Re: [fossil-users] Minor markdown glitches

2017-07-28 Thread Ross Berteig
hen you can just use our wonderful hodgepodge of HTML and quirky custom extensions?" as a response. I'd add these examples to my blog post that demonstrates their bugs, but I fear what it might do... ;-) -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Ch

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

2017-07-21 Thread Ross Berteig
the bug is actually in the test case. We really ought to make some time to review every use of "knownBug". If tester.tcl is invoked with the -strict flag, then tests marked knownBug that succeeded count as failures to draw attention to a known bug that got fixed. -- Ross Berteig

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

2017-07-20 Thread Ross Berteig
On 7/12/2017 2:08 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: On 7/12/2017 11:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: The current plan is to release the 10th anniversary edition of Fossil, version 2.3, on 2017-07-21. I will dust off my test-maven hat and see what happens with clean builds tortured by the test suite

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 2.3 - 10th anniversary edition

2017-07-12 Thread Ross Berteig
https://core.tcl.tk/ -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http

Re: [fossil-users] Curiosity question: is there a recap of add/change/remove on a per-file report

2017-06-19 Thread Ross Berteig
ff I have here on my Windows box (version 2.8.7 built in 2004 apparently) does not have such an option. Read about "fossil set diff-command" for how to do that. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.Ch

Re: [fossil-users] bug : /zip or /tar error page response return HTTP/1.1 200 OK

2017-06-09 Thread Ross Berteig
tended for use by automation that wants to consume JSON, attempting to guarantee that any access within that namespace will be HTTP 200 with a JSON packet explaining the API call results seems reasonable. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineerin

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil http" doubts

2017-06-09 Thread Ross Berteig
On 6/9/2017 1:21 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Jun 9, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Ross Berteig <r...@cheshireeng.com> wrote: I do think that the JSON support is close to solid enough to be on by default. For functionality alone, that is surely true, but in the face of malice? Parsers are notor

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil http" doubts

2017-06-09 Thread Ross Berteig
On 6/8/2017 9:17 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Ross Berteig <r...@cheshireeng.com <mailto:r...@cheshireeng.com>> wrote: For building tools to generally interact with a repo, take a look at the JSON support. It's (still) not compiled i

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil http" doubts

2017-06-08 Thread Ross Berteig
hout requiring a lot of work for new versions. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Webpage for multiple fossil repositories - configuration options?

2017-06-05 Thread Ross Berteig
appears to work on any number of table columns without any coding changes. I like the idea in general. It could completely eliminate the need for cron jobs to generate an index file, without a huge amount of configuration work. -- Ross Berteig r

Re: [fossil-users] /dev/null and /dev/urandom not available ?

2017-05-15 Thread Ross Berteig
not a symbolic link because the chroot jail won't allow the link to be followed). -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users maili

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup v0.6.6 issue

2017-05-11 Thread Ross Berteig
lued options... And I don't want to make my build and test automation depend too much on which version it is building. That is the whole point of using autosetup! -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup v0.6.6 issue

2017-05-11 Thread Ross Berteig
___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with: fossil revert -r xxx

2017-05-10 Thread Ross Berteig
d needed on disk to move the current working copy to revision xxx. It isn't an edit. You simply have a check out at that revision level. This is a command that is frequently used to hop between trunk and branches, or to go back to a version that has a bug report to reproduce it locally in exact

Re: [fossil-users] Limiting cruft in my repos

2017-05-10 Thread Ross Berteig
On 5/10/2017 1:12 PM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: So, ignore ‘makefile’? *From:* Ross Berteig <mailto:r...@cheshireeng.com> # ignore files without at least one dot somewhere in their name !*.* Yup. It would do that. And README, LICENSE, CHANGELOG. Not without its problems. But

Re: [fossil-users] Limiting cruft in my repos

2017-05-10 Thread Ross Berteig
f the REGEX operator is enabled in fossil's loaded SQLite. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists

Re: [fossil-users] A tutorial about "branches", "trunks", "leafs", etc.?

