On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:22:37AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 03.09.2013 23:31, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
This link gave me the deciding hint -- I didn't have
cryptsetup-generator in my system, because I didn’t have the
cryptsetup useflags enabled. I rebuilt systemd and
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:22:37AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 03.09.2013 23:31, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
This link gave me the deciding hint -- I didn't have
cryptsetup-generator in my system, because I
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:16:55AM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Well, it’s an experiment, but I’m still quite hesitant to switch. It
really shuts down fast (1 to 2 seconds or so), but I don’t see much
improvement in booting time (still around 40 seconds until KDM is
finished). I like
Hey list
after the many discussions here about systemd I had a flash of
objectivity (“Who cares if people rant about Lennart, the concept seems
sound and I don’t care about separate /usr”). So I wanted to try systemd
on my netbook.
I cloned the / partition from sda2 to sda7 and chrooted into it.
Am 03.09.2013 13:46, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
Hey list
after the many discussions here about systemd I had a flash of
objectivity (“Who cares if people rant about Lennart, the concept
seems sound and I don’t care about separate /usr”). So I wanted to
try systemd on my netbook.
I
Am 03.09.2013 14:32, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I use a crypted /home on my thinkpad ... with systemd.
I only have problems with the encrypted swap but /home works fine.
But I think my /home gets mounted when I login ... pam_mount ... would
have to check if it's mounted and available
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
Hey list
after the many discussions here about systemd I had a flash of
objectivity (“Who cares if people rant about Lennart, the concept seems
sound and I don’t care about separate /usr”). So I wanted to try systemd
on
Am 03.09.2013 13:46, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
Hey list
after the many discussions here about systemd I had a flash of
objectivity (“Who cares if people rant about Lennart, the concept seems
sound and I don’t care about separate /usr”). So I wanted to try systemd
on my netbook.
I
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:15:54AM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Hey list
[…]
Rebooting works until the point of mounting /home, which is a LUKS
container. I get the message:
A start job is running for dev-mapper-home.service
and eventually a timeout and prompt for root password
Am 23.08.2013 00:44, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
/etc/grub.d/40_custom
Add you entries there, and change the number in the filename to
have them appear before the autogenerated entries.
Thanks for the pointer. Gotta play with that.
On Wed, August 21, 2013 22:02, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:50:57 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
This sounds like a bug in LVM. If it was down to a version clash, why
did a restart find the PVs?
Sorry, ianap, but I do know that this kind of thing has never happened
to me in my 8+
On 22/08/2013 08:20, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wed, August 21, 2013 22:02, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:50:57 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
[snip]
No one has demonstrated that it can. An initramfs isn't magic, it
caries out a couple of trivial tasks before switching to the real root
On Thu, August 22, 2013 08:39, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 22/08/2013 08:20, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wed, August 21, 2013 22:02, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:50:57 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
[snip]
No one has demonstrated that it can. An initramfs isn't magic, it
caries out a
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:23:57 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
True, but with the scripts that are floating in this thread, a usable
solution can be build.
It took me a few seconds to do that, so why hasn't it been done before?
It's obviously not due to the work involved, so it must be that no one
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:20:23 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
No one has demonstrated that it can. An initramfs isn't magic, it
caries out a couple of trivial tasks before switching to the real root
partition.
The issue mentioned was an example. It was also:
1) The only one I can remember
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:26:38 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
So the only out of sync scenario that should matter is with the
kernel or kernel modules. Even if it were out of sync with your
current toolset it should still be able
to perform the pivot. Shouldn't any userland stuff that
breaks
On Aug 22, 2013 1:28 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Correct, and here lies the cause for the out of sync scenario.
So the only out of sync scenario that should matter is with the
kernel or kernel modules. Even if it were out of sync with your
current toolset it should still be
On 22/08/2013 13:47, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013 1:28 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org
mailto:jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Correct, and here lies the cause for the out of sync scenario.
So the only out of sync scenario that should matter is with the
kernel or kernel modules.
On Thu, August 22, 2013 11:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:23:57 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
True, but with the scripts that are floating in this thread, a usable
solution can be build.
It took me a few seconds to do that, so why hasn't it been done before?
It's obviously not
On Thu, August 22, 2013 11:17, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:20:23 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
No one has demonstrated that it can. An initramfs isn't magic, it
caries out a couple of trivial tasks before switching to the real root
partition.
