I was confused, by my git SVN import of the OSG source tree, about
what commits are in 2.8.3. I'll check in a correction soon.
Tim
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr wrote:
- Bertrand Coconnier a écrit :
2011/2/15 Tim Moore timoor...@gmail.com:
I've
By the way, I committed the changes to releases/2.2.0 and then merged that
branch into next. This is the way fixes should move between the two branches.
Please don't commit a fix to next and then cherry-pick it to the release
branch. It is very messy to have the same change committed on
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Jack Mermod wrote:
Hi,
The Red Bull livery has been removed from this release.
Download: http://jackmermod.bplaced.net/Files/cobra21511.zip
I find it ridiculous and a bit immature how Oliver people whine about
a simple logo.
It is neither
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
By the way, I committed the changes to releases/2.2.0 and then merged that
branch into next. This is the way fixes should move between the two
branches. Please don't commit a fix to next and then cherry-pick it to the
release branch. It is very
At Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:48:58 +0100
Csaba Halász csaba.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
I have noticed that after about an hour of hanging around at KSFO in
an ufo on MP, FG's memory went steadily up and eventually reached
2.7GiB. Similarly, during the TGA event at the weekend, memory usage
was above
My patch may not work for OSG =2.9 but the fact is that
_readerWriterOptions is also needed for SimGear to compile with OSG 2.8.1.
Cheers,
Bertrand
Le 16 févr. 2011 02:53, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr a écrit :
- Bertrand Coconnier a écrit :
2011/2/15 Tim Moore
PodaVhone issue:
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=56can=1q=vodaphone
Tips:
#1 don't mention the brand name as you are are aware of it and thus
intentional.. (or patents)
Sorry, but I have worked in this area and they are out to kill as interest
is held...
Flightgear
Stuart Buchanan
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Jack Mermod wrote:
Hi,
The Red Bull livery has been removed from this release.
Download: http://jackmermod.bplaced.net/Files/cobra21511.zip
I find it ridiculous and a bit immature how Oliver people whine about
a simple
On 2/15/2011 8:27 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:50:36 -0800, Jack wrote in message
72e5b800-d213-466d-bf46-c3d33d4ae...@gmail.com:
Hi,
The Red Bull livery has been removed from this release.
Download: http://jackmermod.bplaced.net/Files/cobra21511.zip
I find it
Vivian Meazza wrote:
This is ridiculous. We have this discussion every so often, when we are not
arguing over FlightPro Sim. Do we have to change every airliner model in the
inventory? Of course we don't. Use the bloody thing.
Red Bull is known to be very restrictive sensitive when it comes
I hate to wade into mud wrestling matches. But for every one who is on
their high horse about being pristine in our non-use of any possible
trademarked items ... have you browsed through our aircraft? We have
liveries from just about every airline imaginable, past and present.
What I don't like
Re: Red Bull. One could ask for forgiveness rather than permission. But,
another approach might be to go directly to Red Bull for permission to use
their trademark in return for free advertising for them. I don't know how
several RC aircraft makers 'solved' this issue. There are several RC
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
This is ridiculous. We have this discussion every so often, when we are not
arguing over FlightPro Sim. Do we have to change every airliner model in the
inventory? Of course we don't. Use the bloody thing. And if ever anyone
complains say:
Hi Curt,
At the risk of being a case of if the hat fits
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
I hate to wade into mud wrestling matches. But for every one who is on
their high horse about being pristine in our non-use of any possible
trademarked items ... have you browsed
Stuart Buchanan
Hi Curt,
At the risk of being a case of if the hat fits
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
I hate to wade into mud wrestling matches. But for every one who is on
their high horse about being pristine in our non-use of any possible
trademarked
I was browsing the flightgear wiki pages on doing model animations.
Everything is written from the perspective of a single model with named
parts and the animations refer to the part names.
What I have here is two version of the same model as separate 3ds files. I
realize it's a crude hack, but
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com wrote:
I was browsing the flightgear wiki pages on doing model animations.
Everything is written from the perspective of a single model with named
parts and the animations refer to the part names.
What I have here is two
On 15.02.2011 13:41, Tim Moore wrote:
I've checked in fixes for this change in osgDB:DatabasePager to the
SimGear and FlightGear next and releases/2.2.0 branches.