2017-05-01 Thread Ross Berteig
d I personally never use is "fossil close". It exists at all for symmetry with "fossil open", and to clean up a database entry in your master list of open repositories that will be subject to "fossil all". But I've never found that to be a co

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: local .fossil-ignore

2017-04-18 Thread Ross Berteig
. No, the wild cards in the glob can match any part of the path. You can ignore "*/_build/*" and that will ignore any folder named _build and all its descendants anywhere in the tree except at the root of the workspace. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.co

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: local .fossil-ignore

2017-04-18 Thread Ross Berteig
someone who wants to delve into the fossil codebase. I would, but I'm *way* over-committed at the moment. As usual, a working patch adds a *lot* of weight to an argument for a feature. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp.

Re: [fossil-users] How to deal with obsolete stuff in a repository

2017-04-18 Thread Ross Berteig
ion. Probably should do that anyway, it can help you locate where in the timeline you introduced a particular version. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.

Re: [fossil-users] How to deal with obsolete stuff in a repository

2017-04-17 Thread Ross Berteig
to bring the new library version and all the integration effort over to trunk. Naturally, this keeps the older versions on hand, but since they built older versions of your project, that helps keep it all straight for later maintenance and patching. -- Ross Berteig

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *

2017-04-13 Thread Ross Berteig
nfusion when experimenting with this: C:\Users\Ross\Documents\tmp\fossil4>fossil test-echo *.no-such-file.* g.nameOfExe = [C:\Programs\Bin\fossil.exe] argv[0] = [fossil] argv[1] = [test-echo] argv[2] = [*.no-such-file.*] C:\Users\Ross\Documents\tmp\fossil4> -- Ross Berteig

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *

2017-04-12 Thread Ross Berteig
hedding. Also, sadly, no changes. It doesn't help that MS has been changing what they do in edge cases from release to release, making it even harder to figure out what to do to build code that does what you assume you wanted. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Chesh

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Ross Berteig
://www.sqlite.org/src/artifact/9d52522cc8ae7f5c?ln=616-631 -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lis

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Ross Berteig
On 4/11/2017 3:24 PM, Thomas wrote: On 2017-04-11 23:09, Ross Berteig wrote: On 4/10/2017 11:48 AM, Thomas wrote: Actually, I got a batch file that reads the file filter settings from another file and creates the binary-glob and the ignore-glob files on the fly before an addremove

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Ross Berteig
. Comments are probably easy, but I suspect the glob syntax is tied to SQLite. I may look into that. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

2017-04-11 Thread Ross Berteig
ccidental tracking. The --ignore switch is documented to "Ignore files matching patterns from the comma separated list of glob patterns." And that is exactly what it does. The fossil addremove command does not touch those files either on disk or in the repository. It igno

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *

2017-04-08 Thread Ross Berteig
ings or a specific repository. 4. Use SQL to edit the setting into the repo file. Don't do this unless you know what you are doing. The hint I'll provide is that the repository is actually a SQLite database file. There is documentation. But directly poking it is dangerous, so only try on a backu

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with crlf-glob *

2017-04-08 Thread Ross Berteig
lf-glob is to use versionable settings for them. Then you get to edit a file rather than fighting with strange shell quoting rules. Just create the file .fossil-settings\crlf-glob in the root of your repository's workspace and put a single line in it containing the asterisk. Ad

Re: [fossil-users] Couple of beginner questions

2017-04-04 Thread Ross Berteig
e of constraints. But I won't recommend you try it at home. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fos

Re: [fossil-users] Couple of beginner questions

2017-03-30 Thread Ross Berteig
and lessons learned from the Linux community which has been blazing that trail and found (and escaped) most of the dead ends. I think it has become clear that Unicode is here to stay, and UTF-8 is the best representation of it both at rest in files and on the wire in protocol

Re: [fossil-users] Couple of beginner questions

2017-03-29 Thread Ross Berteig
type ActiveTclScript ActiveTclScript="C:\Programs\Tcl\bin\wish86.exe" "%1" %* You can change the definition of ActiveTclScript to include -encoding utf-8 Note that would make your installation less consistent with the rest of the users, and is thus like

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil interprets plain-text file as a binary file

2017-03-28 Thread Ross Berteig
On 3/27/2017 6:21 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On 3/27/17, Ross Berteig <r...@cheshireeng.com> wrote: I believe that a line is too long if it is more than about 8191 ASCII characters, a restriction based on the size of the buffer used in the diff engine. Technically, that restriction

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil interprets plain-text file as a binary file

