Re: [Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-20 Thread Durk Talsma
On 17 Sep 2011, at 21:45, Stuart Buchanan wrote: /sim/dimensions/radius-m /sim/aircraft-class ? It might be worth having this multi-valued, so classes such as WWII fighter can be identified bit as mil-combat, and WWII. Looking at the -set.xml and Liveries/*.xml files in our aircraft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-18 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:23:57 +0200, Durk wrote in message f2886125-96b7-40ff-a334-f92932287...@gmail.com: Hi Stuart, On 17 Sep 2011, at 21:45, Stuart Buchanan wrote: However, I think that the properties you've defined have a use beyond just ATC, so hiding them under /sim/atc and only

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-17 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Durk Talsma wrote: Hi All, I just added some new code to src/Main/fg_init.cxx that allows FlightGear's airport dynamics functions to give you a valid parking position without having to bother about the details of whether the parking is of hte right type,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-17 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Stuart, On 17 Sep 2011, at 21:45, Stuart Buchanan wrote: However, I think that the properties you've defined have a use beyond just ATC, so hiding them under /sim/atc and only loading them as additional config feels like a bit of a wasted opportunity to me. Thanks for your comments.