jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-String-Errf` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.009 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-Errf/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 2023-01-02 16:44, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Hi,
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Hello team,
While building opensubdiv, the failure[1] occurred on doc subpackage with
the following line:
BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different
architectures:
Hello team,
I am orphaning dlib as I no longer need it for dependencies like howdly
(Windows Hello type authentication app) and I no longer have a 2018 HP
Envy 2-in-1 device for testing. The package is well maintained and up
to date with upstream. Feel free to take it.
Reference:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 7:21 PM Dale Turner via devel
wrote:
>
> As I mentioned last week, I would be interested in xaos. BUT, I am not
> presently a packager/maintainer...
Hi Dale,
Unfortunately there's nothing that can be done (except perhaps
delaying the retirement of xaos) until you become
Dne 02. 01. 23 v 22:39 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Also, 'mock --buildsrpm' will not convert them. Perhaps Vitaly meant mock should support such usage?
Mock cannot add such support, because Mock rarely operate on top of dist-git (or even git). So there is no way how to
retrieve git log.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 10:52 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 1/2/23 22:30, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> - incompatible compile-time options (i.e. resulting in conditional
> >> compilation): different packages depend on crates with different sets
> >> of
On 1/2/23 22:30, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> - incompatible compile-time options (i.e. resulting in conditional
>> compilation): different packages depend on crates with different sets
>> of features enabled, sometimes with conflicting options. Even with a
>> stable
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - incompatible compile-time options (i.e. resulting in conditional
> compilation): different packages depend on crates with different sets
> of features enabled, sometimes with conflicting options. Even with a
> stable ABI, you'd need to build crates for all necessary
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
fastfetch-1.8.2-1.el8
tcpreplay-4.4.3-1.el8
voms-2.1.0-0.27.rc3.el8
Details about builds:
fastfetch-1.8.2-1.el8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156199
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 11:46 -0600, Robby Callicotte via devel wrote:
> I went ahead and took vim-nerdtree.
FYI: Nerdtree is unmaintained upstream:
https://github.com/preservim/nerdtree/issues/1280
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
___
Hi,
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> While building opensubdiv, the failure[1] occurred on doc subpackage with
> the following line:
>
> BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different
> architectures: opensubdiv-doc-3.5.0-1.fc38.noarch.rpm
> rpmdiff output
On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 17:02 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144904
Bug 2144904 depends on bug 2148461, which changed state.
Bug 2148461 Summary: Add perl-CPAN-02Packages-Search to EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2148461
What|Removed |Added
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
novnc-1.3.0-5.el7
tcpreplay-4.4.3-1.el7
voms-2.1.0-0.27.rc3.el7
Details about builds:
novnc-1.3.0-5.el7
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 2:30 PM Pete Walter wrote:
> This is now done. The following 4 packages failed to rebuild. The rest of
> 102 packages built fine and are all rebuilt in rawhide.
>
> mozjs78: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95691022
> mozjs91:
Hello team,
While building opensubdiv, the failure[1] occurred on doc subpackage
with the following line:
BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different
architectures: opensubdiv-doc-3.5.0-1.fc38.noarch.rpm
rpmdiff output was:
added
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 4:40 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:59:07PM +0100, mkol...@redhat.com wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 15:42 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
On Monday, 02 January 2023 at 17:25, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 04:06:29PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Monday, 02 January 2023 at 15:42, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Note that uefi http boot can also work with iso images, i.e. you can
> > >
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:02:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek kirjoitti 2.1.2023 klo 22.44:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 03:10:22PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
On 30/12/2022 20:01, Ben Cotton wrote:
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:59:07PM +0100, mkol...@redhat.com wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 15:42 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > > > * Better secure boot support (specifically
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157775
--- Comment #1 from vladimir.pach...@gooddata.com ---
Hello team,
please, branch and build cpanspec in epel9.
Thank you
Vladimir
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Dne 02. 01. 23 v 22:01 Richard Shaw napsal(a):
Also mock builds seem fine. I tested this now on F37 with a few different
scenarios:
- fedpkg mockbuild
- git commit --allow-empty -m Rebuild && fedpkg mockbuild
- fedpkg srpm && mock *.src.rpm
seem to generate the expected
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 03:01:16PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 2:44 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 03:10:22PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> > >
> > > > On 30/12/2022 20:01, Ben
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157775
Bug ID: 2157775
Summary: Please branch and build cpanspec in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: cpanspec
Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 12:06:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:44 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:23:35AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 31. 12. 22 15:07,
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 01:06:52PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Okay. no. This is not how we do things here.
