Kris Feldmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the posting here of the Eifel tower fly-through, I tried to
duplicate the maneuver in MSFS. Their tower has solid sides with
transparency in the bitmap and thus one cannot fly under it :(
Obviously it depends on how the tower is constructed for
Martin Spott wrote:
Kris Feldmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the posting here of the Eifel tower fly-through, I tried to
duplicate the maneuver in MSFS. Their tower has solid sides with
transparency in the bitmap and thus one cannot fly under it :(
Obviously it depends on how the
Curt,
MSVC ( ISO ? ) doesn't allow non integral initialisation within a class.
Here below is the patch needed to compile the replay sources.
Cheers,
-Fred
D:\FlightGear\cvs\FlightGear\src\Replaycvs diff -u
cvs server: Diffing .
Index: replay.cxx
Michael Selig wrote:
I just did a cvs update in the process of updating some uiuc files, e.g.
the recorder files which had some issues and I want to put the new ones
on the fgfs cvs.
In the process of doing the updates, I have found that the two chase
views we had are now ***very*** different.
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Curt,
MSVC ( ISO ? ) doesn't allow non integral initialisation within a class.
Here below is the patch needed to compile the replay sources.
This is in CVS now.
Thaks for the patch.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
Jim Wilson wrote:
Small patch to expose the localizer property (e.g., true for ILS localizer).
It's in CVS.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 18 July 2003 09:48:
Michael Selig wrote:
In the process of doing the updates, I have found that the two chase
views we had are now ***very*** different. There's a lag effect that is
giving me serious vertigo and there's roll now as well which is
compounding the
Wow. This is *great*! And after nobody responded to my request that it
wasn't even on bottom of the priority list Thanks!
-Matt
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I have implimented a first stab at an instant replay system and have
just commited it to CVS. The system continuously records your
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The autopilot altitude hold seems a bit messed up though since yesterday -
quite bad porpoising - I checked that with the 747, a4, c-172 and a couple of
mine. Terrain following still seems ok though. I doubt this is due to the
replay stuff.
Lee,
Norman Vine writes:
Six statue miles is the generally-accepted cutoff for good VFR.
Terminal area forecasts (TAF's) don't bother with anything over that,
and just report P6SM (plus six statue miles).
Nice to know but does that have any bearing on anything other then
what is
Anyone running FG on XBox/linux yet?
http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/index.php
Dave
--
David Culp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 04:46:08 +0200 (CEST)
Bert Driehuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always found hat switches to be darn near impossible to use for
controlling critical things. I reluctantly use them for the view,
because it won't impact the aircraft flight path.
FYI, it seems that the
Anyone running FG on XBox/linux yet?
http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/index.php
Dave
Hilarious. I wonder if MS saw that coming.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
David Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone running FG on XBox/linux yet?
http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/index.php
Well, I'd have to be interested in console gaming. But heck all you'd need
now is a PS/2 emulator and x-box would really be in trouble. IIRC these units
with modified chips
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 01:40:40 +0100 (BST)
Jon Stockill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do I need to do to make lighting on scenery visible over more that
very short distances?
I've been designing a few objects in blender, converted them to AC3D,
then edited the material properties to have emis
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:34:18 +0200
Jorge Van Hemelryck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, has my tmdc.xml file been added to CVS, in the same Thrustmaster
directory ? How can I check it easily without clearing my whole data
directory and checking out the whole package ? Sorry, I'm not too
familiar
Jon Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone running FG on XBox/linux yet?
http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/index.php
Dave
Hilarious. I wonder if MS saw that coming.
Of course they did. I remember reading an article quite a while back about an
MIT student cracking the security
Nice...
FWIW, here's what more or less the product we currently use at work:
http://www.sogitec.com/anglais/produita/apogee.htm
As it's on the web, I guess it's not too secret.
Ours runs on a bunch of cupboard-sized computers, but it can provide
rather interesting images... projected on a
Hello.
Here are my patches files. Please check them out and include them in
your project.
These files has been testet with a Phoenix Joystick (4-axis,
4-buttons).
Chears,
Roland
4-axis.zip
Description: Zip archive
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
David Megginson writes:
That depends on where and when. I think that most pilots in the
eastern U.S. (you're there, aren't you, Norm?) would have been happy
even for 3 SM for much of this spring and summer, and L.A., of course,
has its smog. Somewhere like Arizona, on the other hand, 10
At 7/18/03, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 18 July 2003 09:48:
Michael Selig wrote:
In the process of doing the updates, I have found that the two chase
views we had are now ***very*** different. There's a lag effect that is
giving me serious vertigo and there's roll now as
xpdf indeed does open it but kghostview does not...
On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 02:26, Jim Wilson wrote:
Christopher S Horler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Tried to look but the pdf file won't open once I downloaded it.
That's strange. Works for me with xpdf 1.00 and linux acroread 5.0.5. File
* Michael Selig -- Friday 18 July 2003 20:15:
The update that Erik made has returned the two old views.
No. It only removed heading damping from the Helicopter
View. Everything else is unchanged.
FYI -- View #3 does not 'play' well w/ my computer (Linux w/ a GeForce4 Ti
4400 card). The
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Michael Selig -- Friday 18 July 2003 20:15:
The update that Erik made has returned the two old views.
No. It only removed heading damping from the Helicopter
View. Everything else is unchanged.
I think if we start creating more views, we should *add* them and not
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 18 July 2003 21:08:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
None of the views was removed.
Well, sort of. The number of views was increased to 6, but the maximum
value after toggling the 'v' key was still set to 5 ...
