01.04.2011 11:00, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
Good idea, but what if the user later turns out to have been wrong? How
to handle it?
It will be his/her problem. Restore backup.
01.04.2011 11:03, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
I'm against this. But feel free to keep arguing :-)
If user has a
08.04.2011 18:50, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 08-04-2011 13:43, alexpeshk...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Log Message:
---
Use interface IBlrMessage instead passing C++ class pointer to API
interface's functions
I'm *very* against this *undiscussed* change.
Weren't
13.04.2011 11:45, Geoff Worboys wrote:
More seriously. Yes I know there are important security
considerations BUT I thought perhaps people were overlooking
what I see as the biggest potential advantage of the request.
Just because it is a risk does not take away the potential
for advantage.
15.04.2011 15:08, Woody wrote:
However, it would be useful, IMO, to have an alias for directories so that
conceptually, you could separate entire functionalities. For instance, the
main databases reside in an alias directory called MainDataDir. Backups
could be performed to the BackupDataDir.
17.04.2011 20:03, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Comments?
Great!
Can it also automatically engage BLOB filters if BLOB subtypes differ?
--
SY, SD.
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond
19.04.2011 13:30, Nikita Konyuchenko wrote:
Any suggestions?
Always use UTF8 and you won't miss.
--
SY, SD.
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
Consolidation -- Increasing the use
27.04.2011 15:33, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
Step 2 may be a big problem for 24/7 servers
24/7 systems should not be based on a single server, so, while one node is
performing
classic backup-restore or suggested procedure, all users can be served by other
node(s).
--
SY, SD.
27.04.2011 21:01, Mercea Paul wrote:
Is Firebird server cluster ready? I mean for this scenario with multiple
server without replication but cluster !
It sounds like you refuse to call shared-nothing architecture a cluster...
--
SY, SD.
09.05.2011 18:27, Leyne, Sean wrote:
- shadow - not tested
I would like to propose that support for database Shadow be completely
dropped in v3
I disagree. Shadow is the only method for synchronous replication in
Firebird now.
Before of dropping it, a replacement should be proposed.
--
09.05.2011 18:48, Leyne, Sean wrote:
I disagree. Shadow is the only method for synchronous replication in
Firebird now.
Synchronous replication on a single server is not replication.
Don't forget about NFS and iSCSI(?).
--
SY, SD.
10.05.2011 9:40, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
As long as it
keeps launching one process per connection, there's no difference
between SharedCache being true or false, as there will always be only
one Database/Attachment pair per process.
Sure
Isn't the cache shared between processes?
--
17.06.2011 18:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
FB_MESSAGE(Message,
(FB_SMALLINT, smallInt0)
(FB_INTEGER, integer0)
(FB_BIGINT, bigInt0)
(FB_SCALED_BIGINT(3), bigInt3)
(FB_VARCHAR(10), str10)
)
Comments?
With GPRE you
26.07.2011 14:30, Alessandro Fiorino wrote:
I've been at least a bit lucky: the record structure of the data I
want to recover is simple and I already found how to detect a record
and decode all the other fields (a varchar which always store a 17
chars string and two integers).
Don't
27.07.2011 13:40, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Before doing JIT, we must think about related security issues. How can
we prevent pascal procedure from doing bad things with firebird runuser
access rights?
Leave it to DBA/sysdmin? In trade-off security vs speed Firebird used to
vote for speed.
--
27.07.2011 15:05, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
BTW, how is it solved in Java?
There is no pointers in Java, AFAIK.
--
SY, SD.
--
Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for
28.08.2011 15:52, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Certainly, we can make API look like we_do_ join a new attachment to an
existing distributed transaction. To do so we just start new transaction
in API call internally (need to know TPB...) and join it with existing
distributed transaction.
What
10.10.2011 12:36, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Wrong reason, as Oracle doesn't support external triggers.
Oracle SQL Reference for version 10 has other opinion:
-- quote ---
CREATE TRIGGER salary_check
BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OF salary, job_id ON
12.10.2011 23:28, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
I would love being able to give you a reproduceable test case with the
trace api command-line utilities, but I can't.
Any pointers are much appreciated, because currently, FBTM can't be used
against 2.5.1.
19.10.2011 14:59, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
As you can see, the role name (NONE) is missing from the connect
information and the user name is in lower case. Just letting you know,
perhaps this shall be changed to be consistent.
I wonder if attempted user name and password can be added to
19.10.2011 15:23, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Storing it could be a potential security breach.
But a great advantage for DBA on support. But, as Alex already said, it is
impossible.
--
SY, SD.
