Max Vlasov schrieb:
An idea here is to introduce a directive (maybe something else, but
directive looks more straightforward), let's call it readonly that
forces the method to be able only to read the fields and properties of
the object it belongs to and forbid any writing. Sure in this case
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.comwrote:
I thing there might be some logical contradictions I'm not aware at the
moment, but I think they can be resolved with general oop inheritance logic.
My experience with const methods in C++ often resulted in a
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 22:28, Max Vlasov max.vla...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious, was it a fight with yourself or with someone else's code?
Sure I had no experience with const methods, but I just can't imagine how
function or procedures intended to caclulate/find/collect some information
from
A few days ago I came across a Pascal implementation called Pascal-XSC,
formerly Pascal-SC. This is a portable compiler oriented towards
mathematicians originating at Karlsruhe, it is written in and compiles
to C and is now GPLed.
It appears to work although I've not exercised it thoroughly.
Frankly, from a quick skim read, the only thing I find interesting about
that language is the column selection operator, for multidimensional
arrays, and I think that it might even be possible to integrate that
into FreePascal. Such a feature would make FreePascal much easier to use
in
OS: Ubuntu 10.10 x64 all updates as of this am. But problem has persisted
for days now.
Laz/FPC: Today's trunk
worker thread running issues a call to fpSend with iSend Bytes in buffer
Try
RSRP^.LastCall:=Sockets.fpSend(RSRP^.Info.Socket,@FSendBuffer[0],iSend,0);
except
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Andrew Brunner wrote:
OS: Ubuntu 10.10 x64 all updates as of this am. But problem has persisted for
days now.
Laz/FPC: Today's trunk
worker thread running issues a call to fpSend with iSend Bytes in buffer
Try
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.orgwrote:
It would help if you could say what the exception exactly is ?
Thanks Michael,
Well all I see is a SIGPIPE exception. As stated before the actual FPC
exception was not raised (or the except block was not
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Andrew Brunner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org
wrote:
It would help if you could say what the exception exactly is ?
Thanks Michael,
Well all I see is a SIGPIPE exception.
As stated before the actual FPC exception
