On Saturday 09 September 2006 20:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen no
progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and unless
someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be removed in 30
days.
Hi.
shillelagh
://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352152
Thanks
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
PS - I still haven't fixed my Gentoo email setup, so I wasn't following
this
thread until someone hinted about it.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 25 March 2013 09:30, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll say it again: if we don't make install media anymore and
tell people to use SRCD instead, we will lose installation
support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:02:46 -0800
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
snip a few arguments
Ciaran and Brian,
please respect Pettery's request and move your discussion to the GLEP55
thread or to another thread, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alistair Bush wrote:
Here is an issue that is currently being faced by the java project that
I would like to bring to the attention of everyone. I have already
discussed this will devs from all pm's.
Intro:
Within the java project we have 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alistair Bush wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 19:18 Mon 02 Mar , Alistair Bush wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Could you explain what you see as the important difference that makes
package.mask bad and a separate overlay good?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Caleb Cushing wrote:
I'd like to start with, I'm not trying to stir up trouble but since
questions were asked i'll answer them.
If you think neither should exist why do you have an opinion about this at
all?
I merged the java-overlay into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
On Monday, 02. March 2009 10:29:59 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Also, having separate overlays would allow one to do experimental stuff
with eclasses in the experimental overlay without affecting users of the
base
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
This seems desirable and reasonable.
As I replied to this subject earlier regarding KDE, let me complement
that information. In the case of the KDE team, we keep work on a release
all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Thomas Sachau wrote:
Petteri Räty schrieb:
Thomas Sachau wrote:
I would like to know, if there is some policy about editing skel.* files
or who owns/maintains them.
Additionally, i suggest some changes to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:26:36 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why? It was an official EAPI agreed upon by the Gentoo KDE project.
Having it there is helpful for package manager people, and removing
it would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alin Năstac wrote:
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
I opted to reply to your mail after reading all the other replies.
FWIW, I agree with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following
packages had their metadata.xml updated to remove all maintainers that
were retired.
If you are a maintainer or a member of a herd listed in these packages,
you may want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As the KDE team prepares to add revised eclasses for the KDE3 ebuilds so
we can get 3.5.10 marked stable and then finally ask for KDE4
stabilization, we'd like to drop some old eclasses from the tree. We
plan to drop the kde-base, kde-dist,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hi.
As the KDE team prepares to add revised eclasses for the KDE3 ebuilds so
we can get 3.5.10 marked stable and then finally ask for KDE4
stabilization, we'd like to drop some old eclasses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
report:
Hi.
Gentoo KDE team status report.
Current:
- We have a Lead again (me). It happened on FOSDEM, so it might have
been related
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
2009/5/17 Piotr Jaroszyñski pe...@gentoo.org:
1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously)
2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change
3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 17:00 -0700 schrieb Josh Saddler:
AllenJB wrote:
I'd favor tags over increasing the category
levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
(tho tags might make searching
://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/
If you want to ask a question or share your thoughts, contact any of
the election officials:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (jmbsvicetto)
Łukasz Damentko (rane)
Roy Bamford (neddyseagoon)
Shyam Mani (fox2mike) will be doing infra magic.
You can send us an e-mail (gentoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
...
A quick scan shows that the following eclasses were deprecated more
than three years ago, and are used by no ebuild in the tree:
2002-05-25 inherit.eclass
2003-12-11 kde-i18n.eclass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Anderson wrote:
...
... please remember to vote for gentoofan23, not tanderson(irc nick). ;-)
Regards,
Thomas
This is why everyone should verify their votes when submitting them.
Don't forget to run:
$ votify --verify election
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello fellow developers and users.
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
Nominations are now closed.
An email with further details about
Hi.
I'm forwarding Ned's (solar) mail accepting his nomination for the council.
--
Regards,
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE
---BeginMessage---
As I'm not subscribed to the getnoo-dev mailing list but rather make use
of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again.
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello fellow developers and users.
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
The voting booth has now opened and his waiting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Due to an oversight on my part, the _reopen_nominations candidate was
not initially added to the ballots for the council200906 election. This
has now been fixed.
If you have already voted, please add it (if you want to) to your
ballot. I suggest
ndrew D Kirch wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
I move that we elect George W Bush and Ciaran McCreesh Council Members
For Life.
Are these people serious?
Andrew
Andrew,
I've chosen to reply to this particular mail, but this applies to your
other mails in this
Hello.
This is a remainder that the voting for this Council's election will end
at 23:59:59 UTC June 30rd - which means in less than 44 hours.
At the moment, we have 101 casted votes which means ~ 41% of attendance.
