On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 04:47 -0700, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 22, 9:34 pm, Le Roux Bodenstein wrote:
> > > If it is to bring down application for maintenance, seems like it
> > > would be easier to use Apache/mod_wsgi in daemon mode.
> >
> > I'll give mod_wsgi a
> The only criticism I have seen of lighttpd is that is has been a long
> time since last release and that it can leak memory. Don't know how
> valid that is, so I could be generating my own FUD here. :-)
Well. I was running it for more than a year without a restart at some
stage and I didn't
On Jul 22, 10:17 pm, Le Roux Bodenstein wrote:
> > http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/03/load-spikes-and-excessive-memory-usa...
>
> Wow. Thanks. I'm reading your entire blog now - it is really helpful.
> I just realised how little I know about this. Your blog is certainly
> the
> http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/03/load-spikes-and-excessive-memory-usa...
Wow. Thanks. I'm reading your entire blog now - it is really helpful.
I just realised how little I know about this. Your blog is certainly
the best resource on this topic I've ever seen.
Since I'm currently running
On Jul 22, 9:34 pm, Le Roux Bodenstein wrote:
> > If it is to bring down application for maintenance, seems like it
> > would be easier to use Apache/mod_wsgi in daemon mode.
>
> I'll give mod_wsgi a go. To be honest I never looked at it before
> simply because it is tied to
> If it is to bring down application for maintenance, seems like it
> would be easier to use Apache/mod_wsgi in daemon mode.
I'll give mod_wsgi a go. To be honest I never looked at it before
simply because it is tied to apache. But if it can easily do
everything I need using a reasonable amount
On Jul 22, 8:19 pm, Le Roux Bodenstein wrote:
> I'm trying to keep my django powered cms online even when I have to
> restart the app or take it down for maintenance.
>
> My rendered pages are generally quite cacheable and they only change
> if someone content manages a page
7 matches
Mail list logo