thanks to all...
i finally get the cdrom work, not perfectly though, i change
the BIOS setting that use S-ATA only instead and keep P-ATA
enabled, which makes cdrom the primary 1st, the sata drive
recognized as primary third. (i hate such layout !! i prefer
the hard disk to be the primary first
On Monday 05 September 2005 09:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks to all...
i finally get the cdrom work, not perfectly though, i change
the BIOS setting that use S-ATA only instead and keep P-ATA
enabled, which makes cdrom the primary 1st, the sata drive
recognized as primary third. (i
On Monday 05 Sep 2005 15:31, Robert Crawford wrote:
I just had a similar problem after I updated udev (I think). I run ~x86
systems, always kept current, so I expect a few minor hiccups, even though
I'm extremely careful with etc-update. There seems to be some weird stuff
going on with udev,
On Monday 05 September 2005 10:51 am, Steve Evans wrote:
On Monday 05 Sep 2005 15:31, Robert Crawford wrote:
I just had a similar problem after I updated udev (I think). I run ~x86
systems, always kept current, so I expect a few minor hiccups, even
though I'm extremely careful with
Page 5-6 of a long udev thread is good reading on recent udev problems.
Robert
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-355069-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-100.html
On Monday 05 September 2005 10:51 am, Steve Evans wrote:
On Monday 05 Sep 2005 15:31, Robert Crawford wrote:
I just had a similar
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:07:34PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote:
i alway build it into kernel, i already checked my config file,
the BLK_DEV_IDECD=y is just there.
besides, why there is a register dump while i reboot,
the error occures at /etc/init.d/halt.sh right
after Unmounting filesystems. hehe
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no error on reboot now, but i will try to switch to windows to see
if the cdrom works well
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:07:34PM +0200, Sven K?hler wrote:
i alway build it into kernel, i already checked my config file,
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no error on reboot now, but i will try to switch to windows to see
if the cdrom works well
All my cdroms in /dev/cdroms/cdrom. May be...?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Alex Korshunov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no error on reboot now, but i will try to switch to windows to see
if the cdrom works well
All my cdroms in /dev/cdroms/cdrom. May be...?
I didn't see the beginning of
my BIOS infomation shows my cdrom is at the third IDE primary,
so i do:
mknod -m 660 hde b 33 0
and later i tried
mknod -m 660 hdc b 23 0
the output:
hdc is not a valid block device
no luck. hde failed either, i give it up. ;-(
thanks for all help.
daniel
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:53:57PM
yes, it works just well in WindowsXP.
it even works before i use udev. hehe
i'm not sure it failed due to the udev,
i have no idea now.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:20:42AM -0400, Matt Randolph wrote:
Alex Korshunov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800,
On Saturday 03 September 2005 08:20, Matt Randolph wrote:
Alex Korshunov wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:32:56PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no error on reboot now, but i will try to switch to windows to see
if the cdrom works well
All my cdroms in
i did read that document, to find the doc is trivial.
what i got is just similar. the udev just create the device
files which were detected by kernel, and handle the operations
like add or remove dynamically. i tried this feature with my usb
devices already, i really like the way udev works. i
050903 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my BIOS infomation shows my cdrom is at the third IDE primary,
so i do: 'mknod -m 660 hde b 33 0' ...
What happened in that case ? That ought to be what you want.
... and later i tried 'mknod -m 660 hdc b 23 0'
the output: hdc is not a valid block device
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i alway build it into kernel, i already checked my config file,
the BLK_DEV_IDECD=y is just there.
Are you really really sure? What do you have in /sys/bus/ide/drivers ?
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
there are two items there:
ide-cdrom ide-disk
but just empty directories. ??
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 06:45:21PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i alway build it into kernel, i already checked my config file,
the BLK_DEV_IDECD=y is just there.
Are you really really sure?
i discover a something while examine my dmesg output.
--Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
--ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
--Probing IDE interface ide0...
--hda: ST380817AS, ATA DISK drive
--Probing IDE interface ide1...
17 matches
Mail list logo