If you haven't voted yet, please hurry to your booth located at
woodpecker. You
Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
What I'd like to see for sure is a formal rule on who can decide to
modify or change parts of glep 39. As it's the council's constitution
somehow, we have two options from my pov (besides that a former council
did decide the council itself can change
I'm forwarding Roy's email to the dev-announce ml for reaching the wider
community and for future reference.
Roy Bamford wrote:
All,
On behalf of the Elections project, the next Gentoo Council will be
composed of:-
Ned Ludd (solar)
Petteri Räty (betelgeuse)
Denis
Hi Torsten.
Torsten Veller wrote:
* Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council/2009/council-200906-nominees.xml
Please archive the manifestos somewhere under the project space
like it was done the last years.
Looking back at the 2005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alright,
seeing that things are getting out of hand again, let me reply as a
member of the userrel team.
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:55:02 -0600
Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Ciaran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 22-07-2009 a las 18:45 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
Lars Wendler wrote:
Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
the cdda USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
During the course of bug 280312[1], we (KDE team) made the pm-utils
support in powerdevil optional based on a use flag. Although hal was
already using the laptop use flag for similar support, we decided to
use the pm-utils use flag as wicd was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/22/2009 06:40 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Huh? This is true of all overlays.
Not the ones I'm using.
Have you ever used the X11, GNOME or KDE teams overlays? Most of the
overlays around exist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Torsten Veller wrote:
* Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net:
This should really be a non-issue. I just spent 2 days dealing with
being 3.5 weeks out of date.
To help us improve the user experience, what were the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrey Grozin wrote:
Hello *,
I am fixing a bug (#284080) in a ebuild
(sci-visualization/mayavi-3.3.0). I have a fix that installs on my
box fine, all deps are satisfied. I try to commit it, but repoman
issues a lot of errors like
RDEPEND.bad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov wrote:
Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and
possibly extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary
distros do or do we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some
packages are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
As announced by Denis (Calchan)[1], we need to have an election for the
Gentoo Council's empty seat.
We'll be putting up a page with all the information for the Council
election, including the election officials, asap. I'll send another
email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
As announced by Denis (Calchan)[1], we need to have an election for the
Gentoo Council's empty seat.
We'll be putting up a page with all the information for the Council
election, including the election officials, asap. I'll send another
email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20-12-2009 15:13, David Abbott wrote:
To nominate anyone for the empty seat, please send an email to the
gentoo-dev ml. Anyone can nominate for the Council, but only current
Gentoo Developers can stand for and vote in the election.
I nominate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-12-2009 13:10, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Thursday 31 of December 2009 14:43:54 Mark Bateman wrote:
Ben de Groot yngwin at gentoo.org writes:
As announced 5 months ago[1], Gentoo's Qt team now officially
deprecates usage of x11-libs/qt:3 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again.
The nominations for the empty seat in the Council were closed 20 hours
ago. All the details about this election can be found in the Council
Elections Archives[1]. The information about the nominees can be seen in
the 200912 nominees[2]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-01-2010 21:25, Dawid Węgliński wrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:
/var/lib/layman
do well?
+1
-1, /usr/local/layman?
Wouldn't that break the rule that /usr/local is reserved for users / admins?
- From the
Hello fellow devs, users and Gentoo community,
in this election we received 87 valid ballots from a total of 260
voters, which means we had a 33.462% turnout. Without much ado, Tomas
Chvatal (scarabeus) was elected to the council. The full ranked list for
this election is:
scarabeus
patrick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-03-2010 06:39, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Friday 26 February 2010 18:40:47 Alec Warner wrote:
You mistake the intent I think. We deploy automation because humans
fail; even when they have the best intentions. We make typos, copy
and paste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-03-2010 20:47, William Hubbs wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:11:50PM +, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri R??ty betelge...@gentoo.org
wrote:
There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a
Hello.
I've just committed an update to the project pages to remove retired
developers (I left alone historical pages such as
gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/userrel/soc/archives/). The diff is attached
to this email so project members can check it.
As I'm not a member of the cvstrans group (thanks
Hello again.
On 21-03-2010 16:26, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello.
I've just committed an update to the project pages to remove retired
developers (I left alone historical pages such as
gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/userrel/soc/archives/). The diff is attached
to this email so project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21-03-2010 11:41, Thomas Sachau wrote:
I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would
like to ask, if someone
wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should
delete that herd and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-03-2010 23:49, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 04/01/10 01:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
your logic does not lead to the statement that gentoo-core is the
appropriate
place.
point takes, it's not the non-technical nature - i should put it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-04-2010 09:50, Petteri Räty wrote:
I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-04-2010 04:50, Dale wrote:
I felt sorry for the KDE folks when KDE4 was released. It just had
to be a nightmare to get all that in the tree at once. If they had
twice as many people working on it tho, it would have been easier. The
people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-04-2010 13:19, Ben de Groot wrote:
A proposal for a Gentoo WIKI that generated much replies
I have the following general comments about this thread.