The issue mentioned was an
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:55:58 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
No thanks you. As Alan said, portage doesn't have a mechanism to run a
command after a batch emerge, it would have to be done after every
single package. So the next time a bunch of Perl packages and their
virtuals are updated, look
Am 20.08.2013 08:54, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
Unless you want to learn the ins and outs of using an initramfs (and
having a lot of fun and failed boots in the process), I highly
recommend using Dracut. It does everything for you.
I'd dig a short and working howto systemd and dracut.
My
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:08:43 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Additionally I would really like to understand how to influence the
default entry for grub2 ... letting grub2-mkconfig detect the available
options is one thing ... but do I really have to count down the
available kernels and
On 08/21/2013 02:13 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:54:26AM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote
No, the kernel has a mini filesystem (doesn't matter which directory
structure has inside), and it
On 2013-08-21 3:06 AM, thegeezer thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
On 08/21/2013 02:13 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
The worry about falling out of sync, although justified, I think it's
a little overreacted; even for things like LVM2 and NFS, how many
times changes the metadata or format used by
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:40:32 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
update LVM2
kernel remains the same
reboot
initramfs finds all PVS and activates VG
main system init
/etc/init.d/lvm2 start
error can't read from USB PVS
login to system with missing PVS
/etc/init.d/lvm2 restart
all PVS
On 2013-08-21 11:10 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:40:32 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
update LVM2
kernel remains the same
reboot
initramfs finds all PVS and activates VG
main system init
/etc/init.d/lvm2 start
error can't read from USB PVS
login to system with
On 08/21/2013 04:10 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:40:32 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
update LVM2
kernel remains the same
reboot
initramfs finds all PVS and activates VG
main system init
/etc/init.d/lvm2 start
error can't read from USB PVS
login to system with missing PVS
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, thegeezer thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
On 08/21/2013 04:10 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:40:32 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
update LVM2
kernel remains the same
reboot
initramfs finds all PVS and activates VG
main system init
On 08/21/2013 05:42 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, thegeezer thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
On 08/21/2013 04:10 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:40:32 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
update LVM2
kernel remains the same
reboot
initramfs finds all PVS
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:56 PM, thegeezer thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
anyone have any good pointers to an initramfs interrogator, maybe that
takes as argument kernel command line ?
If you are looking to test an initramfs, qemu is handy.
qemu-kvm -kernel /boot/vmlinuz -initrd
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:56:36 +0100, thegeezer wrote:
anyone have any good pointers to an initramfs interrogator, maybe that
takes as argument kernel command line ?
I posted a script fragment that compares the contents of the kernel's
initramfs config file with the live filesystem. Dracut users
On 2013-08-21 2:52 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:56:36 +0100, thegeezer wrote:
anyone have any good pointers to an initramfs interrogator, maybe that
takes as argument kernel command line ?
I posted a script fragment that compares the contents of the
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-08-21 2:52 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:56:36 +0100, thegeezer wrote:
anyone have any good pointers to an initramfs interrogator, maybe that
takes as argument kernel
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:50:57 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
This sounds like a bug in LVM. If it was down to a version clash, why
did a restart find the PVs?
Sorry, ianap, but I do know that this kind of thing has never happened
to me in my 8+ years of running this old system with a separate
On 08/21/2013 07:52 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:56:36 +0100, thegeezer wrote:
anyone have any good pointers to an initramfs interrogator, maybe that
takes as argument kernel command line ?
I posted a script fragment that compares the contents of the kernel's
initramfs
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:09:41 +0100, thegeezer wrote:
I posted a script fragment that compares the contents of the kernel's
initramfs config file with the live filesystem. Dracut users could use
the same method by parsing the output from lsinitrd.
the script you posted referenced
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-08-20 2:54 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless you want to learn the ins and outs of using an initramfs (and
having a lot of fun and failed boots in the process), I highly
recommend using
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
On 2013-08-20 2:54 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless you want to learn the ins and outs of using an initramfs (and
having a lot of fun and failed boots in the process), I highly
recommend using
On 08/19/2013 04:55:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a
system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs
On 20/08/2013 08:44, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 08/19/2013 04:55:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a
system
booting with
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
On 08/19/2013 04:55:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a
On 08/20/2013 08:54:26 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
On 08/19/2013 04:55:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
what
On 2013-08-20 2:54 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless you want to learn the ins and outs of using an initramfs (and
having a lot of fun and failed boots in the process), I highly
recommend using Dracut. It does everything for you.
What about a previous posters comment that
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:57:02 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Unless you want to learn the ins and outs of using an initramfs (and
having a lot of fun and failed boots in the process), I highly
recommend using Dracut. It does everything for you.
What about a previous posters comment that they
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:10:26 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
So, how do/can you *guarantee* that nothing ever gets out of sync?
