I have a mirror raid on Promise controller
supported by atacontrol.
How can i verify it?
Thank you in advance
--
Artem
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have a mirror raid on Promise controller
supported by atacontrol.
How can i verify it?
[snip]
No, no. i meant completelly verify raid data, that is
that bother drive match and no bad blocks on any of them.
There is a special VERIFY raid command
William LeFebvre wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
Maybe someone with deeper knowledge of the internals of FreeBSD
can clean up something for me (any for many others)^
Here are lines from my top:
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
COMMAND 9258 hordelo_ru1
William LeFebvre wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
CPU is more than just enough in my case. There will a a lot https
sitting there but load, i am sure, will be low.
If the load is low then you may not need very many processes.
They belong to different sites ;) so they need to be run constantly
in advance!
--
Regards,
Artem Kuchin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for this CPU and optimization for it, so
i would get myself a speedy system and less memory hungry, right?
The only option known to me which is related to the isee is cpu
setting in kernel config file. Anything else?
Thank you very much in advance
--
Regards,
Artem Kuchin
Jack Vogel wrote:
I am preparing to update the em driver to the equivalent of my
6.6.6 driver. Just doing some last minute sanity checking, I
hope to the checkin before end of day.
This will provide support for devices up to our latest, the
next stage I'm planning will incorporate multiqueue
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
What value of HZ option would you recommend
for a hosting (web) server with a lot of processes
(about 900) and polling off (as decided from previous
discussion polling is useless in
this situation).
In that case, I would recommend not to override
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
1. Any process, including the kernel can only allocate up to 4 GB of
memory on a 32-bit system (since a 32-bit integer can only hold that
many values)
2. The kernel is further constrained so the user programs can get
Craig Boston wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:32:39PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
In that case, I would recommend not to override the
default at all (which is 1000).
ISTM that it would be better to use kern.hz=100 in this case.
My reasoning is that a web server shouldn't be terribly
Stephen Clark wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
1. Any process, including the kernel can only allocate up to 4 GB
of memory on a 32-bit system (since a 32-bit integer can only
hold that many values)
2. The kernel
effect. I would not go under 100, though. I personally believe
that a default of 1000 is ridiculously high, especially on a SMP
system.
Nuts! Everybody has his own opinion on this matter.
Any idea how to actually build syntetic but close to real
benchmark for this?
For example:
Hello!
What value of HZ option would you recommend
for a hosting (web) server with a lot of processes
(about 900) and polling off (as decided from previous
discussion polling is useless in
this situation).
What parts of kernel does this option affect? What depends
on it?
--
Regards,
Artem
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 20:58, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand is why timer rate on each cpu is 1995? I
have set it to 1000, not 1995 or 2000. I have seen it showing 2000
on another box.
So
1) why not 1000?
DOUBLING
I can only make assumptions about
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 12:13, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have dual CPU with HT. If i turn on HT (and it does help in my
case) it shoud 2000 int x4 = 8000 ints per second. SO, i have saved
200 int/second from NIC and got myself 8000 ints/second from timer.
This kind
3) Is timer int really generated on each cpu? Am i really wasting cpu
time on ~4000 ints per second?
4000 ints per second is rather nothing on any modern CPU.
Have a look at the top(1) display of an otherwise idle
system. The %interrupt column should be zero, even if
it's processing 4000 timer
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
3) Is timer int really generated on each cpu? Am i really wasting
cpu time on ~4000 ints per second?
4000 ints per second is rather nothing on any modern CPU.
Have a look at the top(1) display of an otherwise
Anyone any clue on this issue:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I enabled device polling in the kernel, in nics and
set HZ=1000.
How, when i do
omni2# vmstat -i
i see
interrupt total rate
irq14: ata0 47 0
irq15: ata1
I enabled device polling in the kernel, in nics and
set HZ=1000.
