Re: [gentoo-user] zoom?

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, at 08:04, Michael wrote: > > I have not used Zoom, but the interwebs are screaming about the fly-by > > malware > > silent installations that come with it. I don't know if this applies to > > Linux > > too. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] zoom?

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:16 PM Alarig Le Lay wrote: > > On mer. 25 mars 11:51:33 2020, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Did someone try to install zoom? (relevant to many people during the > > current crisis) > > > > https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/204206269-Inst

[gentoo-user] zoom?

Did someone try to install zoom? (relevant to many people during the current crisis) https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/204206269-Installing-Zoom-on-Linux I downloaded an archive (cannot find the URL again; the site is that bad) and the directory doesn't even contain a REDME...) Jorge

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: line wrap over in xterm/konsole

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 11:16 AM Mick wrote: > > > Just to make sure there is no misunderstanding: the apparent bug only > > manifests itself the first time I do the shrinking/restoring stuff, > > after launching a urxvt window. Following tries will show the desired > > behaviour. Can you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: line wrap over in xterm/konsole

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 9:36 AM Mick wrote: > > On Saturday, 22 June 2019 08:52:56 BST Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > > However, > > my urxvt behaves as you describe, more or less: > > - open urxvt > > - cat some file with long enough lines > > - li

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: line wrap over in xterm/konsole

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:44 AM Grant Taylor wrote: > > > This was expected. After all, the output of "cat foo" is not processed > > through readline. > > I don't think that readline has anything to do with this. I think (wrongly?) that readline deals with redrawing when typing a command in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: line wrap over in xterm/konsole

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 11:38 PM Grant Taylor wrote: > > On 6/21/19 4:20 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Nope. Just plain xterm (which I use a lot). BTW: it also works > > remotely, via ssh. $TERM is "xterm". > > What use terms do you have enabled (that impact

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: line wrap over in xterm/konsole

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 9:16 PM Grant Taylor wrote: > > On 6/21/19 2:04 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > My xterm wraps & resizes just fine (e.g., a long line wraps; > > on maximizing the window, contents are redrawn and use just one > > line, if it fits). I don't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: line wrap over in xterm/konsole

My xterm wraps & resizes just fine (e.g., a long line wraps; on maximizing the window, contents are redrawn and use just one line, if it fits). I don't think I did anything special for this to work. Maybe it's window manager related? I use openbox. My USE variables for xterm are the same as Mick's. Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: line wrap over in xterm/konsole

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:03 PM Mick wrote: > In case it is a bash thing: Do you have a line shopt -s checkwinsize in ~/.bashrc ? If not, add it and then experiment with a new xterm window (maybe rxvt doesn't require it, for some reason...) Regards, Jorge

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: line wrap over in xterm/konsole

le > behave like rxvt-unicode does and redraw the content to fit the changed window > width? > CTRL + middle button -> Enable auto wraparound Maybe you have this option disabled? To enable it by default, edit .Xresources and add/edit the line *VT100.autoWrap: true Regards Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall?

d both usable. I would just use iptables if I were iptables-wise enough. Cheers Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] microcode applied?

0906e9, pf_mask 0x2a, 2017-04-06, rev 0x005e, size 97280 018/002: sig 0x000906e9, pf_mask 0x2a, 2017-04-06, rev 0x005e, size 97280 So in this example "intel-ucode/06-9e-09" is what you'll write in the kernel form. There is a amd-ucode dir in /lib/firmware, so I assume it will be the same. Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <can...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] Documentation not for "end-users", "just works" stuff, users should not stress their little he

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Ian Zimmerman <i...@very.loosely.org> wrote: > On 2017-12-09 12:00, Jorge Almeida wrote: > >> Are you sure you need udisks? And policykit? I'm guessing you have >> some default USE variables which if removed would contribute to a >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 09/12/17 12:08, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> I'm all in favour of Lennart-bashing, but let's keep the bashing to what >> he's responsible for. > > > > As far as I can tell, the most egregious thing he's responsible for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 6:12 AM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote: >> On Saturday, 9 December 2017 12:00:12 GMT Jorge Almeida wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Mick <

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

ldn't want such stuff in my system. (Of course, the aforementioned fingers are exceedingly sticky. We all have to live with udev, after all...) Regards Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: memset_s

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:41 AM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:42 PM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You can set your optimization preferences in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: memset_s

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14/11/17 19:36, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > Unless you look at the assembly

Re: [gentoo-user] memset_s

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:42 PM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> http://www.d

Re: [gentoo-user] memset_s

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2014-09-04-how-to-zero-a-buffer.html > > >>> Of course, what would really solve the optimize-into-oblivion problem >>> is a pragma that when invoked on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: memset_s

? Even the volatile modifier doesn't >> solve the problem, according to the link in previous post. > > > explicit_bzero() is available in glibc. It's in . > > OK, thanks. dietlibc also has it, musl doesn't. Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] memset_s

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Mart Raudsepp <l...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On L, 2017-11-11 at 00:10 +0000, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> Well, most programmers probably won't care about this stuff anyway, >> and people who deal with cryptography tend to be more cautious tha

Re: [gentoo-user] memset_s

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:19 PM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 4:25 PM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> http://www.daemonology.net

Re: [gentoo-user] memset_s

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 4:25 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm having trouble finding the article again, but these functions look > very similar to Microsoft's extensions to the C standard. There is a > good case to be made that they are counterproductive. Yes, it looks

Re: [gentoo-user] memset_s

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Marc Joliet <mar...@gmx.de> wrote: > Am Freitag, 10. November 2017, 10:54:53 CET schrieb Jorge Almeida: >> I'm trying to use memset_s() but the system (glibc?) doesn't know >> about it. I also tried to compile against musl, same result. >

[gentoo-user] memset_s

You can guess what the output is. Someone using it? Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] www-plugins/adobe-flash

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:42:53AM +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote > > https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ shows 27.0.0.183 as the current > Flash version. If you don't want to give up on F

[gentoo-user] www-plugins/adobe-flash

Cannot download it: 404 I emerge --sync'ed yesterday, and again just a few minutes ago, in case the particular version of the package required by portage ( www-plugins/adobe-flash-27.0.0.170) was nuked. What might be happening here? Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:28 PM, wrote: > # > # Executable file formats / Emulations > # > CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y > CONFIG_COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF=y > CONFIG_ELFCORE=y > CONFIG_CORE_DUMP_DEFAULT_ELF_HEADERS=y > CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT=y > # CONFIG_HAVE_AOUT is not set >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:25 PM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote: > On 07/19 06:57, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:40 PM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote: >> >> > >> > the tool is statically linked and only the command "file" >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Small and dirty 32 bit environment just to flash my Bus Pirate

les (Executable file formats / Emulations ---> x32 ABI for 64-bit mode) (I hope I'm not saying something utterly silly...) Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] managing chromium exceptions

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Mick wrote: > > > I am able to go to Settings/Advanced/Privacy/Content Settings/JavaScript > /Manage Exceptions, click on the left field that shows (in grey colour): > > [*.]sample.co.uk > > and I can type in the URL you provided. Then

Re: [gentoo-user] managing chromium exceptions

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/04/2017 03:54 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> Well, a plugin to make a browser barely usable. But what about a >> functionality allegedly built in? >> >> > Even stranger, chromium

Re: [gentoo-user] managing chromium exceptions

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Corbin Bird wrote: > Using Chromium and uMatrix / uBlock Origin Plugins, no problem with the > page. No ads or Java errors. > ( No, not the 'www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins'. ) > Well, a plugin to make a browser barely usable. But what

[gentoo-user] managing chromium exceptions

ell me I'm not the only one to whom such beautiful things happen. Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Wed, 17 May 2017 12:14:18 -0700 > schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com>: >> Well, regardless of how well/badly it works, it does seem to have >> everything I don't want: h

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/14/2017 01:47 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> >> It's the first time I hear about plymouth. Visiting >> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/plymouth/ I found zilch documentation. >

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > I see 16 Tuxen at boot up, no problem. A whole raft, then. (Or is it a waddle?) I was happy enough with my huddle of 4... > > Something strange happened when I installed the 4.11.0 sources - all the > options were

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Sun, 14 May 2017 10:11:31 +0100 > schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com>: >> >> >> I suppose it's goodbye to Tux, for now. I was hoping someone else >> would be us

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100 > schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com>: >> >> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything >> >> seems fine, except t

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Tux AWOL

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Stroller <strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 13 May 2017, at 09:46, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything seems >> fine, except that the l

[gentoo-user] [OT] Tux AWOL

kernel.org, off portage (hence the OT in the title). thanks Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/05/2017 09:36, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Now, can you please get over yourself so we can move on? > We get it, we really do. You don't like the message. > In case you didn't notice, the t

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 05/01/2017 08:01 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 10:33:05 -0700 >> schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com>: >> >>&g

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:36:03 -0700 > schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com>: >> The warnings don't bother me that much, I just feel they are Bad >> Policy. Enabling cgroups wo

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/30/2017 08:33 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:26:16 -0700 &

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 09:26:16 -0700 > schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com>: > > Well, it says "should be" enabled. It's not a requirement. You may not > use some of htop's featur

Re: [gentoo-user] htop wants cgroups

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Rasmus wrote: > Hi, > > it's possible to use htop without the cgroup config in your kernel, but htop > is able to display cgroups (which it obviously isn't able to if those aren't > enabled in the kernel), so emerge throws this

[gentoo-user] htop wants cgroups

want my dog to die for lack of cgroups support.) thanks Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake?

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Adam Carter wrote: >> Thanks. I suppose it's just a gcc thing, then. I just emerged >> gcc-5.4.0 and the output is the same, though. > > > My skylake comes up as broadwell too, with gcc 5.4 > > Looks like gcc 6 has a skylake arch, but not a

Re: [gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake?

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Poison BL. <poiso...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > While I don't have anything that new handy, the 6MB cache checks out against > intel's specs for the i5-7600. The bro

[gentoo-user] broadwell for kaby lake?

reads=4 (...) Was I ripped off? Can someone with the same cpu check the output of the above commands? Thanks... Jorge Almeida

[gentoo-user] fbi kills X

first with "X" USE flag, same problem. Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] lumina

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:43:20 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > It seems fairly clear, some .desktop files contain invalid values. It > shouldn't stop them working but they should have been fixed bef

[gentoo-user] lumina

lumina-support.desktop: error: value "Lumina;" for key "OnlyShowIn" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "Lumina"; values extending the format should start with "X-" ?? Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > I have a similar setup here in Frontier territory. The ADSL circuit > connects to their Netgeat/Westell B90 > which has wifi and 4 ethernet ports. One ethernet port connects to my > "internal" DLink-615 which serves

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/29/2017 12:07 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> I think I need wan-to-lan. Anyway, those numbers seem too good to be >> true. 919Mbps with a $61 TP-Link AC1200? What would explain my poor >> re

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:52:08 -0700 > schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com>: > >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> >> wrote: >> > O

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:19:29 +0100 > schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com>: > > > I'm using a 400 MBps cable link here, directly connected, I can get 48 > MBytes/s out of it (which sh

Re: [gentoo-user] HD 630?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Todd Goodman <t...@bonedaddy.net> wrote: > * Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> [170327 18:04]: > > > I've built a number of desktop machines using Intel i7 (mostly) CPUs > with integrated GPU and all have been supported well in my >

Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:28 PM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/graphics-drivers/05520.html > ev says that everything up to I

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Adam Carter <adamcart...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > The next hop after the ISP supplied router is another piece of the ISPs > network equipment,

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 Jorge Almeida wrote: > > Many ISPs today implement TR-069 (a standard of the DSL forum) to access > customer equipment remotely for service provisioning. They use confi

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:52:25 -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > It's more a privacy issue that security for me. I have a similar setup > with a virgin cable router, which I set to what they call mod

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/28/2017 01:19 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> The point is: I connected the computers to the lan ports of my >> secondary router (with original firmware, but I intended to install >> ddwrt),

[gentoo-user] [OT] router woes

router is thottling speed when in bridge mode? Is this possible at all? (And if so, what could be the purpose of such measure? *spooky*) Someone has a similar setup? Any experience with that (TP-link) router? Thanks, Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:39 PM, J. Roeleveld <jo...@antarean.org> wrote: > On March 28, 2017 11:19:00 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>Maybe someone with a 7th generation can share experience? >> > > > If you just want

Re: [gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:02 AM, J. Roeleveld <jo...@antarean.org> wrote: > On March 28, 2017 10:39:22 AM GMT+02:00, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> > > My laptop uses the integrated GPU 95÷ of the time. For the occasional game I > want t

[gentoo-user] drivers for INTEL integrated GPU?

I'm resending this because "HD 630" is a title bound to elicit no response at all. Sorry, I was tired. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: > This may be a stupid question, for one of two possible reasons, but > here it goes: >

[gentoo-user] HD 630?

one?) Any input is appreciated Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] 32 bit firefox on 64 bit system

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:55 AM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is it possible? >> > > Yes, the most straightforward way I know of is to use crossdev to > create an i[3456]86 GCC a

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

cords. Even if it was said with a grain of salt, the fact is that updating a stable system after sync'ing is not expected to be a surprising experience, at least regarding packages that are not part of a huge bundle like KDE. Regards Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Why portage demands to unmask an unstable version of the package?

after that, but still... I couldn't find the name of the maintainer. Maybe different devs are in charge of vim and gvim? just > use emacs... What do[es] the maintainer[s] use? Regards Jorge Almeida

[gentoo-user] 32 bit firefox on 64 bit system

? (It is OK if I have to recompile basic libraries, as long as this is stable...) TIA Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] fatrace

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> $ fatrace >> Cannot initialize fanotify: Function not implemented >> > > Check CONFIG_FANOTIFY. > That's it. Thank you. Jorge Almeida

[gentoo-user] fatrace

$ fatrace Cannot initialize fanotify: Function not implemented Up–to–date system. Maybe the ebuild misses some dependency? Or some kernel configuration? Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] ro /

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jorge Almeida wrote: >> Failed to retrieve available kernel versions. >> >> I use a custom kernel, off-portage. What would the output line about >> kernel mean? >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] ro /

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Run it with '-r l' and you will find out, harmlessly. > > OK, done that. I can't really check it until next time an update makes remounting ro to fail. For now, $ needrestart -r l Scanning processes... Scanning linux

Re: [gentoo-user] ro /

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 01:57:11 -0800, Jorge Almeida wrote: > Aside from the minor details that needrestart is written on Perl and well > documented, I couldn't agree with you more ;-) > OOPS, my bad. I w

Re: [gentoo-user] ro /

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > restart them automatically if you like to live dangerously ;-) > Underdocumented python scripts running as root and messing with services? What could possibly go wrong? ;-)

Re: [gentoo-user] GPT partitions

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Bicno wrote: >> The names are suggestive enough, but I have no clue about what does it > >> mean to use 8304 instead of just plain 8300 for /. > > > > The reason is that with efi bootloader the partitions with that GUID in the > GPT table are

[gentoo-user] GPT partitions

are suggestive enough, but I have no clue about what does it mean to use 8304 instead of just plain 8300 for /. Any insight? TIA Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] ro /

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jorge Almeida wrote: >> >> It would be great a program that goes through all processes and >> checks for old libraries in use. If the program assumes a particular >> setup ( sysv

Re: [gentoo-user] ro /

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Michael Morak <michael.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 January 2017 at 23:04, Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Almost, but not quite. The problem is that the POSIX standard requires that > any file *must* continue to exis

Re: [gentoo-user] ro /

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Michael Morak wrote: > Hi, > > I have a similar setup. The problem is that some of your services may still > have open handles on files that no longer exist after updating (i.e. the > service, when originally started, opened an .so library

Re: [gentoo-user] ro /

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 05:35:09 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> app-admin/checkrestart-0.47-r3 (/usr/sbin/checkrestart) > > There's also needrestart that is a little more intelligent, can Dale and Neil, thanks for the hints. I'll

[gentoo-user] ro /

dated libraries (old versions kept?). I tried logging out. The problem persists after logging in in a getty, with no X process active. I'm updating the system with emerge -NDu world and then emerge @preserved-rebuild Maybe I'm missing something obvious re updating? Ideas, similar experiences? Thanks Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd good or bad?

start such threads just > after the New Year so that to remind us about this topic and make > PR action? > I have a feeling this thread was started by the author Himself. (Hint, to the less attentive readers: "Dominus Mundi" means "Lord of the World") ~_^ Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 & Youtube... Audio: No

t, which I was > already using, into the systemd collective! > Wasn't gummiboot the brain child of a certain systemd developer who got kicked off the kernel due to attitude issues? And keep those taglines coming. Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:39 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Even when there is a buggy font it picks, it shouldn't crash. >>> >> Sure, but it doesn't seem to happen to anyone else. I'm reluctant to >>

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 7:49 PM, lee wrote: >>> >> The menu has the same fonts when the first in the path is >> /usr/share/fonts/100dpi or /usr/share/fonts/Type1/; when >> /usr/share/fonts/75dpi it uses smaller fonts. So it seems that it >> wants /usr/share/fonts/?dpi. But if

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:40 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> writes: > >> >> It is a voodoo (i.e. fonts) problem. Things work for me now, with -fp >> in the Xserver command line and /usr/share/fonts/Type1/ before >&

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: Jorge >> > > Actually, I just had a thought. I stumbled onto a very weird fonts bug > some years ago where Firefox would crash on loading certain pages. It > was something very stupid, all fonts need to have world-readable >

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:46 AM, lee wrote: >> > I'm using fvwm. I was having trouble with xterm once when I still used > Fedora, and though I'm not sure, results might be different with > different WMs (I seem to remember something about that). I tried fvwm and there was no

[gentoo-user] font path [WAS: xterm menu]

fonts/misc/ from the font path? Will it not break something else? And what is the standard way to set the font path? I know I can do it via the -fp flag of Xorg (I start X via xinit), but I assume most people don't do this. Thanks, Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:44 PM, lee <l...@yagibdah.de> wrote: > Jorge Almeida <jjalme...@gmail.com> writes: > > > This works for me: > Nope. No change. > > Perhaps it has to do with a font not being available in the size needed > for the menu? > Ma

Re: [gentoo-user] xterm menu

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Daniel Frey <djqf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/18/2016 07:25 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> >> The logs complain about helvetica, and I found similar stuff in the >> net (not necessarilly about xterm). This appears to be a font problem, >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >