On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:29 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/14/2009 01:08 PM, GerhardosG wrote:
/etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc: line 61: xterm: command not found
/etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc: line 62: exec: xterm: not found
^^
That last line is
On Monday 08 February 2010 21:34:01 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Valmor de Almeida val.gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
[snip]
This has been helpful for me. I'm glad Valmor is getting better
results also.
[snip]
These 4k-sector drives can be
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:20:47PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
However, I'm now trying to get X up and running. The X Server
Configuration HOWTO, section 3. Configuring Xorg says:
Hal comes with many premade device
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 00:20:47 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo!
I've just got a sparkling new installation of Gentoo on my new PC. It
only took me ~5 hours, mainly because I'd already configured the kernel
in a trial run. :-)
However, I'm now trying to get X up and running. The
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
sys-libs/pam
sys-apps/dbus
sys-apps/hal
That's as much crippling as simplifying. You can do without pam and hal
by setting appropriate USE flags (I
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:16:15AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Simpler than that, just add -hal to xorg stuff in package.use and then
run emerge -uvDNa world. It will rebuild a couple things, maybe even
just xorg, then everything is back to the old way. This allows hal to
be their for other things
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 02:16:15AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Simpler than that, just add -hal to xorg stuff in package.use and then
run emerge -uvDNa world. It will rebuild a couple things, maybe even
just xorg, then everything is
Hi, Iain,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:09:14AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:20 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[snip to the crux:]
Can this new-style fragmented XML configuration do anything that a
good old-fashioned, human-readable and compact xorg.conf can't? If
so,
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:27:32 +0100, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk
wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
sys-libs/pam
sys-apps/dbus
sys-apps/hal
That's as much crippling as
On 9 Feb 2010, at 00:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am
now
suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (including all parts
of my RAID5) are starting on sector 63 and I
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:43:12 +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote:
That's as much crippling as simplifying. You can do without pam and
hal by setting appropriate USE flags (I run pam-free here by
doing just that) but D-Bus provides a standard way for applications to
communicate with one another and
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:46:40 +, Stroller wrote:
With the RAID, you could fail one disk, repartition, re-add it,
rinse and
repeat. But that doesn't take care of the time issue.
Aren't you thinking of LVM, or something?
No. The very nature of RAID is redundancy, so you could remove
On Dienstag 09 Februar 2010, Stroller wrote:
On 9 Feb 2010, at 00:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am
now
suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (including all parts
On Dienstag 09 Februar 2010, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to unsubscribe from this list, but the
mlmmj said, that I cannot unsubscribe since I am
not subscribed. Which isn't quite right as you
can see here.
I fear if I would subscribe now a second time and
unsubscribe
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 13:46:40 Stroller wrote:
On 9 Feb 2010, at 00:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am
now
suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (including all
On 2/8/2010 5:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
. Am I the only person that finds this semantic gibberish? Is there
any explanation somewhere of what a policy aka device rule is? What
is the semantic significance of a device rule? What does it mean, to
rule a device, or what sort of restrictions
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Iain,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:09:14AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 22:20 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[snip to the crux:]
Can this new-style fragmented XML configuration do anything that a
good old-fashioned, human-readable and
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:43:12 +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote:
That's as much crippling as simplifying. You can do without pam and
hal by setting appropriate USE flags (I run pam-free here by
doing just that) but D-Bus
On 2/9/2010 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
sys-libs/pam
sys-apps/dbus
sys-apps/hal
You'll have to do a manual depclean (very carefully) and
revdep-rebuild, but it's
On 9 Feb 2010, at 13:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
With Raid (NOT striping) you can remove one disk, leaving the Raid-
array in a
reduced state. Then repartition the disk you removed, repartition
and then re-
add the disk to the array.
Exactly. Except the partitions extend, in the same
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 16:11:14 Stroller wrote:
On 9 Feb 2010, at 13:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
With Raid (NOT striping) you can remove one disk, leaving the Raid-
array in a
reduced state. Then repartition the disk you removed, repartition
and then re-
add the disk to the
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:11:14 +, Stroller wrote:
You cannot remove one disk from the array and repartition it, because
the partition is across the array, not the disk. The single disk,
removed from a RAID 5 (specified by Paul Hartman) array does not
contain any partitions, just one
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
There's a few small downsides I've run into with all of this so far:
1) Since we don't use sector 63 it seems that fdisk will still tell
you that you can use 63 until you use up all your primary partitions.