You could add a custom postinst function to /etc/portage that would
check whether any of the files included in your initramfs are newer than
the initramfs/kernel
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:54:26AM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote
No, the kernel has a mini filesystem (doesn't matter which directory
structure has inside), and it executes the init script (or binary
program) in the root of the initramfs. This init program/script is the
responsible for
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:54:26AM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote
No, the kernel has a mini filesystem (doesn't matter which directory
structure has inside), and it executes the init script (or binary
program) in the
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
On 08/19/2013 04:55:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a
system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs myself)
Thanks for some hints,
Helmut
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs myself)
You need to get your root filesystem and /usr
On 08/19/2013 10:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs myself)
Thanks for some hints,
Helmut
my 2c would be to autobuild one using genkernel or
Hi. I would like to be able to have an equivalent of /etc/local.d/
something to execute those commands which do not fit neatly into the
boot scheme -- for instance I have several things which have something
in init.d and I just have to say /etc/init.d/thing start after
everything is up. There
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 17:41 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I would like to be able to have an equivalent of /etc/local.d/
something to execute those commands which do not fit neatly into the
boot scheme -- for instance I have several things which have something
in init.d and I just
On 25 July 2013 22:31, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@sayusi.hu wrote:
Hi All,
[snip]
Unity is in the tree? Where?
In the unity-gentoo overlay. At the moment the overlay packages are
clashing the already unmasked
Am 25.07.2013 17:42, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
What do you use - and what are the benefits of your method?
I use the following unit in one of my servers:
#
---
[Unit]
My current version, using
Am 2013-07-26 11:26, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 25.07.2013 17:42, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
What do you use - and what are the benefits of your method?
I use the following unit in one of my servers:
#
On Tue, Jul 23 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I wouldn't stress about it too much, your choice is do you want to use
Gnome3 or not? And then just use whatever Gnome3 gives as *that* part
Howdy folks,
currently I am migrating some servers to systemd, and I am wondering
what's the best way to set up static networking. Until now, I always
used dhcp + networkmanager (workstations, laptops).
Some suggested creating your own network unit and manually start
ifconfig/route or ip via
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
What do you use - and what are the benefits of your method?
Why not continue to use DHCP and simply set a static assignment based on
the MAC inside the DHCP server? Then it doesn't matter how the system is
setup, it just
On Thursday 25 July 2013 17:23:56 I wrote:
Systemd will not read /etc/conf.d/net like /etc/init.d/net.*
scripts do. You need some service that will prepare the
network.
I personally prefer netctl, it is KISS enough. It was me who
asked the devs to add it to the tree :)
I tried NM too, it does
KMail is messing with my
emails here, quotations in
sent letters are not the way
they used to look in edit mode
:)
On Thursday 25 July 2013 08:18:00 Douglas J Hunley wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz[1]
wrote:
What do you use - and what are the benefits of your method?
Systemd will not read /etc/conf.d/net like /etc/init.d/net.* scripts do. You
need some service
Am 2013-07-25 14:18, schrieb Douglas J Hunley:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
What do you use - and what are the benefits of your method?
Why not continue to use DHCP and simply set a static assignment based
on the MAC inside the DHCP server? Then it
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Howdy folks,
currently I am migrating some servers to systemd, and I am wondering
what's the best way to set up static networking. Until now, I always
used dhcp + networkmanager (workstations, laptops).
Some suggested
Hi All,
Due to the fact I use Unity and it pulls lot of gnome stuff I started
to migrate my desktop from consolekit to systemd. At the point
described below I run out of knowledge. Does not matter what I do
packagekit-base package wants consolekit. It looks like badly... :S
Thanks in advance for
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, András Csányi sayusi.a...@sayusi.hu wrote:
Hi All,
Due to the fact I use Unity and it pulls lot of gnome stuff I started
to migrate my desktop from consolekit to systemd. At the point
described below I run out of knowledge. Does not matter what I do
Am 25.07.2013 17:42, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Howdy folks,
currently I am migrating some servers to systemd, and I am wondering
what's the best way to set up static networking. Until now, I always
used dhcp +
Re
CADPrc803kq_c76b1oqp3PksvDgyP5MD+zqLGqcsxk=eCT2iYRA@mail.gmail.comCADPrc803kq_c76b1oqp3PksvDgyP5MD+zqLGqcsxk=eCT2iYRA@mail.gmail.com51f10221.1080...@hadt.biz,
Michael Hampicke said:
Tanks. I will give netctl a try in a VM. For now, on real machines, I
am going with the unit you suggested.
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that
On 23/07/13 09:11, András Csányi wrote:
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:58 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
[ snip ]
I have several things depending on consolekit:
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.5_p20120320-r2 pulled in by:
gnome-base/gnome-control-center-3.8.3 requires
On 23/07/2013 11:31, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
So, this implies if I want to keep using gnome then systemd is required,
or use another desktop. That is something to think about.
Correct.
I wouldn't stress about it too much, your choice is do you want to use
Gnome3 or not? And then just use
Am 2013-07-23 08:11, schrieb András Csányi:
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of
the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge
On Tue, Jul 23 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I wouldn't stress about it too much, your choice is do you want to use
Gnome3 or not? And then just use whatever Gnome3 gives as *that* part
you don't have a choice about.
Very clearly stated. Thanks.
Currently I have gnome-base/gnome-3.6.2 with
On Monday 22 July 2013 21:57:06 Michael Hampicke wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:31 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:58 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
[ snip ]
I have several things depending on consolekit:
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.5_p20120320-r2 pulled in by:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I wouldn't stress about it too much, your choice is do you want to use
Gnome3 or not? And then just use whatever Gnome3 gives as *that* part
you don't have a choice about.
Very clearly
Hi,
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
emerge -vpc sys-auth/consolekit gives
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.5_p20120320-r2 pulled in by:
Am Montag, 22. Juli 2013, 09:03:46 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
Hi,
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
emerge -vpc sys-auth/consolekit gives
On 22/07/13 10:03, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
How did you resolve this conflict?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
As a maintainer of sys-auth/consolekit, and xfce-base/xfce4-meta I can
assure you sys-auth/consolekit is not about to be removed and the
support for systemd-logind will be
On Jul 22, 2013 6:34 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 22/07/13 10:03, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
How did you resolve this conflict?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
As a maintainer of sys-auth/consolekit, and xfce-base/xfce4-meta I can
assure you sys-auth/consolekit is
130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
How did you resolve this conflict?
Don't use Gnome. I've been using Fluxbox for years
On 22 July 2013 15:35, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
How did you resolve
On 22/07/2013 15:39, András Csányi wrote:
On 22 July 2013 15:35, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
but many packages depend on
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
Regards.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
On 22/07/13 18:02, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
It's how you look at it. I call it mature but
yeah, because it is so great to have that monster systemd on your box.
Because xml configs are awesome and binary logs even more and I always
wanted an init with builtin webbrowser. Security? bah, not needed.
So when do I have to install mysql to use it? How long until some crap ala
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:35:22AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
How did you resolve
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
Thanks, just purged consolekit from my
maybe you should not just believe everything posted. Especially from a
systemd fanboi.
2013/7/22 Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind ebuild
(wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally intended.
But yeah you usually stay away from unmaintained upstreams.
On Jul 22, 2013 11:03 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
ConsoleKit is for
Thank you for the FUD. I was beginning to miss M$.
Heres the freedesktop entry for a more authoritative statement.
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ConsoleKit/
On Jul 23, 2013 4:57 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
wrote:
maybe you should not just believe everything
Thanks for the FUD.
On Jul 22, 2013 11:15 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
wrote:
yeah, because it is so great to have that monster systemd on your box.
Because xml configs are awesome and binary logs even more and I always
wanted an init with builtin webbrowser. Security?
Mark David Dumlao madum...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the FUD. I was beginning to miss M$.
Heres the freedesktop entry for a more authoritative statement.
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ConsoleKit/
On Jul 23, 2013 4:57 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:58 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
[ snip ]
I have several things depending on consolekit:
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.5_p20120320-r2 pulled in by:
gnome-base/gnome-control-center-3.8.3 requires sys-auth/consolekit
Dependency of gnome-control-center:
|| ( (
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 17:14 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
yeah, because it is so great to have that monster systemd on your box.
Because xml configs are awesome and binary logs even more and I always
wanted an init with builtin webbrowser. Security? bah, not needed.
So when do I have
On 23/07/13 00:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind
ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally intended.
not possible, logind since systemd = 205 requires systemd and won't
work on openrc, upstart, and such
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:59 PM, João Matos jaon...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear list,
Every boot, since I don't know when, systemd display the warning message:
Smack is not enabled in the kernel, not loading access rules.
Today, I decide to check it out. Googled it, found out some stuff about
Upgrading to systemd-198 and udev-198 magically enabled me to login via
gdm again.
Nice ...
Stefan
401 - 500 of 692 matches
Mail list logo
