customers where we’ve done the opposite - split > large clusters apart to separate

Re: If reading from materialized view with a consistency level of quorum am I guaranteed to have the most recent view?

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Benjamin Roth wrote: > For MVs regarding this threads question only the partition key matters. > Different primary keys can have the same partition key. Which is the case > in the example in your last comment. > > Am 10.02.2017 20:26

Re: New committers announcement

Three cheers! Hip , Hip, NotFound 1 ms later Hip, Hip, Hooray 1 ms later Hooray, Hooray, Hooray On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Congrats!! > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 at 13:37 Joaquin Casares > wrote: > > > Congratulations! >

Re: If reading from materialized view with a consistency level of quorum am I guaranteed to have the most recent view?

If you want to test the scenarios thia project would be helpful Http://github.com/edwardcapriolo/ec I use brute force at different CL and assert if i detect and consistency issues. Having mvs would be nice On Saturday, February 11, 2017, Benjamin Roth wrote: > For MVs

Re: Proposal - 3.5.1

Where did we come from? We came from a place where we would say, "You probably do not want to run 2.0.X until it reaches 2.0.6" One thing about Cassandra is we get into a situation where we can only go forward. For example, when you update from version X to version Y, version Y might start

Re: Create table with ID - Question

I have a similar set of problems. I will set the stage: in the past, for a variety of reasons I had to create tables(column families) by time range for an event processing system. The man reason was expiring data (TTL) did not purge easily. It was easier to simply truncate/drop old column

Re: Proprietary Replication Strategies: Cassandra Driver Support

I have contemplated using LocalStrategy as a "do it yourself client side sharding system". On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Vladimir Yudovin wrote: > Hi Prasenjit, > I would like to get the replication factors of the key-spaces using the > strategies in the same way we get

Re: Question on assert

ntial 5% performance win > when you've corrupted all their data. > > best, > kjellman > > > On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > There are a variety of assert usages in the Cassandra. You can find > several &

Question on assert

There are a variety of assert usages in the Cassandra. You can find several tickets like mine. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12643 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11537 Just to prove that I am not the only one who runs into these:

Re: Proposal - 3.5.1

If you all have never seen the movie "grandma's boy" I suggest it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJLQ5DHmw-U There is one funny seen where the product/project person says something like, "The game is ready. We have fixed ALL THE BUGS". The people who made the movie probably think the coders

Re: [Discuss] Adding dtest to project

I love DTest I think it is a great thing in the tool belt. One thing that I want to point out, nosettests and dtests are black-box type testing. You can not step or trace these things very easily. My dream would be if cassandra was re-entrant and it was possible to run a 3 node cluster in one JVM

Re: Proposal - 3.5.1

"The historical trend with the Cassandra codebase has been to test minimally, throw the code over the wall, and get feedback from people putting it in prod who run into issues." At the summit Brandon and a couple others were making fun over range tombstones from thrift

Re: Question on assert

Yes obviously we do not need to go in and replace them all at once. Some rough guidance/general consensus should be in place, because we are violating the standard usage: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/language/assert.html Do *not* use assertions for argument checking in

Re: #cassandra-dev IRC logging

One thing to watch out for. The way apache-gossip is setup the PR's get sent to the dev list. However the address is not part of the list so the project owners get an email asking to approve/reject every PR and comment on the PR. This is ok because we have a small quite group but you probably do

Re: #cassandra-dev IRC logging

Aug 26, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > One thing to watch out for. The way apache-gossip is setup the PR's get > > sent to the dev list. However the address is not part of the list so the > > project owners get an email asking t

Re: Github pull requests

>> I think it goes the other way around. When you push to ASF git with the right commit message then the integration from that side closes the pull request. Yes. This is how apache-gossip is setup. Someone makes a JIRA and they include a link to there branch and tell me they are done. We review

Re: Broader community involvement in 4.0 (WAS Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

was historically very poor > indeed, but is I believe much stronger today - try not to judge current > behaviours on those of the past) > > > On 5 November 2016 at 00:05, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > "I’m sure users running Cassandra in

Re: Broader community involvement in 4.0 (WAS Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

"There is also the issue of specialisation. Very few people can be trusted with review of arbitrary Cassandra patches. I can count them all on fingers of one hand." I have to strongly disagree here. The Cassandra issue tracker is over 12000 tickets. I do not think that cassandra has added 12000

Re: Broader community involvement in 4.0 (WAS Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

odds of such a thing happening. > > I’m sure users running Cassandra in production would prefer actual proper > reviews to non-review +1s. > > -- > AY > > On 4 November 2016 at 23:03:23, Edward Capriolo (edlinuxg...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > I feel that is really standing up on a soap box. What would be the worst > thing that happens here

Re: DataStax role in Cassandra and the ASF

ven > > during consultancy services I got, I’ve spoken with some people having > > records of DataStax in their resumes and even them told me "collaboration > > with them [cassandra team] was hard". Now imagine how outsider will get > any > > chance to get any cha

Re: Low hanging fruit crew

Yes. The LHFC crew should always pay it forward. Not many of us have a super computer to run all the tests, but for things that are out there marked patch_available apply it to see that it applies clean, if it includes a test run that test (and possibly some related ones in the file/folder etc for

Low hanging fruit crew

I go through the Cassandra jira weekly and I notice a number of tickets which appear to be clear issues or requests for simple metrics. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12626 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12330 I also have a few jira issues (opinion) would be