It used
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage
is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
thanks
Laurent
Am Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
4) Everything I've done so far leave me with messages about partition
1 not ending on a cylinder boundary. Googling on that one says don't
worry about it. I don't know...
Well since only the start of a partition determines its
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:45:20 +0100, Laurent Kappler
laur...@logiquefloue.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage
is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
thanks
Laurent
add this to your package.mask: =media-gfx/imagemagick-6.4.7.1 and then
On 9 Feb 2010, at 15:43, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:11:14 +, Stroller wrote:
You cannot remove one disk from the array and repartition it, because
the partition is across the array, not the disk. The single disk,
removed from a RAID 5 (specified by Paul Hartman) array
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:45:20 +0100
Laurent Kappler laur...@logiquefloue.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
portage is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
thanks
Laurent
by using emerge =ImageMagick-6.4.7.0 - if that version was in portage
though,
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:45:20 +0100, Laurent Kappler wrote:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
portage is 6.5.7.
Go to http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/ browse to the
package you want and select Show dead files. this gives all the obsoleted
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:34:01 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
Thanks for the info everyone, but do you understand the agony I am now
suffering at the fact that all disk in my system (including all parts
of my RAID5) are starting
On 9 Feb 2010, at 15:27, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 16:11:14 Stroller wrote:
On 9 Feb 2010, at 13:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
With Raid (NOT striping) you can remove one disk, leaving the Raid-
array in a
reduced state. Then repartition the disk you removed, repartition
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Laurent Kappler
laur...@logiquefloue.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage is
6.5.7.
How could I do that??
Here you can download ebuilds for all previous versions and then put
it in your local overlay:
try emerge =media-gfx/imagemagick-6.4.7.0
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Laurent Kappler laur...@logiquefloue.orgwrote:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage is
6.5.7.
How could I do that??
thanks
Laurent
On 02/09/2010 06:45 PM, Laurent Kappler wrote:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage
is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
You can't, since the lowest version in portage is 6.5.2.9:
$ eix imagemagick
[I] media-gfx/imagemagick
Available versions:
Hi, Gentoo,
The Subject: just about says it all; following the instructions in The
Xfce Configuration Guide, I did
# emerge -avt xfce4-meta
followed by
$ echo exec startxfce4 ~/.xinitrc
followed by
$ startx.
The X-server complained about not finding startxfce4. A quick find
Laurent Kappler writes:
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
portage is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
Look in the attic [*] for old ebuilds. Looks like 6.4.7.0 is not
available, so maybe you will download 6.4.8.3 which is the nearest
version. Put the ebuild
Hey guys,
There seems to be a lot of confusion over this RAID thing.
Hardware RAID does not use partitions. The entire drive is used (or,
actually, the amount defined in setting up the array) and all I/O is
handled by the BIOS on the RAID controller. The array appears as a
single drive to the OS
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this some sort of LVM thing creeping in? I don't use it but I see
signs of it starting to show up on my systems like something is making
it come in with new profiles or something.
Some lvm tools/packages have replaced
Laurent Kappler schrieb:
Hi,
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in portage
is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
thanks
Laurent
Hi,
you will have to search for the source and an ebuild. I remember that
there is a place where all (old) ebuils are saved, but I cannot
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
SNIP
So sdb7 now ends at sector 976703935. Interestingly, I couldn’t use the
immediate next sector for sdb8:
start for sdb8 response by fdisk
976703936 sector already allocated
976703944 Value out of
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
SNIP
IMO this is a fdisk bug. A feature should be added so that it tries to
align optimally in most circumstances. RAID controllers should not be trying
to do anything clever to accommodate potential misalignment
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hi, Gentoo,
The Subject: just about says it all; following the instructions in The
Xfce Configuration Guide, I did
# emerge -avt xfce4-meta
followed by
$ echo exec startxfce4 ~/.xinitrc
followed by
$ startx.