How, when i do
omni2# vmstat -i
i see
interrupt total rate
irq14: ata0 47 0
irq15: ata1 41 0
irq28: em0
Martin Nilsson wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
But i don't understand how and why it happened. ONly 6 hours ago (a
night before)
all those files were backed up fine w/o any read error. And now,
right after replacing
the driver and starting rebuild it said that there are bad sectors
all over those
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
That exactly was i was talking about. I don't acess to individual
disks
behind raid unit, so, i cannot doit. I don't know it controller
VERIFY command does it right. If it doesm then i shoudl put it into
a cron
job and do it on weekly basis. Also
You can run smartmontools on disks behind 3ware controllers, eg
/dev/twe0 -d 3ware,0 -a -o on -S on -m [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/twe0 -d 3ware,1 -a -o on -S on -m [EMAIL PROTECTED]
did this:
smartctl /dev/twe0 -d 3ware,1 -a
for each driver on another server. Two driver are pretty old, the driver
Hello!
Here is the newest story of mine about how one should
never use raid5.
Controller is 8xxx-4LP.
I have a simple 360GB raid5 with 4 drives since 2004.
Only about a year ago i realized how much speed i have
wasted be saving lousy 120GB. I should have choosen
bigger driver and setup two
David Schwartz wrote:
A day ago at 11 am i have turn off the server,
pull out the old driver, installed a new one, turned of the server
and started rebuild in an hour from remote location via web
interface. After about 5 minuted the machine became unresponsive.
Tried rebooting - nothing. I went
Hello!
I don't know if it really belongs to this list, since
i have only tested on 7-CURRENT, but on the other hand
7-CURRENT is soon going to be stable.
So here it goes:
1) insert usb flash disk
2) usbd detected it
3) mount it (mount -t msdosfs /dev/da1s1 /mnt)
4) simply pull the pen drive
Hello!
I have heard that 7 is very stable since november and
much better (perfomance wise since GIANT lock have been
deleted completely) since that time.
Is it true?
Also, how to cvsup the sources? I tried RELENG_7 and
HEAD tags and no sources and docs fetched at all. Which is
the correct tag?
Hi!
When i installed twas driver on 6.2-STABLE it said
[FAST]
i presumed that it measn that twa is giant-lock free.
Now, after installing 7-CURRENT i see
Aug 15 17:00:02 omni3 kernel: 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage
controllers, version: 3.70.03.007
Aug 15 17:00:02 omni3 kernel:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use gtar (gtar because it has incremental
backups, and tar does not)
You _can_ use BSD tar for incremental backups. I do that
every day.
Yes, but that's not real incremental backup because
if you restore data you'll get a bunch
I am having tough time with backup system.
I use gtar (gtar because it has incremental
backups, and tar does not)
I use inode change time in order to backup
all changed files. I have notices that some
files are always backed up even if they did not
change. For example all mysql database.
I
man gtar
states:
--newer dateOnly store files with creation time newer than
date.
Is it totally wrong and gtar really uses inode change time (like tar)
or gtar does no take inode change time into account at all?
--
Regards,
Artem
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
this
libc.so.5
or this
libc.so.6
?
Did you recompile Perl after the last installworld? If not, do so.
No i did not do
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
/lib/libc.so.5
I chflaged it, deleted it and made a link to
libc.so.6
this guy sounds familiar. i am really hosed right now, i can't
run a browser simultaneously, maybe i am being really stupid,
but what do you mean when you say
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how the appropriate 'so'
is selected? How freebsd known which so to load
this
libc.so.5
or this
libc.so.6
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
What i don't understand, is how
Maybe it is the wrong list, but maybe someone can quickly
help me out.
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
or lower case using manually set locale (setlocale(..)).
A very simple program:
#include locale.h
#include errno.h
#include ctype.h
main(){
char
is currently set.
I tried without call setlocale(LC_CTYPE,NULL);
- no difference.
--
Regards,
Artem
--
-max
2007/5/24, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe it is the wrong list, but maybe someone can quickly
help me out.
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
or lower case using
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have a very stupid problem. I cannot convert to upper
or lower case using manually set locale (setlocale(..)).
A very simple program:
[...]
printf(IS UPPER ?: %d\n,isupper('?'));
printf(IS UPPER ?: %d\n,isupper('?'));
printf
Recently i figured out that all locales stopped working
properly on some of my 6-STABLE servers and in all jails
on them.
These server diffeer from others (on which locale work)
in that they were upgraded to 6-STABLE directly from
5.3-STABLE.
Test was easy:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use POSIX
I am just wondering if it is normal.
I have two xeon processors with HT on each of them.
