On 11/8/05, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig Boston wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:05:13PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote:
Thanks, Craig. I'm glad to hear that I'm not alone in pursuing this method.
Do you know of any particular disadvantages of continuing with this
TB --- 2005-11-08 06:48:07 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-11-08 06:48:07 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2005-11-08 06:48:07 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2005-11-08 06:49:22 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-11-08 06:49:22 - cd
On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 00:30, Stephen Hurd wrote:
I installed from two CDs, and got a working KDE system. Now, I want to
[snip]
Heh, essentially the problem is this... before a release, the ports tree is
stabalized... everything builds and works together, broken dependencies are
fixed, all
newbie wants to know.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
newbie wants to know :)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As the front page of the website says, the 5.x series of releases are
now Legacy. 6.0 is now considered the stable release platform, but 5.x
will be supported for a while longer, I think.
Eriq Lamar wrote:
newbie wants to know :)
___
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:46:28PM +0900, TOMITA Yoshinori wrote:
[...]
Here is a tiny patch.
Please send-pr this, so that it doesn't get lost. This would probably
fix http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88538 as well.
Thanks.
--
Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
thanks to Oliver and Michael for explain me the mechanics
behind timecounter and Hz quality.
I have send the question, why i have to wonder about
different IRQ-Counts but same HZ. It is really thaat HZ on
both machines is the same.
I have only knowed the old behavior.
I set the HZ over
Since upgrading to 6-STABLE I get errors on my cardbus NIC. If I have
the patience to wait for echo on an ssh terminal one could say that it
works, but in a real world it's unusable.
Hopefully helpful details:
* Worked fine on 5.4
* Whilst downloading a freebsd iso over ftp, no watchdog timeouts
Sam Leffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Richard Arends wrote:
Today I upgraded my laptop from 5-STABLE to 6-STABLE. After the
upgrade, my wireless is not working anymore.
You are doing better than me. I try this:
ifconfig ath0 wepkey 12345
and get
Hola listeros
Soy nuevo en el tema del FreeBSD y me gustaria saber
cual es la distribucion stables en estos momentos.
Podria ser la 4.11 o la 5.x?
Saludos
y gracias
taurus
__
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos servicios, más
martinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After digging in the source i have found that timec.c have an routine for
computing the so called Hz quality.
During boot, the kernel probes several time counters and
assigns
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 04:27:21PM +0100, dani mot wrote:
Hola listeros
Soy nuevo en el tema del FreeBSD y me gustaria saber
cual es la distribucion stables en estos momentos.
Podria ser la 4.11 o la 5.x?
Saludos
y gracias
taurus
Hola,
La distribucion stable en este momento es la 6.0
Tom Grove wrote:
Richard Bejtlich wrote:
After speaking with Colin, he mentioned that IPSec, NAT, and disk
quotas (enabled via options QUOTA) are the three most popular kernel
changes that prevent people from running GENERIC and hence using
freebsd-update for binary kernel updates.
Can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5-stable:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/imb# swapinfo
Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
/dev/da0s1b 104419222736 1021456 2%
/dev/da1s1b 104419222996 1021196 2%
Total 208838445732 2042652
Hi,
I've got an IBM Intellistation M Pro with dual 600 Mhz PIIIs, an IBM
DNES-309170W (da0 on ahc0) as the root drive and HighPoint RocketRaid 1520
with two WD1600JD drives mirrored as data drives. There is nothing on
ata0 and the CD-ROM drive is the master on ata1. I have been running a
custom
Hello all,
I'm trying to configure a firewall with carp + ipfw, but I encountered the
strange problem.
Packets are bypassing carp interface, instead ipfw log shows packet flow
to/from physical interface, e.g.:
http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/
it is important to keep in mind that
Colin Percival wrote:
Tom Grove wrote:
Richard Bejtlich wrote:
After speaking with Colin, he mentioned that IPSec, NAT, and disk
quotas (enabled via options QUOTA) are the three most popular kernel
changes that prevent people from running GENERIC and hence using
freebsd-update for binary
I installed 6.0-RELEASE on a Toshiba M55-139 laptop. It has the Atheros
AR5005G 802.11 device, which 'dmesg' reports as
ath0 Atheros 5212 mem 0xd0200-0xd020 irq 21 at device 2.0 on pci 4
ath0: Ethernet address: 00:11:f5:8d:f4:fc
ath0: mac 7.8 phy 4.5 radio 5.6
On PCI Bus 4, 'scanpci'
Hi All
I just installed FreeBSD I have to say, it looks good. Certainly I have
better experiences with it than I have with Linux.
Jamie.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
On Monday 07 November 2005 09:23 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2005 05:18 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Mon, November 7, 2005 11:49 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Please send me 'pciconf -lv' output.
Here it is, thanks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote:
It seems that it work. Thanks.
Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify em, for tun, vice
versa... what a mess, hehe.
No prob; I don't see why using the em(4) backing the tun(4) wouldn't
work for ALTQ _IF_ you actually tagged
Hi all,
I've found the following problem on my IBM T41p when running 6.0-RELEASE:
when both psm and acpi_ibm are compiled in the kernel, the psm0 device
(touchpad) doesn't initialize properly - with verbose logging it says
psm0: unable to allocate IRQ
When acpi_ibm is removed from the kernel,
TB --- 2005-11-08 17:30:11 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-11-08 17:30:11 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2005-11-08 17:30:11 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2005-11-08 17:31:07 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-11-08 17:31:07
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:53:21 +0200
Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 05/11/2005 20:36 Manfred Lotz said the following:
I agree. Happened to me as well under FreeBSD 6.0. burncd was
hanging when trying to fixate and never came back.
I personally don't see this problem, but I am
Two hours ago I made a post with the Subject line you see on this note.