--
All the data
Hello, All.
Why CORE-432 was closed with resolution Won't fix? I would like to see
information
about field names in input XSQLDA fields. Should I create duplicate ticket as a
feature
request?
--
SY, SD.
--
26.10.2011 8:58, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Probably I've missed some details. Capacitor present on HDD is really
enough only for making sector's writes atomic. A solution with capacitor
to save cache somewhere requires additional flash RAM - in that case not
too big capacitor is enough to save
26.10.2011 11:05, Ted Miglautsch wrote:
The problem with using the energy from rotating to write data is as you
remove the energy the rotation slows so it is not possible to write as
the disk slows down.
It is hard, but I don't see a technical problem in synchronizing write
frequency with
29.11.2011 9:01, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
Frank has shown a somewhat similar one: it's a more or less common
practice to empty/nullify the RDB$***_SOURCE columns.
So perhaps, unless some good alternative can be offered, we could still
allow modifications of particular columns that are known to
29.11.2011 9:48, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
29.11.2011 12:35, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
While i agree with you about SUBSTRING, i think the much better solution
will be to allow to index COMPUTED BY columns. It allows to not compare
potentially complex expressions at optimize time and to not write
30.11.2011 9:08, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Or more object type bound, e.g.:
ALTER TABLE ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
ALTER VIEW ... CHANGE OWNER TO ...
etc..
ALTER PROCEDURE ... DROP SOURCE;
I have no idea if the SQL standard suggests here something.
I agree with changing owner, but
30.11.2011 12:17, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
BLR remains.
Weren't you going to get rid of it someday?..
Btw, I also do not like practice of dropping the sources. People use it
as a kind of protection for the database. This protection is not efficient.
But if users need that feature I can better
30.11.2011 12:27, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
APDROP SOURCE OF [procedure name|trigger name|*]
+1
May I suggest to borrow a term from Oracle and add clause WRAPPED to
CREATE or ALTER?
I.e create wrapped procedure as ... or create procedure aaa wrapped
as
It would make migration
Hello, All.
Let's say I defined few UDR triggers and I need to keep rather big array of
shared
information bound to a transaction. What is the best (fastest) way to do it?
If I have to organize my own storage, I need to identify the transaction. Is
ITransaction pointer got from
Hello, All.
I wonder: why libfbclient2 package has in dependencies ICU?
I wanted to install client only, but had to download 7MB of needless crap.
--
SY, SD.
--
All the data continuously generated in your
02.12.2011 13:04, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
I then installed 2.5.0 on 11.04 via the project TAR ball and since that,
everything works fine.
Right, but the project's TAR also doesn't offer client-only install and has
the same
7MB in size.
--
SY, SD.
03.12.2011 0:21, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
libfbclient depends on firebird2.5-common, which depends on ICU
because if libfbintl. If the client doesn't need fbintl, then I guess
I can move it in the -server-common package.
Of course client doesn't need fbintl. fbintl is a server-only thing.
--
04.12.2011 10:28, Jesus Garcia wrote:
why instead crush the engine when an exception is raised, the engine would
catch it and
write in the log the error?
How??? How the engine catch an alien exception? Could you show the method
working in
MSVC and GCC?
--
SY, SD.
04.12.2011 17:26, Jesus Garcia wrote:
an exception not catched in my app, would not restart my computer.
But it will make OS to close your application harshly. Exactly as it is done
with Firebird.
--
SY, SD.
04.12.2011 17:51, Jesus Garcia wrote:
but i Only have had responses like learn more, learn to write udf, etc
Because every programmer know that exceptions can hardly pass boundaries of
DLL. Now it
is time for you to learn it too.
--
SY, SD.
04.12.2011 18:07, Jesus Garcia wrote:
you say can hardly not can't.
Right. But I'm not going to describe how many stars must have right
positions to allow
that.
--
SY, SD.
--
All the data continuously
07.12.2011 11:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Even if it is written in different
language?.. Could you provide example engine handling exception raised in
Delphi UDR?..
Could you provide example of UDR in Delphi at all?..
I expect the Delphi people will work on it.
No way,
07.12.2011 11:40, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
No way, I'm afraid. I'm quite good in Delphi, but I have no idea how to
convert C++
classes to Delphi classes.
I can help.
I would prefer to leave this task to the author of the API. Just to make him
to think
twice next time.
--
SY,
Speed is one of the most important feature so i think it should be
pushed again and again :)
If you have some ideas please send them to the list even if they are
in Delphi (Pseudo Code)
Currently work with BLOBs is slow. I'd suggest to merge packets for
open_blob-get_segment-close_blob
14.12.2011 18:00, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
This implicitly suggests that a bigger value of the network packet could
improve the performance even more, perhaps down to the MySQL's almost
three seconds.
