Alex D-HUND wrote:
plib:
Version 1.8.6. Why and how to obtain it can be found here [1]. Pretty
old but still up to date, as far as I know.
BTW, just for the record (and to finally purge this thread from my
inbox): I remember a rule which says that FlightGear releases are
requested to rely on
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
Alex D-HUND wrote:
plib:
Version 1.8.6. Why and how to obtain it can be found here [1]. Pretty
old but still up to date, as far as I know.
BTW, just for the record (and to finally purge this thread from my
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:42:41 +0200, Alex wrote in message
20110621234241.5daf0f9e@main:
I am using system:
Linux 2.6.39.1 #2 SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux Debian Stable/Squeeze
ATI Technologies Inc RS880 [Radeon HD 4200]
..a laptop?
Driver: fglrx, mostly latest version, 11.6 atm (11.1/11.2 during
Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:20:17 +0200
schrieb Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:42:41 +0200, Alex wrote in message
20110621234241.5daf0f9e@main:
I am using system:
Linux 2.6.39.1 #2 SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux Debian Stable/Squeeze
ATI Technologies Inc RS880 [Radeon HD 4200]
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:37:27 +0200, Alex wrote in message
20110622133727.6a7007df@main:
Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:20:17 +0200
schrieb Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:42:41 +0200, Alex wrote in message
20110621234241.5daf0f9e@main:
I am using system:
Linux
Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:48:59 +0200
schrieb Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:37:27 +0200, Alex wrote in message
20110622133727.6a7007df@main:
Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:20:17 +0200
schrieb Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:42:41 +0200, Alex wrote in
I am also interested in this and since nobody replied yet I am starting
the discussion by bringing up my personal experiences:
OpenAL-Soft/libopenal:
AFAIK at least version 1.11.753 is needed to have all features (like
doppler), though older versions may work as well.
plib:
Version 1.8.6. Why
Yes OSG 2.9.10 works best if you can compile it. But on Debian sid/unstable
I'm unable to compile it with gcc/g++ 4.6.
So I'm using 2.9.15 right now with some font size issues.
2011/6/21 Alex D-HUND f...@beggabaur.de
I am also interested in this and since nobody replied yet I am starting
the
Am Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:42:41 +0200
schrieb Alex D-HUND f...@beggabaur.de:
Oops, wrong link for the plib version. Should be:
[1]http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg20793.html
I am also interested in this and since nobody replied yet I am
starting the
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Short version for the impatient reader:
Please do _NOT_ push any major changes or new features to simgear,
flightgear, fgdata until further advice!
snip
Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
to our
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
to our streams. Please note: this includes fgdata, too!
[...]
What's the position on aircraft updates?
They're part of fgdata ;-)
Indeed,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Martin Spot wrote:
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Please refrain from pushing new features or major infrastructure changes
to our streams. Please note: this includes fgdata, too!
[...]
What's the position on
On 20 Jun 2011, at 21:18, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
No, not generally. Obvious fixes are ok, major overhauls are not, in
case of doubt I'd propose that the changes in question should be
reviewed (which is a darn good idea anyway ;-)
Well, I _was_ planning to review the changes. :)
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Both of the changes in question are major model overhauls to the respective
models (c172p, c150).
Comments on the state of the c172 model went unheard for months,
therefore I'd like to hear a really convincing reason why such major
overhaul can't wait until
Hi all,
Stuart wrote:
Both of the changes in question are major model overhauls to the respective
models (c172p, c150).
I need to correct that slightly. All I've been working on is a (c172p) new
panel
including the pedestal. There were a lot of faults and missing switches in the
previous
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
Comments on the state of the c172 model went unheard for months,
therefore I'd like to hear a really convincing reason why such major
overhaul can't wait until the tree is open for the next development
cycle.
Not quite unheard - just
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I don't think there's a convincing reason why it can't wait until the next
development cycle, but I was unclear as to whether aircraft were
considered major features.
Ah, well, aircraft are a pretty prominent feature in flight simulation,
don't they ;-)
While we're
On 20 Jun 2011, at 21:52, Martin Spott wrote:
This is the first time we're aiming at having one release every six
months and not everything will be perfect on the first attempt. Anyhow
I'm still proposing to let us familiarize ourselves with the
implications of having a release plan instead
Torsten Dreyer skrev 2011-06-17 21.47:
Anticipating the release 2.4.0, we reached our first milestone today.
The development streams for flightgear, simgear and fgdata on gitorious
are now declared frozen.
The above states quite clearly that testing is expected to be against
the source
On 17 Jun 2011, at 20:47, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Thanks for supporting our effort to create the next FlitghtGear release
Woo-hoo, release process!
Thanks to Torsten for driving the release, and ThorstenB for already doing a
huge amount of bug-fixing. If you've previously filed bugs in
Short version for the impatient reader:
Please do _NOT_ push any major changes or new features to simgear,
flightgear, fgdata until further advice!
Long version:
Anticipating the release 2.4.0, we reached our first milestone today.
The development streams for flightgear, simgear and fgdata on
21 matches
Mail list logo
