Hi all -
I see that I'm listed as a sponsor. Can you please remove my name and replace
with someone else? I never agreed to sponsor this.
Sorry about any inconvenience.
geir
On Jun 1, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Luke Kowalski wrote:
The following project is being sent in as an incubator
rich dot cole at uk dot ibm dot com
Christian Glatschke christian at glatschke dot com
Sonal Goyal sonalgoyal4 at gmail dot com
Affiliations
The initial committers listed are affiliated with IBM and self.
Champion
Geir Magnusson Jr has agreed to be Champion
Proposed Apache Sponsor
Incubator PMC
As long as you mark it as UNTESTED or BETA per the JAX-WS part - IOW,
make no claim about compatibility, you're fine.
geir
On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:14 AM, Bozhong Lin wrote:
Hi,
Apache CXF team is planning for its 2.0 final release. In benefit
of CXF users, we would like to cut 2.0 release
All - note that the mail lists for the River podling have been created :
The public lists are :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subscribe in the usual way, following the pattern :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
See you there.
geir
Yoav
No other votes cast. (I hope I didn't miss anyone).
As we received an adequate number of +1 votes from Incubator PMC
members, this vote passes :)
I'll get the necessary infrastructure machinery going, staring with
the mail lists.
geir
On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:46 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr
Jim,
I've updated the proposal in the wiki, hopefully addressing your two
concerns - noting that there are no other implementations of Jini
technology at the ASF, and noting that committership for the initial
committers will be granted upon engagement with the project, as
determined by
On Dec 21, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:46 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as
River. You may be familiar with this project as it has
On Dec 21, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 21, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 21, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 10:46 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Geir Magnusson Jr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Bob Scheifler ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Jim Waldo ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* John McClain ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Brian Murphy ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Peter Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Juan Ramirez ([EMAIL PROTECTED
+1 from me
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as River.
You may be familiar with this project as it has been discussed under
other names, including Braintree and Jini. I've
Note - this vote will be for 3 days, ending midnight, saturday december
23rd, 2006.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as River.
You may be familiar with this project as it has
+1
Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
Hi,
I have fixed all the issues that were raised during the earlier vote and
I have uploaded the new release at: http://people.apache.org/~bravi
Also, I used the tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/tags/yoko-1.0-incubating
-M1-release for
I don't think so.
Let the podling come up with what they call 0.9.6, let it give clear
information to what that means, and the incubator PMC votes from there.
This is getting counterproductive.
geir
Patrick Linskey wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Marc that we should continue to iterate on the
(transaction);
getBoardApproval(transaction);
transaction.commit();
}
catch(RollbackException re) {
continueIncubation();
}
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator
if you haven't voted and are interested in voting, please do.
Thanks
geir
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone else? Mino started processing last night, and I want to give
time for people to have a chance to vote...
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator
As noted in the vote email :
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Under the Incubator process, Harmony must have a destination prior
to exiting incubation, which means the ASF Board must decide whether or
not create a TLP for Apache Harmony prior to the Incubator vote being
official. However, I suspect
I didn't want to mess up the vote thread...
Should this really be Shall? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any code.
We treated the Initial Committer
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be Shall? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt' start with any
code.
Yes, it should be a Shall
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be Shall? We've been successful in Harmony with a
slightly different model, where we didn't just sweep committers in
except for the mentors and champion, because we didnt
Anyway, I do realize that the discussion was two weeks ago. I just
missed it. Apologies. Ignore me :)
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Should this really be Shall? We've been successful
Greg Stein wrote:
The Incubator is about verification, not participation. I think Geir
is wrong in trying to lever IPMC members into more project
involvement. We are here as volunteers to oversee the process, not
participate in the projects.
I think this is a topic for honest disagreement,
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/
200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following votes have been recorded (in order of votes cast) :
+1 Geir Magnusson Jr
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/
200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following votes have been recorded (in order of votes cast
w00t!