2017-03-28 Thread Ross Berteig
by older Macs. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil interprets plain-text file as a binary file

2017-03-27 Thread Ross Berteig
uestion is about 3.3 megabytes in size, and as far as I am aware, a normal plain-text org-mode file. Any ideas would be very appreciated! -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.Ch

Re: [fossil-users] [PROPOSED FEATURE] Fossil 'branch' command displays only current branch by default

2017-03-27 Thread Ross Berteig
ial builds. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:80

Re: [fossil-users] Using child projects/repositories effectively

2017-03-21 Thread Ross Berteig
ence much less my opinions. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.Cheshi

Re: [fossil-users] Old fossil (1.29) accessing current fossil trunk?

2017-03-14 Thread Ross Berteig
On 3/14/2017 3:06 PM, Stefan Bellon wrote: On Mon, 13 Mar, Ross Berteig wrote: When fossil is configured to include JSON support it has a fossil json command that consumes a JSON object full of command and arguments and returns a JSON object of results. A similar feature is available over

Re: [fossil-users] Old fossil (1.29) accessing current fossil trunk?

2017-03-13 Thread Ross Berteig
Also, not every command is available via JSON, and I suspect that there is no JSON equivalent to fossil annotate. If we can figure out how to represent the annotate/blame/praise data in JSON, then adding it should be possible. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.1 upgrade path

2017-03-13 Thread Ross Berteig
ssue. Now fossil update trunk succeeds. So to move an existing project to the latest fossil after an SHA3-named artifact exists, it appears to be necessary to rebuild existing repos with version 2.0 or later so the database schema don't include a constraint that forbids SHA3 names.

Re: [fossil-users] Google Security Blog: Announcing the first SHA1 collision

2017-02-24 Thread Ross Berteig
ing a new kind of tag that can be matched by prefix for the purpose. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lis

Re: [fossil-users] fast-import crash (mark not declared)

2017-02-16 Thread Ross Berteig
eckin is stored in the D card of the checkin's manifest, so it is not possible to edit it directly without changing the SHA1 hash of the checkin. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602

Re: [fossil-users] UNMANAGE status

2016-11-18 Thread Ross Berteig
about pure documentation. [1] https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/contribute.wiki -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-use

Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

2016-10-26 Thread Ross Berteig
nce. We support fossil because it is useful to us. You approach us with a hostile attitude, then get worse when people engage and try to help. 4. The rest of this email which I'm not responding to in detail. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire En

Re: [fossil-users] windows compiling with MS VC

2016-10-24 Thread Ross Berteig
. Back in the day, they used to insist on setting PATH, and then adding INCLUDE and LIB which often messed with other compilers, even other compilers targeting Windows let alone cross compilers. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp.

Re: [fossil-users] fast-export to git produces unimportable dump

2016-10-11 Thread Ross Berteig
in the long run. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] visual studio solution and project file for fossil

2016-10-05 Thread Ross Berteig
On 10/5/2016 3:27 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On 10/5/16, Ross Berteig <r...@cheshireeng.com> wrote: Note that building for 64-bit needs something trickier than just following that recipe from a 64-bit VisualStudio prompt. Really? Because just typing "nmake /f makefile.msc&quo

Re: [fossil-users] visual studio solution and project file for fossil

2016-10-05 Thread Ross Berteig
for the complete list. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossi

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

2016-10-04 Thread Ross Berteig
d a folder named aux that was bit by this issue, and IIRC they ultimately resolved it by renaming the folder to something that worked on all platforms. I'm not recalling what project that was, though. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

2016-10-04 Thread Ross Berteig
rough a badly thought out device driver) to create more such names. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Ross Berteig

Re: [fossil-users] windows build assistance

2016-09-22 Thread Ross Berteig
empted to do that as an experiment. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.or

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-12 Thread Ross Berteig
per-file tagging, you could have a build script that verifies the "immutable" files have not mutated, and then require that script be edited if a reason to update the immutable data is discovered. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire

Re: [fossil-users] Infinite loop on merge

2016-09-07 Thread Ross Berteig
curiosity (despite what that does to cats) and try to understand it one of these days. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users ma

Re: [fossil-users] Fix for stash-next pointer (fix for the fix)

2016-08-17 Thread Ross Berteig
06-22. I could see rewording the text for --force to be a little more succinct and not imply something that contradicts the paragraph above it. But all in all, this is pretty clear, IMHO. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www

