I think its time for me to apologize to the group.
I posed the question concerning personal experiences in the use of QRP
vs QRO.
I did so sincerely anticipating the high level of experience and
expertise within the group would be informative. It is an area of
experience unknown to me.
I want
Duane,
I too responded and thought it was a good subject since Elecraft has been
one of the leaders in recent times for lower power technology and equipment.
QRP or lower levels of power are not for everyone which is fine and as
someone said this is a broad hobby and many ways of enjoying it
DW:
If you're new to QRP, there is nothing offensive in asking more
experienced hams if it really works. As you can see from the many posts
that your question attracted, the answer to your question is that QRP is
effective a lot more often than most people would expect. If your
question is
Don wrote:
Point of information - the QRP crowd got me back into the area of ham
radio that I enjoy the most, and that is experimenting and homebrewing.
--
That's been what kept me active among the QRP crowd too. And I felt
disappointed one time when a very nice fellow with
--- On Thu, 3/5/09, Ron D'Eau Claire r...@cobi.biz wrote:
From: Ron D'Eau Claire r...@cobi.biz
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] I think its time for me to apologize to the group.
To: 'Elecraft_List' elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Thursday, March 5, 2009, 5:55 PM
Don wrote:
Point of information
Many eons ago, I got intensely interested in QRP. This was the era of the
bantam 1 watter made from a BC-746 tuning unit. The ones that were used
in the early horsy talkies or pogo stick transceivers. Forget the SCR
number! My first fun QRP 'fone rig was a slightly modified BC-611 Handy
6 matches
Mail list logo
