date:20051219

RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song)

2005-12-19 Thread Sasa Stupar

It doesn't work on winxp. I am going to build another machine with FreeBSD 
5.4 and I'll try it then and let you know the results.


Sasa

--On 18. december 2005 14:02 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:




In looking at this again, I didn't realize you were pinging from
Win2K

Win2K uses the -f option to set the Do Not Fragment bit, UNIX uses
the -f option to flood ping.  Win2k ping does not have a flood ping
option.  You can download a ping for Windows from Microsoft here:

http://research.microsoft.com/barc/mbone/mping.aspx

that does have an option for flooding traffic. ( set the milliseconds
between packets very low) but I have not tested it.  Doubtless
others are available on the Internet.

Ted


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 6:07 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
Song)


Nothing. From the GUI view it is at 0% of utilisation.

Sasa

--On 18. december 2005 3:51 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:



what does the CPU of the router do when your doing that?

Ted


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 3:00 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme
Song)




--On 18. december 2005 2:32 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of

Sasa Stupar

Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 2:21 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
Theme Song)




--On 18. december 2005 1:33 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:





-Original Message-
From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:25 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Drew Tomlinson
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
Theme Song)




--On 16. december 2005 3:36 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:





-Original Message-
From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Drew Tomlinson
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd
Theme Song)



Ted


Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and

without polling:

**

Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default)

[1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with
192.168.1.200 port 5001
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[1816]  0.0-10.0 sec   108 MBytes  90.1 Mbits/sec

This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0.

If I disable this option then my transfer is worse:

Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default)

[1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with
192.168.1.200 port 5001
[ ID] Interval   Transfer Bandwidth
[1816]  0.0-10.0 sec  69.7 MBytes  58.4 Mbits/sec
***

BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11).



what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices
in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in
use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram
of the setup, etc. etc. etc.

The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless.
Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact
duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get

identical

results.

Ted



OK. The server (192.168.1.200) is FreeBSD 5.4 with Duron 900

and 3C905C


The 3com 3c905 is not a very good card under FreeBSD the

driver was

written
without support from 3com and is shakey on a lot of

hardware.  I would

say
there's a big question that your server is actually saturating the
ethernet.
Probably that is why your only getting 90Mbt.


NIC; router is m0n0wall (FreeBSD 4.11) with three Intel
Pro/100S Nics and
Celeron 433; The user computer (192.168.10.249) is Celeron 2400
with winxp
and integrated NIC Realtek 8139 series. Switch is CNET CNSH-1600.



Once again, the winxp+realtek 8139 is not a particularly

steller combo,

I would question that this system could saturate the

ethernet, either.



Diagram: http://me.homelinux.net/network.pdf

dmesg from the router:

$ dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991,

1992, 1993, 1994

The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.

Re: httpd_flags=-DSSL?

2005-12-19 Thread Riemer Palstra

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 07:03:02PM -0800, Jeff D. Hamann wrote:
 I've searched plenty looking for the proper method to get apache2 to start 
 up at boot time with little success. I've tried the various combinations of 
 httpd_flags/apache2_flags/apache_flags= to my rc.conf file to no avail:
 
 bobby# cat rc.conf
 blah, blah, blah...
 apache_enable=YES
 httpd_flags=-DSSL

You probably want apache2_enable=YES and apache2ssl_enable=YES
(although the last one has become obsolete by now). Alternatively, you
could still use apache2_flags=-DSSL I think. 

With the apache22 port, this has become somewhat easier, by including
extra/httpd-ssl.conf.

-- 
Riemer PalstraAmsterdam, The Netherlands
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.palstra.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Long delay when sending mail

2005-12-19 Thread Sasa Stupar




--On 18. december 2005 11:13 + Matthew Seaman 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Sasa Stupar wrote:

Hi!

