Re: [fossil-users] What is maximum limit size of a .fsl file ?

2010-01-07 Thread Weijers
-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Gé Weijers email: g...@weijers.org mailto:g...@weijers.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Passwords stored in cleartext in 'user' table

2010-01-10 Thread Weijers
-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Gé Weijers email: g...@weijers.org mailto:g...@weijers.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org

[fossil-users] RSS feed ignores access control

2010-02-04 Thread Weijers
Hi, I decided to configure a repo for access by a few people only. I took away all privileges for the 'nobody' and 'anonymous' users. Result: your have to authenticate first. The one annoyance is that the RSS feed still shows the titles of individual commits. I don't think it's correct to do

Re: [fossil-users] RSS feed ignores access control

2010-02-05 Thread Weijers
And thank you for the fix in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/ci/78a6270fdc Ge' On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 21:40 -0800, Gé Weijers wrote: Hi, I decided to configure a repo for access by a few people only. I took away all privileges for the 'nobody' and 'anonymous' users. Result: your have

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil GUI for local source tree operations

2010-04-04 Thread Weijers
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, D. Richard Hipp wrote: I argue that abandoned branches are part of the historical record and ought to be preserved. Fossil does distinguish between Open and Closed branches. The user interface currently displays all branches on the same page, but if it got to be a

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil GUI for local source tree operations

2010-04-05 Thread Weijers
working. That's not exactly trivial. I work in a heavily regulated industry, and legal concerns have been keeping us from implementing any and all DVCSes until now. Gé -- -- Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] praise/questions for fossil

2010-04-08 Thread Weijers
I add the capabilities I remove from Adnonymous and Nobody to 'Reader', and give all legitimate users either 'Reader' or 'Developer' access. Gé On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Joshua Paine wrote: On 04/08/2010 04:57 PM, Wes Freeman wrote: - Is there a way to host a repository publicly, but make it so

[fossil-users] Validating repositories

2010-05-11 Thread Weijers
Hi, Is there any way to get fossil to validate (check the hash) of every single artifact? Ge' ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] backout a merge

2010-11-09 Thread Weijers
After you merge in changes from a different branch, but before you check in the merge, is there any way to back out the merge? fossil revert undoes the changes but leaves the files edited, although with no changes. fossil undo type fossil help undo for an explanation Ge'

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with repos shared over network

2011-02-01 Thread Weijers
I would suggest running the problematic fossil command and capturing the system call trace using 'strace -o LOG fossil cmd'. It's usually easy enough to figure out the problem from the last dozen or so lines from the 'LOG' file. Ge' ___

Re: [fossil-users] Basic question: how to create fossil web service using bash cgi

2011-03-07 Thread Weijers
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, David Bovill wrote: My bash scripting is very basic. I've been trying to create some cgi's on the server that will let me create new fossil repos. I've this test cgi, and am unable to issue the commands to fossil that I am able to in the terminal. fossil sees that the

Re: [fossil-users] Non-synchronized Fossil repositories for same project, can it be done?

2011-05-25 Thread Weijers
Nolan, That should work just fine. I would put the closed-source variant in a separate branch, so they can pull your changes and either merge wholesale or cherrypick at will. Ge' On Wed, 25 May 2011, Nolan Darilek wrote: A commercial company is interested in productizing one of my open

[fossil-users] sqlite3.h and sqlite3.c

2011-06-27 Thread Weijers
fossil built from the tip has mismatched versions of these two files. The version numbers do not match, and therefor 'fossil sqlite3' is not working. Gé___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] sqlite3.h and sqlite3.c

2011-06-27 Thread Weijers
You're right, thanks. 'touch src/sqlite3.h' followed by a 'make' does not cause any files to be rebuilt. That explains it. Gé On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote: fossil built from the tip has mismatched versions

Re: [fossil-users] tar file is different then zip file

2011-07-18 Thread Weijers
The old tar 'v7' format only supports file names up to 99 characters, according to the GNU tar documentation. The check in 'tar_add_header' (tar.c) checks for nName 100. The file name that gets mangled is exactly 100 chars long Gé On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Rene wrote: On Mon, 18 Jul 2011

Re: [fossil-users] tar file is different then zip file

2011-07-20 Thread Weijers
I have submitted a bug report on this issue. The 'tar' format has been extended over the years, and it's now a fairly interesting mess. File names over 100 bytes are split into two. Posix requires this to be done at a '/' (which you can delete). Fossil splits it anywhere, which confuses all

