Hi all
2016-12-16 16:13 keltezéssel, Jan Holesovsky írta:
> The idea is to get rid of the 'oldref' attribute in the help files; ie.
> change
>
>l10n="U" oldref="13">Heading
>
> to
>
>l10n="U">Heading
I did not realized oldref being part of msgctxt, so in my recent help
commits removed a
Hi, Jan,
2016-12-16 17:38 GMT+01:00 Jan Holesovsky :
> > It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use
> pootle (sl and sr) please do not forget those.
>
> Thanks for the reminder. I hope Cloph can do the upgrade for them some
> way that fits them too,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:51:41PM +0100, khagaroth wrote:
> > there are many ways how to describe the same thing in html ('s and 's
> > vs. and vs. 's with css vs. who-knows-what)
>
> CSS is the preferred way, its the same as with styles and direct formatting
> in Writer.
CSS is preferred for
On 12/16/2016 05:38 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> * there are many ways how to describe the same thing in html ('s and
> 's vs. and vs. 's with css vs. who-knows-what)
> which would make the help harder to maintain, if we eg. want to reuse
> the information from there to generate other
Hi All
Em 16/12/2016 14:51, khagaroth escreveu:
>> it seems the goal is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml
>>
>> I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance).
> html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need)
>> in the help files (like or
Hi Bubli,
Katarina Behrens píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 18:20 +0100:
> > Going further, we can later change 'paragraph' to 'p', introduce 'h2' as
> > a shortcut for too, if we with so;
> > but for the moment, I think there are XHP features that are worth
> > keeping, because as a format, it gives
Hi,
khagaroth píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 17:51 +0100:
> > I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance).
>
> html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need)
> > in the help files (like or to name few)
> >
>
> Both and are part of HTML 5
Hello world & Kendy,
> Going further, we can later change 'paragraph' to 'p', introduce 'h2' as
> a shortcut for too, if we with so;
> but for the moment, I think there are XHP features that are worth
> keeping, because as a format, it gives more semantics to the text than a
> plain HTML would
>
> it seems the goal is to move away from .xhp to .xhtml
>
> I hope you meant HTML 5, because XHTML is a dead end (and good riddance).
html does not have markup for some of the semantics that we have (and need)
> in the help files (like or to name few)
>
Both and are part of HTML 5 and
Hi Jan,
Jan Iversen píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 16:27 +0100:
> > this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and
> > Documentation teams, but they should know :-)
>
> It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use pootle (sl
> and sr) please do not forget those.
Thanks
> this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and
> Documentation teams, but they should know :-)
It does not seem transparent for the few languages that do not use pootle (sl
and sr) please do not forget those.
It does also influence the help repo (of course), since the change will be a
Hi Olivier,
Olivier Hallot píše v Pá 16. 12. 2016 v 08:52 -0200:
> > I am (so far) convinced that the actual format is not the real problem
> > here, and that with a bit of a cleanup, XHP will be as convenient as a
> > format as HTML would be - but with the advantage that:
>
> The format is not
Hi Cloph, all,
I've recently proposed some help cleanups on the documentation@ ML, and
this is the first one of them. I'm cross-posting to l10n@ and
documentation@ - this change is supposed to be transparent for L10n and
Documentation teams, but they should know :-)
The idea is to get rid of
Hello Jan
Em 16/12/2016 07:21, Jan Holesovsky escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I was interested to hear yesterday that there were discussions about
> abandoning XHP as the file format for the help files, and use plain HTML
> instead.
What documenters want is a easy way to insert, edit and update help
Hi,
I was interested to hear yesterday that there were discussions about
abandoning XHP as the file format for the help files, and use plain HTML
instead.
I am (so far) convinced that the actual format is not the real problem
here, and that with a bit of a cleanup, XHP will be as convenient as a
15 matches
Mail list logo