I have configured mail server on FreeBSD 5.4 with sendmail 8.13.5 and
cyrus-imapd v2. I am also using client Mulberry (but also tested with
Tbird, Outlook Express, Outlook). I use IMAP access with all the
clients, the server is on the same network as clients (100 Mbit
network). The issue is when I try to send several messages one after
another I get smtp delay message and this sometimes takes for 30 sec to
a minute. My sendmail has configured a smart host and also to accept
unqualified domains.
I have attached my sendmail config.
What am I missing here?


30s delays sounds like DNS timeouts.  Check that the host running sendmail
can do a reverse lookup on the IP number of the clients connecting to it.
Simply putting IPs and hostnames of all your client boxes into /etc/hosts
should fix the problem.


It is allready able to do a reverse lookup on clients.



Alternatively, that delay could be due to the ident protocol.  Ident is
trivially easy to spoof which makes it a pointless waste of time.
Putting:

define(`confTO_IDENT', `0')dnl

in your .mc file will stop ident getting in your hair.



This is allready defined also.


The third possibility is that you've got quite a few milters set up there
and sendmail simply needs a bit of time to run each message through all of
them.

Cheers,

Matthew


Will try without milters but there are only two milters sendmail and clamav.

But is this possible also to be an imap issue since I use it to read my 
mail and also to store all outgoing mail?



--
Sasa Stupar
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Bulk] Re: PHP startup error in Apache error log

2005-12-19 Thread Riemer Palstra

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 02:44:25PM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote:
 The contents of my extensions.ini file are:
 extension=mysql.so
 
 ; Directory in which the loadable extensions (modules) reside.
 ; extension_dir = ./
 
 It looks like that is commented out.

That shouldn't matter as it should default to the right extension
directory.

 I am assuming I need to uncomment this as well as extension=msql.so in
 the Dynamic Extensions section below.  Am I correct?

No need to, and msql is not mysql.

I'm still suspecting somehow debugging was turned on at compile-time.
Could you show me what's in your /var/db/ports/php5/options ?

-- 
Riemer PalstraAmsterdam, The Netherlands
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.palstra.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Value too large to be stored in data type -- gzipped tarball

2005-12-19 Thread Nikolas Britton

On 12/18/05, TuxGirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is nothing wrong with tar and large files, it's synonymous with
what tar is used for. I think your problem is just a Linux tar to
FreeBSD tar quirk. I had no problems with the 3.3GB testfile I made
for tar and gzip to play with:

I think I may have found some additional info about the problem:
http://groups.google.com/group/list.freebsd.questions/browse_thread/thread/9234a3841dce6209/ce62e532d4e2fa0d?lnk=stq=%22+Value+too+large+to+be+stored+in+data+type%22+freebsdrnum=14hl=en#ce62e532d4e2fa0d

It appears that the problem has something to do with large files
burned to DVD and read in freebsd (linux has not had a problem with
it, from what I've seen).

I've found a few articles on google and google-groups regarding this,
but they all seem to be related to burning DVDs in FreeBSD. It
appears to be the same problem however... So, I guess now my question
is, does anybody have any great ideas for getting around this? I was
wondering if it's possible to use dd to copy the tarball over to my
local drivek so that i can work with it that way. I haven't had the
chance yet to figure out dd well enough to know if this is possible or
how I would do it, but it seems to be the best option i've been able
to think of...

Thanks for the help!
~Erin

From what I've read their is a 2GB limit per file on ISO9660 file
systems. It seems as though Linux 'worked around' this limit thus
forcing you into this problem.

dd will not work for you. the only easy workaround is to mount the DVD
on a Linux box and then copy the file over the network to the FreeBSD
box, or make a new DVD. In the future make sure the files you burn to
disc are less then 2GB.

dd is for disk image stuff to see what it does and how it works read
up on mdconfig and mdmfs (man pages). you want to make file backed
(vnode) memory disks to use for playing with dd...
http://www.crazytrain.com/dd.html Also grab some floppy, hdd, or even
cd image files to play.
http://rcsg-gsir.imsb-dsgi.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/documents/advanced/node13.html
http://www.rajeevnet.com/hacks_hints/os_clone/os_cloning.html

anyways...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

56 matches

Mail list logo