Re: [fossil-users] tar file is different then zip file

2011-07-21 Thread Weijers
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Rene wrote: Thanks for the bug report. I wonder are you able to get the same (mis)behavior out of fossil as I did out of my repository? Yes, it's reproducible. Once the file path length goes over 100 characters the file quite reliably does not come out right. All the

[fossil-users] Tarball generation fix (please test)

2011-07-23 Thread Weijers
Hi, I have just committed a fix for issues with long path names when Fossil generates a tar file. What first looked simple wasn't because of backward compatibility requirements. You can find my work in branch 'ge-tarfix'. I have attempted to use the rules laid out on the latest POSIX.1

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil destroys repositories?

2011-07-26 Thread Weijers
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Russ Paielli wrote: And [Fossil] is reported to destroy repositories if someone branches: http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/1306005291.html I expect that mr. Shaw will shoot himself in the foot using git rebase or git push --force one day and abandon git for something

Re: [fossil-users] Why do people create branches as a separate step? Was: Unable to sign manifest

2011-08-09 Thread Weijers
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Richard Hipp wrote: Change the subject:  Please help me to understand why people want to create a new branch before adding changes to that branch, rather than just waiting until they check-in their edits?  I'm not being sarcastic or critical here.  A lot of people do

Re: [fossil-users] Why do people create branches as a separate step? Was: Unable to sign manifest

2011-08-09 Thread Weijers
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: If you could just tell fossil that you intend to commit to a new branch from the current workspace/checkout creating that extra commit object could be avoided without risking a commit to the wrong branch. You can *later* change the branch,

Re: [fossil-users] Why do people create branches as a separate step? Was: Unable to sign manifest

2011-08-09 Thread Weijers
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Richard Hipp wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote: If you create the branch first you cannot forget later and commit to the wrong branch. I beg to differ!  Just this past Friday, I did three separate commits to SQLite that went

Re: [fossil-users] bug: extraordinarily slow rebuild

2011-08-16 Thread Weijers
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Christopher Vance wrote: How about fossil test-integrity? fossil: checksum mismatch on blob rid=7657: da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709 vs 76ce4c2d48d71c1c50113303fa40dbf1805bfad7 But I also notice that a fresh clone from www.fossil-scm.org on two different OSs

Re: [fossil-users] Concepts: why close a lead

2011-08-17 Thread Weijers
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Jos Groot Lipman wrote: One question that pops up: why/when would I close a leaf. I mostly do it to make non-active branches no longer show up in the UI and as the result of some command lines (fossil leaves). I use feature branches a lot, and when I'm done with one I

Re: [fossil-users] Timestamps should be in local time.

2011-08-21 Thread Weijers
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, Vikrant Chaudhary wrote: Timestamps should be recorded in local timezone rather than in UTC. 1. It hurts eyes and brain to see the time in UTC and then calculate it in local time. 2. For forensics. I'll be able to know which timezone I was while committing that change.

Re: [fossil-users] delete: Retrieve versions?

2011-08-26 Thread Weijers
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Gilles wrote: I'm not very clear at what a manifest is: www.sqlite.org/debug1/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki It seems to be a list of artifacts (ie. changes?) for each file under source control. The manifest describes a committed revision. It's mostly file names and

Re: [fossil-users] Issues with 1.19 ...

2011-09-07 Thread Weijers
My guess: because you're running as root fossil locks itself in a 'chroot' jail. Try creating a directory 'root' in the directory your repository lives in, and make sure the owner of the repository can write to that directory. Or you can set HOME=/ which sets the home directory to the root of

Re: [fossil-users] Current status on hooks?

2011-09-10 Thread Weijers
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011, Richard Hipp wrote: The hook mechanism should include a delay.  This is because client-to-server push operations can occur in multiple stateless steps, and we really want to wait and run the hooks after all steps of the push operation are complete.  So, for example,

[fossil-users] Ignoring CVS/*

2011-09-12 Thread Weijers
Hi, Is there any way I can get fossil to ignore all the CVS directories and anything under it? I can't seem to get ignore-glob to do anything useful here. Thanks, Gé___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] is there a fossil/sqlite3 routine to get a Unix Epoch GMT int (current time)?