Alex Schuster a écrit :
Laurent Kappler writes:
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
portage is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
Look in the attic [*] for old ebuilds. Looks like 6.4.7.0 is not
available, so maybe you will download 6.4.8.3 which is the
On 02/08/2010 10:27 PM, Konstantinos Bekiaris wrote:
What do you have in /etc/env.d/gcc/? I have this:
#ls -l /etc/env.d/gcc/
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32 2010-02-08 11:53 config-i686-pc-linux-gnu
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235 2009-01-29 12:33 i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.2
firefly ~ # emerge -ep xfce4-meta | grep xfce | grep utils
[ebuild R ] xfce-base/xfce-utils-4.6.1
firefly ~ #
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
firefly ~ # which startxfce4
/usr/bin/startxfce4
firefly ~ # equery belongs /usr/bin/startxfce4
[
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 19:25:00 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
wrote: SNIP
IMO this is a fdisk bug. A feature should be added so that it tries to
align optimally in most circumstances. RAID controllers should not be
trying
Wow, seven mostly similar answers. Is the list becoming slow? When I
posted about an hour after the question was posted, there were no answers
yet. Let's see how long this post takes to arrive. Usually it's just a
matter of a few minutes.
Wonko
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 19:03:39 Neil Walker wrote:
Hey guys,
There seems to be a lot of confusion over this RAID thing.
Hardware RAID does not use partitions. The entire drive is used (or,
actually, the amount defined in setting up the array) and all I/O is
handled by the BIOS on the
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hi, Gentoo,
The Subject: just about says it all; following the instructions in The
Xfce Configuration Guide, I did
# emerge -avt xfce4-meta
followed by
$ echo exec startxfce4 ~/.xinitrc
Alex Schuster a écrit :
Laurent Kappler writes:
I'm tryin to emerge ImageMagick version 6.4.7.0 while current in
portage is 6.5.7.
How could I do that??
Look in the attic [*] for old ebuilds. Looks like 6.4.7.0 is not
available, so maybe you will download 6.4.8.3 which is the
On 02/09/2010 09:32 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
Wow, seven mostly similar answers. Is the list becoming slow? When I
posted about an hour after the question was posted, there were no answers
yet. Let's see how long this post takes to arrive. Usually it's just a
matter of a few minutes.
I noticed
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:17:48 +, Stroller wrote:
only applies in the specific case that Paul Hartman is using Linux
software RAID, not the general case of RAID in general.
That's true, although in the Linux world I expect that the number of
software RAID users far outnumbers the hardware
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com writes:
Possibly you installed something other than xfce4-meta?
firefly ~ # emerge -ep xfce4-meta | grep xfce | grep utils
[ebuild R ] xfce-base/xfce-utils-4.6.1
firefly ~ #
I'm just seconding fireflys' report. I suspect xfce4 expects you to
be starting
Am Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
I have reset sdb7 to use boundaries divisible by 64.
Old rangebegin%64 size%64 New rangebegin%64
size%64 813113973-976703804 0.82810.125813113984-976703935 0
0
And guess what - the speed of
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 22:13:39 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
snipped
When I use parted on the drives, it says (both the old external and my 2
months old internal):
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
So no speedup for me then. :-/
That doesn't mean a thing, I'm afraid.
I have the
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
I have reset sdb7 to use boundaries divisible by 64.
Old range begin%64 size%64 New range begin%64
size%64 813113973-976703804 0.8281
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 2/9/2010 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask
sys-libs/pam
sys-apps/dbus
sys-apps/hal
You'll have to
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:39:45PM +0100, Laurent Kappler wrote:
I'm using Haxe/Neko and we have a wrapper for ImageMagick, but as no one
did really use it often the last version is made for IM 6.4.7.
So I might download the ebuild 6.4.5 in a hurry, then we will update the
Haxe library.
I
Harry Putnam wrote:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com writes:
Possibly you installed something other than xfce4-meta?
firefly ~ # emerge -ep xfce4-meta | grep xfce | grep utils
[ebuild R ] xfce-base/xfce-utils-4.6.1
firefly ~ #
I'm just seconding fireflys' report. I suspect xfce4
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 08:47 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I now only need to figure out the best way to configure LVM over this to get
the best performance from it. Does anyone know of a decent way of figuring
this out?
I got 6 disks in Raid-5.
why LVM? Planning on changing partition size
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 13:34 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:46:40 +, Stroller wrote:
With the RAID, you could fail one disk, repartition, re-add it,
rinse and
repeat. But that doesn't take care of the time issue.
