: Thursday, May 31, 2012 5:17 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] CSMIO Eth motion controller + EMC2
On 30 May 2012 15:45, Łukasz Prymula luk...@cs-lab.eu wrote:
For me, most interesting thing is that in what method planner transfers
trajectory to HAL layer. As you see I need points
its halting state is 43 68 72 69 73 20 52 61 64 65 6b
Is the Carry wire connected up?
j.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.atwrote:
Am 30.05.2012 um 16:51 schrieb Viesturs Lācis:
2012/5/30 Łukasz Prymula luk...@cs-lab.eu:
For me, most
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Łukasz Prymula luk...@cs-lab.eu wrote:
There is no reason to use specific eth card. We are using typical Ethernet
card and we don’t implement real time protocols such as EtherCAT. There is
no need.
In our current product we are using UDP client-server
Lukasz,
Am 30.05.2012 um 15:30 schrieb Łukasz Prymula:
http://www.cs-lab.eu/en/index.php http://www.cs-lab.eu/en/index.php
It work over Ethernet with Mach only but we want to write the driver for
EMC2 software.
I think you need a HAL component which can talk to your device over UDP or TCP
On 31 May 2012 12:19, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
I think it is about time this community considers and decides what to do on
RT network I/O devices - a plethora of special-case contraptions is
undesirable IMO.
I see a mention of a Realtime Ethernet interface in the page that
On 31 May 2012 12:19, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
that said, I think a RT HAL component with net I/O would be a bit of
unchartered territory, OTOH I dont see any existing RT
component doing that; maybe netlink sockets can help
There is likely to be some impetus in this
On 30 May 2012 15:45, Łukasz Prymula luk...@cs-lab.eu wrote:
For me, most interesting thing is that in what method planner transfers
trajectory to HAL layer. As you see I need points buffer.
Can your system run with an empty buffer? That would make the
interface with LinuxCNC much easier. If
On 5/31/2012 11:16 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On 30 May 2012 15:45, Łukasz Prymulaluk...@cs-lab.eu wrote:
For me, most interesting thing is that in what method planner transfers
trajectory to HAL layer. As you see I need points buffer.
Can your system run with an empty buffer? That
On 31 May 2012 17:20, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
If you never under run the buffer you are ok, if you do, they fault out.
That's how they can run with a non-realtime system like Windows.
They just spool up a second or more of move data, and then go to work.
Yes, but this would be very
Am 31.05.2012 um 14:35 schrieb andy pugh:
On 31 May 2012 12:19, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
I think it is about time this community considers and decides what to do on
RT network I/O devices - a plethora of special-case contraptions is
undesirable IMO.
I see a mention
On 31 May 2012 17:47, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
any idea what the Mesa folks are using as Ethernet transport method?
I don't think I know enough to understand the question. Would UDP be
a valid answer?
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
andy pugh wrote:
On 31 May 2012 12:19, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
I think it is about time this community considers and decides what to do on
RT network I/O devices - a plethora of special-case contraptions is
undesirable IMO.
I see a mention of a Realtime
Maybe it is known to everybody but I found it
http://tuxgraphics.org/electronics/200901/avr-ethernet-realtime.shtml
May be it can be implemented using code from ancient times:
Data: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
Nadawca: Evert Lammerts lamme...@tech.nhl.nl
Odpowiedź-Do: Enhanced
On Thu, 31 May 2012, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:10:39 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] CSMIO Eth motion controller
On 5/31/2012 12:39 PM, andy pugh wrote:
On 31 May 2012 17:20, Davee...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
If you never under run the buffer you are ok, if you do, they fault out.
That's how they can run with a non-realtime system like Windows.
They just spool up a second or more of move data, and
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
On 5/31/2012 12:39 PM, andy pugh wrote:
On 31 May 2012 17:20, Davee...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
If you never under run the buffer you are ok, if you do, they fault out.
That's how they can run with a non-realtime system like
On 1 June 2012 01:19, Yishin Li y...@araisrobo.com wrote:
Yes, we have a buffer inside FPGA to keep track of trajectory planning
results.
Sorry to belabour the point, but am I right that your system only does
G0/G1/G2/G3/G5 motion, and that spindle-synchronised motion and
probing are missing?
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:26 AM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 June 2012 01:19, Yishin Li y...@araisrobo.com wrote:
Yes, we have a buffer inside FPGA to keep track of trajectory planning
results.
Sorry to belabour the point, but am I right that your system only does
Very interesting !
I don't know this. thank's for link.
They speak about :
Thousand control packets per second are possible
so this give about 1000 kbyte so aroud 2,3 Kherzt frame signal
If we espected that here the physical layer is set to 10 Mbit transfer rate.
Whit a microcontroler which
-
From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 4:09 PM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] CSMIO Eth motion controller + EMC2
On 30 May 2012 14:30, Łukasz Prymula luk...@cs-lab.eu wrote:
http://www.cs-lab.eu/en/index.php http://www.cs-lab.eu/en
2012/5/30 Łukasz Prymula luk...@cs-lab.eu:
For me, most interesting thing is that in what method planner transfers
trajectory to HAL layer. As you see I need points buffer.
AFAIK it is done with NML messages. I think that Michael Haberler
would be most knowledgeable about this.
--
Viesturs
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 04:45:02PM +0200, ??ukasz Prymula wrote:
... we have to send a set of trajectory points to
CSMIO. This buffer is set to collect a points for 500 ms now.
Have you seen
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Emc2HardwareDesign
On 30 May 2012 15:45, Łukasz Prymula luk...@cs-lab.eu wrote:
In our current product we are using UDP client-server connection. There are
implemented various simply commands for configuration, simple movement and
trajectory move, for ex. Home(axis), Jog(axis, speed).
In that case you can't
Am 30.05.2012 um 16:51 schrieb Viesturs Lācis:
2012/5/30 Łukasz Prymula luk...@cs-lab.eu:
For me, most interesting thing is that in what method planner transfers
trajectory to HAL layer. As you see I need points buffer.
AFAIK it is done with NML messages. I think that Michael Haberler
what does C R think of that state?
On 5/30/2012 3:56 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 30.05.2012 um 16:51 schrieb Viesturs Lācis:
2012/5/30 Łukasz Prymulaluk...@cs-lab.eu:
For me, most interesting thing is that in what method planner transfers
trajectory to HAL layer. As you see I need points
25 matches
Mail list logo