Re: [fossil-users] ambiguities and inconsistencies in --help

2016-08-12 Thread Ross Berteig
finfo) and also the silent switch -q as 2nd aka for compatibility with GNU/diff --brief? Thanks for your time and work! Best regards, Kain ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/m

Re: [fossil-users] change sync URL

2016-08-10 Thread Ross Berteig
On 8/10/2016 11:43 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: If I have a repo syncing to example.com and I want to change it to sync locally on my network, what's the best method to update the sync url? Set the url:fossil remote-url http://new-url-here.local/ Turn off sync: fossil remote-url off -- Ross

Re: [fossil-users] tags manifest

2016-08-08 Thread Ross Berteig
On 8/6/2016 12:02 PM, Jan Danielsson wrote: On 05/08/16 02:51, Ross Berteig wrote: Many thanks; this saved me a lot of time, as a non-native tcl speaker. And as such, I also would like someone to quickly look over the additions I've made. It seems to work, but I have a feeling I have have

Re: [fossil-users] tags manifest

2016-08-04 Thread Ross Berteig
On 8/4/2016 2:33 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: I just built it and ran the existing test suite over it on Windows. It passes all existing tests. I didn't spot any test cases for the new feature I just created test cases for fossil set manifest that verify that the files manifest, manifest.uuid

Re: [fossil-users] tags manifest

2016-08-04 Thread Ross Berteig
oks and crannies in the fossil source kit. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.o

Re: [fossil-users] Release 1.35 checksums?

2016-07-01 Thread Ross Berteig
is would be less of a concern. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://list

Re: [fossil-users] Web comment editor transforms LF into CRLF

2016-06-17 Thread Ross Berteig
d reasonable for it to pick a preferred line ending and convert to it from entry and from it on display. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___

Re: [fossil-users] Weird cross-contamination between two fossil repositories (and not even talking to server!)

2016-05-27 Thread Ross Berteig
and safely stowed in the local repository. There is no "roll back" from that. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Rejected JSON tests

2016-05-27 Thread Ross Berteig
tcllib, as packaged and delivered by ActiveTcl's teacup utility. https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/65f8333164e4?txt=1=33-38 On linux, you'll have to find your own way to get the library, IIRC I was able to tease it out of apt-get, but I don't recall what its name w

Re: [fossil-users] No progress on "fossil cp"

2016-05-16 Thread Ross Berteig
ly see such files as newly added at the time of the copy while letting a new version also track the history across that event. I'm not steeped enough in the manifest details to know what is possible myself, however. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Ch

[fossil-users] Quirk with GUI vs CLI timelines of technotes.

2016-05-03 Thread Ross Berteig
name. I'd argue the two displays should agree. I'm not sure at the moment which display of the timeline is "correct". -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 62

Re: [fossil-users] Some more default settings for a UI user

2016-04-25 Thread Ross Berteig
ould be trickier. But a way to do that would be to serve different clones to each user, and use a cron job to keep them all synced. Probably not worth the effort unless the value added to the user's convenience is significant. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire

[fossil-users] fossil all ignore and case insensitive paths

2016-04-15 Thread Ross Berteig
ick. But the difficulty is likely deciding when to add it. And then hoping no one needed proper handling of cases for anything other than 7-bit ASCII letters. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp.

Re: [fossil-users] feature implemented or suggestion for stash

2016-04-14 Thread Ross Berteig
ed junk provided by SOC vendors without which it is often impossible to build their sample code or even cross compile for their platform without a whole lot of reverse engineering of their tool chain.>> -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineer

Re: [fossil-users] Getting time of last repository change

2016-04-11 Thread Ross Berteig
"isLeaf":true, "timestamp":1460254449, "user":"andygoth", "comment":"Merge trunk.", "parents

Re: [fossil-users] fossil update --latest not working

2016-04-07 Thread Ross Berteig
ould probably also say that "--latest" and "latest" are the same thing. As it is worded now, the two ways of describing it seem to hint at a difference that isn't there. I'll take a crack at rewriting that "soon", but if anyone else has ideas I'm all ears

Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-04 Thread Ross Berteig
On 4/4/2016 11:33 AM, Ross Berteig wrote: On 4/2/2016 3:40 AM, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: But why that commit [b6b50b12] is marked as *FORK* in timeline.rss; and as *BRANCH* in `fossil timeline`; while here https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/b6b50b1244796110 looks like usual commit

Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-04 Thread Ross Berteig
On 4/2/2016 3:40 AM, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: (Fri, 01 Apr 17:50) Ross Berteig: Even better, Joe has already done that to trunk. But why that commit [b6b50b12] is marked as *FORK* in timeline.rss; and as *BRANCH* in `fossil timeline`; while here https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info

Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-02 Thread Ross Berteig
On 4/1/2016 7:14 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 1, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Ross Berteig <r...@cheshireeng.com> wrote: may I recommend just reading /test-all-help cover to cover once in a while? Okay. Back in a few…

Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-02 Thread Ross Berteig
On 4/1/2016 6:13 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Ross Berteig <r...@cheshireeng.com> wrote: ... * "mtime" or "modification time”? That one’s different, with a much stronger claim: man 2 stat. That is, it is a ~45-year old term of art, not a neologism.

Re: [fossil-users] typos

2016-04-01 Thread Ross Berteig
neologism as a jargon term with an exact meaning in this context is probably good. On the other, where plain English would do just as well, it probably should be preferred. * "webpage" or "web page"? * "filename" or "file name"? *

Re: [fossil-users] Last call for "testerCleanup" branch review...

2016-03-07 Thread Ross Berteig
On 3/7/2016 12:39 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: Ross Berteig wrote: I don't think that is needed any more? $ fossil open ../fossil.fossil $ ./configure --with-miniz --with-openssl=none $ make test" In an open checkout: cannot initialize a new repository here. while executing &

Re: [fossil-users] Last call for "testerCleanup" branch review...

2016-03-07 Thread Ross Berteig
st/amend.test" line 52) I updated main.mk (via makemake.tcl) and checked that in. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing l

Re: [fossil-users] Last call for "testerCleanup" branch review...

2016-03-06 Thread Ross Berteig
a decent confidence level that most fossil features are touched. We haven't reached that goal completely, but this is a strong step along the way. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 62

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil-dev] Call for review / testing...

2016-03-04 Thread Ross Berteig
will be using it to debug an issue in the fossil json test cases "real soon now". -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-use

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil-dev] Call for review / testing...

2016-03-04 Thread Ross Berteig
FOSSIL_TEST_TEMP, FOSSIL_TEMP, TEMP, or TMP with each checked as all caps, all lowercase, and initial caps) to force it to land somewhere known. Also use -keep (which certainly should cause it to print the location of the clutter) to keep the clutter around for post-mortem fuss

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil-dev] Call for review / testing...

2016-03-03 Thread Ross Berteig
On 3/3/2016 11:34 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: I'll see if I can track it down later if there is no more progress elsewhere. Try setting TEMP somewhere sane, perhaps: $ export TEMP=/tmp $ tclsh That fixed it for me. -- Ross Berteig r

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil-dev] Call for review / testing...

2016-03-03 Thread Ross Berteig
On 3/3/2016 10:53 AM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: Ross Berteig wrote: My Ubuntu VM saw this exact message. I was running tester.tcl in a testing folder that is neither the build nor source tree. My guess is that you had a pre-existing checkout recorded for that directory. Please "fossi

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil-dev] Call for review / testing...

2016-03-03 Thread Ross Berteig
today. But I'm hoping that between Andy's and my reports of failure, that someone much more versed in the subtleties of cross-platform Tcl will spot the mistake. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626

Re: [fossil-users] possible bug in dc72fd9624 whenadding--with-th1-hooks

2016-02-29 Thread Ross Berteig
her than root when serving files, which is exactly what would normally happen if fossil were accessed via CGI since web servers are usually not running as root. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626

Re: [fossil-users] possible bug in dc72fd9624 whenadding--with-th1-hooks

2016-02-29 Thread Ross Berteig
ttps://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/e75796be5338a81c?ln=1463,1523 That function is called in "fossil http", "fossil server", and "fossil ui", also implemented in main.c. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engin

Re: [fossil-users] possible bug in dc72fd9624 when adding--with-th1-hooks

2016-02-29 Thread Ross Berteig
bled? -- Joe Mistachkin -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fos

Re: [fossil-users] Shorter alias for FOSSIL AMEND --EDIT-COMMENT request

2016-02-25 Thread Ross Berteig
. So it looks like that was a six character edit to the amend command. Try checkin [769bc7b4] as see if it does what you expected. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602

Re: [fossil-users] fossil all remove?