Aren't you thinking of LVM, or something?
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 20:37 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Don't get me started on those ;)
The reason I use Linux Software Raid is because:
1) I can't afford hardware raid adapters
2) It's generally faster then hardware fakeraid
I'm starting to stray OT here, but I'm considering a second-hand
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 18:03:39 Neil Walker wrote:
Be lucky,
Neil
How would I go about doing that?
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:54 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
When I use parted on the drives, it says (both the old external and my 2
months old internal):
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
So no speedup for me
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 22:58:10 Dale wrote:
So, hal may be progress to you but it is a step backward for me.
It's the opposite of progress.
Careful now, Dale. Watch that blood pressure...
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:58:10 +0100, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 2/9/2010 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
My solution to simplify Gentoo...
waltd...@d531 ~ $ cat
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 22:58:10 Dale wrote:
So, hal may be progress to you but it is a step backward for me.
It's the opposite of progress.
Careful now, Dale. Watch that blood pressure...
Oh I'm fine. I
On 9 Feb 2010, at 23:52, Iain Buchanan wrote:
...
I'm starting to stray OT here, but I'm considering a second-hand
Adaptec
2420SA - this is real hardware raid right?
Looks like it. Looks pretty nice, too.
The affordable PCI / PCI-X 3wares don't do RAID6 - you have to go PCIe
for that, I
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:02:50 Dale wrote:
Oh I'm fine.
Thank Goodness!
Now to go watch NCIS.
I won't ask what that is; I think I'd rather not know.
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:54 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
When I use parted on the drives, it says (both the old external and my 2
months old
On 9 Feb 2010, at 19:37, J. Roeleveld wrote:
...
Don't get me started on those ;)
The reason I use Linux Software Raid is because:
1) I can't afford hardware raid adapters
2) It's generally faster then hardware fakeraid
I'd rather have slow hardware RAID than fast software RAID. I'm not
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:58:10 +0100, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On 2/9/2010 3:16 AM, Dale wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:17:08 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:18:54 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:02:50 Dale wrote:
Oh I'm fine.
Thank Goodness!
Now to go watch NCIS.
I won't ask what that is; I think I'd rather not know.
NCIS = Naval Criminal Investigative
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:18:54 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:02:50 Dale wrote:
Oh I'm fine.
Thank Goodness!
Now to go watch NCIS.
I won't ask what that is; I think
On 02/09/2010 06:30 PM, Dale wrote:
With all the things I have to deal with, hal is not even on the top 25 or so.
Heck, my puter doesn't even make that.
You offer us a glimmer of hope, Dale. How did you push your computer problems
below number 25? If it involves drugs, please publish a
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 13:34 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 12:46:40 +, Stroller wrote:
With the RAID, you could fail one disk, repartition, re-add it,
rinse and
repeat. But that doesn't take care of the time
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 09 February 2010 18:03:39 Neil Walker wrote:
Be lucky,
Neil
How would I go about doing that?
Well, you need a rabbit's foot, a four leaf clover, a horseshoe
(remember to keep the open end uppermost), a black cat,
;)
Be lucky,
Neil
Iain Buchanan wrote:
I'm starting to stray OT here, but I'm considering a second-hand Adaptec
2420SA - this is real hardware raid right?
It's a PCI-X card (not PCI-E). Are you sure that's right for your system?
If I'm buying drives in the 1Tb size - does this 4k issue affect
hardware
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 17:27 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:54 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Frank,
As best I can tell so far none of the Linux tools will tell you
that the sectors are 4K. I had
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 01:22:31 Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 08:47 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I now only need to figure out the best way to configure LVM over this to
get the best performance from it. Does anyone know of a decent way of
figuring this out?
I got 6
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 07:31 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 10 Februar 2010, Iain Buchanan wrote:
so long as you didn't have any non-detectable disk errors before
removing the disk, or any drive failure while one of the drives were
removed. And the deterioration in
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 03:29:50 Dale wrote:
Well, actually, if hal would have worked I wouldn't have cared if it
uses xorg.conf at all. That was the point of using hal. Thing is, I
followed the howto and it didn't work. The fact that the config files
are in xml only became a
82 matches
Mail list logo