2011-09-16 Thread Weijers
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Richard Hipp wrote: time(0) should give you UTC directly.  No need to convert. This is the common implementation, but not required by any standard. Most OSes do it this way, but POSIX and C99 do only require that time_t be an integer or real type (so it could be a

Re: [fossil-users] is there a fossil/sqlite3 routine to get a Unix Epoch GMT int (current time)?

2011-09-16 Thread Weijers
Stephan, 'mktime' converts localtime, it's not designed to do what you want it to do. Setting is_dst just sets the assumption about whether DST is in effect. Setting it to -1 makes the routine look it up. I don't know what happens in that one 'ambiguous' hour each year.

Re: [fossil-users] is there a fossil/sqlite3 routine to get a Unix Epoch GMT int (current time)?

2011-09-16 Thread Weijers
use the result of time(0). It doubt there's a system out there that can compile Fossil _and_ uses a different representation of time. Gé On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Stephan Beal wrote: On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote: long UnixTime(time_t now

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

2011-10-03 Thread Weijers
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: Additionally, I don't know how portable it is to use always getaddrinfo (POSIX-2001?) while requiring C89. C89 does not address networking, so this issue is unrelated to C89. If getaddrinfo is not supported on a platform that uses the

Re: [fossil-users] [PATCH] IPv6 support and improved reverse proxying support

2011-10-05 Thread Weijers
Hi Ashish, On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: I wasn't aware of both sockaddr_storage, and getnameinfo(). They seem good to me, and I've updated diff[1] to use them. References: [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~ashish/fossil-ipv6-rev-proxy.diff A few comments (not all about your

Re: [fossil-users] Why you should not shun

2011-10-05 Thread Weijers
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Michal Suchanek wrote: And when you find an issue with a commit that is some way back in your personal branch it is more logical and easier to review your branch if you append the fix to the commit where it belongs logically or if you append it at the top of the history

Re: [fossil-users] IPv6

2011-10-18 Thread Weijers
The best way to handle this is to use getaddrinfo and getnameinfo, deal with multiple sockets and be blissfully unaware of the actual protocol being used in 99% of the code. All the #if stuff is a pain to deal with. -- Gé On Oct 16, 2011, at 18:59, Christopher Vance cjsva...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: [fossil-users] Automatically enabled hyperlinks

2011-11-28 Thread Weijers
One approach I have seen is to add a link that when traversed classifies the IP address as belonging to a robot. It could be put on the timeline page, preceded by a warning not to follow the link. -- Gé ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] fossil/git interaction

2012-01-08 Thread Weijers
On Sunday, January 8, 2012, Russ Paielli wrote: I am wondering about fossil/git interaction. Everyone else seems to be using git and github. I see that fossil can import from, and export to, git. If I understand it correctly, however, that is only for creating a new fossil or git repository.

Re: [fossil-users] With jimtcl available can we have hooks that trigger tcl scripts stored in the db?

2012-02-13 Thread Weijers
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.auwrote: Joe Mistachkin has recently added support for calling TH1 scripts on certain actions. See http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/0b61e3c019 In the jimtcl branch, TH1 is replaced with Jim Tcl, so any of these

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil commands will not follow through managed symlink dirs

2012-05-17 Thread Weijers
To prevent stupid stuff from happening fossil could (on (Lin|Un|Pos)ix at least) track whether any file it manages shows up twice by looking at the output of the stat() system call: if (S_ISREG(statdata.st_mode) statdata.st_nlink 1) { if (seen_before(statdata.st_dev, statdata.st_ino))

Re: [fossil-users] Signing

2012-05-26 Thread Weijers
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On top of that, could support signing one or more of the existing signatures at the time of signing. When I sign a commit, it can mean multiple things: 1) I wrote this (authentication) 2) I approve this (authorization) In

Re: [fossil-users] timezone in ubuntu

2012-09-06 Thread Weijers
On Wednesday, September 5, 2012, E. Timothy Uy wrote: In case anyone ever runs into this issue (an xinetd env issue), the solution is to add the following to your service: server = /usr/local/bin/fossil server_args = http REPOSITORY env = TZ=PST8PDT (insert your timezone here) I suggest

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

2013-03-27 Thread Weijers
Try CC=gcc ./configure before you run 'Make'. The autoconfig tool uses cc, which is an alias for the 'clang' compiler frontend. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle stephen.degabrie...@acm.org wrote: Thanks, I did install the CL tools, but something is clearly awry if its