Only for massive fetches. Performance of big number of small queries cannot
be improved
14.12.2011 18:24, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
They won't perform worse either. And I was replying to the example where
MySQL was faster in fetching rows.
Yes. But it was rather artificial example which you can hardly find in real
applications.
On the other hand, if you remove overhead of
14.12.2011 18:46, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
I'd say they will crash (on non-Intel platforms) instead.
If you access raw values right in network buffer - yes. But if you use utils
from
memory_routines.h it won't happen.
--
SY, SD.
16.12.2011 13:40, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
there is plenty of time for testing.
It is not actually about testing, but rather practical usability. API can
work without
any glitch, but don't provide some functions that are required for real
usage. As an
example - API for trace plugins which
16.12.2011 14:17, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Define wider.;-)
Anybody outside of core development team.
--
SY, SD.
--
Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011
Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows
20.12.2011 11:16, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
The new auth protocol will not truncate the longer password
but the legacy one will, AFAIU.
In this case there is no security breath: if a malefactor has got truncated
password by
bruteforcing legacy hash, it is useless.
--
SY, SD.
20.12.2011 11:25, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
please agree that if one knows
first 8 chars it's much simpler to guess/bruteforce/etc. the rest.
As a man who don't use meaningless passwords, I have to agree.
--
SY, SD.
21.12.2011 12:59, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
And what about ZIP - may I ask, how does it work now? I've thought that
people at least need to register themselves windows service after
opening archive. Am I wrong?
For regular users - no, but developers used to use FB server in application
mode.
27.12.2011 19:17, Leyne, Sean wrote:
That type of solution is not what I would define as a cluster.
As you wish. But the rest of world consider this kind of system to be called
a
shared-nothing cluster.
--
SY, SD.
27.12.2011 22:17, Leyne, Sean wrote:
I should have said:
That type of solution is not what immediately comes to mind for me, since I
see a shared disk solution (using redundant SAN storage) to be much easier to
implement for FB.
Unfortunately, shared-storage cluster doesn't solve
29.12.2011 20:41, Jesus Garcia wrote:
Would not be better, instead of that, If transaction id is equal To 0, no
transaction, else transaction.
There is transaction number zero.
As now there is a problem with transactionid and heavy loaded systems, that
could solve in a little the
01.01.2012 14:06, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
Disk speed was always the issue, it doesn't increase that fast as
CPU/memory speed. So the on-disk size always matters quite a lot.
CPU speed also has stopped growing.
--
SY, SD.
01.01.2012 21:31, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
So far, these are the suggestions I've seen
Hey, how about my suggestion leave everything as is and perform
backup-restore cycle on
demand?..
Pros:
- No overhead.
- No additional disk space.
- No code change.
Cons:
- DBA with brain is required.
--
02.01.2012 1:38, Steve Friedl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 08:14:56PM -0400, W O wrote:
Right, but it take more time for type them and the probability of mistakes
grows.
Sure, but if long passwords are allowed, people have a choice as to their
own tradeoff of security -vs- convenience.
01.01.2012 23:43, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
Den 2012-01-01 23:25 skrev Dimitry Sibiryakov såhär:
01.01.2012 21:31, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
So far, these are the suggestions I've seen
Hey, how about my suggestion leave everything as is and perform
backup-restore cycle on
demand?..
Pros
02.01.2012 14:46, Jesus Garcia wrote:
he problem is not downtime is how much downtime. Backup and restore is so
much downtime.
Not more downtime that simple restore after complete server destruction by
flood or
plane crash.
--
SY, SD.
02.01.2012 16:10, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Could you stop with the absurd comparisons? One is normal maintenance
and the other is (extreme) disaster recovery which are in no way comparable.
But downtime is downtime. Customers don't care about its reason, do they?..
--
SY, SD.
03.01.2012 13:25, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Firebird needs what is called definers right in Oracle (as opposed to
our invokers rights).
But not for UDR. External libraries can be substituted/hacked. Giving them
all
definer's rights is insecure.
--
SY, SD.
03.01.2012 13:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
They could not, if newbies are not DBA(ing).
Heh! And they called me sarcastic when I said that DBA requires a brain...
--
SY, SD.
--
Write once. Port to
03.01.2012 18:51, Leyne, Sean wrote:
- a data port utility which would allow for data to be ported from a live
database to a new database while live is active but would need a finalization
step where the live database is shutdown to apply the final data changes and
add FK constraints.