2016-02-19 Thread Ross Berteig
. I have several more folders just like it (built with different configurations). -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@l

Re: [fossil-users] Further rename stashing oddities

2016-02-18 Thread Ross Berteig
On 2/17/2016 6:54 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said Ross Berteig on Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:18:12 -0800: fossil mv --hard old new; touch old; fossil stash -m "both" fails to stash with the SQLITE_CONSTRAINT message. Not for me... $ f ver This is fossil version 1.35 [7ad8230273]

Re: [fossil-users] Further rename stashing oddities

2016-02-17 Thread Ross Berteig
cause fossil stash diff to complain. The stash currently is quite touchy about renamed and deleted files. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602

Re: [fossil-users] Further rename stashing oddities

2016-02-15 Thread Ross Berteig
On 2/15/2016 10:19 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said Ross Berteig on Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:09:26 -0800: I've been seeing that same message on Windows, specifically in the context of test stash-2-1. The changeset being stashed includes a renamed file and an added file that uses

Re: [fossil-users] Further rename stashing oddities

2016-02-15 Thread Ross Berteig
of test stash-2-1. The changeset being stashed includes a renamed file and an added file that uses the renamed file's original name. Notably, fossil revert passes given the conditions. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http

Re: [fossil-users] Further rename stashing oddities

2016-02-12 Thread Ross Berteig
On 2/12/2016 8:45 AM, Warren Young wrote: While doing the tests detailed in my other thread (delta.c assertion failure on Linux) I came across two other oddities that seem like unrelated issues, so I’m starting a new thread for them. I think Ross Berteig ran into some of this, so please

Re: [fossil-users] Further rename stashing oddities

2016-02-12 Thread Ross Berteig
On 2/12/2016 9:02 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said Ross Berteig on Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:53:38 -0800: 2. The file rename is not rescheduled. It says: MISSINGzip.c Reproduced in the test case. Which I will commit any minute now. I saw this too a couple days ago and began working

Re: [fossil-users] Further rename stashing oddities

2016-02-12 Thread Ross Berteig
On 2/12/2016 5:39 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Feb 12, 2016, at 5:09 PM, Ross Berteig <r...@cheshireeng.com> wrote: After considering, I strongly suspect this is by design. Of course; reverting add should not remove the file. The file was not always Fossil’s to do with as it pleas

Re: [fossil-users] Further rename stashing oddities

2016-02-12 Thread Ross Berteig
On 2/12/2016 11:53 AM, Ross Berteig wrote: While comparing to a similar sequence with an added f3 instead of a rename, I noticed another anomaly which I will try to paint into a corner next. Ok, I chased this into a corner with a test case, and got all the way to the corner apparently

Re: [fossil-users] ./src/delta.c:231: checksum: Assertion failed

2016-02-11 Thread Ross Berteig
On 2/11/2016 10:06 AM, Ross Berteig wrote: What does fossil revert do in this circumstance? It says: REVERT f1 DELETE f1new "fossil undo" is available to undo changes to the working checkout. and has now forgotten the pending rename. I think that fossil stash save *

Re: [fossil-users] We strongly feel that the code and issue tracker...

2016-02-11 Thread Ross Berteig
and support everything else he's touched *without aggravating his elbow. -- Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/ +1 626 303 1602 ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] ./src/delta.c:231: checksum: Assertion failed

2016-02-11 Thread Ross Berteig
On 2/10/2016 10:41 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said Ross Berteig on Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:48:40 -0800: which as expected renamed the file in the repository but not on the disk. It then says fossil stash -m "B 2016-02-09" Did you mean: fossil stash save -m "B 20

Re: [fossil-users] ./src/delta.c:231: checksum: Assertion failed

2016-02-10 Thread Ross Berteig
ch file: c:/Users/Ross/Documents/tmp/fbuild/stash/f1new and does not create any stash entry. What was fossil stash supposed to do in this circumstance? The early test case (modeled after fossil revert's behavior) modeled the stashed rename oddly as well, but at least it did model it. -- Ro

  1   2   >