Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-12 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Friday 10 November 2006 19:28, John Wojnaroski wrote: Frederic Bouvier wrote: Quoting John Wojnaroski : Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest cvs version? This is mandatory in any case.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-12 Thread John Wojnaroski
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: On Friday 10 November 2006 19:28, John Wojnaroski wrote: Frederic Bouvier wrote: Quoting John Wojnaroski : Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest cvs

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-12 Thread Curtis Olson
I think you will need at least libjpeg-devel and giflib-devel. giflib-devel is the one I hit which wasn't installed by default on fedora. Curt. On 11/12/06, John Wojnaroski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mathias Fröhlich wrote:On Friday 10 November 2006 19:28, John Wojnaroski wrote:Frederic Bouvier

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-12 Thread John Wojnaroski
Curtis Olson wrote: I think you will need at least libjpeg-devel and giflib-devel. giflib-devel is the one I hit which wasn't installed by default on fedora. Curt. Right, I knew that ;-), Should have had my morning coffee first, before trying something more complicated than walking...

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-12 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, OSG requires LPEG, GIF, TIFF and PNG support. Typically these are being IMHO OSG requires png and rgb plugin support. Or did I miss something where GIF or TIFF is needed? Thumbnails are in jpeg format, just to make sure I included the jpeg osg plugin. Olaf

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-12 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Olaf, Olaf Flebbe wrote: OSG requires LPEG, GIF, TIFF and PNG support. Typically these are being IMHO OSG requires png and rgb plugin support. Or did I miss something where GIF or TIFF is needed? Well, at least when you build the 'standard' set of OSG plugins (on Unix), then support

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread Curtis Olson
On 11/10/06, John Wojnaroski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port.Anearlier first attempt built and segfaulted when loading the c172.Aftergetting the fresh tar file I casually blew away the earlier version and untarred the fresh one.Now when

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread John Wojnaroski
Martin Spott wrote: John Wojnaroski wrote: Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port. [...] About the only strange, quirky thing is that when untarring the file, getting a warning msg regards time stamp set to the epoch on some of the files. Am I grabbing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread John Wojnaroski
Curtis Olson wrote: On 11/10/06, John Wojnaroski [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port. An earlier first attempt built and segfaulted when loading the c172. After getting the fresh tar

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread Curtis Olson
Hi Jack,Try this link, I'll update the link on the web site.http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/source.tar.gz?view=tar Issue is that the old viewcvs.cgi is broke, now using viewvc.cgi, but for some reason never uninnstalled viewcvs.cgi, probably should do that someday.Curt.ps.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread John Wojnaroski
John Wojnaroski wrote: Curtis Olson wrote: On 11/10/06, John Wojnaroski [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port. An earlier first attempt built and segfaulted when loading the c172. After

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Quoting John Wojnaroski : Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest cvs version? This is mandatory in any case. FlightGear and SimGear should match. -Fred -- Frédéric Bouvier

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread John Wojnaroski
Frederic Bouvier wrote: Quoting John Wojnaroski : Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest cvs version? This is mandatory in any case. FlightGear and SimGear should match. OK, after

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread Georg Vollnhals
John Wojnaroski schrieb: Frederic Bouvier wrote: Quoting John Wojnaroski : Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest cvs version? This is mandatory in any case.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Georg Vollnhals schrieb: John Wojnaroski schrieb: Let Mathias explain it (= one of his older replies from this list!): .. You did use the patched osg version from ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/OpenSceneGraph-20061029/ ?? I believe to remember that such messages

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-10 Thread John Wojnaroski
Georg Vollnhals wrote: John Wojnaroski schrieb: Frederic Bouvier wrote: Quoting John Wojnaroski : Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest cvs version?

[Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-09 Thread John Wojnaroski
Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port. An earlier first attempt built and segfaulted when loading the c172. After getting the fresh tar file I casually blew away the earlier version and untarred the fresh one. Now when starting the build sequence with autogen.sh

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

2006-11-09 Thread Martin Spott
John Wojnaroski wrote: Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port. [...] About the only strange, quirky thing is that when untarring the file, getting a warning msg regards time stamp set to the epoch on some of the files. Am I grabbing a wrong copy? Using the