There is a (not yet documented) fink cleanup command too for debs built
locally.
'fink cleanup'
Will remove any debs not at the latest version from /sw/fink/dists
Peter
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 06:12 PM, Matt Wong wrote:
Anyone who has a good idea of how to clean out old .debs? I'm
This is the crash log I get after trying to start xemacs:
**
Date/Time: 2003-01-12 14:25:01 +0100
OS Version: 10.2.3 (Build 6G30)
Host: cubelet.local.
Command:xemacs
PID:8553
Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001)
Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS (0x0001) at 0xbff5bbb0
Hi Martin:
Thanks. Yes, I get the warning -- didn't look at the console.log
As a work-around, I found adding a logout script using the logout hook
to delete these files into /etc/ttys did the trick.
The permissions on /tmp etc are as yours.
For now everything works.
Many thanks.
Bill
Artemio Gonzalez-Lopez wrote:
This is the crash log I get after trying to start xemacs:
[]
Thread 0 Crashed:
#0 0x001a7418 in re_match_2_internal (regex.c:5507)
[etc]
I can't help with the crash, I don't get it myself. I can run an Xemacs
compiled under a Fink version of xfree86 without
Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is a (not yet documented) fink cleanup command too for debs
built locally.
'fink cleanup'
Will remove any debs not at the latest version from /sw/fink/dists
Oh, good. (I use the CVS version of fink, not the binary dist.)
I found that it
Jonas Steverud wrote:
In that case, all those dangling symlinks in /sw/fink/debs that will
occur then, is there some easy way of getting rid of them?
fink cleanup removes these, too.
--
Martin
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
I'm using Mac OS X 10.2.3 and I update fink from cvs and unstable, so
is it okay to get rid of /sw/fink/10.1? If not, will fink
automatically delete 10.1 when I don't need it?
Thom
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge
In a message dated 1/11/03 21:34:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The current version of xfree86-base is 4.2.1.1-4. So, you'll need to
update fink with "fink selfupdate" or "fink selfupdate-cvs" if you're
accessing CVS tree.
I ran fink selfupdate, and it updated some core packages and then I
I recently installed the non-fink version of mysql which seems to have
done something to my fink installation (i can't think of anything else
that might have done it). I can no longer access various items by name,
but instead have to denote their path to run them IE. /sw/bin/fink etc.
Any
First I want to thank the developer's at Fink. I have Fink up and
running on Jaguar and Apple's X11, and I really did not have much
trouble. I do have a couple of questions that I hope someone in the
mailing list can answer.
1) I have WindowMaker running with Apple's X11, but I cannot
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 07:35 PM, Gary Olson wrote:
First I want to thank the developer's at Fink. I have Fink up and
running on Jaguar and Apple's X11, and I really did not have much
trouble. I do have a couple of questions that I hope someone in the
mailing list can answer.
1) I
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 05:13 PM, Gary Elshaw wrote:
I recently installed the non-fink version of mysql which seems to have
done something to my fink installation (i can't think of anything else
that might have done it). I can no longer access various items by
name, but instead have
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 03:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/11/03 21:34:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The current version of xfree86-base is 4.2.1.1-4. So, you'll need to
update fink with "fink selfupdate" or "fink selfupdate-cvs" if you're
accessing CVS tree.
I
Le lundi, 13 jan 2003, à 04:35 Europe/Paris, Gary Olson a écrit :
First I want to thank the developer's at Fink. I have Fink up and
running on Jaguar and Apple's X11, and I really did not have much
trouble. I do have a couple of questions that I hope someone in the
mailing list can answer.
Well, i managed to fix my own problem by editing the .tcshrc file and
putting fink's path in there.
Yipee! No extra typing!
Cheers,
Gary
_
The difficulty now is that unexceptional adults believe the loss of
youthful dreaming is itself
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran fink selfupdate, and it updated some core packages and then I ran fink
update-all and then when I did a fink list the xfree86-base was still
listed as 4.2.1.1-3.
Are you sure this isn't the xfree86-base-threaded package? This one is
indeed at 4.2.1.1-3.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo