On Monday 07 May 2007, John Doty wrote:
Where are the Verilog-AMS models? Given no models, I *cannot*
switch from SPICE.
I understand now. You think we should wait until everyone else
has it, then copy.
No. *I* *must* wait until it's usable. I have circuits to simulate
*today*.
The
One of the ideas I have been playing with A spin off of my work on
back annotation.
I am finishing off a temporary program backnet which loads and runs a
scheme script at the start to read in a netlist and another to read in
an eco file it builds a page with component and pins from the
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, John Doty wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2007, John Doty wrote:
Where are the Verilog-AMS models? Given no models, I
*cannot* switch from SPICE.
I understand now. You think we should wait until everyone
else has it, then copy.
No. *I* *must* wait until it's
On Monday 07 May 2007, Stephen Brickles using shaun wrote:
snip maybe the ability to use the file formats of some
of the comercial eda tools?
I haven't heard anyone mentioning OpenAccess on this forum
yet... How about an OpenAccess module for gEDA ? The ability
to open Cadence schematics
On May 8, 2007, at 9:31 AM, al davis wrote:
The bit about compatibility of file formats is one reason why I
brought up VHDL, the structural subset, a while back. Verilog
would work too, but require a hack to work around the missing
entity/architecture feature.
That's what's making me
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, John Doty wrote:
On May 8, 2007, at 9:31 AM, al davis wrote:
The bit about compatibility of file formats is one reason
why I brought up VHDL, the structural subset, a while back.
Verilog would work too, but require a hack to work around
the missing
On May 8, 2007, at 1:24 PM, al davis wrote:
The problem with Spice is that it is not flexible enough. It
might be flexible enough for you, but lots of people bump
against its problems on a regular basis. That's why there are
others like Spectre, Touchstone, Hyperlynx, Nano-sim, Rice, and
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, John Doty wrote:
Well, then quit throwing rocks at SPICE
You are the only one throwing rocks.
and do something
better.
I'm working on it. I even told you what I am doing now, and
why.
SPICE may be a klunker, but it's better than vapor.
Gnucap is not
John Doty wrote:
On May 8, 2007, at 1:24 PM, al davis wrote:
The problem with Spice is that it is not flexible enough. It
might be flexible enough for you, but lots of people bump
against its problems on a regular basis. That's why there are
others like Spectre, Touchstone, Hyperlynx,
Hi All,
I just got an e-mail that says that there are functions in
x_menu.c which are = glib 2.8.x functions, such as: g_file_set_contents()
Confirmed: http://www.gtk.org/api/2.6/glib/glib-File-Utilities.html
Could somebody please add the appropriate #ifdefs? I think the right
answer
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Russell Shaw wrote:
Does anyone have a diode and BJT model done in verilog-AMS?
Look here:
http://designers-guide.org/VerilogAMS/
Dan said:
http://mextram.sourceforge.net/
___
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
