vements on the water, as water
conditions vary, as it is executing a specified set of moves in order.
*From:*Friam *On Behalf Of *Prof David West
*Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2024 7:15 AM
*To:* friam@redfish.com
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] The problems of interdisciplinary research
The notion of searc
: Monday, February 12, 2024 7:15 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The problems of interdisciplinary research
The notion of search brings to mind two different experiences:
1- traditional "searching" of the library via the card catalog (yes, I know I
am old) for relevant inpu
, but also can discard whole modules at a time
>> and reimagine them.Managers are suspicious of such people because
>> managers want to modularize expertise for division of labor. Scrum is in
>> some sense a way to impede the development of expertise and to deny the need
&
> From: Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On
> Behalf Of David Eric Smith
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2024 2:25 AM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The problems of interdisciplinary re
for it.
From: Friam On Behalf Of David Eric Smith
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2024 2:25 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The problems of interdisciplinary research
There’s a famous old rant by von Neumann, known at least by those who were
around to hear
It is an interesting question.
A colleague of mine, to whom I refer either affectionately (sometimes) or in
exasperation (most times) as The Mystic believes that this utilization was what
the Phenomenologists were after, though he considers only Husserl and Fink the
real deal, and the others
“math had become too big; nobody could understand more than 1/4 of
it”.
"But with four neighbors I can compute most of it" ;-)
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024, 5:25 AM David Eric Smith wrote:
> There’s a famous old rant by von Neumann, known at least by those who were
> around to hear it, or so I was
There’s a famous old rant by von Neumann, known at least by those who were
around to hear it, or so I was told by Martin Shubik.
von Neumann was grumping that “math had become too big; nobody could understand
more than 1/4 of it”. As always with von Neumann, the point of saying
something
Yeah, it seems like the premise of the cartoon, or maybe Jochen's
interpretation, was that people have limited scopes of application, and the
average scope of application doesn't include interdisciplinary research.
But there are people who have larger scope and have a lot of fun doing
I didn't read the article but Carnegie Mellon, where I worked for almost 20
years, prides itself on the amount of interdisciplinary research
accomplished there.. Herb Simon had appointments in psychology, computer
science, business and public policy, I believe. I was a coauthor of papers
in
10 matches
Mail list logo
