Re: [gentoo-user] portage problems

2003-12-02 Thread Robert Cole
Thanks for the quick reply! It's probably my fault or I'm mis-reading something in your reply but my system is built with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 from the beginning. The masking notes say the ~ should be there. Is that not correct? It's late for me here so it's probably a goof on my part. :) I

Re: [gentoo-user] portage problems

2003-12-02 Thread Marius Mauch
On 12/02/03 Allen Parker wrote: You should definitely file your own bug report. One of the caveats of running ~x86 is that sometimes things are just broken. I'd suggest a rebuild with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=x86 instead as portage-2.0.49-r15 is working fine for me. If there are things that are

Re: [gentoo-user] portage problems

2003-12-02 Thread Robert Cole
Thanks I looked it up. I did indeed find a lockfile so I tried re-emerging the add and I see that it fails to completely install: making executable: /usr/lib/libsndfile.so.1.0.5 Completed installing into /var/tmp/portage/libsndfile-1.0.5/image/ Merging media-libs/libsndfile-1.0.5 to / ---

Re: [gentoo-user] portage problems

2003-12-02 Thread Collins Richey
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:02:34 -0800 Robert Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the quick reply! It's probably my fault or I'm mis-reading something in your reply but my system is built with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 from the beginning. The masking notes say the ~ should be there. Is that not

RE: [gentoo-user] portage problems

2003-12-02 Thread MARTINSON, GREGORY
, December 02, 2003 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage problems On Tuesday 02 December 2003 22:59, Collins Richey wrote: On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:02:34 -0800 Robert Cole wrote: my system is built with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 from the beginning. The masking notes say

Re: [gentoo-user] portage problems

2003-12-02 Thread Robert Cole
I use to write code many years ago and I'm looking into getting back into it as soon as I figure out what to start with but in the mean time I like to contribute the best way I can right now and that's testing. :) I'm fairing good at testing stuff and then using my programming background to get

RE: [gentoo-user] portage problems

2003-12-01 Thread Allen Parker
You should definitely file your own bug report. One of the caveats of running ~x86 is that sometimes things are just broken. I'd suggest a rebuild with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=x86 instead as portage-2.0.49-r15 is working fine for me. If there are things that are masked unstable/experimental that you need,

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage Problems

2003-08-28 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:50:27 -0700 Bryce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone having problems with the new portage?? what new portage? 2.0.48-r5 or 2.0.49-r1 are the current x86 and ~x86 versions of portage. Like emerge saying it is running outta space. And emerge not being able to unzip files

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage Problems

2003-08-28 Thread Bryce
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 11:14 pm, Marius Mauch wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:50:27 -0700 Bryce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone having problems with the new portage?? what new portage? 2.0.48-r5 or 2.0.49-r1 are the current x86 and ~x86 versions of portage. Like emerge saying it

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage Problems

2003-08-28 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Bryce wrote: Is anyone having problems with the new portage?? Like emerge saying it is running outta space. And emerge not being able to unzip files anymore. Kinda like the whole problem that happened like 8 months ago? And if nobody remembers, how do i replace my current broken portage