Re: Low hanging fruit crew

I realize that test passing a small tests and trivial reviews will not catch all issues. I am not attempting to trivialize the review process. Both deep and shallow bugs exist. The deep bugs, I am not convinced that even an expert looking at the contribution for N days can account for a majority

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

These tickets claim to duplicate each other: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12674 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12746 But one is marked fixed and the other is still open. What is the status here? On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:20 PM, DuyHai Doan

Re: Summary of 4.0 Large Features/Breaking Changes (Was: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any proposal to solve the problem you describe? > > -- > Jeff Jirsa > > > > On Nov 19, 2016, at 8:50 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > This is especially relevant if people wish

Re: Summary of 4.0 Large Features/Breaking Changes (Was: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

On Friday, November 18, 2016, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > We should assume that we’re ditching tick/tock. I’ll post a thread on > 4.0-and-beyond here in a few minutes. > > The advantage of a prod release every 6 months is fewer incentive to push > unfinished work into a

Re: Summary of 4.0 Large Features/Breaking Changes (Was: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

probably switch but its not stable and we have that one compact storage cf and who knows what is going to happen performance wise when) We really need to lose this realease wont be stable for 6 minor versions concept. On Saturday, November 19, 2016, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

I would like to propose features around seeds: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12627 I have other follow up issues like getting seeds from Amazon API, or from JNDI/ DNS, etc. I was hoping 12627 was an easy way to grease the wheels. On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jason Brown

Re: Moderation

Is the message in moderation because 1) it was sent by someone not registered with the list 2) some other reason (anti-spam etc) If it is is case 1: Isn't the correct process to inform and encourage someone list properly? If it is case 2: Is there an expected ETA for list moderation events?

Re: DataStax role in Cassandra and the ASF

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Kelly Sommers wrote: > I think the community needs some clarification about what's going on. > There's a really concerning shift going on and the story about why is > really blurry. I've heard all kinds of wild claims about what's going

Re: Committer access to CassCI

I will take this up at the next NYC-cassandra meetup. I have been on the fence for "charging" for events for a while, but a nice donation piece would be pretty cool if it can fuel the project. I have also joked about creating CaSETI (Search for Extra Testing Infrastructure) and building a docker

Re: Rollback procedure for Cassandra Upgrade.

On Tuesday, January 10, 2017, Romain Hardouin wrote: > To be able to downgrade we should be able to pin both commitlog and > sstables versions, e.g. -Dcassandra.commitlog_version=3 > -Dcassandra.sstable_version=jb > That would be awesome because it would decorrelate

Re: Failed Dtest will block cutting releases

I think it is fair to run a flakey test again. If it is determine it flaked out due to a conflict with another test or something ephemeral in a long process it is not worth blocking a release. Just deleting it is probably not a good path. I actually enjoy writing fixing, tweeking, tests so pinge

Re: splitting CQL parser & spec into separate repo

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Anthony Grasso <anthony.gra...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a great idea > > +1 (non-binding) > > On 22 March 2017 at 07:04, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Mark Dewey <mil

Re: DataStax Client List

Well that is quite unsettling. On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Theresa Taylor < theresa.tay...@onlinedatatech.biz> wrote: > Hi, > > Would you be interested in acquiring a list of DataStax users' information > in an Excel sheet for unlimited marketing usage? > > List includes – First and Last

Re: Spam Moderation

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Daryl Hawken wrote: > +1. > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Michael Shuler > wrote: > > > I won't reply to the obvious spam to hilight it any further, so new > > message.. > > > > Could the mailing list

Re: splitting CQL parser & spec into separate repo

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Eric Evans <john.eric.ev...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I believe you could accomplish a similar goal by making a multi-module > > project https://mave

Re: Code quality, principles and rules

time to do it. I > > > created CASSANDRA-13007 as a follow up with the intent of working on > > > compaction from a purely architectural standpoint. I think this type > of > > > thing should be done throughout the codebase. > > > > > > Removing the singletons is

Re: Code quality, principles and rules

a huge effort. I wish I had time to do it. I > > > created CASSANDRA-13007 as a follow up with the intent of working on > > > compaction from a purely architectural standpoint. I think this type > of > > > thing should be done throughout the codebase. > > > >

Re: Can we kill the wiki?

Wikis are still good for collaberative design etc. Its a burden to edit the docs and its not the place for all info. On Friday, March 17, 2017, Murukesh Mohanan wrote: > I wonder if the recent influx has anything to do with GSoC. The student > application period

Re: Code quality, principles and rules

(and of course incrementally > > making that system easier to work with/test) seems like an achievable > goal. > > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:33 PM

Re: Code quality, principles and rules

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > > On 2017-03-16 10:32 (-0700), François Deliège > wrote: > > > > To get this started, here is an initial proposal: > > > > Principles: > > > > 1. Tests always pass. This is the starting point. If

Re: Code quality, principles and rules

ave not benched it, but looking at it's feature set, > that's my guess) , Spring I know from experience even with the most optimal > settings is slower on initialization time than doing by DI "by hand" at > minimum, and that can sometimes be substantial. > > > On Mar 17, 201

Re: State of triggers

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > I used them. I built do it yourself secondary indexes with them. They > have > > there

Re: State of triggers

On Saturday, March 4, 2017, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jji...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Edward Capriolo &

Re: State of triggers

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 4, 2017, at 7:06 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > &

Re: Calling all library maintainers

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 02:43 -0500, Stu Hood wrote: Java you serialize a type to a byte[] whereas with the query language you'd serialize to a string term The serializing to a byte[] part is what the RPC libraries exist

  1   2   >