Re: [PATCH] orig DLR bitmask passing back via DLR msg

2015-07-20 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 16.07.2015 15:45, schrieb Stipe Tolj: Am 16.07.2015 14:15, schrieb Alexander Malysh: I disagree to put it in dlr group because it has nothing with dlr todo. To dlr group belongs submittime/donetime/errorcode etc. (means any metadata that are DLR specific) but original message is not related

Re: [PATCH] orig DLR bitmask passing back via DLR msg

2015-07-16 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 13.07.2015 17:50, schrieb Alexander Malysh: Hi Stipe, first of all I don’t get the intension for this feature? Please explain. Hi Alex, the intention was actually explained, let me enroll here. When the DLR gets back to an smsbox application, we get only the DLR event itself, i.e.

Re: [PATCH] orig DLR bitmask passing back via DLR msg

2015-07-16 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi Stipe, Am 16.07.2015 um 12:09 schrieb Stipe Tolj st...@kannel.org: Am 13.07.2015 17:50, schrieb Alexander Malysh: Hi Stipe, first of all I don’t get the intension for this feature? Please explain. Hi Alex, the intention was actually explained, let me enroll here. When the DLR

Re: [PATCH] orig DLR bitmask passing back via DLR msg

2015-07-16 Thread Stipe Tolj
Am 16.07.2015 14:15, schrieb Alexander Malysh: I disagree to put it in dlr group because it has nothing with dlr todo. To dlr group belongs submittime/donetime/errorcode etc. (means any metadata that are DLR specific) but original message is not related to DLR. If we think further about your

Re: [PATCH] orig DLR bitmask passing back via DLR msg

2015-07-13 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi Stipe, first of all I don’t get the intension for this feature? Please explain. Even if we should forward back original dlr_mask of message, we should not do it in dlr group because original dlr_mask has nothing todo with dlr. Maybe create a new group ‚orig_msg‘ and put it inside but not in