Still doesn't compile with OSG = 2.8.5. We also need the patch that
Bertrand sent yesterday, i.e. the #ifdef logic for the
OK, I see that merely removing the 2.8.3 case from my conditional,
which I checked in a couple of hours ago, isn't correct. I'll have
another go.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:10 PM, ThorstenB bre...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15.02.2011 13:41, Tim Moore wrote:
I've checked in fixes for this change in
Thanks Gary,
Worked perfectly ... turns out I don't need to specify a global model ... I
can just load submodels and give them names and use them. A global
offset/rotation does work.
Now I'm having trouble with that whole ambient/diffuse thing and my model
surfaces that aren't pointed at the
Hi,
Curt has it right. Get real guys. No one is going to sue a
non-existent
organization with no assets. The worst they will do is tell
us to desist.
Which we will do of course.
If you want to remove or alter almost every livery in our
inventory, fork
the data in git and go right
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:05:41 + (GMT), Heiko wrote in message
59953.21793...@web29501.mail.ird.yahoo.com:
Hi,
Curt has it right. Get real guys. No one is going to sue a
non-existent
organization with no assets. The worst they will do is tell
us to desist.
Which we will do of
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andreas Gaeb a.g...@web.de wrote:
Hi Henri,
I think I found the error, it was in JSBSim's FGForce class. I've
proposed a fix on the JSBSim-devel mailing list.
Best regards,
Andreas
Hi Andreas,
had a look at the patch you suggested on the JSBSim list
Hi Andreas,
had a look at the patch you suggested on the JSBSim list
(http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/attachment.php?list_name=jsbsim-develmessage_id=4D5436B3.10606%40web.decounter=1).
However, I looking at the code it seems calling these InitMatrix in
the FGForce constructor shouldn't
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Gary,
Worked perfectly ... turns out I don't need to specify a global model ... I
can just load submodels and give them names and use them. A global
offset/rotation does work.
Now I'm having trouble with that
Hi Gary,
I think I've beat the model pretty much into submission now. I was able to
export as .ac, but the scaling was off by 2.54 ... hmmm where have I seen
that number before? I figured out how to scale and reposition the model in
blender wow! and there was much rejoicing. :-) Then all the
Hey everyone,
Based on my (brief) reading of some United States statutes, I would suggest we
can continue using these trademarks until asked not to do so. I don't think
this will bring forth a lawsuit, most likely a cease and desist action which is
easily complied with, if it is on trademark
To throw something into the mix here:
I've actually got experience of dealing with RedBull regarding the use of their
logos and IP in Flight Simulation.
Several years ago I contacted them for an old Payware project and they were
most supportive, provided an email stating that as long as
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Gary,
I think I've beat the model pretty much into submission now. I was able to
export as .ac, but the scaling was off by 2.54 ... hmmm where have I seen
that number before? I figured out how to scale and reposition
Hi,
To throw something into the mix here: I've actually got experience of dealing
with RedBull regarding the use of their logos and IP in Flight Simulation.
Several years ago I contacted them for an old Payware project and they were
most supportive, provided an email stating that as long as
Hi,
Technically, all these logos are under trademark:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=blob;f=Aircraft/737-100/Models/Liveries/731CA.png;h=43cfc5a15abb392519e1f95d34951d410d3c3c80;hb=HEAD
Jack wrote:
Hi,
The Red Bull livery has been removed from this release.
Jack, thanks for caring and removing the livery from the package. As I said
you can still provide it separately from your web site. This does not make it
legal but moves FlightGear out of the focus.
I find it
so what happened to fgfs 2.2? can we get a Linux installer as well?
as it's not yet released, what about changing licence to something alike CC
etc.(see the forum) Android uses Apache licence...I didn't read those but am
sure that there's one to keep off jerks.
i doubt...have a look at FSX. Even commercial products alike xtraffic etc use
such liveries.
--- On Thu, 2/17/11, Jack Mermod jackmer...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jack Mermod jackmer...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..IP and litigation risks, was: AH-1 Merge
Request
To: Devel List
34 matches
Mail list logo