03.01.2012 20:37, Leyne, Sean wrote:
As for the FKs, I see the tool as being a some which needs to have the
maximum performance.
If you are going to move whole database at once - yes. Fortunately, in most
cases it is
not necessary.
--
SY, SD.
05.01.2012 12:35, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
When I checked it on interbase server some
time ago protocol 10 was supported.
But connection with fbclient to Interbase XE fail.
--
SY, SD.
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With
Hello, All.
I see in IConfig methods to read config entries only. Does it mean that
plugin cannot
change own configuration or I missed something?
--
SY, SD.
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400
17.01.2012 10:30, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
As another option everyone is free
to write configuration tool for his plugin with any features wanted.
There is one little problem: this tool has to be run on the server by user
with enough
rights. In some cases it is hard.
--
SY, SD.
17.01.2012 10:46, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
What about on server - ti depend upon implementation. I can suggest 2
simple methods to do it remotely:
- share disk with configuration file and access it over the wire,
- write simple web management tool and access it from your favorite
browser (like
18.01.2012 13:18, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
But I do not like an idea of making SQL
command (GRANT CREATE DATABASE TO SomeUser) dependent upon
authentication plugins behavior.
But you don't mind SQL command CREATE USER to be dependent on plugin, do
you?..
--
SY, SD.
13.02.2012 9:06, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
13.02.2012 11:51, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
Taking into an account that most of users do not need2Gb of lock
table, 64-bit offsets (at least for 2.5) should better remain tunable
build parameter, turned off by default.
Great idea, BTW. I haven't thought
13.02.2012 11:37, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Later we have plans to have pluggable lock manager, making it possible
to tune installation.
I don't like the idea to put whole responsibility to DBA because it is hard
to predict
when such tuning may be required.
How about keep 32bits offset, but
21.02.2012 13:13, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
What I want to advice - should we have separate crypt level setting for
client and server in firebird.conf?
Why to use on client parameter in config file at all? Client library always
had
problems with finding it which may lead to unexpected raw
22.02.2012 3:27, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Or do people prefer the code as it's now? Comments, please.
When in the past I fixed variable shadowing warnings caused by such code,
I also meet
a couple of bugs where wrong variables were used. So, I think that such code
must die.
--
SY,
22.02.2012 11:05, ik wrote:
Sorry, but I do not understand the difference. Can't you add such task
to a Server Manager ?
Just one problem: there is no Server Manager for Firebird.
--
SY, SD.
--
Virtualization
22.02.2012 14:49, ik wrote:
I think that at least task scheduler such as the databases I mentioned
above have, can help a lot in this case, even if we do not have the
tmeout record feature.
As a developer you, probably, know, that there is no point to invent a wheel
and
duplicate already
22.02.2012 15:13, ik wrote:
And some data tasks require to act according to time
rules.
Such as?..
At the moment, for doing this, you constantly require a daemon and not
a cron based program to constantly access the database and change
data.
For example?..
Wouldn't it be better if
22.02.2012 18:32, ik wrote:
Queues that are specific for time, like Task Queues that can start
for example at 10:00:25 pm but no longer then 10:05:40 pm that day .
I never heard about such queries. Could you provide a practical example?
How would you go with that ?
I would go back to
Hello, All.
Because password encryption method is going to be changed in 3.0, isn't it
too late to
suggest to convert password into UTF-8 before encryption?
Imagine two user environments on Linux, one has locale win1251 and another
utf-8.
Password, containing non-Latin symbols,
01.03.2012 16:27, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
That's nightmare:-)
But something like KOI-8 is quite possible.
Even more possible win1251 in Windows GUI vs cp866 in console.
--
SY, SD.
--
Virtualization Cloud
01.03.2012 16:55, Dalton Calford wrote:
Why not have all password connections use a single default encoding
regardless of the
overall codepage that is in use?
The problem is not in the password itself, but in typing it on keyboard.
--
SY, SD.
01.03.2012 17:17, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I understand a problem, but please talk about the solution you're
proposing. What is the moment(s) a password should be converted, and
from what to UTF8?
Sorry, but I don't have a solution for this problem. I would say that
password
06.03.2012 10:55, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
I'm sure there will be objections. I'd say the world moves
forward - if you don't want it to, that's your problem - live with it!
Meaning: if you really want to stay at dialect 1, then fine with me, but
then live with the implications, e.g. staying with an
06.03.2012 10:30, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 03/06/12 13:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
06.03.2012 10:03, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Does it mean that in dialect 1 we keep old limits like number of
streams?