Aaahh, OK. That explains a lot. Didn't think of this, but
Chase
Ok, I have a proposal. If this is ok with everyone I'll go ahead and do the
xml for the bindings:
'v' - scrolls through a limited number of views. I'll just make it the first
3 defined views. If the current view is greater than 3, then it'll start at 0
(the cockpit).
'CTRL+v' - scrolls
Jim Wilson wrote:
Ok, I have a proposal. If this is ok with everyone I'll go ahead and do the
xml for the bindings:
Looks good to me.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Hi.
Just to let you know, this is the Fokker 100 with separate flaps
(inbound and outbound), ailerons and speedbrake objects:
http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/gallery/fokker/
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has this occurred to anyone ?
http://jvh.net/fgfs/sceneryglitch-001.jpg
I was flying peacefully over the standard scenery when I saw a strange
island... How can this be explained ? Is my scenery wrong ?
--
Jorge Van Hemelryck
___
Flightgear-devel
At 7/18/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Ok, I have a proposal. If this is ok with everyone I'll go ahead and do the
xml for the bindings:
'v' - scrolls through a limited number of views. I'll just make it the first
3 defined views. If the current view is greater than 3, then it'll start at 0
(the
At 7/18/03, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 18 July 2003 21:08:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
None of the views was removed.
Well, sort of. The number of views was increased to 6, but the maximum
value after toggling the 'v' key was still set to 5 ...
Aaahh, OK. That explains a lot.
Hi Jim,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:27:25PM -, Jim Wilson wrote:
This was an outstanding find. I did have a main panel map that John sent me a
while back, but this has the whole flight deck in one pdf. Now if I could
only have (for free :-)) the pages that reference each of the balloon
On Friday 18 July 2003 07:09, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Kris Feldmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the posting here of the Eifel tower fly-through, I tried to
duplicate the maneuver in MSFS. Their tower has solid sides with
transparency in the bitmap and thus one
On Friday 18 July 2003 22:42, Michael Selig wrote:
At 7/18/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Ok, I have a proposal. If this is ok with everyone I'll go ahead and do
the
xml for the bindings:
'v' - scrolls through a limited number of views. I'll just make it the
first
3 defined views. If the
On Friday 18 July 2003 6:55 pm, Lee Elliott wrote:
what makes this possible,
It's because the horizontal surfaces are very thin.
-Fred
_All_ surfaces are very thin:)
(geometry joke)
That's what I like to hear, plane talk
hwaah hwaah hwaaah hwah
Do I get double points
On Friday 18 July 2003 13:30, Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The autopilot altitude hold seems a bit messed up though since yesterday -
quite bad porpoising - I checked that with the 747, a4, c-172 and a couple
of
mine. Terrain following still seems ok though.
On Friday 18 July 2003 14:10, Jim Wilson wrote:
David Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone running FG on XBox/linux yet?
http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/index.php
Well, I'd have to be interested in console gaming. But heck all you'd need
now is a PS/2 emulator and x-box would
David Megginson commit in CVS:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Scenery/w130n30/w123n37
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv25197/Scenery/w130n30/w123n37
Modified Files:
737-static.ac 942050.stg
Added Files:
737-01.rgb
Log Message:
Add a Southwest 737 holding short of 28L on taxiway
Lee Elliott wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2003 07:09, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Kris Feldmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the posting here of the Eifel tower fly-through, I tried to
duplicate the maneuver in MSFS. Their tower has solid sides with
transparency
On Saturday 19 July 2003 00:41, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Lee Elliott wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2003 07:09, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Kris Feldmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the posting here of the Eifel tower fly-through, I tried to
duplicate the
Frederic Bouvier writes:
The texture should be marked -kb in CVS. It is corrupted under windows
and makes FG segfault on loading it.
Where is that cvswrapper that enforce the use of -kb for any rgb file ?
It's on my todo list ... 2 out of town funerals and a trip to Norway
for business have
Richard A Downing writes:
I'm working my way through some of the UK aerodromes, and have hit
some problems agreeing ANY of the decimal coordinates
in the FG files with the DMS coordinates given in the UK AIP.
probably worth while reading this just to
make sure you have the 'maths' right
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:20:38 -0400,
John Check [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 18 July 2003 6:55 pm, Lee Elliott wrote:
what makes this possible,
It's because the horizontal surfaces are very thin.
-Fred
_All_ surfaces are very thin:)
Manuel Bessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maybe this is an excerpt of the well known NWA 744 Manual that is sold
on the web, eg. at http://www.esscoaircraft.com/
(the 744 AOM is here: http://www.esscoaircraft.com/noname162.html )
Could be. I think that's the one that was $70.
Do you know
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Friday 18 July 2003 07:09, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
It's because the horizontal surfaces are very thin.
-Fred
_All_ surfaces are very thin:)
(geometry joke)
LeeE
Infinitely so.
Best,
Jim
At 7/18/03, you wrote:
* Michael Selig -- Friday 18 July 2003 20:15:
The update that Erik made has returned the two old views.
No. It only removed heading damping from the Helicopter
View. Everything else is unchanged.
FYI -- View #3 does not 'play' well w/ my computer (Linux w/ a GeForce4 Ti
Frederic Bouvier writes:
The texture should be marked -kb in CVS. It is corrupted under windows
and makes FG segfault on loading it.
As in
cvs admin -kb 737-01.rgb
? If so, then it should be OK now.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hello Jim,
Sorry, I missed this post at first. The porpoising is certainly related to
the elev_adj_factor - the lower it is the worse the problem. It's hardly
apparent with the c-172 or 747 but more so with the a4.
Try increasing then. Generally
This backs out only the target climb rate calculation fix for the time being.
http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/newauto-patch.diff
Best,
Jim
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
49 matches
Mail list logo