* I congratulate everyone involved on this that is so motivated to
create a new option for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-04-2010 18:26, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:07:01PM +, Jon Portnoy wrote:
There should be a process of weeding out developers that bitch and/or whine,
but if most of the teams are understaffed then there has to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allo.
On 10-04-2010 14:09, Vincent-Xavier JUMEL wrote:
Le samedi 10 avril 2010 15:53:48, Petteri Räty a écrit :
As people seem to want the council to take action I offer to take
action. As it's impossible for me to do everything myself I offer to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-04-2010 13:35, George Prowse wrote:
On 10/04/2010 05:10, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:19:32AM +0200, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 3 April 2010 20:56, George Prowsegeorge.pro...@gmail.com wrote:
Does mediawiki have captcha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-04-2010 13:16, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hello folks,
Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the inactive
council members doesn't look optimal to me
As others have already explained, this is from GLEP39 and it has an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21-04-2010 04:59, Vincent Launchbury wrote:
On 04/20/10 22:52, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Hello,
As suggested in bug 291860, I am heading up an infra cleanup project to
disable/close some mailing lists. Since the list is quite large, I want
to send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-04-2010 13:10, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 04/26/2010 01:42 AM, Alistair Bush wrote:
On 04/24/2010 09:14 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-04-2010 22:16, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 29/04/2010 09:06, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. a écrit :
What actions would you suggest?
Don't use ccache. We (speaking as a former gnome herd member) have had
countless unexplained bugs due to ccache.
Now,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Following Petteri's thread last month about RESOLVED LATER and given a
issue that has been reported to User Relations about the abuse of the
VERIFIED status in Bugzilla, I'd like to get some feedback from fellow
developers.
We have a user that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow developers and remaining community.
We've arrived at that time of the year again in which we elect a new
Council into office.
Here are the details for the Council 201006 elections:
* nominations: June 5th to 18th
* voting: June 20th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-06-2010 08:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 04:11:26 Torsten Veller wrote:
* Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org:
On Monday, May 31, 2010 22:46:50 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Here are the details for the Council
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-06-2010 14:44, Markos Chandras wrote:
all the gnome-* herds look obsolete to me. It should be like kde and use
only one alias. Further more the comm-fax could be merged with a net-*
alias, and all the desktop-* could be merged in one herd.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-06-2010 13:19, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On Saturday 05 of June 2010 02:00:02 Torsten Veller wrote:
Hello fellow developers and users.
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-06-2010 11:12, Anders Hellgren wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Torsten Veller wrote:
Hello fellow developers and users.
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010).
All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-06-2010 08:41, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
There are some packages which were 'readded' to the Sunrise overlay
after lying unmaintained in the tree for a long time and finally being
removed. One example could be net-im/ekg2 for removal of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16-06-2010 16:39, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 6/16/10 5:33 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
- With these Code of Conduct rules in place how come DevRel
is not publicly reminding of these rules where necessary?
I think the initiative is on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16-06-2010 05:03, Alec Warner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Could it be we expect perfection from each other instead seeking to
understand and complement each other? What can we do to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-06-2010 00:00, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello!
yngwin's devaway message still reads
inactive, pending resolution of devrel issue.
yngwin retired. I woudn't go as far as saying that his case made him
retire but I definitely say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-06-2010 00:17, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Jorge,
On 06/17/10 02:01, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
There was a mostly silent agreement between some teams, including
DevRel, UserRel, Council and Trustees, that after the Proctors project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-06-2010 02:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello.
As some people seem to be interested in examples of out of the line tone
in Gentoo I feel like sharing an example just happened a few minutes ago:
In #gentoo-infra people are talking about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-06-2010 16:15, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Jeremy,
On 06/19/10 06:45, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On 06/18/2010 09:25 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
In #gentoo-infra snip
#gentoo-infra is a private channel and you don't have to be in there. No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19-06-2010 17:40, Richard Freeman wrote:
On 06/19/2010 01:06 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On 19-06-2010 16:15, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
#gentoo-infra is a channel on infra matters.
The fact that it's developers only doesn't make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
With my apologies for being late, you can find my manifesto for the
current Council election in woodpecker[1].
Please feel free to ask any questions you'd like to be answered.