> Apologies for my snide remark that visibly came out rude, sorry.
Thank you, Kevin.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 2:44 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 03:10:22PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> >
> > > On 30/12/2022 20:01, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of
On 2023-01-02 04:52, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 12:32 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
I need rebuild a package that is using rpmautospec , how I can rebuild
the package and increase relversion ?
`git commit --allow-empty -m "Changelog entry here"` will do what you
want. The
On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 03:10:22PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
>
> > On 30/12/2022 20:01, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> >> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> >> community
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157192
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157197
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157215
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-App-Cmd-0.335-1.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157224
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157232
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Config-INI-0.028-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157234
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157238
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157239
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157242
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Routine-0.029-1.f
Let me sum up what the Copr team did during 2022. The review of 2021 can be found at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R2MWYN7CRF34WKSRUUYNLAISQB47MHXI/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157193
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
Hello.
As I mentioned last week, I would be interested in xaos. BUT, I am not
presently a packager/maintainer...
Dale
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, January 2nd, 2023 at 12:02 PM, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-String-Errf` that
you are following:
``
0.009 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-Errf/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
On Monday, January 2, 2023 10:02:41 AM CST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> reason:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157188
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Abortable` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.003 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Abortable/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157225
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test-Abortable`
that you are following:
``
0.003 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Abortable/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
* Miroslav Lichvar:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 09:55:11AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> It may work to use this for libtinfo.so:
>>
>> GROUP (/usr/lib64/ncurses-novs/libtinfo.so.6 AS_NEEDED
>> (/usr/lib64/ncurses-novs/libncurses.so.6))
>
> FWIW, I tried this and the error messages from the
On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 15:42 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > > * Better secure boot support (specifically the initrd is covered
> > > by
> > > the signature).
> > > * Better confidential
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157188
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157099
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2157746
Referenced Bugs:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 09:55:11AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It may work to use this for libtinfo.so:
>
> GROUP (/usr/lib64/ncurses-novs/libtinfo.so.6 AS_NEEDED
> (/usr/lib64/ncurses-novs/libncurses.so.6))
FWIW, I tried this and the error messages from the swift-lang build
changed from:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 04:06:29PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 02 January 2023 at 15:42, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> [...]
> > Note that uefi http boot can also work with iso images, i.e. you can
> > have the dhcp server hand out URLs to the fedora netboot iso. The
> >
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Monday, 02 January 2023 at 15:42, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
[...]
> Note that uefi http boot can also work with iso images, i.e. you can
> have the dhcp server hand out URLs to the fedora netboot iso. The
> firmware will fetch the iso, create a ramdisk, add a acpi table for
> it so the OS finds it
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Jiri Konecny wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > * Better secure boot support (specifically the initrd is covered by
> > the signature).
> > * Better confidential computing support (measurements are much more
> > useful if we know what
Florian Weimer writes:
After installing redhat-rpm-config, this works in bash and similar
shells:
$ eval `rpm --eval %set_build_flags`
Maybe we can make it more clear in buildflags.md that this macro is a
shell script fragment?
I find it more convenient to generate parameters for an
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 09:01:52AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> I doubt that Fedora's shim+grub2 can boot Ubuntu kernels in Secure Boot mode
> and vice versa.
Needs installing the signing keys to the shim key database using
mokutil, but should otherwise work just fine.
take care,
Hi,
> A much better approach is to install a TPM-generated key in the TPM’s
> NVRAM, with a policy that only allows the key to be used once a trusted
> operating system has booted. That can be used as a trust anchor even
> without support from buggy UEFI firmware.
Side note: measuring kernel
Dne 02. 01. 23 v 14:09 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
* Vít Ondruch:
And yes, that is the problem why upstream can't see the issues we see,
despite they were so kind to test on Fedora. Luckily, there was
analysis of the issue which initially triggered this discussion done
by Mamoru [1] and it seem
Hello,
we have just disabled Fedora 35 chroots in Copr.
