It looks like github is presenting nothing but problems. Anything that I have
had to install from there has always been a big hassle. Perhaps a more
simplified solution should be implemented.
From: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas
Instead of spending time on creating a new web interface, it would have been
more productive to create a stable version gmond that runs on Windows Server
2008 R2. :)
I prefer the original interface anyways.
From: Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr
To: Martin
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Protocol Efficiency Ideas
On 1/27/12 2:05 PM, Im Root wrote:
I forgot to add that by adding json, you will be restricting the types
of Linux that this platform runs on. Although it may be a nice to have
feature
I believe that adding json would be a mistake. The reason is that when users
install the main package there would be now a dependency on having json
installed. It just adds to the complexity and helps to perpetuate RPM hell.
I've had to deal with installing json in the past and it's been awful.
the flavors of
linux that the keepers of json feel like using. Sorry, but adding the json
dependency is a completely boneheaded move.
From: Im Root imr...@rocketmail.com
To: Dave Rawks d...@pandora.com; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
ganglia
We should also bundle the new monitor core with a version of gmond that runs on
Windows 2008 r2 as well. The ganglia web front end loses some of it's
monitoring functionality when it can't monitor basic operating systems.
Besides, it only makes sense to keep ALL of the basic components up to
dan...@pocock.com.au
To: Im Root imr...@rocketmail.com
Cc: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved
On 17/01/12 19:59, Im Root wrote:
We should also bundle
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 17/01/12 20:40, Im Root wrote:
I would like to politely correct Dan in that I was proposing the gmond
fix as opposed to providing it. I seriously think that all of the new
releases should be suspended until this critical bug has been addressed
dan...@pocock.com.au
To: Im Root imr...@rocketmail.com
Cc: Vladimir Vuksan vli...@veus.hr;
ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia Web repo moved
On 17/01/12 21:17, Im
right.
When you supply a data collection module that crashes systems, then it needs to
be fixed.
From: Nick Satterly nfsatte...@gmail.com
To: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
Cc: Im Root imr...@rocketmail.com; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
ganglia
I would be in agreement with the sentiments of the ganglia maintainers in that
I too hate Windows. Unfortunately I'm stuck with it.
From: Jeff Buchbinder rufustfire...@gmail.com
To: Im Root imr...@rocketmail.com
Cc: Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au
interest in
fixing gmond for Windows.
Vladimir
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Im Root wrote:
I'm not interested in deploying a completely new infrastructure. I already
have an extensive ganglia setup and can
see all my servers except for a growing number of Win2k8r2 servers. If we can
get them to report
Hey this would be a great to benefit lots of users. Apparently the gmond
program goes into an indefinite CPU loop on this operating system. (Nobody
really cares if you make gmond run on zero/MQ pub sub anyways.) In fact this
would be of more benefit than writing a ganglia book or putting the
:-). This is
speaking from my own experience. Perhaps you should take up the challenge
?
As far as Windows is concerned you may be best of use host-sflowd. That is
what I use
http://blog.sflow.com/2010/10/installing-host-sflow-on-windows-server.html
Vladimir
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Im Root wrote:
Hey
14 matches
Mail list logo