On 3/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The conversation on OpenJPA has been quiet for about a week so I was
wondering if there are outstanding issues that need to be resolved or
this could be moved to a vote to accept the project and what the next
please check
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-commons-composite-pool.html. i
will wait at 48 hours (no earlier than 1200 GMT on tuesday 21st march) for
objections before exporting the code from it's initial drop into the actual
codebase.
note that there is additional
A few observations from following the process as currently documented
and proposals for improvements:
1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with
incubator karma. this needs to be documented on the clearance form.
PROPOSAL: document this and add section on form so that
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:41:04AM +, James Strachan wrote:
BTW I CC'd the Geronimo PMC as this is an interesting dilema for the
Geronimo folks too
I'm not so happy with crossposting between public/private lists (private lists
should be unused if possible) so I dropped that again...this
[ +1] Accept the OpenJPA proposal
-- dims
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal.
+1 from me (of course)
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week
until Sunday, March 26,
On 3/19/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
snip
3 there is no indication the form which CLA's and CCLA's are relevant.
this makes oversight difficult.
PROPOSAL: the form should include official names (as listed
On Sunday 19 March 2006 20:46, Leo Simons wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:41:04AM +, James Strachan wrote:
(i) don't use the incubator code, but fork it elsewhere (say to
codehaus) and make releases there if Geronimo needs bug fixes
(ii) Geronimo use incubator release candidate
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:25 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin
wrote:
snip
3 there is no indication the form which CLA's and CCLA's are
relevant.
this makes oversight difficult.
+1
-dain
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
person say yes, I'm ready and will be contributing immediately before
making the
+1
-Brian
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until
On 3/19/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:25 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin
wrote:
snip
3 there is no indication the form which CLA's
+1 to the general idea.
Yoav
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/19/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/3/19, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few observations from following the process as currently documented
and proposals for improvements:
1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with
incubator karma. this needs to be documented on the clearance
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
On 3/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few observations from following the process as currently documented
and proposals for improvements:
1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 09:51:40PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry for the confusion: this is about the actual process of preparing
the paperwork required by the incubator not the receipt of the
software grant form. AIUI the receipt of the software grant form needs
an officer but an officer or a
robert burrell donkin asked:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony.
The list of committers on the proposal are the people we
expect to show up, but we won't be creating accounts by
default - we'll need to have each person say yes, I'm ready
[X] +1 Accept the OpenJPA proposal
-jean
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week
Hi All,
I wanted to check what the time frame is for us to wait before
getting nervous that a CLA was lost.
The Cayenne team sent in their CLA's on the 9th and 10th of March. Is
it to early to ask everyone that's not listed here;
http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
to send in
[X] +1(non-binding) Accept the OpenJPA proposal
Craig
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run
24 matches
Mail list logo
