Hi
Is there a way currently to install libreoffice on the same computer as
openoffice
?
Right now, emerge said open is blocking libreoffice, and I would like to try
libre but keep open ...
Best regards
--
Stéphane Guedon
page web : http://www.22decembre.eu/
carte de visite :
Hi,
I have just tried to emerge net-analyzer/rrdtool-1.4.5 (1.4.4 is
currently installed), but it hangs
This last messages are
Resolve Portability Issues
checking if msync with MS_ASYNC updates the files mtime...
It doesn't use any CPU time, so it's probably waiting forever.
Has anybody
Hi,
On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
Is there a way currently to install libreoffice on the same computer as
openoffice ?
Right now, emerge said open is blocking libreoffice, and I would like to
try libre but keep open ...
apparently not, but I recently switched to
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 09:23:51 Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
Is there a way currently to install libreoffice on the same computer as
openoffice ?
Right now, emerge said open is blocking libreoffice, and I would like to
try libre but
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 11:52:25 Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 03:35, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 21:02:46 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I see. In my head it is as if we're going against the udev principle of
populating required device nodes. If udev
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
Considering that ~250 devices consumes a teeny-weeny bit of disk space
and they are hidden from view normally, I say it's worth it leaving them
in. Which is what vapier also says.
I see. In my head it
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:48 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Peter
Humphrey did opine thusly:
It's quite simple logic... If a file is modified, it is no longer the
file portage installed, so portage does not uninstall it. If anything,
the problem is that the logic used by portage is
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:48:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
It's quite simple logic... If a file is modified, it is no longer the
file portage installed, so portage does not uninstall it. If
anything, the problem is that the logic used by portage is too
simple.
I don't think it's too
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:00:01AM +0200, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I'd be livid if portage were to remove my carefully crafted work
from time immemorial, without so much as a by-your-leave. Anyone who wants
to delete his own work is free to do so, but the rest of us ought not to be
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:31 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Indi did
opine thusly:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:00:01AM +0200, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I'd be livid if portage were to remove my carefully crafted
work from time immemorial, without so much as a by-your-leave.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 15:10, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 11:52:25 Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 03:35, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 21:02:46 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I see. In my head it is as if we're going
Helmut Jarausch writes:
I have just tried to emerge net-analyzer/rrdtool-1.4.5 (1.4.4 is
currently installed), but it hangs
This last messages are
Resolve Portability Issues
checking if msync with MS_ASYNC updates the files mtime...
It doesn't use any CPU time, so it's probably
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2011 05:00:08 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I get the following error several times when trying to emerge
gnome-panel on oldlap, an ~x86 gentoo.
CCLD panel-test-applets
On 6/1/2011 5:47 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:31 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Indi did
opine thusly:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:00:01AM +0200, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Personally, I'd be livid if portage were to remove my carefully crafted
work from time
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:20:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 17:26:43 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
I'll trim my earlier quote down to the salient statement.
It
removes files that are still in the same state as when
Am 01.06.2011 03:31, schrieb Adam Carter:
I've been having problems with my Squid-equipped Gentoo box: For some
sites, Squid just times out. But if I access the sites directly, they
appear in my browser. And doing a direct wget from the Squidbox also
works.
Now I'm not
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 02:00:01 +0200, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 00:14:04 Neil Bothwick wrote:
[snip]
A customised file contains an investment of the user's time, a
generic file does not. That investment may be
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:57 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, David W Noon
did opine thusly:
We agree on the usefulness of a purge-like option but not on the
desirability or otherwise of the current default behaviour
I called it an annoyance. Having to clean up obsolete configuration
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 09:32:48 Stéphane Guedon wrote:
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 09:23:51 Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
Is there a way currently to install libreoffice on the same computer as
openoffice ?
Right now, emerge said
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:20:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
Sounds like you want a --really-all suboption to -C
Basically, yes. I want it on -C and -c runs of emerge.
This means it would not be applicable to upgrade or rebuild runs,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:57:58 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
No it's not. You were referring to a special case of the general
statement I made.
I can see no material difference in the two statements in question,
unless you mean by the user is a special case. By whom else would
files be modified
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:20:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:57:58 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
[snip]
Remember: we are discussing the COMPLETE DELETION of a
package, not an upgrade or rebuild.
We are discussing
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2011 05:00:08 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I get the following error several times when trying to emerge
gnome-panel on oldlap, an ~x86 gentoo.
CCLD panel-test-applets
There doesn't seem to be anything in the VBox.log that indicates the
system had a hard lockup. I imagine the kernel panicing resulted in
VirtualBox being unable to write to the log.
Is anyone running VB on a Linux raid partition? I've logically
narrowed down the issue to one of the following:
David W Noon wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:20:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:57:58 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
[snip]
Remember: we are discussing the COMPLETE DELETION of a
package, not an
* David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com [110601 13:10]:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:20:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:57:58 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
[snip]
Remember: we are discussing the COMPLETE DELETION of a
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 15:57:58 David W Noon wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:20:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 17:26:43 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
I'll trim my earlier quote down to the salient statement.
In /etc/portage/package.use I have
# Need these or for some games
gnome-extra/gnome-games clutter opengl
But when I try to emerge gnome-games, I don't get clutter
[ebuild R ] gnome-extra/gnome-games-2.30.2-r1 USE=guile opengl
-artworkextra (-clutter) -test 0 kB
I know
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:44 AM, James j...@nc.rr.com wrote:
There doesn't seem to be anything in the VBox.log that indicates the
system had a hard lockup. I imagine the kernel panicing resulted in
VirtualBox being unable to write to the log.
Is anyone running VB on a Linux raid partition?
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 14:25:50 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
In /etc/portage/package.use I have
# Need these or for some games
gnome-extra/gnome-games clutter opengl
But when I try to emerge gnome-games, I don't get clutter
[ebuild R ]
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:20:02 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote about
Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 15:57:58 David W Noon wrote:
[snip]
I called it an annoyance. Having to clean up obsolete
configuration files is just that, unless you can
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:20:01 +0200, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user]
Cleaning redundant configuration files:
Even if the -C option is used, I would still want it to be something
extra to remove config files. As stated before, I sometimes emerge -C
a package then emerge it again. I still want
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:20:02 +0200, Todd Goodman wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
What you seem to ignore or miss in the discussion is that an
emerge -C is necessary at times during an upgrade and rebuild when
package dependencies are not perfect.
See my
110601 Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
Is there a way to install libreoffice on the same computer as openoffice?
emerge said open is blocking libreoffice
apparently not, but I recently switched to libreoffice and it just works.
you can always store
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 14:25:50 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
In /etc/portage/package.use I have
# Need these or for some games
gnome-extra/gnome-games clutter opengl
But when I try to emerge gnome-games, I don't get clutter
I'll get the error message and then post it here.
I'm using Samsung drives that haven't seen any other problems under
heavily utilization.
What specific kernel version are you using? What version of vbox?
-j
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 14:52, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:33 PM, James j...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I'll get the error message and then post it here.
I'm using Samsung drives that haven't seen any other problems under
heavily utilization.
What specific kernel version are you using? What version of vbox?
-j
The underlying
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:01:00AM -0400, Todd Goodman wrote:
Yes, Dale, I tried that before. T tage mail matching a pattern does
not what I seems to be: It matches only against the subject line.
This was the reason, why I asked here...
Best regards,
mcc
Hi mcc,
What are
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
In /etc/portage/package.use I have
# Need these or for some games
gnome-extra/gnome-games clutter opengl
But when I try to emerge gnome-games, I don't get clutter
[ebuild R ]
* David W Noon dwn...@ntlworld.com [110601 14:41]:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:20:02 +0200, Todd Goodman wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
What you seem to ignore or miss in the discussion is that an
emerge -C is necessary at times during an upgrade and rebuild
Hi! Sorry for not answering sooner; got sidetracked by other
high-priority job demands...
On 2011-06-01, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 01.06.2011 03:31, schrieb Adam Carter:
I've been having problems with my Squid-equipped Gentoo box: For some
sites, Squid just times
Am 01.06.2011 22:31, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
Hi! Sorry for not answering sooner; got sidetracked by other
high-priority job demands...
On 2011-06-01, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 01.06.2011 03:31, schrieb Adam Carter:
I've been having problems with my Squid-equipped
Todd Goodman wrote:
* David W Noondwn...@ntlworld.com [110601 14:41]:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:20:02 +0200, Todd Goodman wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
What you seem to ignore or miss in the discussion is that an
emerge -C is necessary at times
David W Noon wrote:
That's easy: if you know you are going to reinstall after deleting,
just take a backup copy of those files you have modified, which is
usually only the one configuration file. After the reinstallation,
restore from your backup.
Alternatively, you can switch the suggested
Hello, Stroller.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:26:45AM +0100, Stroller wrote:
On 30/5/2011, at 11:10am, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
...
Right clicking on Audio Disc gives an eject menu point. YUCK!!!
If I'd've wanted an Apple Macintosh, I know where to buy one. I just
want my drive's eject
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2011 18:38:35 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2011 05:00:08 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I get the following error several times when trying to emerge
gnome-panel on oldlap, an ~x86 gentoo.
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 14:45:47 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:46 on Monday 30 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
e17 is the best desktop for me, because it is extremely light footed, has
enough eye candy (if you need that) and it is relatively
configurable. Until
Am 01.06.2011 20:25, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
I know that the (-clutter) means that the clutter flag has been removed,
The flag is not removed as in is not there anymore but it is masked
because using it makes, at a high percentage, problems of some kind
.
You could unmask that flag if you want
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
In /etc/portage/package.use I have
# Need these or for some games
gnome-extra/gnome-games clutter opengl
But when I try to emerge gnome-games, I don't get clutter
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 01.06.2011 20:25, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
I know that the (-clutter) means that the clutter flag has been removed,
The flag is not removed as in is not there anymore but it is masked
because using it makes, at a high percentage, problems of
, though unproven, at 00:05 on Thursday 02 June 2011, Mick did opine thusly:
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 14:45:47 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:46 on Monday 30 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
e17 is the best desktop for me, because it is extremely light footed,
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:06:23 -0500, Dale wrote:
I would think this would be a idea on this. Do a emerge -C to get the
regular way and a emerge -CC to remove everything literally, including
config files.
So a bit of keyboard bounce can nuke your configs? No thanks. I'd rather
have an
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:52 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, David W Noon
did opine thusly:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:20:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
Sounds like you want a --really-all suboption to -C
Basically, yes. I
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:06:23 -0500, Dale wrote:
I would think this would be a idea on this. Do a emerge -C to get the
regular way and a emerge -CC to remove everything literally, including
config files.
So a bit of keyboard bounce can nuke your configs? No
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2011 23:50:18 Alan McKinnon wrote:
, though unproven, at 00:05 on Thursday 02 June 2011, Mick did opine thusly:
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 14:45:47 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:46 on Monday 30 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
e17 is
55 matches
Mail list logo