Jim Hurley wrote:
Hi all-
Thank you to the 134 folks who participated in the survey
to help us determine a new name for the Jini project
proposal at Apache. The results are included below.
The first preference was for aladin (related to the genie
theme), but unfortunately, there are
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I am asking for a vote of the Incubator on graduation of Harmony
that is conditional on the board's approval of a TLP for that purpose.
This way we don't have to vote again after the board meeting on
Wednesday
Might be nice to leave binding-ness as an accounting detail for the
person running the vote, to get rid of the my vote counts, yours
doesn't thing that David pointed out.
After all, if you get consensus, and it's all +1s.
geir
Paul Fremantle wrote:
David
I think you are wrong. Before
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 06:34:02PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Just so no one misunderstands this - the only way a podling can graduate
is if it has enough IPMC votes. The model in mind was that there are
IPMC members engaged with the community, so that it's
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not trying hold a vote elsewhere - this can only happen if there
is a binding vote by the Incubator - it just means you vote over there
rather than over here.
Um, no. The only votes that are binding from
Greg Stein wrote:
I was happy to give a +1 days ago. But that wasn't put on the table.
Ok. I'm going to stick my neck out here, out of my comfort zone.
While bringing Harmony out for graduation was never meant to be a
vehicle for change, it's clear that there are opportunities where we
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Last checkpoint, Has the sponsoring PMC [e.g. Board] voted to accept the
project? You have a few hours yet to put a resolution on their plate for
next week. And honestly - they would probably table it for review even if
you gave them a month lead time, so might
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
I was happy to give a +1 days ago. But that wasn't put on the table.
Ok. I'm going to stick my neck out here, out of my comfort zone.
While bringing Harmony out for graduation was never meant to be a
vehicle for change, it's clear
I'm not dismissing the importance of Greg's concern, and am not trying
to take the Harmony conversation down a rat-hole (or different rat-hole
in this case...), so I changed the Subject line.
---
Let me take a brief side trip here about [Unwritten] Incubator
Graduation Requirements
I made the mistake of not responding publicly, thinking that it was just
best to ignore it. I had nothing to do with it - it didn't represent any
sentiment that I have, nor was I a participant in any such email
conversation, or ever have been. My head has only room for one hat at a
time,
, promised! :-)
Greg -- having many e-mails as threaded responses rather than a single
one is useful if you have nested threading and you're only interested in
part of a sub-sub-thread. Maybe gmail needs fixing :-P. In any case,
here's your overview.
On Oct 17, 2006, at 6:44 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote
Into the incubator, of course ;)
geir
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Robert,
Is this something you would bring over to the ASF, and which we can start
promoting around the ASF to use?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Greg Stein wrote:
On 10/19/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 19, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
...
I'd like to ask that those who have asked for a release to assuage
concerns about community health and capability to please read those
3 testaments from
I'm pretty resigned to the fact that we're not going to be able to
present a resolution to the board this month for Harmony. I do keep a
flicker of hope, mainly because I'm an eternal optimist.
I do think it's a shame, because I believe the core values sought and
taught in the incubation
I just wanted to run RAT on RAT ;)
geir
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/19/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this something you would bring over to the ASF, and which we can start
promoting around the ASF to use?
To be honest, I don't believe it's a good fit. Not every project
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
IMHO - the only reason to have a project (TLP or subproject, no matter) is
to release code. Anything prior to a release might be a sandbox, it might
be a podling, it might be a lose alliance of the willing. Whatever...
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Don Brown wrote:
Agreed. I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate.
The graduation requirement is that a majority of the PMC members
agree that a podling should be
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a developer release, but it let's non-Harmony folks play
with your
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 12:44, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Thanks, and we look forward to your comments. To avoid cross-post
confusion, I will forward this message to the harmony-dev list rather
than CC.
Amazing feat, indeed. I was very pessimistic to the start
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 10:33, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Will you be satisfied with a vote on posting a snapshot?
I think some Incubator PMC member wants to see a 'full release' artifact for
review. The podling should select a release manager producing
All,
The PPMC of the Apache Harmony incubator podling has voted to ask for
graduation from the Apache Incubator. We have enjoyed our time here
with you, but feel that we don't want to overstay our welcome. We want
to do our part to help make sure the ASF has more projects than the
Incubator :)
+1
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release a parent pom and buildtools jar
that are dependencies for a forthcoming M2 release. These would be made
available through the m2-incubating-repository to allow end users to
build source distributions of that release. In accordance
There certainly is interest in Apache Harmony, as this is very much
aligned to what we've already been doing for the past year and a few
months.
geir
On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:09 AM, Chris Gray wrote:
Hello guys,
To introduce myself: I'm one of the original developers of the
Wonka embedded
While we all appreciate you inviting the community to help, I also
encourage the proposers to consider choosing a name among yourselves.
There's nothing wrong with that, and as it's the project you are
proposing, it's natural that you can choose the name.
geir
Jim Hurley wrote:
Hi all-
I
I gave it a cursory look, and things seem to be in order.
+1
Hiram Chirino wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
Apache ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0.2 release
binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Aug 06, at 12:27 PM 15 Aug 06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Jan Blok wrote:
Hi,
What could be the problem of any real-time communication medium usage
between some community members as long as every one agrees code and
design decisions are made on the mailing
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 16 Aug 06, at 9:40 AM 16 Aug 06, Dion Gillard wrote:
You mean like this:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/IRC+Log+Design+Discussion+26+May+2005
That particular discussion had everyone who even vaguely knew what the
issue at hand was, even so you only
Jan Blok wrote:
Hi,
What could be the problem of any real-time communication medium usage
between some community members as long as every one agrees code and
design decisions are made on the mailing list?
Because the reality is that decisions are made on IRC, implicitly. It's
hard to
Bob Scheifler wrote:
Filip at Apache wrote:
jini is a trademark
directory isn't
The question wasn't about Jini vs others. Geir said he wouldn't support
Apache EMail or Apache Web, and I'd like to understand how those two
are different from Apache Directory, Apache Web Services, etc.
I
Jukka Zitting wrote:
I think the question boils down to the issue of what will happen to
the Jini standard now that the JDP has been closed down. It's correct
to insist in that the standard shouldn't be developed within the
implementation project if the goal is to allow independent
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 8/14/06, Bob Scheifler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm extremely reluctant to start out with two podlings.
I'm not sure what governance you have in mind beyond the spec process,
but I don't believe we have sufficient commitments from people to keep
an equivalent
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
The community learns about each other in a shared, non-exclusionary
method. Private Email/IM/IRC does NOT foster that.
Public IRC, free for anyone to join, at a channel that is 'officially'
published/ promoted however, does.
No it doesn't.It's exclusionary in
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 12:41 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
We have a tradition, for good reason, for not giving our projects
technology domain ownership for implementations. I'd never support
Apache EMail or Apache Web. That's why if we are going to have
Apache
Bob Scheifler wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
We have a tradition, for good reason, for not giving our projects
technology domain ownership for implementations. I'd never support
Apache EMail or Apache Web.
Is it written somewhere that ASF project names must mean ownership of
rather
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Bob,
What is your concern? Can you please try to be simple and specific about
it?
For example, what if we created [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forget
the question of how many podlings --- I am simply talking about a list
related to specification
Bob Scheifler wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I'm extremely reluctant to start out with two podlings.
Why? I think we are talking about two very different community dynamics.
For the reason I stated: I don't believe we have sufficient commitments
from people willing and able to run
I'm going to reply to this as I found no good point in the thread.
I think that instead of spinning on this lock, we should move forward
with some other name to get things booted, and then resolve the Jini
name issue in parallel.
Clearly there's sufficient interest to see this become an Apache
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I think that instead of spinning on this lock, we should move forward
with some other name to get things booted, and then resolve the Jini
name issue in parallel.
I don't know that the name is an issue at all, if Sun is willing to transfer
What broken mail client are you using?
inline...
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
- Is Apache in the business of writing and publishing specifications? -
As long as Apache is not in the business of also creating
specifications, there will be by definition some separation
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Wait ... why can't a specification be a releasable, just like a
codebase? The only issue, as I see it, would be enforcement of
compliance. And Roy even put forward a proposed license amendment
for such things.
Which
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I don't know that the name is an issue at all, if Sun is willing to
transfer
the trademark to the ASF, as was done with SpamAssassin. The impression
that I have from Craig and others is that this is do-able. According
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
It's an implementation of a spec. A single spec that is part of an
external spec-governing ecosystem, the JCP. Jini isn't a spec, it's
it's own spec ecosystem. It's not part of the JCP, for example.
So Apache Jini is like saying Apache JCP (I'm stretching
As the champion for JINI, I suppose it behooves me to try and get this
untangled.
I'm not a Jini expert, but my understanding is that it is it's own spec
ecosystem. Therefore, I'm against having one project doing software
implementation that is called Jini, just as I'd be against projects
like
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Aug 13, 2006, at 7:05 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
As the champion for JINI, I suppose it behooves me to try and get this
untangled.
I'm not a Jini expert, but my understanding is that it is it's own spec
ecosystem. Therefore, I'm against having one project
James Strachan wrote:
I guess its a murky area legally - making similar APIs using
documentation as a guide. e.g. its quite striking how many extremely
similar APIs are in .Net and Mono to the JDK.
FWIW there's a current practice to get around Sun's bizarre licensing
on various Java/J2EE
+1
(And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although can't
commit the time to be a mentor right now.)
Ted Leung wrote:
It seems like the discussion on Heraldry has died down, so I'd like to
call for a VOTE on accepting Heraldry into the incubator.
In keeping with Apache
David N. Welton wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
... an idea and
community ...
i was wondering whether we might widen the general incubator list to
include
ideas for new projects provided that they are prefixed by [idea] in the
subject so that anyone who's not interested can ignore.
This thread may be dead/resolved, in which case just ignore me.
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 6/23/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The use of e-mail as the primary means for communication is part of ASF
policy and philosophy, and we can certainly learn lessons from
projects that
have
It's my impression that the trademark would be donated to the ASF to
avoid this problem. I'm not sure though.
geir
Leo Simons wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 03:43:13PM -0400, Bob Scheifler wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I guess this means keeping jini.org around for a long time to come, and I
Hani is a good guy. He really understands technology, he's honest, he's
open and he has a utterly wicked and warped sense of humor.
I count him as a friend of mine, and I certainly have no problem with
him becoming a committer for CeltixFire.
BileBlog is satire with almost always a grain of
. :)
* Mentor
- Geir Magnusson Jr.
Lately popular opinion seems to be that it'd be good if there were at least
three mentors. Any others?
The snippet you quoted is bait :)
We figured that we'd have people volunteering once this was proposed and
people saw that there was only me.
So please
With the additional request that when discussion is over and it comes
for a vote, a copy of what is being voted in be submitted in the email
calling for the vote.
gier
Paul Querna wrote:
General Comments:
Is it possible to put this proposal onto the wiki (
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ )
+1 from me as well. Sorry.
geir
James Strachan wrote:
Passed with +1s from jstrachan, jim, jvanzyl, brianm and no -1s.
Many thanks to all those who responded to the plethora of emails to
get the release distro into good shape :)
On 6/5/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
I don't understand the problem. The project is OpenJPA. The wiki is
OpenJPA. The project proposal, which everyone agreed to, had
open-jpa-dev in it, so it was created that way. Do you all think that
it's a killer problem to have that hypen in the list name when
everything else is OpenJPA?
once the project graduates from
the incubator, so I don't see it as an issue.
Craig
On May 8, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I don't understand the problem. The project is OpenJPA. The wiki
is OpenJPA. The project proposal, which everyone agreed to, had
open-jpa-dev in it, so
done
Everyone will have to re-check out at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Oh - it's in SVN too... since there's nothing there except the README I
put there to test, I'll move that now.
geir
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Just to be clear
Leo Simons wrote:
(please drop harmony-dev from the CC list on replies. Thanks!)
Hi Noel,
Sorry for the lack of report for harmony so far (BTW, we should probably
get Marvin to send out automated reminders to relevant (P)PMCs too, it should
save you some nagging effort). The wiki is
Try now.
BTW, is there really only one committer (you) in this podling? There is
only one person listed in the svn group 'lucene-dot-net'
geir
George Aroush wrote:
Hi folks,
I am trying to update the file lucene.net.xml (which is here:
Regards,
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:02 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can't commit
Try now.
BTW, is there really only one committer (you) in this podling? There is
only one person
: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:47 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can't commit
George Aroush wrote:
Hi Geir,
It works now. Thanks!
Yes, right now I am the only committer (and the project lead.) I'm
trying to finish off
How does one distinguish this, the 2nd candidate, from the 1st candidate
of the 4.0-RC1 release?
Doesn't the RC in RC1 mean Release Candidate ?
Also, when you start it up, it says
INFO BrokerService - For help or more information
please see: http://www.logicblaze.com
James Strachan wrote:
On 3/30/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C:\Documents and Settings\gmagnussjava -version
java version 1.4.2_10
Its nothing to do with running from a directory with spaces in it is it?
I'm not - that was just showing my cmd line.
I'm running activeMQ
make want
to delete the contents of you activemq-data directory.
Ah - I have activemq 4.0 - M4 there. So 4.0 RC1 is incompatible w/ 4.0 M4?
I deleted activemq-data and it works now.
geir
On 3/30/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does one distinguish this, the 2nd candidate
What we do in Harmony (where we're very concerned about such things) is
reference the JIRA entry - since we require any such contribution to
come through JIRA - and bring each into SVN once accepted so it's always
available in original form for inspection in the future.
geir
robert burrell
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 3/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Here are the SVN names for
everyone who has committed to each of the trees:
(Question : are those people
Oh! I thought that the sysadmin loads preserved history...
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 3/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 3/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question was slightly
+1 from me (of course)
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1 week
until Sunday, March 26
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
person say yes, I'm ready and will be contributing immediately before
making the
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we'll probably do is run it like we're running Harmony. The list
of committers on the proposal are the people we expect to show up, but
we won't be creating accounts by default - we'll need to have each
)
Matt Hogstrom (matt at hogstrom dot org)
David Jencks (djencks at apache dot org)
Kevin Sutter (kwsutter at gmail dot com)
David Wisneski (wisneskid at gmail dot com)
Geir Magnusson Jr (geirm at apache dot org)
Sponsor
==
We kindly request the Incubator PMC to accept sponsorship
+1
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The Apache Jackrabbit committers have voted to request graduation
from the Incubator as a TLP.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-jackrabbit-dev/200603.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following votes have been recorded:
Committers
+1 Roy T.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Can you confirm the community diversity? That is one thing I could
not tell
straight off, although I do note the comment in July 2005 about
crossing the
threshold, and observe that
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, back in Jakarta's heyday, the general list was the meeting place
for all the subprojects. It was a lot of fun.
I'm not sure we could do that on an apache-wide scale though. Part of
the fun was because we knew
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Saturday 11 March 2006 03:21, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Which is a really long-winded way of saying: At graduation,
maybe it's worthwhile to see whether the podling committers
actually earned any Apache merit.
Agree. That would also allow for a lot lower bar at
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Well, back in Jakarta's heyday, the general list was the meeting place
for all the subprojects. It was a lot of fun.
I'm not sure we could do that on an apache-wide scale though. Part
1 - 100 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