[1] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~jmbsvicetto/council201006-manifesto.xml
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sebastian.
On 29-06-2010 20:06, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello Jorge,
I stumbled upon this in the section on community related beliefs of
yours:
[T]he Gentoo community is made of its members and they are what
they are. We have a mostly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Theo.
On 29-06-2010 11:49, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
Please feel free to ask any questions you'd like to be answered.
1) Is it possible an election
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-07-2010 15:23, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been already
reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be familiar
with internals of current code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
On 11-07-2010 16:03, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirbheek,
thanks for writing such a well thought-out and comprehensive reply to
Enrico. I agree with all the points you raised.
On 11-07-2010 10:28, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-07-2010 21:56, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
Jorge,
I remember very clearly as you and I were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 21:54 +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
1. Due to the tardiness in the election process, there was no council
meeting in September. Will this council have 11 meetings or will its
term end
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you all.
Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 01:51:36PM +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
Please give him the usual
Gentoo words of encouragement for which we are so well known.
I would like to congratulate our Spanish ( :-P )
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
rewrite.
Great.
Thanks to everybody that worked on this:
- jokey,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
Dear Gentoo Devs and Users,
The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little
bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel.
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
| All:
|
...
|
| I also have a slew of SPARC hardware, need to go home and catalog that,
| not all that sure what all I have. I can answer any questions about the
| other specs of the machine upon request.
Can you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Daniel Ostrow wrote:
| As I am no longer an ebuild dev (real life job got in the way) I
| have a whole slew of hardware that I'm willing to ship to any
| gentoo dev for the cost of
their term on March 1st.
The election officials are Łukasz Damentko[1], Jorge Manuel B. S.
Vicetto[2], and Richard Freeman[3]. The infrastructure team contact for
the election is Shyam Mani[4]. The election officials have published a
page[5] with all the information on the election including
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello fellow devs, users and Gentoo community.
...
We ask all Foundation members and current devs to check if they are in
the correct lists and to confirm their details. In particular, devs
should check if they don't lack a join date in the ldap record[10
Hello again.
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello fellow devs, users and Gentoo community.
The election for the Gentoo Foundation trustees has started. The
nomination period started today and lasts until Tuesday, February
12th. The election polls will be open from Wednesday February
Hi.
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
...
The election polls will be open from Wednesday February 13th to
Wednesday 27th.
Just a small update. For logistic reasons we need to push the voting
period 24 hours. Thus, the election will take place from 00H00 UTC
February 14th (Thursday) to 0H00
Hello again.
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
The election officials are Łukasz Damentko[1], Jorge Manuel B. S.
Vicetto[2], and Richard Freeman[3]. The infrastructure team contact
for the election is Shyam Mani[4]. The election officials have
published a page[5] with all the information
Hi.
As we've stated before and is listed on the election page[1], the voting
period lasts from 00:00.00 UTC February 14th (Thursday) to 23:59.59 UTC
February 28th (Thursday). Thus, there's little less than 48 hours to
cast your vote.
At the moment 24% of the eligible voters have submitted
Welcome zlin.
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 07:48 -0500, Thomas Anderson a écrit :
[snip]
Anyway, Welcome to our crazy team and have fun !
Cheers
--
Rémi Cardona
LRI, INRIA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even more on-topic, Welcome to the Krazy team!
Hi.
As was announced many times before, the voting period for the election
ended at 23:59:59 UTC yesterday.
We are currently counting the votes and will announce the winner and
send the master ballot asap - hopefully, in a few hours.
For the election officials,
--
Jorge Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow devs, users and Gentoo community,
here are our 2008 trustees :
NeddySeagoon
fmccor
tsunam
tgall
wltjr
Master ballot and personal confirmation emails will follow.
Thanks to Shyam for the technical support :)
Congratulations
Markus Ullmann wrote:
we had that in the past already yet it didn't solve one problem at hand:
users getting distacted and devs getting nervous b/c the process is
a) undocumented and
b) a bit complex as you have to keep $repo and gentoo-x86 in sync
So giving both (devs and users) an automated
Petteri Räty wrote:
Christian Faulhammer kirjoitti:
Hi,
in the Emacs overlay we imported the bzr.eclass from the xeffects
overlay. In the near future Emacs development will switch from CVS to
Bazaar and thus we need the new eclass in Portage to still provide our
live ebuilds from
Petteri Räty wrote:
Mike Auty kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Defining required amount of activity for ebuild devs. I would like us
to raise the required amount of activity for ebuild devs.
Given that the low number of developers is ranked as our number one
problem in Donnie's informal
1 - 100 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