I copied the post I made to bsdforum's laptop forum Sunday night, and added
the kldstat to the copy.
Unfortunately, I included the kldstat from my more recent NDISulator efforts
to get the 5005 going (which has not worked yet
As Brain had stated you are using the libsasl from your 5.x system.
You need to rebuild the sasl port for 6.x, and then do either a
buildworld or build sendmail manually from the base sources.
If your system is not at 6.x right now, just comment out those entries
in /etc/make.conf. Do the
Colin Percival wrote this message on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:22 -0800:
In deciding what options should go into the GENERIC kernel, I think the
question we should be asking is not how many people use this?, but
instead would adding this option inconvenience more people than it would
help?.
My sk0 is rendered useless when flooded with multicast join requests.
Here is my setup:
FreeBSD server.mcneil.com 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #94: Mon Nov 7
23:51:05 PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMD64
amd64
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
GENERIC is already so large, that if you want/need a smaller kernel,
you're going to rebuild anyways,
Since I care about that extra 2megs, I recompiled my own kernel,
And the real problem of a big kernel is
I dont understand exactly why do you have to
Sounds like a misunderstanding. . Dani asks the question about freebsd
releases.
I just answer his question in spanish.
- Rodrigo
Hector Lecuanda wrote:
Hay dos ramas de -stable
6.0-stable y 5.x
ambas son de calidad de produccion aunque la de nueva tecnologia es la
6.0 y la de legado es la
Hi,
I was wondering if someone could tell me how to set the permissions for a USB
card reader when it's plugged in? I've been Googling for hours and found
nothing concrete so far although I'll keep looking.
So far I have this situation:
I plug in the card reader and device nodes are created
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:24, Andy Fraser wrote:
I was wondering if someone could tell me how to set the permissions for a
USB card reader when it's plugged in? I've been Googling for hours and
found nothing concrete so far although I'll keep looking.
devfs.conf can do it.
So far I have this
On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 10:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I was wondering if someone could tell me how to set the permissions for a
USB card reader when it's plugged in? I've been Googling for hours and
found nothing concrete so far although I'll keep looking.
devfs.conf can do it.
I
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:20, Andy Fraser wrote:
On Tuesday 08 Nov 2005 10:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I was wondering if someone could tell me how to set the permissions for
a USB card reader when it's plugged in? I've been Googling for hours
and found nothing concrete so far although
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Colin Percival wrote:
Tom Grove wrote:
Richard Bejtlich wrote:
After speaking with Colin, he mentioned that IPSec, NAT, and disk
quotas (enabled via options QUOTA) are the three most popular kernel
changes that prevent people from running GENERIC and hence using
--
http://www.fabiankeil.de/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20051108/6998ec73
Randy Parker wrote:
Two hours ago I made a post with the Subject line you see on this note.
I copied the post I made to bsdforum's laptop forum Sunday night, and added
the kldstat to the copy.
Unfortunately, I included the kldstat from my more recent NDISulator efforts
to get the 5005 going
On Wednesday 09 Nov 2005 12:22 am, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
I thought that was only for devices that exist at boot? I have my DVD
burner set up in devfs.conf so I can use it as my user (reading and
burning with some other tweaks[1]).
Nope, it's applied to all devices as they are created as
TB --- 2005-11-09 01:16:50 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-11-09 01:16:50 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2005-11-09 01:16:50 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 01:17:51 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 01:17:51 -
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Petr Holub wrote:
I've found the following problem on my IBM T41p when running 6.0-RELEASE:
when both psm and acpi_ibm are compiled in the kernel, the psm0 device
(touchpad) doesn't initialize properly - with verbose logging it says
psm0: unable to allocate IRQ
When acpi_ibm
TB --- 2005-11-09 02:24:47 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-11-09 02:24:47 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2005-11-09 02:24:47 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 02:26:08 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 02:26:08 -
See my posts and others on these topics:
critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4)
5.3 - 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2)
[PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing
Those are from September 2005, when I and others started having problems
with the latest (poor) edits to the
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2005 09:23 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2005 05:18 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Mon, November 7, 2005 11:49 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Please send me 'pciconf -lv' output.
Here it is,
TB --- 2005-11-09 03:56:25 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-11-09 03:56:25 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2005-11-09 03:56:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 03:57:28 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 03:57:28 - cd
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 18:15, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:39:02PM +0100, Marko Cuk wrote:
It seems that it work. Thanks.
Damn, for vlan's ( 802.1Q) you should specify em, for tun, vice
versa... what a mess, hehe.
No prob; I don't see why using the
On Tue, 2005-Nov-08 20:54:41 +, Andy Fraser wrote:
I've read the man pages for devfs, devfs.conf and devfs.rules. devfs.rules
looks like what I need but I can't work out what I actually need to do or how
to test a rule without rebooting.
I also found the man pages very opaque but some
Hi folks!
And the real problem of a big kernel is
Sometimes people want just what they
need. Do you want your cousin's cycle
in a living room? Stuff one even don't
know what is it for? Drivers for scsii
you don't have?
I would like freebsd as neat as possible.
It _is_ simple and neat.
TB --- 2005-11-09 06:13:51 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2005-11-09 06:13:51 - starting RELENG_5 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2005-11-09 06:13:51 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 06:14:45 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2005-11-09 06:14:45
Hello freebsd-stable,
FreeBSD 6.0 on VMWare 5.0 prints such messages every 3-4 minute.
Also, messages like
calcru: runtime went backwards from 40644816 to 40005944 usec for pid 3 (g_up)
is shown routinely.
timecounter is ACPI-safe, kernel is GENERIC one.
5.4-STABLE on some virtual
50 matches
Mail list logo
