On Friday, July 29, 2011 02:41:20 PM Dale wrote:
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
To check this, you could try creating a new file (with size = 0) on the
root of that drive, like (After you close and save all your work):
touchmountpoint of drive/LetMeseeIfThisWorksOrIfTheKernelPanicsAgain
If
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2011 02:41:20 PM Dale wrote:
I sort of gave up on this drive. I had a very kind soul to send me a
video card when I did this build. He also sent me a 250Gb drive. I
copied all I could to that but did lose a LOT of my videos and such.
Anyway, I'm
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 01:53:39 Peter Humphrey wrote:
I hope you're pleased to know the process finished. 23 hours to move a
partition! Never heard anything like it.
Not unheard of. If you have too small/large bs and the disk is relatively
large it will take quite some hours to get it
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 15:50:11 Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
One thing's certain: it's a good test of the USB disk! I just hope your
power incident doesn't happen to me too. :-)
That would suck. I sure did hate to lose my videos. I bet ATT
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 01:53:39 Peter Humphrey wrote:
I hope you're pleased to know the process finished. 23 hours to move a
partition! Never heard anything like it.
Not unheard of. If you have too small/large bs and the disk is relatively
large it will take quite some
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 09:49:33 Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 01:53:39 Peter Humphrey wrote:
I hope you're pleased to know the process finished. 23 hours to move a
partition! Never heard anything like it.
Not unheard of. If you have too small/large bs and the disk is
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 15:50:11 Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
One thing's certain: it's a good test of the USB disk! I just hope your
power incident doesn't happen to me too. :-)
That would suck. I
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 09:49:33 Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 01:53:39 Peter Humphrey wrote:
I hope you're pleased to know the process finished. 23 hours to move a
partition! Never heard anything like it.
On Sunday 31 July 2011 14:15:20 Joshua Murphy wrote:
Well, GParted, if I recall, does a couple checks to guess 'best' block
size when cloning or moving a partition, but I'm really not sure how
it does things when shrinking and shifting it sideways to a spot that
overlaps with where it
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Sunday 31 July 2011 14:15:20 Joshua Murphy wrote:
Well, GParted, if I recall, does a couple checks to guess 'best' block
size when cloning or moving a partition, but I'm really not sure how
it does things when
On Sunday 31 July 2011 15:17:16 Joshua Murphy wrote:
There probably is a fair chunk of difference in maximum speed the disk
can work at on each end (I've even seen around a 20MB/s difference on
several 160GB drives I've dealt with), but outside of some older
drives that've been heavily abused
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 01:53:39 Peter Humphrey wrote:
All I have to do now is to persuade Win-XP to find the disk. No luck so
far...
I don't know what's your partition topology, but you may want to use:
fixboot (to rewrite the partition boot record on the WinXP partition)
fixmbr (to rewrite
On Sunday 31 July 2011 18:20:02 Mick wrote:
If the partition of the WinXP installation is intact then the position of
the partition on the disk may be causing you trouble, in which case play
around with the GRUB hide and chainload options to hide other
disks/partitions, so that WinXP thinks
Peter Humphrey wrote:
In fact it is so, by design. I don't know what I did, but after enough
reboots Win-XP was happy. Thanks anyway.
That sounds like winders. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
On Saturday 30 Jul 2011 01:32:07 Dale wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Am 30.07.2011 01:06, schrieb Dale:
I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
dcfldd has a progress indicator AFAIR.
To make sure that your dd
Mick wrote:
On Saturday 30 Jul 2011 01:32:07 Dale wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Am 30.07.2011 01:06, schrieb Dale:
I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
dcfldd has a progress
On 2011-07-30 01:06, Dale wrote:
I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
http://www.rootninja.com/dd-with-a-progress-bar/
(emerge sys-apps/pv)
Disclaimer: I haven't used this myself...
HTH
Best regards
Peter
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:17:52 Dale wrote:
What could have caused this? Could it be a file system problem? I
don't think it is a physical failure since it is working now after
giving it a fresh start. I just don't get how this could have caused a
kernel panic. This is plain weird.
One
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:17:52 Dale wrote:
What could have caused this? Could it be a file system problem? I
don't think it is a physical failure since it is working now after
giving it a fresh start. I just
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:17:52 Dale wrote:
What could have caused this? Could it be a file system problem? I
don't think it is a physical failure since it is working now after
giving it a fresh start. I just don't get how this could have caused a
kernel panic.
Michael Mol wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:17:52 Dale wrote:
What could have caused this? Could it be a file system problem? I
don't think it is a physical failure since it is working now after
pk wrote:
On 2011-07-30 01:06, Dale wrote:
I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
http://www.rootninja.com/dd-with-a-progress-bar/
(emerge sys-apps/pv)
Disclaimer: I haven't used this myself...
