Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-07-13 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: Hello, SK That depends on which mail you mean: SK b) about the env bug: There has been sent a patch by Tom already SK (actually, it's in Bugtrack, but I didn't got no notification by it). ^ Bugzilla, of course :) I

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-07-13 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 13--2004 09:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steffen Kaiser) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SK b) about the env bug: There has been sent a patch by Tom already SK (actually, it's in Bugtrack, but I didn't got no notification by it). SK ^ Bugzilla, of

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-07-09 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: PS: Steffer, when you answer to my letter in the freedos-freecom about issues with environment in FreeCOM? That depends on which mail you mean: a) about LAST_FIT: I said all what I have to say: I do not currently change the behaviour. b) about the env

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress: menu

2004-07-07 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 7--2004 22:44 Arkady V.Belousov wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: AVB As requested by some peoples, menu changed: now screen not cleared, if AVB there are no MENUCOLOR; now correctly handled case, when there are more MENU AVB lines, than screen width. I mean, screen _height_, but too

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-07-06 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: Hello, config.c - config now parsed in 5 passes: te that's fine IF config.c fit's into buffers or you boot from disk. te else (if boot from floppy) that might become *SLOW* There was 3 passes, now 5. Not a big change, especially because on some

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-07-06 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 6--2004 08:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steffen Kaiser) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - config now parsed in 5 passes: te that's fine IF config.c fit's into buffers or you boot from disk. te else (if boot from floppy) that might become *SLOW* There was 3 passes, now 5. Not a

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-07-05 Thread tom ehlert
Hello Arkady, where the hell are thge sources for these changes ?? config.c - config now parsed in 5 passes: that's fine IF config.c fit's into buffers or you boot from disk. else (if boot from floppy) that might become *SLOW* - screen now cleared (white on black) well - I IMPLEMENTED THE

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-07-05 Thread Bernd Blaauw
tom ehlert schreef: Hello Arkady, where the hell are the sources for these changes ?? I wonder, too. CVS read/download access is nice. Is it possible to fork the CVS kernel tree into an Arkady branch so he can work on the kernel and at same time provide sources (he doesn't have a website, and

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-07-05 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 5--2004 23:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Arkady V.Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: te where the hell are thge sources for these changes ?? Lucho promise to place changed files from me on his site. config.c - config now parsed in 5 passes: te that's fine IF config.c fit's

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-06-29 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 28--2004 14:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just reproduce MS-DOS behavior. Also, I myself found that skipping all remaining questions (including ?) is useful. Though, later this behavior may be changed (and documented in config.txt!). A BUT, IMHO the key

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-06-28 Thread Alain
I just reproduce MS-DOS behavior. Also, I myself found that skipping all remaining questions (including ?) is useful. Though, later this behavior may be changed (and documented in config.txt!). In my opinion this would be a _great_ improuvement :) Many times I had ro reboot (in MS-DOS)

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-06-28 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Alain schreef: In my opinion this would be a _great_ improvement :) Many times I had ro reboot (in MS-DOS) because the critical instruction was executed ok and I didn't want to singlestep all the rest. BUT, IMHO the key for that should not be Esc but something completely different, like some

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-06-28 Thread Alain
Bernd Blaauw escreveu: Win9x's DOS (7.x0) interprets the keys in a different way compared to older MSDOS. Y = confirm N = not confirm ENTER=confirm ESC = No (MSDOS7), YES (FreeDOS, older MSDOS). so a don't ask any other items unless explicitly mentioned in config.sys option/key would have to use

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-06-28 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 28--2004 14:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just reproduce MS-DOS behavior. Also, I myself found that skipping all remaining questions (including ?) is useful. Though, later this behavior may be changed (and documented in config.txt!). A BUT, IMHO the key

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-06-27 Thread Bernd Blaauw
tom ehlert schreef: - when tracing, Esc now turns off asks for following lines with ? and assumes Y for all; F8 now behaves similar to Esc. I disagree. Esc turns of F8 'single stepping', nothing else. so if pressed ESC, then everything except a command?=value is auto-executed? Arkady, define

Re: [Freedos-kernel] kernel progress

2004-06-27 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 27--2004 20:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: - when tracing, Esc now turns off asks for following lines with ? and assumes Y for all; F8 now behaves similar to Esc. I disagree. Esc turns of F8 'single stepping', nothing else. BB so if pressed ESC, then