Re: Including instrumenst was: Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-22 Thread Jim Wilson
Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Speaking of which, when I hit 's' to switch panel, it looks like we're reading the XML file each time. It funny that loading scenery doesn't cause any hiccups in performance but switching panels does. Yep, I just used the panel-load that was/is bound to

Re: Including instrumenst was: Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-22 Thread Cameron Moore
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Wilson) [2001.12.22 08:27]: Cameron Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Speaking of which, when I hit 's' to switch panel, it looks like we're reading the XML file each time. It funny that loading scenery doesn't cause any hiccups in performance but switching panels

re: Including instrumenst was: Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-21 Thread David Megginson
John Check writes: While I'm at it... is there a chance we might see being able to include fully defined layers in instruments at some point? The best I can do now is layer include=whatever.xml transformations /layer You should be able to include a complete layer with

Re: Including instrumenst was: Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-21 Thread John Check
On Friday 21 December 2001 04:34 pm, you wrote: John Check writes: While I'm at it... is there a chance we might see being able to include fully defined layers in instruments at some point? The best I can do now is layer include=whatever.xml transformations /layer

RE: Including instrumenst was: Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-21 Thread Norman Vine
John Check writes: Eventually, I guess you could have a separate subdirectory for each instrument, with a README, etc. Think of yourself as a fine craftsman, like a watchmaker. err.. uhh... umm.. whatever. I'd like to stay away from excessive directories. Maybe if the

Re: Including instrumenst was: Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-21 Thread Bernie Bright
Norman Vine wrote: John Check writes: Eventually, I guess you could have a separate subdirectory for each instrument, with a README, etc. Think of yourself as a fine craftsman, like a watchmaker. err.. uhh... umm.. whatever. I'd like to stay away from excessive

Re: Including instrumenst was: Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-21 Thread Cameron Moore
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Norman Vine) [2001.12.21 19:25]: Bernie Bright writes: Norman Vine wrote: We could even walk both the compressed and the uncompressed tree and use the 'newest' file for easy experimentation. Easy and slow. I remember someone once saying on this very list that

Re: Including instrumenst was: Re: [Flightgear-devel] c310 Panel

2001-12-08 Thread Andy Ross
I found the following magazine review, which I used to fix the performance of the YASim model. It's the turbo variant. http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/content/specs/79cessnaturbo.html Also, this site, which is a buyer's guide for the 310 family, has lots of good trivia about equipment