When loading kernel says that 4 cpu's are found,
but when i do top i can see only 0 or 2 in the C
column. never 1 or 3. Is it normal?
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (cvsed 1 day ago)
--
Regards.
Artem
We use 3ware cards (twe driver) on most of our
server. While it is a very good raid controller it's
driver is still GIANT LOCKED and i think this
reduces perfomance of the server (they do a lot of disk io).
Does anyone know a good raid controller (raid-5 not really needed,
mirror is enough)
Richard Tector wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I am just wondering if it is normal.
I have two xeon processors with HT on each of them.
When loading kernel says that 4 cpu's are found,
but when i do top i can see only 0 or 2 in the C
column. never 1 or 3. Is it normal?
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (cvsed 1
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:47:48 am Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I have a Pentium D box, running 6.2-RELEASE. In dmesg, I see CPU#1
launched, but I never see any process running on it, and mptable
shows
Hmm. I am running PentiumD 3.0 Ghz on Asus p5p800-vm
the number do not change with or without PAE
Maybe i look in the wrong place?
I'm not going to waste my time explaining for the hundredth time how
the x86 memory layout works. If you want to recover the missing
256MB, go look in your BIOS for an option about memory hole remapping.
No
Hello!
I've upgraded one of my servers today.
Now it is
Asus P5p800-VM
Pentium D 3.0Ghz
4GB RAM (4x1 GB)
3WARE raid5
FreebSD 6.2 cvsed today compiled from sources.
after that i decided to try PAE. It runs just fine but
when i compare available memory with and without
pae i do not see any
Martin Nilsson wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Apr 21 18:01:30 osiris kernel: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz
(3000.33-MHz 686-class CPU)
Why bother with PAE on a CPU that is 64-bit capable and can run the
amd64 version of FreeBSD 6.2?
Do you know a RELIABLE way to migrade a production
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 4/21/07, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I've upgraded one of my servers today.
Now it is
Asus P5p800-VM
Pentium D 3.0Ghz
4GB RAM (4x1 GB)
3WARE raid5
FreebSD 6.2 cvsed today compiled from sources.
after that i decided to try PAE. It runs just fine
About one year ago, I was able to do the regular procedure after enabling i386
compat. It was just another make world for me.
options COMPAT_IA32
This is interesting. I have setup and amd64 box with this option enabled. And i
am sure i have to leave
foreve, since some client have
Maybe someone could help me.
I have a machine with 4GB of RAM 128MB of which is wasted and i really
need 2 gigs more.
This is a heavy duty production server with a lot of jails and custom scripts,
etc..
and i am afraid i cannot reinstall all from scratch. Furthermore it is located
in the
Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x - 6.x upgrade from source without
upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step?
tried twice - did not work, but going to 5 and then to 6 was not a problem.
But i suspect than going from older 4.x to newer 5.x (like 5.4) might not work
and it might need
What's the basis for your suspicion?
My memory might play tricks on me, but i think I remember that i tried to
upgrade
from 4.1 to 5.3 longtime ago and it did not work. I had to up to 5.0 and the to
5.3.
But that might be just some weird client install (i did not install freebsd on
that box
Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via
csup and
source build?
AFAIK nobody has lived to tell the tale (or at least I didn't see any
followups from people who claimed they'd try it). In any case it would
be better to migrate it via binary reinstall (the same as
Is there way to more or less sefely migrade to AMD64 arhitecture via
csup and
source build?
...
Damn it. Then i guess i need to do some experimenting myself.
Definitely.
Theoretically, what would be the procedure?
1) Backup system.
2) Download amd64 install ISO and burn to CD
3) Boot
Yep. It should look something like this output, from my dual-core
Opteron running Linux 2.6.19-ck2:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1)
System -- Linux daydream 2.6.19-ck2 #5 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jan 20
12:23:54 EST 2007 i686 athlon-4 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/mapper/vg-u2 10321208 6610764
Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you using?
My raid pretty much sucks. It is build it on the intel motherboard
LSI Megaraid. But i still get 81Mb/sec when doing
dd if=/dev/ar0 of=/dev/null bs=1M
How much do you get on this?
--
Regards
Artem
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you using?