HTH
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 100 100 000
On Saturday 30 July 2011 00:06:57 Dale wrote:
I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
I'm in a similar process. I have an external disk which I use to back my
boxes up. I need a bootable vfat partition for the
Michael Mol wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always
- 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000Old_age Always
- 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable
Peter Humphrey wrote:
One thing's certain: it's a good test of the USB disk! I just hope your
power incident doesn't happen to me too. :-)
That would suck. I sure did hate to lose my videos. I bet ATT does to
since I have to go find them and download them again. :/
Dale
:-) :-)
On Saturday 30 July 2011 15:50:11 Dale wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
One thing's certain: it's a good test of the USB disk! I just hope your
power incident doesn't happen to me too. :-)
That would suck. I sure did hate to lose my videos. I bet ATT does to
since I have to go find them
On Thursday 28 July 2011 18:37:24 Dale wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives
file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may
explain why I can't copy anything to it but it works fine as far as
reading goes.
Thoughts? How do I
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 18:37:24 Dale wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives
file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may
explain why I can't copy anything to it but it works fine as far as
reading
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 18:37:24 Dale wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives
file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may
explain why
Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
It worked fine and it was there with 0 bytes. Weird.
I sort of gave up on this drive. I had a very kind soul to send me a video
card when I did this build. He also sent me a 250Gb drive. I copied all I
Am 30.07.2011 01:06, schrieb Dale:
Michael Mol wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
While I am at it, what is the best file system for videos? That is the
biggest thing I use that drive for. I had a LOT of NCIS, CSI and other
shows that are now gone.
Alex Schuster wrote:
Am 30.07.2011 01:06, schrieb Dale:
I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
Find the PID of the dd process with ps ax | grep [d]d or somethhing,
then kill -USR1pid. This will dd
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 17:18:19 James Wall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a update. Let's see what folks think about this situation. I
mentioned in another thread that I did a from scratch kernel. It was a
.35 version. It seemed to
Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 17:18:19 James Wall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a update. Let's see what folks think about this situation. I
mentioned in another thread that I did a from scratch kernel. It was a
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives
file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may
explain why I can't copy anything to it but it works fine as far as
reading goes.
Thoughts? How do I check/change it? Headed to some man pages
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:37:24PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my
drives file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are
called?
That usually won't throw a kernel panic. That usually just gives an
error.
W
--
Willie W. Wong
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives file
system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may explain
why I can't copy anything to it but it works fine as far as reading goes.
Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my drives file
system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are called? That may explain
why I can't copy anything to it but it works fine as
Willie Wong wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:37:24PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Pardon me. My brain passed gas here. lol Could it be that my
drives file system has ran out of inodes or whatever they are
called?
That usually won't throw a kernel panic. That usually just gives an
error.
W
1) Is the filesystem mounted read-only?
Dale, usually you'd check this by running mount without arguments, and
looking to see if the options have ro or rw listed;
eg
adam@rix ~ $ mount
rootfs on / type rootfs (rw)
/dev/root on / type reiserfs (rw,noatime)
none on /proc type proc (rw,relatime)
Dale, usually you'd check this by running mount without arguments, and
looking to see if the options have ro or rw listed;
Sorry - didnt read your post correctly. Obviously you already know this.
Adam Carter wrote:
Dale, usually you'd check this by running mount without arguments, and
looking to see if the options have ro or rw listed;
Sorry - didnt read your post correctly. Obviously you already know this.
Doesn't hurt to mention things sometimes. There are things I
Todd Goodman wrote:
It's certainly possible it's unrelated. Or it could be something
similar and the other bug reporter made a mistake bisecting or didn't run
long enough to fail with that bisection. It's possibly a lot of things
since we don't have enough information.
I don't think that
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 22:03:31 Dale wrote:
Does this make sense to anyone?
Yes. I think your power interruption has damaged the drive electronics.
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter number 5290
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a update. Let's see what folks think about this situation. I
mentioned in another thread that I did a from scratch kernel. It was a .35
version. It seemed to work fine, for a while. When I tell Seamonkey to
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [110725 15:33]:
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com [110725 14:43]:
Todd Goodman wrote:
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
Todd Goodman wrote:
I'll let you know if I see anything that looks related. It would be
interesting if going back to 2.6.38 is a temp fix for you. I know you'd
tried older kernels before but...
Todd
This makes me wonder. I have went all the way back to 2.6.35-r15 and it
does the same
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [110726 09:46]:
Todd Goodman wrote:
I'll let you know if I see anything that looks related. It would be
interesting if going back to 2.6.38 is a temp fix for you. I know you'd
tried older kernels before but...
Todd
This makes me wonder. I have
Todd Goodman wrote:
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
That does look interesting. I had a few times where mine would just
* Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [110725 14:43]:
Todd Goodman wrote:
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
That does
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com [110725 14:43]:
Todd Goodman wrote:
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
52 matches
Mail list logo