It means that you keep old limits for applications which use old BLR
dialects
06.03.2012 20:31, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
So, add a new datatype NUMBER(x, y) who does BCD arithmetics like it's
done in Oracle.
What this data type will change? What will be result of 1/3 for this data
type? If 0,
it won't be different from DECIMAL. If 0.(3), how much 3 will
06.03.2012 20:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
It will be 0.333... (up to the maximum NUMBER scale precision).
The thing is that for operations like addition, subtraction, NUMBER will
work like NUMERIC (i.e., it's results are more precise than DOUBLE).
In this case much easier is to
06.03.2012 21:27, Leyne, Sean wrote:
select 2 * 1.001 from rdb$database = 2.000
This is just a display artefact. Precision of double is enough to keep 11
significant
digits.
--
SY, SD.
--
Keep Your
07.03.2012 10:03, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
At least for today dialect 1 means blr 4, dialect 3 means blr 5. Suppose
this can be reworked, but far not trivially.
Weren't there plans to exclude BLR from chain SQL-BLR-EXE at all?..
--
SY, SD.
07.03.2012 10:14, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Some related questions are raised:
If we talk only about BLR generated and executed inside of server, I would
say
generate BLR6 always for any SQL dialect, but with BLR generated or
interpreted in
client library there is a matter of compatibility
07.03.2012 16:41, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
Therefore the question
is - does server-side encoding also fit in to that 'as_server_ can see it'?
I would say that if you use unicode routines for file I/O you won't miss.
--
SY, SD.
10.03.2012 12:08, Alexander Peshkov wrote:
in a form as server sees them
BTW, I strongly believe that when the doc writer typed it as server sees
it, (s)he
mean only drive letter and patch, but not encoding. Particularly because native
English
speakers used to have no idea about
04.04.2012 12:42, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
let's just decide what's better -
keep polluting GFIX with new features or create new command-line tools
for the every new feature (or a set of features).
If the feature is available via Services API, fbsvcmgr already exists.
--
SY, SD.
04.04.2012 16:38, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
If encryption detects (at start or after it) that database is in backup
mode, it stops its activity and the next-page-to-encrypt will not advance.
At merge time, if database is in encrypting state, delta may be merged
and encrypted, and
Hello, All.
How in external DDL trigger get context variables, such as OBJECT_NAME and
SQL_TEXT?
--
SY, SD.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
07.04.2012 17:23, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
From the const IRoutineMetadata* metadata parameter of makeTrigger...
Could you be a little more specific?.. I don't see in IRoutineMetadata
anything like
getContextVariable().
--
SY, SD.
07.04.2012 21:12, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
Perhaps it would be a better idea to write a SQL trigger calling the
external procedure and passing the required context through.
It is loosing whole point of external triggers. The same way an ordinary
triggers can
call UDFs.
--
SY, SD.
07.04.2012 22:44, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
You can have a single external trigger able to read all table columns.
In the context you're probably using it (replication), that's much
better. You don't need to write (generate / regenerate) specific
triggers for each table.
For DML
07.04.2012 22:44, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
You can have a single external trigger able to read all table columns.
And, BTW, no: I can't read BLOBs and arrays with current interface.
--
SY, SD.
--
For
07.04.2012 23:09, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Why not?
You must be able to receive the blob id in the C++ code, and calling
blob functions using the current transaction get its contents.
Yep, I see BLOB function in IAttachment, but where are array functions?
--
SY, SD.
07.04.2012 23:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Yep, I see BLOB function in IAttachment, but where are array
functions?
There too... getSlice, setSlice...
What is function to substitute isc_array_lookup_bounds()?
--
SY, SD.
08.04.2012 0:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
2) Use fb_get_database_handle and fb_get_transaction_handle to retrieve
the legacy handles and use them with the ibase function.
isc_gen_sdl() is not documented.
--
SY, SD.
16.04.2012 13:21, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
I.e. with transaction ID
use of ~0 as special condition should be OK.
Doesn't internal transaction have id 0?
--
SY, SD.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
16.04.2012 14:45, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Alex wrote ~0 instead of 0, did you notice it?
Oops, my fault. :(((
--
SY, SD.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and
17.04.2012 12:53, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
Ok, I would like to create a type. If
typedef ULONG TxnType;
is too awkward, suggest something better.
Because it is not a transaction itself, but only it's id, I would suggest
tid_t...
--
SY, SD.
17.04.2012 12:12, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
It can get out from jrd in at least 2 cases - in system context variable
and in monitoring tables.
Also in the results of isc_transaction_info and isc_database_info.
--
SY, SD.
1 - 100 of 2579 matches
Mail list logo