My raid pretty much sucks. It is build it on the intel motherboard
LSI Megaraid. But i still get 81Mb/sec when doing
dd if=/dev/ar0 of=/dev/null bs=1M
How much do you get on this?
geom_mirror on 2 desktop SATA drives
- Original Message -
From: Charles Shannon Hendrix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:30:12 +0100
Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles
- Original Message -
From: Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:32:36 +0300
Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm
- Original Message -
From: Fluffles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hmm. what kind of HDD, RAID or whatever are you
I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of
different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and
compare results with machine cost.
Hope this will be usefull for someone.
BENCHMARKS:
OMNI3 (current cost 2400$):
Intel entry server mainboard,
I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because
the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy.
Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really
'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine
and even, as seen in
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because
the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy.
Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is
really
'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine
Hi!
I just setup a new machine and while it is supposed to be full SATA II i still
see
these lines in at kernel init:
Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad8: 305245MB Seagate ST3320620AS 3.AAE at
ata4-master SATA150
Mar 6 14:00:09 aaa kernel: ad10: 305245MB Seagate ST3320620AS 3.AAE at
ata5-master
- Original Message -
From: Tom Judge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jack Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Boot prompt for Intel AMT
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
snip/
We have a number
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines of
different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self and
compare results with machine cost.
Hope this will be usefull for someone.
Several things:
a) It looks like your message
See here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.html
Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty terminal
originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis are there.
--
Artem
Hello!
I hope some people will understand what i am talking about, because
the technology, i think, is not very popular, but can come VERY handy.
Intel AMT Serial over LAN (SOL, why is it called 'over LAN' if it is really
'OVER IP'?) allows to boot into BIOS of a remote machine
and even, as
On 2007-Feb-12 16:07:03 +1030, Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regularly ship systems overseas where the power fails frequently. The
inability to boot because one disk got hosed is Bad News (tm).
A decent UPS can help here.
No, i can't. I have seen UPS (even APC) fail in some
hi!
I am the original poster of this thread. I have read many interesting
reply during these two days. However, as i said in the original message
due to certification issues i am pretty limited to INTEL controllers and
i have not seen a single relevant reply about them.
This is interesting.
Hello!
I need a raid controller for FBSD 6.2 which has the following options
1) Full SATA-II support
2) Good rperfomance (over 50MB read, over 30 write) in mirror mode
3) No weird problems with freebSD (like with SRCS16)
4) Utility to monitor status of raids (command line or web)
5) Utility to
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 03:04:05 +0300 Artem Kuchin wrote:
Andras Gót wrote:
Can you try the AMD64 version on that server?
Um.. i have never tried anything AMD in my life. I thought
AMD64 is only for AMD CPUs and this is Intel Xeon.
Are you really suggesting installing
is so slow?
--
Regards,
Artem Kuchin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
I've got an Intel 2400A server to install FBSD. It has 4GB RAM,
SRCS16 raid controller, configured 2TB (actually a little less, about
1.9TB) RAID-5 array, Xeon 3.2Ghz
Recently i have installed 6.2-R, cvsupped it to 6.2-STABLE
(today, thanks to included csup utility, very
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
I am having a VERY weird problem.
The pc config is:
1) Celeron 1+ GHZ
2) Intel PCI ethernet nic
3) Fasttrak TX2000 raid + 2 mirrored disks (seagate 80gb)
4) teac dvd driver
5) 512 MB ram
6) Chaintech montherboard (old one)
also tried
Hello!
I am having a VERY weird problem.
The pc config is:
1) Celeron 1+ GHZ
2) Intel PCI ethernet nic
3) Fasttrak TX2000 raid + 2 mirrored disks (seagate 80gb)
4) teac dvd driver
5) 512 MB ram
6) Chaintech montherboard (old one)
also tried on gigabyte motherboard
I insert boot cd and when
Sometime ago and have setup 5.3-STABLE box with quotas for jailed users. At
that time
quotas did not work inside jails, so i just created some group on host machine
and
group with the same ID inside jail and then put a quota upon that group on the
host box.
That was quotas are observed.
see: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html
Is it the final status of things when went into 6.1R?
I am particulary interested in status of the following
problems:
devfs locking problem
unmount pending error
swap_pager warnings
pty leak
calcru: runtime went backwards problem for
Alexey Karagodov wrote:
needs, make a mirror, make a test server/workstation/notebook/PDA
etc. i'm not an freebsd developer. i'm just admin and a user.
your system is most greatest i ever seen. another wonderful system is
SOLARIS.
but your's is so unstable ...
I never could really undertand
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:52:09AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Running 5.4-CURRENT. Web server. About 150 virtual servers.
%netstat -m
4294481198 mbufs in use
What does this mean? Do i really have 4294481198 mbufs in use?
How is this possible?
This is fixed in 6.0
I have read that in 5.x fxp driver did not work with PAE, but,
as i see, fxp is not in 'nodevice' section of PAE kernel config anymore.
Is it okay now to use fpx in PAE kernel?
Also, is twe driver very stable in PAE?
I have a web server with 6 gigs of RAM and would like to use them all.
Running 5.4-CURRENT. Web server. About 150 virtual servers.
%netstat -m
4294481198 mbufs in use
4294662679/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max)
0/694/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
3463545 KBytes allocated to network
0 requests for sfbufs denied
0 requests for sfbufs delayed
1681997
get you.
--
Regards,
Artem Kuchin
IT Legion Ltd.
Moscow, Russia
www.itlegion.ru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+7 095 232-0338
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
See
man 4 ar
I think it is fully outdated, bease ar is an RAID storage
device, as i see when i use Promise TX2000
Artem
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
of test systems.
Hi. I am running on 5.3-STABLE since december 2004. We
run 14 jails and use nullfs for some shared parts. Everything is just
fine. I tryed unionfs, it worked stable but i didn't do what i wanted
it to do or probably i didn't get its usage right :)
--
Regards,
Artem Kuchin
IT Legion Ltd
pete wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:07 +0300, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2)
controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ?
It is to be installed on a very old motherboard
Gerald de la Pascua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we have had very good experiences with the basic 3ware cards,
I would recommend them, easy to install, reliable, and good
perfomance, in the uk they cost just over 100 pounds, so a similar
price to two
disks to plug into them. When a disk fails
Can anybody recommend cheap IDE mirroring PCI (2.0, not 2.1 or 2.2)
controller with just 2 IDE ports which works fine with FreeBSD 4.10 ?
It is to be installed on a very old motherboard (1998) and two 40GB IDE
driver (more or less modern ones, at least not used ones for sure).
--
Regards,
Artem
Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:58:03 +0300, Artem Kuchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
I have a table with ethernet (MAC) addresses matching IPs. It is
used to build dhcp config file. But regardless of that any user can
assign his neighbour ips while that pc is turned
and have heard that ipfw2 can in someway
use MAC addresses, but how do I setup ipfw in such a way that
it allows certain IP only from one and only one MAC address?
I hope you are getting my idea.
--
Regards,
Artem Kuchin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have a table with ethernet (MAC) addresses matching IPs. It is
used to build dhcp config file. But regardless of that any user can
assign his neighbour ips while that pc is turned off and use it to
access internet
for last 3
days.
You dont' have HT cpus, so you have only 2 logical, but i HAD 4. Now i have
2 logical cpus, which are real cpus. Let's see what happens in the next 4 days.
Regards,
Artem Kuchin
IT Legion Ltd.
Moscow, Russia
www.itlegion.ru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+7 095 232-0338
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Artem Kuchin wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I cvssed just an hour ago. 5.3-STABLE and cannot build kernel with
WITNES. It complains:
This occurs when building WITNESS without DDB in the kernel, which was not
a tested build case when I added show
options INVARIANTS
options WITNESS
options WITNESS_KDB
options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN
#options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive.
Regards,
Artem Kuchin
IT Legion Ltd.
Russia, Moscow
www.itlegion.ru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+7 095 232-0338
___
freebsd
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I cvssed just an hour ago. 5.3-STABLE and cannot build kernel with
WITNES. It complains:
This occurs when building WITNESS without DDB in the kernel, which was not
a tested build case when I added show alllocks, and apparently is a
relatively uncommon
I have a very bad problem. I need to seetup
large number of jails (about 100) to do virtual hosting
and i am doing it on 5.3-STABLE (not 5.3-RELEASE, i mean
-STABLE which is cvsupped). So, when i setup one jail -
everything runs fine for many days. If i setup one more jail
or 3 or more - server
94 matches
Mail list logo
