Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams (+Win32)

2016-12-28 Thread Josef Kufner
Ian Zimmerman wrote, on 29.12.2016 02:26: > On this topic, would it be interesting to create pipelines for editors, > rather than just invoking them 1 by 1? For example, we could make it > possible to create a pipeline where an intricate batch imagemagick > command is called on the current image,

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams (+Win32)

2016-12-28 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2016-12-28 19:35, Roger wrote: > Linux is a different story, as most easy image viewers are heavy on > system resources or (more currently) depend upon clunky and heavy > resource usage Python scripting. For those of us that are a little > more computer literate, ImageMagick display does just

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams (+Win32)

2016-12-28 Thread Roger
>Back in 2006 someone made a port of Gqview to windows. It died pretty quickly. >Was this because: > >a) GTK's cross platform capability is a bit of a fiction > >b) Gqview/Geeqie was too complex to port successfully > >c) Windows users are happy with what they have, and would not bother >with

Re: [Geeqie-devel] Geeqie++ fever dreams (+Win32)

2016-12-28 Thread Colin Clark
On 24/12/16 15:39, Alexander Antimonov wrote: > While porting to C++1x it is good chance to make Geeqie more > cross-platform. But it seems Gtk is becoming (has become) an auxiliary > tool for the "GnomeOS". And some of the well-known projects was/is > migrating from Gtk. Maybe we should consider