According to the Fedora wiki [1], Fedora 35 reached the end of its life
on 2022-12-13 and therefore we are disabling it in Copr.
That effectively means that from this moment, it is no longer possible
to submit builds for the following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152966
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
* Vít Ondruch:
> And yes, that is the problem why upstream can't see the issues we see,
> despite they were so kind to test on Fedora. Luckily, there was
> analysis of the issue which initially triggered this discussion done
> by Mamoru [1] and it seem that the issue are caused by
> LTO.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157630
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156981
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Log-Dispatch-Array-1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157630
Bug ID: 2157630
Summary: Add perl-Image-Sane to EPEL9
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Image-Sane
Keywords: FutureFeature
Assignee:
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Log-Dispatch-Array`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.005 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Dispatch-Array/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 12:32 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I need rebuild a package that is using rpmautospec , how I can rebuild
> the package and increase relversion ?
`git commit --allow-empty -m "Changelog entry here"` will do what you
want. The empty commit will result in a release and
Hi Sérgio,
Hau idatzi du Sérgio Basto (ser...@serjux.com) erabiltzaileak (2023
urt. 2, al. (13:40)):
>
> I need rebuild a package that is using rpmautospec , how I can rebuild
> the package and increase relversion ?
git commit --allow-empty -m "Rebuild because of X"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157099
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2157628
Referenced Bugs:
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
0.086 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/14
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi,
I need rebuild a package that is using rpmautospec , how I can rebuild
the package and increase relversion ?
Thank you,
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Dne 24. 12. 22 v 20:49 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
* Vít Ondruch:
Working with upstream on one issue [1], it seems that the culprit is in
the Fedora compiler options. Is there some convenient way to set them
up? Of course I can copy them from log, or somehow put together from the
RPM macros,
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Personally, I use the kernel's recommended commit to the oldest
> supported branch and merge upwards workflow and I've learned not to be
> afraid of merge commits. If any branch needs some specific fixes,
> I just apply them there and only there, without
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Okay. no. This is not how we do things here.
Apologies for my snide remark that visibly came out rude, sorry.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-PPIx-Regexp` that
you are following:
``
0.086 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPIx-Regexp/pull-request/14
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157618
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Dancer-1.3520-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95721511
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157618
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1935279
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1935279=edit
Update to 1.3520 (#2157618)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157618
Bug ID: 2157618
Summary: perl-Dancer-1.3520 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Dancer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157274
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157274
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157099
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152966
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project:
`perl-Log-Dispatch-Array` that you are following:
``
1.005 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Dispatch-Array/pull-request/1
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156981
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156233
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
On Monday, 02 January 2023 at 09:57, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 02. 01. 23 v 9:38 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> > produces bogus changelog messages and artificially
> > inflates Release counters.
>
> I always wondered why people are afraid of gaps in numbering? It is
> just a
Similar situation happens if you have spec file in upstream. The problem
is that mass rebuilds are
adding entries to dowstream spec file only, so you have to manually
merge the upstream and
downstream or ideally do a backport upstream before realese. This is
nice and easy solution for
the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230101.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230102.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 55
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 24.06 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156233
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156199
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-4fae89f4dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4fae89f4dc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Mon Jan 2, 2023 at 09:57 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 02. 01. 23 v 9:38 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> > produces bogus changelog messages and artificially
> > inflates Release counters.
>
> I always wondered why people are afraid of gaps in numbering? It is
> just a number.
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.1
Test week is happening from 2023-01-03 to 2023-01-08. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As usual,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156199
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Fixed
Dne 02. 01. 23 v 9:38 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
produces bogus changelog messages and artificially
inflates Release counters.
I always wondered why people are afraid of gaps in numbering? It is just a number. The number will not object if you
skip some of them. :)
Or it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156168
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-Install-2.22-
On Sunday, 01 January 2022 at 20:51, Fabio Valentini wrote:
[...]
> Additionally, not having Release counter and changelog in the .spec
> file means that you can usually freely cherry-pick or merge bug-fix
> commits across different dist-git branches. This wasn't possible
> without rpmautospec due
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-ExtUtils-Install`
that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
2.22 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Install/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
